This is the same "supreme" court that refused to touch election fraud because their decision could cause riots. This is the same "supreme" court that gave ACB a $2 million book deal a few days ago.
This is the same "supreme" court that STILL *might* not follow Xiden's agenda.
Trump's crystal ball was right on this one: Xiden is going to pack the court. America is lost.
Exactly what happened. Look at the PA state constitution, for instance.
Most US courts are bought and paid for and are controlled by a giant blackmail scheme involving among several other things pedophilia. A court system of equally corrupt peers.
In 2019 the republican controlled legislature in PA agreed to all these changes to the voting laws. They lost in 2020 and went before a judge. They judge asked them why they voted yes and then waited until after an election was over to challenge it. They had no answer and the case was dismissed.
The ONLY part of elections that fall under the 14th amendment are the effect state laws have regarding the equal protection clause. Citation need if you're claiming anything else.
Nope. The 14th says, and I quote "every person shall enjoy equal rights under the law" There are zero limits IN THE TEXT. Any other claim denies the text.
You quote? Funny how your quote didn't return any search results... nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
There are zero limits IN THE TEXT.
There are bounds in the text - the 14th amendment enables federal judicial review of cases that relate specifically to equal protection of the law. That IS the limit. That doesn't give the federal government permission to review laws it doesn't like.
Nope. 14th says nothing about which court adjudicates any dispute between states or citizens and it DOES demand equal rights Here's the text fool
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5.
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
So, yeah, equal rights, privileges and immunities on pain of loss of electors Oh, and all the Repuliscum who helped the insurrection? Can not sit in any office.
Hopefully Biden shows good sense and undoes the McConnell block of Merrick Garland, and the 32 days confirmation of incompetent Amy Barrett by packing directly to 50 seats on the court, thus ending the RELIGIOUS ONLY Court history for good. A 100 seat court would be very difficult for a Republican to install.
"There are things that are so serious that you can only joke about them"
- Heisenberg
Ha! Supreme Court! (Score:-1, Troll)
This is the same "supreme" court that STILL *might* not follow Xiden's agenda.
Trump's crystal ball was right on this one: Xiden is going to pack the court. America is lost.
Re: (Score:0)
Your mom was terrible last night.
Re: (Score:0)
That wasn't my Mom, that was C.D. Reimer changing the power bars under my computer desk. Embarrassing.
Re: (Score:2)
This is the same "supreme" court that refused to touch election fraud because their decision could cause riots.
Seems that would be something for all the systems below them. Supreme court is when all else fails.
Re: (Score:-1, Troll)
Most US courts are bought and paid for and are controlled by a giant blackmail scheme involving among several other things pedophilia. A court system of equally corrupt peers.
Re: (Score:0)
In 2019 the republican controlled legislature in PA agreed to all these changes to the voting laws. They lost in 2020 and went before a judge. They judge asked them why they voted yes and then waited until after an election was over to challenge it. They had no answer and the case was dismissed.
Re: (Score:0)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
This is the same "supreme" court that refused to touch election fraud
States hold elections under entirely their own jurisdiction. The federal government only receives the state's electoral votes.
I'm so sorry for you to find out this way, but your silent majority was silent because it wasn't a majority.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The ONLY part of elections that fall under the 14th amendment are the effect state laws have regarding the equal protection clause. Citation need if you're claiming anything else.
Re: (Score:1)
There are zero limits IN THE TEXT.
Any other claim denies the text.
Re: (Score:2)
and I quote
You quote? Funny how your quote didn't return any search results...
nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
There are zero limits IN THE TEXT.
There are bounds in the text - the 14th amendment enables federal judicial review of cases that relate specifically to equal protection of the law. That IS the limit. That doesn't give the federal government permission to review laws it doesn't like.
Also, what's i
Re: (Score:1)
Here's the text fool
Section 1.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section 2.
Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the executive and judicial officers of a state, or the members of the legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such state, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such state.
Section 3.
No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section 4.
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section 5.
The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.
So, yeah, equal rights, privileges and immunities on pain of loss of electors
Oh, and all the Repuliscum who helped the insurrection? Can not sit in any office.
Re: (Score:1)