Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Microsoft Patents the Censoring of Speech

Posted by Soulskill on Sunday October 19, @10:11AM
from the %$!#-!%-!%!$-##%-$@#! dept.
theodp writes "On Tuesday, the USPTO awarded Microsoft a patent for the Automatic Censorship of Audio Data for Broadcast, an invention that addresses 'producing censored speech that has been altered so that undesired words or phrases are either unintelligible or inaudible.' The patent describes methods for muting offensive words and replacing them with less offensive versions, and 'a third alternative provides for overwriting the undesired word with a masking sound, i.e., "bleeping" the undesired word with a tone.' After all, there's nothing worse than being subjected to offensive speech when you're shooting someone in the head."
microsoft patents censorship yro !none
yro patents
story

Related Stories

The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login | Reply
Loading... please wait.
  • Yay! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Kral_Blbec (1201285) on Sunday October 19, @10:17AM (#25430923)

    So now the parents of kids too young to play dont have to worry about letting them play!!

    Come on, if you're old enough to play the game, you're old enough to either deal with it or tell them to stuff a sock in it. There are so many other options to work with. Why not just mute the stupid player? Or not even use the voip at all? Like the article says, its only really used for trash talk anyway. Unless I know who I'm playing with, I'm not going to try and coordinate anything.

    Stupid idea.

    BTW first post!

    • Re:Yay! (Score:4, Funny)

      by Sj0 (472011) on Sunday October 19, @12:54PM (#25432019) Homepage Journal

      What's worse, do they bother censoring the ideas, or do they just use softer words?

      Hey, you mother[LOVER] I'm going to skull[LOVE] your [LOVING] corpse and then I'm going to get you down on your knees and get your corpse to [WHISTLE] on my [SKINFLUTE]

      Or would the Microsoft device just change the whole sentence to something like

      [I LIKE YOU. WE SHOULD GET TOGETHER FOR AGE APPROPRIATE SOCIAL BEVERAGES.]

  • Useless (Score:5, Insightful)

    by FluffyWithTeeth (890188) on Sunday October 19, @10:17AM (#25430925)

    Trust me when I say you can come up with new curses faster than you can code them into an automatic censorship proram...

    Nevermind all the fantastic new accents this is going to promote. And if you disagree; well quck you.

    • Re:Useless (Score:5, Interesting)

      by 4e617474 (945414) on Sunday October 19, @10:27AM (#25430977)

      Trust me when I say you can come up with new curses faster than you can code them into an automatic censorship proram...

      Pondering this make me feel a whole lot better about the whole enterprise. I'm all in favor of protecting budding young minds from the use of profanity as a substitute for creative expression... by teaching them that profanity is the inspiration for expressing yourself creatively. Also I like the thought of someone going to their manager and saying, "I need a ruling on 'defecating masonry'. Can we let that go?"

      • Re:Useless (Score:5, Funny)

        by BrokenHalo (565198) on Sunday October 19, @10:42AM (#25431045)
        Pondering this make me feel a whole lot better about the whole enterprise.

        Good thinking. I often think the standard of cursing in this language tends to be woefully inadequate, consisting of the mindless and dull repetition of combinations of the same four-letter words. For once, Microsoft could be doing something positive to improve articulacy of profane expression. It might not be what they intend, but I won't lose any sleep over that. ;-)
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        I'm all in favor of protecting budding young minds from the use of profanity

        My parents kept tight controls over what I was allowed to see/hear. Fortunately, I learned profanity from other kids on the playground at school.

      • Re:Useless (Score:4, Insightful)

        by nightfire-unique (253895) on Sunday October 19, @12:00PM (#25431589)

        I'm all in favor of protecting budding young minds from the use of profanity as a substitute for creative expression...

        I know I speak for many of us here when I say:

        Fuck you.

        Keep your intellectual parenting persuits where they belong: in your home. Raise your own fucking kids, and let me raise mine without government interference. We'll let them both compete in 20 years and see who did a better job.

        The moment you get your way with bad language censorship, I get my way with religious censorship.

      • Re:Useless (Score:5, Funny)

        by gyrogeerloose (849181) on Sunday October 19, @12:26PM (#25431747)

        "I need a ruling on 'defecating masonry'. Can we let that go?"

