MS-Funded Study Attacks GPL3 Draft Process 206
QCMBR writes "A new Microsoft-funded study by a Harvard Business School professor concludes that developers don't want extensive patent licensing requirements in the GPL3. There are significant problems with the study, however, especially given the very small sample size. 'Although 332 emails were sent to various developers, only 34 agreed to participate in the survey — an 11 percent response rate. Of the 34 developers who responded, many of them are associated with projects like Apache and PostgreSQL that don't even use the GPL.' Ars points out that the GPL3 draft editing and review process is highly transparent and inclusive 'to an extent that makes MacCormack's claims of under-representation seem difficult to accept given the small sample size of the study and the number of respondents who contribute to non-GPL projects.'"
Typo! (Score:2, Funny)
In other news... (Score:5, Funny)
Anyone can create a biased survey that self-serves their own interests.
What MS does not like the GPL3? (Score:3, Funny)
Ya but... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:In other news... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Atacks? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:"A Developers' Bill of Rights", proposed by MS (Score:5, Funny)
Yes, Microsoft is proposing a Bill of Rights, for open source developers! Can you believe that?
Okay, I will never - ever - again accuse them of lacking a sense of humour.
See, that's what's missing in the arena of world domination: a bit of drollery. I mean, if an power-hungry megalomaniac can't let his hair down from time to time, where's the point in it?
Re:Atacks? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Actually, yes, I do (Score:2, Funny)
Re:doomed! (Score:1, Funny)
<are>
<so>
<damn>
web 2.0
</damn>
</so>
</are>
</you>