Politician Forces German Wikipedia Off the Net 569
Stephan Schulz writes "A German Member of parliament for a left-wing party, Lutz Heilmann, has obtained a preliminary injunction against the local chapter of the Wikimedia foundation, Wikimedia Deutschland e.V., forbidding the forwarding of the popular http://wikipedia.de to the proper http://de.wikipedia.org. Apparently Heilmann is not happy with the fact that his Wikipedia article (English version) contains information on his work for the former GDR Stasi, the much-hated internal secret service. Wikimedia Germany displays a page explaining the situation, and has announced that it will file an objection to get the injunction lifted. The German Wikipedia has more than 800,000 pages, and is hosted, like all Wikimedia projects, by the Florida-based Wikimedia Foundation, and hence beyond the effective reach of at least German politicians and judges."
Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Insightful)
She knows how well that works.
Frankly, I am living close to Germany and until now I didn't know that guy. Ok, I'm not the leftmost person on this planet, but maybe he just wasn't that important. Now, though, I do. And I know that he's probably not the nicest person to be around.
I also wonder how many have considered voting for his party and now, learning about this and what kind of people are inside it, won't touch it.
Not to mention that, if you really insist, you can still choose a different copy of Wikipedia to get information about him. Ok, granted, not in German, but is there anyone in Germany using the internet and NOT able to read English?
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:4, Insightful)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_the_Federal_Republic_of_Germany [wikipedia.org]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_rights_in_Germany#Freedom_of_Speech [wikipedia.org]
It's scary really. I said only a few days ago that I would never visit or stop over in Germany.
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Insightful)
It's the same in almost every European state - most anti racism laws undermine Free Speech.
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Insightful)
Could you have a anti-racism law that doesn't undermine free speech?
One of the basic premises of free speech is that offensive speech should be allowed.
A big part of anti-racism laws is to prevent offensive speech as it relates to race, right?
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Insightful)
anti-racist-speech laws violate free speech
True.
and are bad laws.
Not necessarily so. Elevating free speech over other rights is a part of American ideology, however it is not universally accepted, certainly not in Europe or Asia.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
For Americans "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of speech,"
abridge /brd/ [uh-brij]
-verb (used with object), abridged, abridging.
1. to shorten by omissions while retaining the basic contents: to abridge a reference book.
2. to reduce or lessen in duration, scope, authority, etc.; diminish; curtail: to abridge a visit; to abridge one's freedom.
3. to deprive; cut off.
Defining someone else's utterance or writing as "hate" speech (politically incorrect) and then outlawing it is an
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Informative)
It is the same idea as not being able to yell fire in a crowded theater. You have the freedom of speech until it harms someone else.
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Insightful)
What you just described is already taken care of with laws against inciting riots. Why do we need more laws covering the same thing? It's like having a law against apples, and another law against red apples.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Whether or not hate crimes are a wrongheaded concept is not an issue on which I have a strong stand.
However, it is possible to craft anti-hate laws which essentially make it harder to incite violence in code. For example, a campaign of hatred is mounted without explicit calls to violence, but with inciting of violence being its aims. Supporters of hate crimes who are both genuine and considered would be attempting to achieve a reduction in this type of activity.
I don't claim the existing hate crimes are we
Re: (Score:3)
>Left-Wing prefers to undermine peoples freedoms for "the good cause"
>Right-Wing prefers individual freedoms over the hissy-fits of a a few minorities
Nice balanced argument. You're a 14 year old idiot, aren't you?
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
stereotypically, in rough order:
Left wing = environmentalists, civil rights advocates, poor people, young people, gay people, anti-war protesters
Right wing = rich people, conservative/traditional (usually older) people, re
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Informative)
Being "left" or "right" has nothing to do with whether you're fascist or not. Fascism is an expression of total authoritarianism, which it is perfectly possible to combine with an attitude of socialism. They're two separate axes on the political compass [stageleft.info].
Note that on the above chart, Dr. Angela Merkel (current German chancellor) is, in fact, "right". She's just not as right as most other Western leaders, leading to the impression that she is, in fact, "left".
