Slashdot Log In
Writing Privacy Policies – Lessons From Indymedia
Posted by
timothy
on Thursday September 04, @04:23PM
from the right-to-remain-silent dept.
from the right-to-remain-silent dept.
somebody-with-too-much-time writes "Privacy policies have recently come up quite a bit on Slashdot. One Indymedia administrator explains why privacy policies are so complicated to understand, shows some examples of good ones, and shows you how to roll your own."
Related Stories
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.

Honestly... (Score:5, Insightful)
It's rather pointless when every single one of them (of the few I've read) says "subject to change at our discretion without notification".
Does anyone not use Google (for example) because of their privacy policy, or their use of beacons?
Reply to This
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Does anyone not use Google (for example) because of their privacy policy, or their use of beacons?
I know this one guy who doesn't. I can't reveal his name due to privacy concerns, however.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Privacy != Security (Score:4, Funny)
I know his password !!! ...
Reply to This
Parent
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Does anyone not use Google (for example) because of their privacy policy, or their use of beacons?
Yes. I don't avoid google entirely; their search engine is too useful, but I block their scripts, and don't use a single one of their services.
Ok ok... I do have a gmail account (along with other webmail accounts) that I use from time to time to confirm that an html newsletter I send (yes, to double-opt-in-subscribers) renders correctly, but that's it.
Re: (Score:2)
Does anyone read these things?
Yes, but only forum ToS's, and even then it's so that I can explain why something's not allowed. Forums that don't use a boilerplat ToS tend to have really clear and understandable ones cause it's less of a headache if a mod can just quote the ToS when banning someone.
privacy (Score:4, Informative)
Odd that the author of the linked article seems not to use it.
Reply to This