IBM Seeks Patent On Digital Witch Hunts 136
theodp writes "Should Mark Zuckerberg want to identify a snitching Facebook employee, Elon Musk wish to set a trap for loose-lipped Tesla employees, or Steve Jobs want to 'play Asteroid,' they'll be happy to know that a new IBM 'invention' makes it easier than ever to be paranoid. In a newly-disclosed patent application for Embedding a Unique Serial Number into the Content of an Email for Tracking Information Dispersion (phew!), Big Blue describes how it's automated the creation of Canary Traps with patent-pending software that makes ever-so-slight changes to e-mail wording to allow you to spy on the unsuspecting recipients of your e-mail."
Not new (Score:5, Interesting)
And yes, they have caught corporate spies with this before.
Re:What an advance! (Score:3, Interesting)
To be honest I assumed this sort of thing was already being done. It's just fingerprinting, using whatever medium is being used.
Re:Wrong (Score:2, Interesting)
I took your quote on Babel Fish and ran it back to English to get this:
"All point of technology is to encode consecutive numbering by doing the little modification to wording of message. Reading those words to another medium still maintains the hand harsh number."
It's a terrible translation example but if you used a professional translator, you'd still have transformations from syntax and sentence structure from each language.
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:No expectation of workplace privacy (Score:1, Interesting)
Once upon a time I had a boss who enlisted my help to install the camera system with which she could spy on me (although that wasn't its main purpose, supposedly).
Re:Two obvious comments (Score:2, Interesting)
It's Digital Watermarking [wikipedia.org] with a software thesaurus/dictionary.
The movie industry used digital watermarks for VHS trailer tapes. http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/4616.cfm [afterdawn.com]
Trent Reznor used an alternate strategy for one of his short films (from 1992?):
"...a few people who received the movie as a special gift. Each version given away was missing a different section of video, thus enabling Reznor to keep track of those who betrayed him."
http://www.toplessrobot.com/2008/08/the_10_most_amazing_unreleased_things_ever_made.php [toplessrobot.com]
Re:Lots of prior art. (Score:3, Interesting)
Spy agencies have been doing this kind of thing for decades. ... They used to have a major problem with classified material being leaked to the press by congressional staffers.
Now you know why "Deep Throat" was so cagey, vague, and just pointed Woodward and Bernstein to the right lines of investigation and insisted they hunt down other sources and confirmation, rather than letting them use him as an unnamed direct source.
Re:Not new (Score:1, Interesting)
Once you have a TS clearance you are trusted until there are signs present that indicate a review thereof might be necessary - at least this is how it worked in my part of the world anyway.
Or at least, that's what they wanted you to think.
But anyway, is it accurate to call it a witch hunt when the "witches" are real? I thought the whole point was that there were no actual witches.
Tom Clancy == prior art (Score:3, Interesting)
Tom Clancy beat this drum -- almost tiresomely -- in several of his books back in the 90's. Our Fearless Protagonist, Jack Ryan, even came up with the algorithm, the name of which currently escapes me. Granted, the algorithm is never actually explained, but its output is identical to what this patent proposes, so methinks this probably isn't worthy of a patent.
Just my two cents, of course.
-Slarty