Analysis of SCO vs. IBM 282
icantblvitsnotbutter writes "An excellent -- and clear! -- article over at LinuxWorld.com has a multipoint analysis of SCO's 40-page complaint (this is a brief?!). For all those IANAL's out there, here's something to sink your teeth into. On the balance, the outlook seems positive for IBM. Still, the parallel invocation of a contractural clause potentially nixing AIX lends some credence to claims that this is a just way for SCO to coerce IBM into buying them out..." Some old documents from a similar lawsuit have surfaced, and naturally ESR has his own take on the case.
ESR chimes in as well??? (Score:1, Funny)
In other news... (Score:4, Funny)
for linus (Score:0, Funny)
if(sco.suing(ibm)) {
panic();
}
Aww... (Score:3, Funny)
[intense cynical sarcasm]
Damn free stuff always screwing us over.
[/intense cynical sarcasm]
ESR's Take on the Case (Score:1, Funny)
Patent Application (Score:1, Funny)
A pocket? You mean there IS prior art?
~
Wait...I've seen this movie before. (Score:4, Funny)
Judge: Ninepence.
SCO: I'm not dead!
Judge: What?
IBM: Nothing. Here's your ninepence.
SCO: I'm not dead!
Judge: 'Ere. He says he's not dead!
IBM:Yes, he is.
SCO: I'm not!
Judge: He isn't?
IBM: Well, he will be soon. He just filed a 9000 word legal brief.
In ESR's take... (Score:5, Funny)
You bet this is a Brief (Score:5, Funny)
Or should I just make an analogy to a brief COBOL program?
Re:Random Programming (Score:3, Funny)
I thought the kernel was written in Perl (Score:1, Funny)
obligatory GNU joke (Score:5, Funny)
Averment 77: Related to the development of the open source software development movement in the computing world, an organization was founded by former MIT professor Richard Stallman entitled "GNU."
RMS may be surprised to learn he is a former MIT professor.
He is not; he is a former GNU/MIT professor.
he's just resting (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Patent Application (Score:3, Funny)
But hey, whatever floats your boat.
Re:Can they not proofread? (Score:1, Funny)
I don't know.. Hoe could they not proofread?
Re:Can they not proofread? (Score:2, Funny)
SCO Threatens To Revoke IBM's Unix License (Score:4, Funny)
Why UNIX kernel must not be GPLed! (Score:5, Funny)
"A female decendant of Christ and two unlikely prophets are called upon by Rufus, an unknown 13th apostle, to stop two angels, that were cast out of heaven, from unknowingly erasing all of God's work by restoring their souls by entering a new church. Restoring ones soul by entering a new church is a part of the Catholic Dogma, and by restoring their souls the angels could reenter heaven thus revealing there is a loophole to return to heaven. This would prove God was not perfect and upon proving this all of God's work would immediately be erased."
If IBM buys SCO outright or from the smothering runins, IBM will gian the rights to UNIX and may also chose to release it under GPL. If someone decides to use the UNIX kernel using GNU O/S, it will become GNU/UNIX.
GNU's Not UNIX/UNIX???
This contridiction will bring calmady to the IT world and bring end the free software movement (including GPL).
nixing? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:SCO/IBM....what's this all about? (Score:4, Funny)
Ironic that they are trying to stop AIX sales, IBM makes more money on AIX sales each year than SCO has grossed since their beginning. AIX sales simply won't be stopped. And then to accuse IBM, of all companies, of misappropriating SCO source and technology? There are some very talented lawyers in IBM's employ, SCO might be trying to get bought it's a real possibility but that stuff doesn't happen like that to IBM. They can play really dirty when you try to bully them and they don't lose very often. The question could become "is it cheaper to pay to convert SCOs customers to Linux and let them die or buy them"
Re:Slashdot interview... (Score:4, Funny)
It's not a committee. It's a TASK FORCE!
JoAnn