Lutz Heilmann is even further left (his Party is called "The Left"), and on the Authoritarian/Libertarian scale doubtlessly up nice and high.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What Rights? (Score:5, Insightful)
"Fortunately, those of us in the U.S. are about to get rid of our despotic strongmen, along about January 20 of next year."
You realize that you just defeated your own argument, don't you? If you can vote them out, then are they despots? Despots don't tend to stand for things like free elections, and George Bush and his party have lost two in a row without sending the Army to void those elections. Just because you don't like the guy doesn't qualify him as a tyrant.
The loss was too big (Score:3, Insightful)
There is not a perfect dichotomy between "perfectly free eletions" and "despotism." In the middle lies "tweaking results," "voter intimidation," "caging," "Diebold" and "The Supreme Court's Bush v Gore".
In the past two elections in the US, the margin was high enough to overrule the tweaking.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually the anti-racism laws are used to suppress certain political viewpoints. They're not used against individuals, but mostly against political parties.
Or at least that's the case here. This was obvious before any such law was passed, but the lefties were in power.
For example associating "socialism" with "national-socialism". THEN they will invoke said laws. Associating islam, an ideology stating DIRECTLY that "there must always be war" with war, that will get those laws invoked. An ideology with hate s
Re: (Score:2)
A big part of anti-racism laws is to prevent offensive speech as it relates to race, right?
Well yes, but I for one think that it's stupid, they should be about stopping violence and discrimination, not someone making nigger jokes.
Of course once you try to stop violence people claim you must stop "incitement to violence", which is a blanket term they use for nigger jokes and using the word "black" instead of "coloured".
Re: (Score:2)
>> most anti racism laws undermine Free Speech.
> A big part of anti-racism laws is to prevent offensive speech as it relates to race, right?
Right, but another big part is preventing discriminatory actions, like not hiring someone because of their race. Also, hate crime legislation (where the punishment is escalated if the victim's race plays a prominent factor). I can't see either of these as being protected speech. Thus, the 'most'.
(Incidentally, I would personally say that very few anti racism
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
He wants to hire a 6th. He'll never hire someone whom he dislikes because of race, so why not allow him to write that down?
Because that would be very popular among his racist buddies, and then, bam! Nazi Germany once more. In fact, in the former GDR regions, companies of racists do already exist, and they spread like wildfire in some regions. This must be stopped as soon as possible. But I guess, they are already under surveillance by the Constitution Protection. We don't want a second Nazi Germany. And you neither, I guess.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
That's an interesting question. If a country will, in a true democratic fashion, slip into rampant nationalism, and then racism (while still remaining democratic)
That's exactly how the Nazis came to power in the first place. They were democratically elected in the Weimar Republic [wikipedia.org].
would you say that "democracy failed" and that a coup is needed, followed by a period of dictatorial rule to make sure that the Nazis are rooted out?
Of course not, we have the Constitution Protection [wikipedia.org] and our laws for that. This makes sure Nazi influence stays limited.
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:4, Insightful)
Fix the problem by not talking about it, yea that works.
By making racist speech illegal all it does is hide all the racist people in society, they are still racist still finding their racist niches, and still can be dangerous. All it does is trying to force people to ignore the problem then actually confronting it.
Hey if you know the guy is a racist then you have a decision to associate yourself with him or not and accept the consequences for the actions. But if you don't you can much easier be seduced.
Also it creates a taboo with the hate just gets deferred somewhere else.
Ok Color of the skin is out, as well as religion. However you can still get people with disabilities, or education, smarts, choice in dress, types of music you listen to, the Operating Systems you prefer to use at home, what text editor you use.....
Silence doesn't fix the problem it defers it.
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:4, Insightful)
I keep telling that to all these dumb chicks at work. If they want me to stop talking about their perky little bits, they should come into my office and *confront* me.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
First the security tools, now this... I used to want to emigrate to Germany.
Instead of having national moments of silence to commemorate calamity after the fact, how about we do it before, like now.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Switzerland still exists.
But they are starting to ban pornography on ALL mobile phones here (wonder how that works on internet enabled smartphones) and of course violent video games.