        "Copulate that excrement!"

    • Re:Useless (Score:4, Funny)

      by CRCulver (715279) <crculver@christopherculver.com> on Sunday October 19, @10:30AM (#25430991) Homepage

      And if you disagree; well quck you.

      Dude, don't disrespect your fellow Slashdot posters. That's crunked up.

    • I'm sceptical that it'll work that well. I do think it'll be more interesting than listening to people using fuck as punctuation - which is to me is dismally boring.

      Question: how will it cope with people using stuff like "Jesus/G-d" as an expletive? That sort of thing is offensive to many people too.

      Imagine if people started using Muhammad as an expletive. You can't just censor every mention of Muhammad because that will get you in big trouble too ;).

      It'll be interesting if the system can tell from the cont
        • Re:I'm sceptical (Score:4, Interesting)

          by TheLink (130905) on Monday October 20, @01:53AM (#25437843) Journal
          As a Christian I actually find "fucking hell" less offensive, and by the way Jesus is also regarded as a prophet amongst muslims. It seems a violent and vocal minority of muslims appear to take offense at almost anything, almost anything can be regarded as insulting their religion, when in fact they're the ones ruining the reputation of their religion the most.

          I actually don't have a big problem with people saying fuck or using other expletives. To me there's a use for expletives. For example, if you were walking about and minding your own business, then some vehicle veered off the road and took your arm off. Now that's a perfectly valid time to say fuck or whatever.

          I just find it silly when people use it as punctuation. It's like reviewers giving 100% or 0% ratings in all of their reviews. Amusing for a few seconds at most.
  • I'm intrigued. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Night Goat (18437) on Sunday October 19, @10:23AM (#25430959) Homepage Journal

    Naturally, I didn't read the article, but I have to say I'm intrigued by this. It would come in extremely handy for radio stations if they no longer needed to have a delay on their live broadcasts. It would especially benefit college radio stations because they often have to limit what they can allow on air since they cannot afford the equipment that is required to have a delay. Although this technology might be very expensive as well, so who knows. I guess I ought to swallow my pride and read the article!

  • Oh come on..... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by LibertineR (591918) on Sunday October 19, @10:25AM (#25430967)
    Is the heading not a TAD over the top here?

    Broadcasters can be, and have been fined thousands of dollars PER EVENT, through violations of FCC rules. One slip of the tongue should not be the basis for fining a program out of existance.

    A tool to help in that regards DOES NOT equal sensorship, and the title is a ridiculous assertion that hurts credibility around here.

    Hate Microsoft if you want, but Christ, why be stupid about it?

    What is next? "Microsoft wants to eat your babies"?

    As supposedly logic-driven geeks, can we not do better?

  • Harry Enfield... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by gringer (252588) on Sunday October 19, @10:41AM (#25431043)

    Reminds me of this clip from Harry Enfield:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WmRTUNh1vPo [youtube.com]

    [For those hard of flashing, it's a parody of a short gangster conversation in which the bad words have been taped over with better words]

  • by KingTank (631646) on Sunday October 19, @10:43AM (#25431049)
    Mother smiling gumdrops! I think that's a bunch of bull smurfs! That sparkle pony happy hole, Bill Gates and his piece of rainbow company, Microsoft, can go flower themselves with a sunshine until they bleed out their bunnies!
  • by NicknamesAreStupid (1040118) on Sunday October 19, @11:02AM (#25431165)
    What the Luck? Those Gassholes in Redmond can't stop me from sMitting up a verbal storm. I'll BLiss all over their parade!
  • Sunny (Score:3, Funny)

    by Tablizer (95088) on Sunday October 19, @01:59PM (#25432567) Homepage Journal

    I...love...Windows Vista. It is a piece of...brilliance. I want to take a sledge hammer and ... gently caress ... it to turn it into a pile of ... sunshine.

  • by Bones3D_mac (324952) on Sunday October 19, @05:11PM (#25434299)

    It'll be interesting to see just how such technology will be abused. Want to prevent speech that might inspire someone to stand up and do something regarding a certain topic, simply filter out keywords in context to the topic itself to help tilt the topic to favor one group's interests over another.

    "Free" speech is long dead and buried. Welcome to the next China.