What's weird is no one is defending people burning buildings. Everyone thinks that those people should be arrested - and in some cases you can see them being restrained by BLM protestors and turned over to the police. The difference is people who burned buildings during the protests made up a negligible percentage - heck even people attempting to push past police barricades made up a negligible percent. Capital protestors who committed federal trespassing (at a minimum) and pushed past police made up 100%
Watch Trump's defence in the most recent impeachment kangaroo court. They provided proof to the Senate that Democrat politicians were supporting and encouraging BLM riots.
Harris even fundraised for them. I can't remember if that was presented at the trial too, but you can do your own research on that one.
Ha ha! from your own link: "Far from encouraging violence, both women have condemned the violence that sometimes occurred at last summer’s police brutality protests, which were overwhelmingly peaceful."
And the whole article was about how trumps legal team was using deceptive quotes taken out of context. Great source you got, no wonder you wouldn't come up with anything.
I didn't mean "name any prominent politicians" I meant "Show prominent politicians saying the things you claim to". Because you're either misinformed or lying.
they should have just burned some small businesses (Score:0, Troll)
instead of filing neatly into the Capitol building. Then they would have just been classified as a peaceful protest and allowed to get away with it.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
What's weird is no one is defending people burning buildings. Everyone thinks that those people should be arrested - and in some cases you can see them being restrained by BLM protestors and turned over to the police. The difference is people who burned buildings during the protests made up a negligible percentage - heck even people attempting to push past police barricades made up a negligible percent. Capital protestors who committed federal trespassing (at a minimum) and pushed past police made up 100%
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Names of those "prominent politicians"? Because I assume you are misinformed or lying.
Comment removed (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Listing names does not prove your accusation, show some proof.
Re: (Score:2)
Watch Trump's defence in the most recent impeachment kangaroo court. They provided proof to the Senate that Democrat politicians were supporting and encouraging BLM riots.
Harris even fundraised for them. I can't remember if that was presented at the trial too, but you can do your own research on that one.
Re: (Score:2)
So you don't have any proof, maybe a link?
Re: (Score:2)
I told you where to find the evidence. I just can't be arsed digging up a link myself.
Sorry for not spoon feeding you. This isn't school.
Re: (Score:2)
i looked and didn't find what you were describing. post a link to back up your claim or get lost.
Re: (Score:2)
You need to improve your search skills.
https://www.independent.co.uk/... [independent.co.uk]
I've backed up my claim, so you're welcome to fuck off.
Re: (Score:2)
Ha ha! from your own link: "Far from encouraging violence, both women have condemned the violence that sometimes occurred at last summer’s police brutality protests, which were overwhelmingly peaceful."
And the whole article was about how trumps legal team was using deceptive quotes taken out of context.
Great source you got, no wonder you wouldn't come up with anything.
Re: (Score:2)
Nonetheless they said it. They didn't deny it at the time.
I'm sorry that I had actual evidence to support me. Now fuck off.
Re: (Score:2)
Trump Delusion Syndrome -Sad!
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't mean "name any prominent politicians" I meant "Show prominent politicians saying the things you claim to". Because you're either misinformed or lying.
Re: (Score:1)