"Canadian DMCA" Rising From the Dead 211
mandelbr0t writes "The Canadian Conservative government is preparing to reintroduce amended copyright legislation on Thursday (we discussed the rumor some weeks ago). Most sources say that the proposed legislation is very similar to Bill C-61, generally dubbed the 'Canadian DMCA.' It still includes definitions of 'technological protections' and criminalizes 'circumvention' of those protections. Bill C-61 died in the summer of 2008, facing massive opposition from the Canadian public. Once again, it's time for Canadians to get politically active; ORC ran a large campaign with the last attempt, and will likely be updated soon with the new proposed legislation." Read below for more of the submitter's thoughts on the coming battle.
As with Bill C-61, the Conservative government has launched a campaign of misinformation to attempt to force the law down our throat. Industry Minister Tony Clement is trying to convince people that "format shifting" is currently illegal. Of course, it is not actually criminal, and enforcement of private infringement, as always, is prevented by the fact that massive invasion of privacy would have to occur. Second, Mr. Clement is claiming that this law is necessary to bring Canada into line with the WIPO Treaty. The above readings discredit WIPO altogether. Furthermore, the two articles that are being referred to are Articles 11 and 12. Note the use of the phrase "effective technological measure" and the absence of any criminality requirement. This legislation is not necessary to provide amended copyright law that is consistent with the WIPO treaty, and will hopefully die an uneventful death, to be buried for eternity.
Re:if it's still there may make for a good court c (Score:5, Funny)
Judge: Did you or did you not circumvent and redistribute manipulated copies of Iron Man 2?
Defendant: Yes
Judge: What do you have to say for yourself?
Defendant: I bought like, 20 spindles of DVDs last year?
Judge: Good, Good, carry on
Re:I wonder if they will cut the tax... (Score:3, Funny)
This makes perfect sense, too. To safely remove a tax, the government would first need a budget surplus greater than or equal to the money brought in by that tax. As long as governments have deficits, they can't reasonably do away with any taxes, no matter how stupid, unless the tax in question is illegal somehow.
Badges, We don't need no stinkin badges ! (Score:2, Funny)
As others have said the establishment lawyers keep bringing back the same old laws hoping to eventually wear out the resistance of the majority who continue to carry on pirating to their hearts content. Civil disobedience is the last refuge of the oppressed majority who eventually will rise throw off the shackles of slavery to the suits.
Wow I'm sounding like Karl Marx all of a sudden ! Too much coffee maybe, Sorry, I'm Canadian.