Slashdot Log In
Senator Proposes to Monitor All P2P Traffic for Illegal Files
Posted by
Zonk
on Thursday April 17, @09:19AM
from the kind-of-strains-the-mind-to-think-about-huh dept.
from the kind-of-strains-the-mind-to-think-about-huh dept.
mytrip writes "Senator Joe Biden (D-Del) has proposed an ambitious plan, costing on the order of $1 billion, aimed at curtailing illegal activities via P2P networks. His plan involves utilizing new software to monitor peer-to-peer traffic on an ongoing basis. 'At an afternoon Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing about child exploitation on the Internet, Sen. Joe Biden (D-Del.) said he was under the impression it's "pretty easy to pick out the person engaged in either transmitting or downloading violent scenes of rape, molestation" simply by looking at file names. He urged use of those techniques by investigators to help nab the most egregious offenders."
Related Stories
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading... please wait.

And people ask why I support Jesse Ventura? (Score:5, Insightful)
Fuck them. Fuck them both.
Reply to This
Re:And people ask why I support Jesse Ventura? (Score:5, Insightful)
In any case, all the more reason to use the TOR network.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:And people ask why I support Jesse Ventura? (Score:5, Insightful)
Does that quote suggest to you that he's technical enough to even know what a MAC address is, let alone know that it's spoofed with five seconds worth of work in the command prompt? People have of course screwed with filenames just to see what happens (much more in Kazaa/Limewire than Bit-torrent), probably to test Rule 34, with interesting results; more importantly, it shows that filenames are completely meaningless if you're looking to actually reveal content. In any case, just ticking the "encryption required" box in your torrent client solves that problem - and you can bet your ass that any sort of unique serial number would be the much more industry-standard (and equally absurd) IP address. You know - take the RIAA approach.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:And people ask why I support Jesse Ventura? (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
This is not a law proposal, just loose talk (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
The payoff (Score:5, Insightful)
One billion dollars! (puts pinky to lower lip) I see the tip of an ice berg, but ok since ... "It's for the children"!
Ah! The rest of the iceberg! Now how will we pay for it? [slashdot.org]
No matter that it cannot possibly work, it is for the children you see. So naturally if it's not working, we'll simply need to provide a bit more funding in this year's budget, and the next, and the next...
Reply to This
Parent
Re:And people ask why I support Jesse Ventura? (Score:5, Insightful)
No, I'm not a republican OR a democrat because I enjoy the process of THINKING too much to give it up.
Both parties of this bi-partisan country are corrupt, lazy, money grubbing, fear mongers and I refuse to vote for another piece of deadwood until there are people put up for election that are WORTH VOTING FOR and not one minute sooner.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:And people ask why I support Jesse Ventura? (Score:5, Insightful)
This is also my disagreement with those supporting Ron Paul. Maybe he is the best candidate, and maybe everything would be better if he were elected, but he has literally no chance of becoming president, but a lot of his supporters talk of voting for him, instead of "throwing away your vote" on one of the 3 contenders.
So, voting for Ron Paul is not throwing away your vote, even though he can't win, and therefore, you still didn't vote for the winner of the election, and possibly helped one of the others get elected instead? I feel it necessary to vote for the lesser of 3 evils, at least so things can be BETTER than they are now. I would rather have my say in voting for someone who can win, than in voting for an ideal out of protest for the others.
It's sad, but these days more people need to vote AGAINST someone, than for someone. You don't want McCain to become president? Vote for the person running against him that can actually win. You don't like any of the three? Find the one you can deal with for the next four years and vote for that one.
Say my dream car was a really fast Ferrari, but I only had $5000 to spend and I don't have any current transportation. Should I put that money away and just wait until I had enough to buy it, (which may never happen), and not have any transportation? Or should I be more practical and find the best option available to me right now, so that I can drive to work, and get a better job that makes more money and maybe earn enough to buy the Ferrari?
It'd be great if I could have my ideal, but practicality limits reality.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:And people ask why I support Jesse Ventura? (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
FYI (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
WHAT!?! (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Re:WHAT!?! (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:WHAT!?! (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
Parent
Tags (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
ugh (Score:5, Funny)
Reply to This
How 'bout some quid pro quo (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Just follow the money... (Score:5, Interesting)
Reply to This
Biden's not Senator RIAA (Score:5, Insightful)
Totally different.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:And I'm sure . . . (Score:5, Insightful)
Anyone with his position should have enough intelligence to seek out smart people and see what can be done sensibly. Of course, all his intelligence is in his wallet; which is (un)fortunately under his ass most of the time.
It really is time to get rid of big business lobbyists. Their damage to the US is unfathomably huge. Time for open lobbying, not dissimilar to having to post your lobbying requests on the legislator's wiki site for all to see.
We need a LOT more transparency in the influences on legislators. Clearly.
This legislation is being promoted without clear evidence that it is needed. Where is the supporting evidence to show that this legislation will stop what it is intended to stop? How will it stop those from posting to the Internet from countries where the material is not illegal? There is no evidence to support it. If there is, the law is not needed. They can use the evidence they already have to arrest those guilty of the supposed crimes. Fucking idiots.
What an asshat. Yes, your child can click on the 'download britany spears' link and get childporn. Those filenames are ALWAYS accurate. Damn, even the **AA were using wrong filenames to spoil P2P sharing.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:And I'm sure . . . (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent
Re:From now on... (Score:5, Funny)
I was thinking something more along the lines of:
cp never_gonna_give_you_up.avi XXX-9yo-boys-blowjobs-and-crystal-meth.avi
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Remember, Kids (Score:5, Insightful)
Don't believe me? Google for US federal deficit charts...
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Remember, Kids (Score:5, Insightful)
On the other hand, republicans also suck for censorship (dems hate violence, repubs hate boobies), and they are far more likely to get "decency-style" laws passed, than infringe on individual liberty...If you can't buy booze on a Sunday in your state, somewhere, there is a Republican to thank.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:Remember, Kids (Score:5, Insightful)
Apologies for the slightly trollish nature of my post, but it's really pissing me off seeing this inane republican vs democrat stuff, it's like racism or something, except the fairly arbitrary divide being which set of self-important morons you vote for instead of place of birth/skin colour. Admittedly you do have a choice who to vote for, but in the end there are always gonna be problems no matter who you vote for, under the current system at least.
Reply to This
Parent
Re:File names?? (Score:5, Insightful)
Reply to This
Parent