Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×
The Courts Piracy Your Rights Online

Federal Judge Rules P2P Users Aren't In a Conspiracy 66

Posted by samzenpus from the personal-responsibility dept.
Fluffeh writes "Judge Holderman ruled against copyright holders who were trying to paint a rather distorted picture. They sue just one Internet user, but use that lawsuit as a pretext to subpoena other defendants who had participated in the same BitTorrent swarm. The plaintiffs in these lawsuits claim that the other users had participated in a "conspiracy" to assist one another in distributing particular copyrighted works. Because the copyright holder's threat is based on the cost of litigation (and risk of public embarrassment — as this is a tactic used increasingly by the pron industry) more so than the damages a defendant would face in the event of a loss, innocent defendants have virtually as much incentive to settle as guilty ones do. That's not how things are supposed to work, and more and more judges are refusing to play along. Coupled with recent rulings in Florida, the copyright holders seem to be finding less and less favor with judges."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Federal Judge Rules P2P Users Aren't In a Conspiracy More

Federal Judge Rules P2P Users Aren't In a Conspiracy

Comments Filter:

Slashdot Top Deals

Solutions are obvious if one only has the optical power to observe them over the horizon. -- K.A. Arsdall

Close