It's all downhill from here. The hippies are winning :)
Re: (Score:3)
The hippies are winning :)
Read up on history, man. The hippies were those that brought you pornography and freedom of sexuality in the first place.
He successfully took down another site (Score:5, Funny)
... his own [lutz-heilmann.info].
Please contact the server administrator, [no address given]
Re:Mr. Heilmann's party (Score:2)
I can tell you more about his party:
The "Linkspartei" (literally translates as "left party") consists partly of former members of the SPD (moderate socialists) and partly of former members of the
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Insightful)
Germany serves as a reminder of what will happen to a country if you vote far-left too long.
Uhhh... what?
The head of state (and the chancellor) are from what is considered the center right. Far-left parties
never were in power. And last I checked, Germany was doing a lot better in this financial meltdown than
the US (which doesn't mean they are doing incredibly well, just a lot better).
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Insightful)
Someone who's 'far-right', anywhere else in the world, in America would be considered 'moderate' or 'left-leaning'.
Think about that for a few moments, and realise what that means.
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Interesting)
Oh yay, let's all classify others on a simplistic and misleading two-dimensional political scale. Hey, at least it helps us from having to use our brains to comprehend the world around us.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Hitler wasn't really that left wing, he had some left wing policies but overall I'd definitely not call him left-wing.
Olame-a "I'll give everyone 5000$" is trying to do the same in America.
oicwutudidthar, how clever, I'm sure you've influenced everyone's vote for 2012, now that we know that he is both lame and trying to emulate Hitler/Stalin/Mao, you're proof of his plans for genocide are very convincing.
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Funny)
I dunno, Hitler may have said he was a socialist, but he didn't throw very many parties. I'd say he wasn't a people person, but I did not know him personally.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Funny)
Only an american could describe hitler as left wing....
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Insightful)
You totally forgot to mention that Hitler was backed by corporations and some aristocracy before he took over, and in bed with Corporate Germany during/after the war. You think that just because he called his party the "National Socialist" Party that he really meant it? Have you forgotten he was the greatest propagandist of his era?
He didn't nationalize large industries in Germany, he printed piles of money to pay the corporations for their work on his war, and made their owners filthy rich (until the currency collapsed, of course, doesn't this sound familiar to you?). A lot of those corporations still exist, in some form or other, but they keep that part of their corporate history quiet, you can be sure. This is totally opposite to Stalin and the Communists, who simply took over the corporations and executed the owners.
Fascism =/= Socialism, sorry, you need to go get some education in that regard. Fascism == Authoritarianism, and Communism == Authoritarianism, but guess what, socialism doesn't automatically equal authoritarianism (unless you've been brainwashed by the current champion propagandists in the US, that is). As hard as it is to believe, you can have a socialist, liberal government. Of course, in these troubled times, when all nations are leaning hard to the authoritarian side, thanks to Mr. Bush and his advisors, Tony Blair, John Howard, etc, examples are hard to come by.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
No, Communism doesn't equal authoritarianism, especially in the same sense as fascism. How could an ideology seeking to take power away from the rich minority and give it the majority, as well as calling for the dissolution of the State itself be considered "authoritarian"?
"Socialism" could be authoritarian or not, depending on the flavour. There are literally dozens of different types of socialism. Some anarchic, some authoritarian. And some in the middle.
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Insightful)
Both Hitler and yourself can keep calling him and the nazi party socialist all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that the country was run pretty much as a Totalitarian regime focused on unilateral warfare, hyper-patriotism and strong law & order credentials, which is about as far from socialism as you can get.
Thanks for playing!
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
No, the USSR did shit Hitler only dreamed about. At least Hitler let the white middle class mostly alone. In the USSR, you weren't safe no matter who you were until at least '57.
Lefty politics necessitate totalitarianism.
You can keep saying it, but it doesn't make it true.
Communism and socialism can only be imposed by force of arms, unlike capitalism.
No, capitalism can only be imposed by force of threat of poverty, which to me, is much more insidious. Money (weal
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:4, Insightful)
Oh woe is you, unable to make infinite amounts of money and not give anything back. How about this, you do that without any public roads, any public education 9including for anyone in your employ, directly or otherwise, without publicly funded police and fire fighters protecting you, without a national military keeping your economic interests safe from interference, and without the benefit of any sort of regulations or laws to protect you while you sit on your enomous pile of money you have out in the woods with nobody else around, and you can stop paying taxes.
