Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

China Does U-Turn, Lifts Ban On Websites

Posted by kdawson on Sat Aug 02, 2008 02:49 PM
from the by-some-definitions-of-complete dept.
krou sends in a Guardian (UK) article reporting that overnight talks with the International Olympic Committee have resulted in the Chinese government lifting a ban on websites such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the BBC Chinese language service "in Beijing, Shanghai and possibly further afield." Websites with information on the Falun Gong, Chinese dissidents, the Tibetan government in exile, and the 1989 military crackdown on the Tiananmen Square protests are still inaccessible. (We've been discussing Chinese Olympic censorship right along.) Quoting: "A spokesman for Amnesty International said: 'It's good news that our site has been unblocked in Olympic venues and perhaps elsewhere in Beijing, but it is still a long way from the "complete media freedom" promised. It seems public outrage has succeeded where the IOC's "quiet diplomacy" had failed.' Chinese engineers quoted in an article in the Atlantic Monthly said they had been told to prepare to unblock access for a list of specific internet protocol addresses to used by foreign visitors. But Andrew Lih, a new media author in Beijing, said it seemed the authorities might have simply decided it was easier to lift blocks for everyone. 'It's possible [to block individual locations] but would be very complicated,' he said."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] IOC Admits Internet Censorship Deal With China 380 comments
Dave writes "BEIJING (Reuters) — Some International Olympic Committee officials cut a deal to let China block sensitive websites despite promises of unrestricted access, a senior IOC official admitted on Wednesday. Persistent pollution fears and China's concerns about security in Tibet also remained problems for organizers nine days before the Games begin. China had committed to providing media with the same freedom to report on the Games as they enjoyed at previous Olympics, but journalists have this week complained of finding access to sites deemed sensitive to its communist leadership blocked. 'I regret that it now appears BOCOG has announced that there will be limitations on website access during Games time,' IOC press chief Kevan Gosper said, referring to Beijing's Olympic organizers. 'I also now understand that some IOC officials negotiated with the Chinese that some sensitive sites would be blocked on the basis they were not considered Games related,' he said." But yet somehow the mainstream media will ignore this because the Olympics are patriotic or something.
[+] James Powderly of Graffiti Research Labs Detained In China 337 comments
An anonymous reader writes "News from Free Tibet 2008 that internationally known artist, technologist and co-founder of the Graffiti Research Lab, James Powderly, was detained in Beijing early on August 19th while preparing to debut a new work and technology of protest, the L.A.S.E.R. Stencil. According to a Twitter message received yesterday by Students for a Free Tibet at approximately 5 pm Beijing Standard Time, Powderly had been detained by Chinese authorities at 3 am. His current whereabouts remain unknown. Powderly was the inventor of throwies." (Powderly's detention was also mentioned at Make Magazine's blog.)
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • U-Turn? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 02 2008, @02:53PM (#24449747)

    That's no U-turn. At best, it's a hard left.

  • What better way? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 02 2008, @02:56PM (#24449787)

    What better way to nail subversives ?

    Let them convict themselves by allowing that whicvh is is deemed illegal in China ?
    The Historical approach..

  • Interesting... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by The MAZZTer (911996) <megazzt.gmail@com> on Saturday August 02 2008, @02:58PM (#24449815) Homepage

    Didn't they say they were going to spy on visitors' traffic too? Nothing about that here, maybe they're hoping we'll forget.

    If I was going, I'd take tor [torproject.org] with me on my laptop. Also I'd buy a laptop first.

    • Why Tor? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Sycraft-fu (314770) on Saturday August 02 2008, @03:56PM (#24450217)

      The Chinese firewall doesn't block encrypted traffic. A far superior solution is to simply VPN to somewhere. That's what I do when traveling if I am in any location that I don't completely trust (airport or hotel network for example). I SSH to a server I have at home and tunnel traffic through the connection. It is then as though I was surfing at my house.

      • Re:Why Tor? (Score:4, Informative)

        by DigiShaman (671371) on Saturday August 02 2008, @06:38PM (#24451247) Homepage

        I use XP. I've used a VPN connection (using it as my default gateway) from Shanghai to Houston. But browsing the web is much faster through a strait RDP session back to my desktop.

        You would think screen refreshes would take more bandwidth then redirecting HTTP requests, but that doesn't seem to be the case in my experience.

        • That's what SSH (and most VPNs) use. It is the most tested cryptosystem in history. It has been signed off on by, well, everyone pretty much in the crypto field. After years of concerted effort, still no way to break it has been found.

          Now if you want to life in AFDB land, go right ahead. However it seems extremely unlikely that anyone, much less the Chinese government, can break AES. As such, a VPN is a good solution.

            • by Sycraft-fu (314770) on Saturday August 02 2008, @09:57PM (#24452403)

              Because they are new to the cryptography game and don't have the computing resources of many other countries. It seems extremely unlikely that even the NSA can break AES (given that they've certified it for top secret data) and when it comes to crypto, they are the best in the business. They are to information espionage what the KGB was to physical espionage. If I'd bet on anyone being able to figure out how to break a cryptosystem without anyone else knowing, the NSA would be my bet.

              Regardless, my primary point is I find it extremely unlikely AES has been broken. It is an open algorithm that underwent an exceedingly rigorous selection process. Because of that, it was scrutinized. Once it was selected and made the official AES standard, it then underwent even more. As I said, it's the most tested cryptosystem out there. Thus far, it has held up wonderfully. So basically for a break to happen, there'd have to be a new field of math developed that would allow for some new way of attacking it. That seems very unlikely to happen, and I find it unlikely the MSS have already done so.

              • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

                Because they are new to the cryptography game and don't have the computing resources of many other countries.

