FBI Rejects Freedom of Information Act Request About Carrier IQ 156
bonch writes with news that website Muckrock recently sent a Freedom of Information Act request to the FBI asking for "manuals, documents or other written guidance used to access or analyze data gathered by programs developed or deployed by Carrier IQ." The Bureau has now responded with a rejection of the request, claiming an exemption applies because such documents "could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings." While many have been quick to assume the worst, the Muckrock article says it's unclear "whether the FBI used Carrier IQ's software to in its own investigations, whether it is currently investigating Carrier IQ, or whether it is some combination of both - not unlikely given the recent uproar over the practice coupled with the U.S. intelligence communities reliance on third-party vendors."
I'm stunned (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Does it really matter ? (Score:5, Insightful)
I think something about that last bit is where any interest in the data might come from.
Re:Does it really matter ? (Score:5, Insightful)
Wise question. Simple answer. 3rd party data collection is cheaper for the carriers.
CEO: These constant warrantless wiretap requests are a pain in the ass. It's only going to get worse.
CTO: There's a app for that, y'know.
Stallman Was Right (Score:5, Insightful)
"It was also possible to bypass the copyright monitors by installing a modified system kernel. Dan would eventually find out about the free kernels, even entire free operating systems, that had existed around the turn of the century. But not only were they illegal, like debuggers—you could not install one if you had one, without knowing your computer's root password. And neither the FBI nor Microsoft Support would tell you that." - The Right to Read [gnu.org]
Re:Does it really matter ? (Score:5, Insightful)
The US government relies on vendors for just about everything.
Including circumventing Constitutional safeguards against unreasonable search and seizure!
Hey! Look! Google and Facebook are a Trojan Horse for the unaccountable Police State!
Re:Does it really matter ? (Score:3, Insightful)
Do you realize...
you can live life w/o google and facebook?
You just have to move to a remote mountain town here in the rockies and get real good at farming, ez right?
Sure....
I've read enough to know those little backcountry mountain towns are the power base for the invasive state security apparatus, "I don't care if a few eggs get broken, just so the one or two things we actually care about get overturned or banned." That attitude, on the part of millions of rural Americans paved the way for Iraq.
Re:Does it really matter ? (Score:4, Insightful)
Exactly. It's a legal warrantless wiretap, which is the problem.
Re:Does it really matter ? (Score:5, Insightful)
> it spells out clearly that you are being monitored and
> have 0 expectation of privacy
Website privacy policy != TOS, and provide a URL or it didn't happen.
No contract with a carrier voids the constitution.
Re:I'm stunned (Score:5, Insightful)
A government agency does not want to hand over information that may link it to abusing its power. I've never heard of such a thing. Maybe Eric Holder is advising them as to handle the situation.
... or your government might not want to hand over information that it is investigating a criminal act by a corporation.
If you filed a FOIA request for Maddof's case while they were building it, they would have denied that one, too, but not because they were abusing their power.
Re:I'm stunned (Score:5, Insightful)
So you believe that this spyware was installed on all those devices based on a decision that someone in "middle management" made?
And this one middle manager made this decision for at least three separate companies (Apple, HTC and Samsung)?
I had no idea that Apple, HTC and Samsung had all hired the same middle manager. I've heard of people with three jobs, but this must be one hard-working middle manager.
Re:I'm stunned (Score:5, Insightful)
Citations?
The KGB and Stasi were remarkably successful at what they did. Yes, I know that the US is moving beyond their example, but how far down that road are we? IMO, the UK is much further along than the US is. And, you could probably make a case for the UK surpassing the USSR. But, citations are in order, if you make that attempt. Not to mention, any attempts to quantify and to qualify the comparisons might be suspect. Are there records available somewhere, documenting how many Stasi there were, and how frequently they monitored each citizen? Can we check their reliability in identifying "enemies of the state"?
Your final sentence is almost certainly correct. But, how do we verify that?
Re:I'm stunned (Score:5, Insightful)
Good thing we elected Obama to stop this shit.
Note to future voters: look at actions, not words.
Re:I'm stunned (Score:1, Insightful)
I am not paranoia, I KNOW that I am being followed.
That's pretty much the definition of paranoia, given that you don't have material evidence.
Re:I'm stunned (Score:5, Insightful)