Philips Targets Wireless TV Retransmission At Home 367
cadfael links to this EE Times story, excerpting: "Philips is attempting to start yet another industry initiative to tackle digital rights management, this time focusing on the wirelessly networked home. 'At stake here,' said Leon Husson, executive vice president of consumer businesses at Philips Semiconductors, 'is the "free-floating" copyrighted content that will soon be "redistributed" or "rebroadcast" to different TV sets throughout a home by consumers using wireless networking technologies like IEEE802.11.'"
With Implied Oral Consent... (Score:4, Funny)
Wireless (Score:5, Funny)
Next on the plate... (Score:5, Funny)
This is related to the article too because phase 2 of the plan is to prevent all wireless transmissions of anything so aliens that have reached earth cannot use thier moon-transglobifiers to enjoy content they haven't paid for. The aliens will just have to rent a house and order cable like everyone else.
Re:I fail to see the issue... (Score:2, Funny)
Don't tell them that! Otherwise they might come after me for redistributing copyrighted material from my antenna to my VCR and television.
Re:Next on the plate... (Score:2, Funny)
Nothing New (Score:5, Funny)
It's sad we've all been so corrupted by IP theft. Thank God Phillips is there to keep us in line.
They haven't addressed one other transmission (Score:2, Funny)
What they really need to crack down on. . . (Score:2, Funny)
Re:But should DRM always exist? (Score:1, Funny)
Let's skip all these little steps. (Score:3, Funny)
Why the hell would they think it's cost effective to prevent somebodies next door neighboor from grabbing a signal for some WWF pay-per-view event. By spending millions of dollars in man hours and equipment, they're going to protect themselves from the theft of a $7 show, that the thieves probably wouldn't have even watched if they had to pay for it.