In the mean time, quit pretending like not having any taxes at all would work, or that you are so oppressed by having to contribute a portion of what you earn to the community in order to retain the benefits of being a part of it. You aren't the only person who counts, and if you're too much of a greedy shithead to accept the idea that, say, everyone deserves medical care when they are sick or injured, even if you don't get to keep every last cent you make, then I don't see why the impetus should be on the rest of us to explain why you're a total douchebag.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Informative)
And the GDR was called the German Democratic Republic. That must mean it was a democratic republic right?
I wouldn't called extreme racism, homophobia etc. left-wing.
There's also the matter of his constant public speeches about how the left-wing movements were Jewish attempts to topple him and how socialists must be destroyed for Germany to prevail.
He arrested all trade union leaders and enforced a pay freeze on all workers.
Of course he did claim prior to the election that we would do just the opposite and give workers more control, but dishonesty seemed to be one of his faults.
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Informative)
Say, that word, nazi, what does it mean again ? Oh right ... it translates to "socialist".
It doesn't "translate" it is a contraction for "National Socialist."
Here's an interesting quote [google.com] for you - "Nazism makes out is is subversive. The most terrible white terror against people and socialism the world has ever seen takes on a socialist disguise. To this end its propaganda must develop a revolutionary facade with trappings of the Paris Commune."
Looks like their pseudo-revolutionary cover suckered you right in, even 60 years later.
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Insightful)
Compared to many people from USA (not all), the majority of people in Denmark are "socialists" (again not everyone). All parties that we can vote for - even the ones we place on the far right on our own political scale, would belong among the democrats in USA. Nearly all political parties in Denmark, would be called leftish in USA. It has been like this for many many decades and I would say that we are doing pretty well, with our national health care system, common wealth, education, etc., etc. - I would even say we are doing better than USA. In Denmark, Nazis, racists and the like are almost always placed on the far right on the political scale.
Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Mao and others like them, might have SAID that they were socialists and making leftish policies. But they weren't/didn't. They were not anywhere near it. They would like people to think so - and I can see they even got to some of you too. A shame.
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Informative)
No, not really. Medicine is one of the strong industries in Denmark. By citizens Denmark produces more patents and earns more Nobel prices than the US in Medicine (by a factor of 4). Most of the large US medical companies has research centers in or near Copenhagen in the so-called "Medicon Valley", and Novo Nordisk one of the largst pharmaceatical companies is danish. One of the benefits of free education is a highly educated population ideal for research and development.
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Insightful)
You are obviously terribly confused. A political party is defined by it's actions not by the labels it chooses to advertise under. So the German Nazi party was far right, as private corporations functioned and profited during that whole period. All the arms manufacturers were private none of them where nationalised, citizens retained private ownership of resources and assets (at least the single group approved of by the party).
As for any associations with the intelligentsia, I see you have failed to hear of junk science, people who basically will trade upon their qualifications and say or write what ever they are paid to say or write. Technically Bill Ayers in his youth put forward his own opinions and with the impatience of youth expressed them in a questionable manner, behaviour which he had long since matured out of.
Now as for the whole gamut of right and left political bias, technically in a global sense the US does not have a leading left wing political party as the democrats and centre right and the republicans are far right, to see actual centre left political parties in action running countries you have to look overseas, Canada, Australia, England, etc. The outer edges of right and left politics has always demonstrated itself to be destructive, a grand deceit based upon propaganda and lies to empower and enrich a minority at the expense of the majority, from Hitler and Stalin, to Bush and Cheney, some of course are far more destructive than others but they have all been equally self serving and, any limits upon their actions have been forced upon them by outside influences rather than their own consciences.
A good indication of how centre a party is defined by it's willingness and hence the politicians of the parties willingness to be open to criticism, open to questions and open to ideas and not resorting to censorship to protect the facade they have created to hide their true nature.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I hate to nitpick, but it actually would translate to "National." The party name was the Nationalsozialisten, which translates, obviously, as "national socialists."