                Well, these days raw computing power is only one way of breaking crypto. In fact, I'd say that it would be the tool of last resort. Much more common is looking for mathematical flaws in the algorithms. And when it comes to raw talent in mathematics, I'd put China up there at the top of the heap with the NSA.

                Remember that Chinese researchers are the ones that discovered collision weaknesses in MD

  • by vivaoporto (1064484) on Saturday August 02 2008, @02:58PM (#24449819) Homepage
    Right now I'm browsing the sites mentioned on TFA and nothing happ&/"$%& NO CARRIER
  • More Accurately (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 02 2008, @03:02PM (#24449873)

    China Does U-Turn, Lifts Ban On Certain Websites

    Title is way too optimistic.

    • Re:More Accurately (Score:4, Informative)

      by Kleinbottler (1090817) on Sunday August 03 2008, @02:34AM (#24453893)

      China Does U-Turn, Lifts Ban On Certain Websites

      Title is way too optimistic.

      Totally agree. As an expat Beijing resident with press connections the story moves by the day. Bottom line is that while generally open at the moment (i.e. in the Olympic press center) there are still sites that are blocked including a China blog at a major US news outlet. The Chinese generally allow VPN but if you go to certain sites you will still be stopped. Free proxy servers are tissue paper and generally not useful. The authorities, from observation and experience, can and do target individual computers. The Chinese are getting cleverer and more subtle at "shaping" the internet landscape and where you can go. Overall bottom line is that whatever little concessions might be made to the press center users the control of internet access will get worse not better. People who give credit to the Chinese for the access they have allowed are living in lalaland. The Chinese are grudging every concession and reneging whenever they can.

    • by hweimer (709734) on Sunday August 03 2008, @04:37AM (#24454387) Homepage

      I configured Tor to use a Chinese exit node [quantenblog.net]. Here are my results:

      - Chinese Wikipedia [wikipedia.org]: accessible (used to be blocked)
      - BBC Chinese (via bbcchinese.com) [bbcchinese.com]: blocked
      - BBC Chinese (via direct URL) [bbc.co.uk]: accessible
      - Article on Tibet in English Wikipedia [wikipedia.org]: accessible (used to be blocked)
      - Human Rights in China [hrichina.org]: blocked

  • by eebra82 (907996) on Saturday August 02 2008, @03:27PM (#24450029) Homepage
    I sincerely hope that the Olympic Committee doesn't think this is a major success. As long as China remains blocking web sites and other types of censorship, they should be banned from ever setting up the Olympic Games while such governing is taking place.

    I'm looking forward to the Olympic Games in North Korea 2012. Apparently, Kim Jong Il is expected to beat 52 world records.
  • by Nymz (905908) on Saturday August 02 2008, @03:37PM (#24450099) Journal
    1) Ban 1000s of websites
    2) Unban 3 of them
    3) Claim the ban is lifted, as the other sites are only inaccessible
    4) Fail!!!

    Note: for those not familiar with the pun - For Dummies [wikipedia.org]
  • Tempest in a teapot (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mu11ing1t0ver (1175051) on Saturday August 02 2008, @03:40PM (#24450111)
    I'm surprised none of the stories about this mention how easy it is to VPN out of China and thus bypass any blocks they throw up.
    • by jopsen (885607) <jopsen@gmail.com> on Saturday August 02 2008, @04:16PM (#24450351) Homepage

      I'm surprised none of the stories about this mention how easy it is to VPN out of China and thus bypass any blocks they throw up.

      The problem is that ordinary citizens in China doesn't know what happen on Tiananmen Square in 1989. Do you seriously expect the average Chinese citizen to be able to get VPN out og China, and risk his/her life/career on it because the sites are illegal.

      • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

        I'm surprised none of the stories about this mention how easy it is to VPN out of China and thus bypass any blocks they throw up.

        The problem is that ordinary citizens in China doesn't know what happen on Tiananmen Square in 1989. Do you seriously expect the average Chinese citizen to be able to get VPN out og China, and risk his/her life/career on it because the sites are illegal.

        The ordinary citizens in China (at least those over 20) know quite well what happened on Tiananmen in 1989,just talk to any Chinese cab driver.

        Most Chinese don't think it has much relevance to today's business. While they agree the government in 1989 committed horrible crimes, hell it is two decades ago and both China and Chinese government has changed a lot [amazon.com]. Most of Chinese are happy with the current government [yahoo.com].

        As for Tiananmen square most think it will resolve over time . Even a lot of 1989 demo

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        Not actually true. I'm currently living in southern China, and the common people know what happened... The problem is that it's a social taboo to mention it, they're scared to talk about it, and they'll get angry if a foreigner brings it up and reminds them. It's a rather sad state of affairs, but I have met some people here that are very critical of the current situation with regards to freedom of speech and are willing to talk about the problems the country has. It's a shame that the common people won't t
  • Sure, I get it. China feels like it is getting a black eye. So they think they can put makeup on that black eye by suddenly opening access. We're not fooled. They are a censoring country and they're going to stay that way. The Leopard can't change his spots and China is not going to change what they're doing.
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      China's Olympic ambitions falter with protests
      http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080802/ap_on_re_as/china_battered_hopes [yahoo.com]

      said Wu Jiaxiang, a former government researcher and now a blogger and businessman. "We care less about human rights than other countries and more about sovereignty. That's bound to create an awkward feeling among other countries."

      They just don't get it, do they...

        • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

          In the wake of the tragic earthquake that hit China, I'd be tempted to go a little easier on China during the games. But now the government is using bribery and intimidation by the police to try to silence the parents of those children killed by faulty school construction.

          I can't imagine any worse torture than that. Your child was killed by a substandard building, put up by a corrupt government. And every month, you get a cash payment, a pension that reminds you of that fact. And it reminds you that instea