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Insightful)
The longer a country's name is, the less likely it is to be true...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
"United States of America" - hmm, I think you're on to something.
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:4, Insightful)
"United States of America" - hmm, I think you're on to something.
No, it's not the length of a country's name that matters at all. If you want to get a better idea of a particular nation's governmental system, look for the keywords "democratic" and "republic". The United States of America has neither of those words in its name ... although it is both of them.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Huh? You lost me at united.
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:5, Funny)
The barely united queendom of small Britain and some part not really on Ireland
The party's one party state of China
The secular dictatorship of Iran
Re:Mr. Heilmann, you should talk to Mrs. Streisand (Score:4, Funny)
"East Yemen; isn't that a democracy too?"
"Its full name is 'The People's Democractic Republic of East Yemen' "
"Oh, I see, so it's a communist dictatorship then"
-Sir Humphrey Appleby and Sir Richard Wharton, Yes Prime Minister, "A Victory for Democracy"
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
There is no "East Yemen".
Correct. Because when insulting countries in your TV comedy, it's generally best to keep them fake.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Well, the whole McCainObama Election thing was very interesting to watch from here (Switzerland).
I'll have to admit that i didn't particularly like McCain, but Obama seemed worse - he wants to introduce most of the problems Europe has to the US, which so far i saw as a better country as they didn't seem to make the same mistakes as most European countries (they made others, of course).
The problem that seems to be the same here and in the US is that politics is more often steered into the subjective "People"
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
holy crap (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Whoever this judge is probably subscribes to the same school of thought as that judge in Kentucky who ordered a batch of domain names transferred to the state.
Oops (Score:5, Funny)
Thankfully for Lutz Heilmann, who formerly worked for the Stasi, attempting to censor information does not cause it to be widely publicized.
There should be a name for that.
Re:Oops (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
So what's the problem? (Score:3, Insightful)
forbidding the forwarding of the popular http://wikipedia.de/ [wikipedia.de] to the proper http://de.wikipedia.org/ [wikipedia.org]
So what part of that is he claiming is illegal?
Re:So what's the problem? (Score:5, Funny)
So what part of that is he claiming is illegal?
The defamation he's about to recieve on his wikipedia page.
Re:So what's the problem? (Score:5, Insightful)
Anyone editing his page should be careful to sticking to the facts, else they just justify its removal as well as degrading the stature of Wikipedia. German news agencies should get a copy of the wiki at the time when Heilmann complained and check all the info on it, then report on it noting the parts he specifically complained on including the findings of their own research. It wouldn't hurt for academia and the general public to join in on this as is their duty as citizens.
It needs to be made clear to politicians and bureaucrats everywhere that their very positions permit or even demand microscopic public inspection of their actions. If they are going to act to ban negative comments on themselves then the comments need to be at a minimum unprovable as facts or better yet provably false. If comments are found to be provably true then the response to the government official(s) involved should be harsh.
Re:So what's the problem? (Score:5, Informative)
According to the page they have put up instead, the german company has been forbidden from forwarding to any site that contains the accusations against him. Not linking to the accusations, but any forwarding. Under that ruling, they definately couldn't forward to google.com either...
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
To clarify a few things: This is NOT a final judgment. In Germany, we have a "Einstweilige Verfügung" (preliminary injunction [wikipedia.org]), so if Mr. Heilmann wants to shut wikipedia.de down, he goes to a judge and the judge may approve in urgent cases, without asking the opposite side. This is only temporarily until there is a hearing with both sides arguing, and also, if it turns out that Mr. Heilmann was wrong, Wikimedia Deutschland has entitlement to damages that were caused by the "Einstweilige Verfügung
How can this happen? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:How can this happen? (Score:5, Interesting)
All doubts are gone (Score:5, Insightful)
FAIL! (Score:5, Insightful)
If you don't want publicity associating you with the Stasi, this probably isn't the best method of challenging the accusation.
Re: (Score:2)
It reminds me of this epic failure [slashdot.org]. God, has it really been that long...
Not a good idea.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Summary wrong: porn, not Stasi (Score:2)
It's well-known that he worked for the Stasi, it seems, but he didn't like the claims that he didn't finish his university degree, or that he worked for a porn-related business (I don't know if either of these is true). The reason he's dealing with the forwarding is that wikipedia.de is under German jurisdiction, but de.wikipedia.org is not.
The lesson here is: totalitarian repression is A-OK, but porn is over the line.
German article here:
Re: (Score:2)
domain name (Score:2, Interesting)
Lutz Helimann, ex Stasi? (Score:5, Insightful)
I didn't know that. Now I do. And so do a few tens of thousand other people who would have not known, if he had not tried to have the German Wikipedia shut down.
In fact, I bet that most of the readers of the German Wikipedia didn't know that Lutz Heilmann was a Stasi, and now they do.
Who the fuck elected this crooked fully-employed ex-Stasi to the Bundestag, though?
Re: (Score:2)
Who the fuck elected this crooked fully-employed ex-Stasi to the Bundestag, though?
German people, I assume.
Translation? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Is there anyone here that can translate wikipedia.de's homepage for us?
Here you go, translation of wikipedia.de's current page:
In accordance with the injunction granted by the district court in Luebeck on Nov 13th 2008 to Lutz Heilman, member of parliament (Left Party), the Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. is forbidden from "redirecting the internet address wikipedia.de to the internet address de.wikipedia.org" as long as "under the internet address de.wikipedia.org" certain statements are published about Lutz Heilmann. Until further notice the service of wikipedia.de will have to be discontinued in its existing form. Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. will appeal this injunction.
The Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. is not the publisher of the "Wikipedia" which is published under de.wikipedia.org and has no influence over its content. Instead, Wikimedia Deutschland e.V. is a non profit organization to further free knowledge, which simply educates about the usage of Wikipedia. The operator of the Encyclopedia is the Wikimedia Foundation, a foundation that is incorporated in Florida, USA with headquarters in San Francisco.
If you want to support us, you can donate for us. More information under http://spenden.wikimedia.de/ [wikimedia.de] That you for your help.
Our thanks go to JBB Lawfirm for the fast and competent help.
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Encyclopedia Dramatica? (Score:3, Interesting)
With a name only 1 letter away from LULZ he's prime fodder for Encyclopedia Dramatica.
Ironically, the article about him [encycloped...matica.com] says
There is currently no text in this page, you can search for this page title in other pages or edit this page.
IT'S CENSORSHIP! It's censorship I say!
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually... (Score:3, Informative)
Completely false summary (Score:5, Insightful)
In terms of free speech in Europe this is very minor, people are jailed for analyses of Nazi treatment of Jews during World War II that don't follow a set pattern. If people are being sent to jail for writing in Europe, I don't see why closing down a press or web site is that big of a deal. From my understanding of things, many Nazis tended to be barbaric, so I would be skeptical of apologetic books on how nice concentration camps were, but I don't think people should be jailed for it, or the books and presses even shut down.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
In terms of free speech in Europe this is very minor, people are jailed for analyses of Nazi treatment of Jews during World War II that don't follow a set pattern.
Citation please?
Summary is wrong (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Obama got elected because right wing policies have killed the US over the last 8 years.
I agree with you that leftist policies suck when implemented poorly. Guess what? Right wing policies suck when implemented poorly, too.
I'm sick to death of all this partisan bullshit. "It's all the Democrats' fault!!" "No, it's all the Republicans' fault!!" Guess what, you blind morons? It's politicians' fault!
The problem is not left or right wing. The problem is politicians, as a rule, horribly suck at implementin
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You should've known that left-wingers only think that their's a right to complain when something happens that doesn't agree with their view.
This problem is the same everywhere in the world.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think, Republicans need any help in looking bad.
Reliably sourced and encyclopedic? (Score:2, Funny)
Now that he's going to be America's next Pres, you can argue that just about anything more than what's on his breakfast table is encyclopedic, but without reliable sources it won't stay on Wikipedia.
Get it on CNN or even a local newspaper and you can put it on Wikipedia. Well, until you get into an edit war then Wikifacts yeilds to Wikitruth, which is whichever side can out-revert the other without getting on the wrong side of the arbitration committee.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)