Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Airlines Plan To Filter, Censor In-Flight Internet Access

Posted by Zonk on Tue Dec 25, 2007 09:37 AM
from the seek-help-if-you-just-can't-make-it-four-hours-without-pr0n dept.
BlueMerle notes that the much-vaunted arrival of internet access in the friendly skies may come at the cost of heavy content filtering by the Airlines. Ars Technica's commentary is prompted by an Associated Press article which does its best to make checking your email seem sinister. "Seat 17D is yapping endlessly on an Internet phone call. Seat 16F is flaming Seat 16D with expletive-laden chats. Seat 16E is too busy surfing porn sites to care. Seat 17C just wants to sleep. Welcome to the promise of the Internet at 33,000 feet -- and the questions of etiquette, openness and free speech that airlines and service providers will have to grapple with as they bring Internet access to the skies in the coming months."

Related Stories

[+] Games: Japanese Airlines Ban DS, PSP 145 comments
Gamespot is reporting that Japanese Airlines such as Japan Airlines and ANA have banned the use of wifi-capable game devices, including the DS and PSP, over 'safety concerns'. From the article: "A law banning on gaming systems with wireless capabilities came into force on Monday, according to the Hollywood Reporter. Japan's transport ministry has concluded that the electromagnetic waves from the wireless networks can interfere with aircraft navigation systems, so it's no Nintendogs for passengers flying with Japanese airlines. The new law also bans wireless computer mice, and headphones that have not been provided by the airlines, although the use of electric razors, calculators, and cassette players is permitted, readers may be relieved to know."
[+] Airlines to Offer In-Flight Internet Service 181 comments
Ponca City, We Love You writes "JetBlue Airways will soon begin testing a free e-mail and instant messaging service on one aircraft, while American Airlines, Virgin America and Alaska Airlines plan to offer a broader Web experience in the coming months, probably priced at about $10 a flight. A recent survey found that 26 percent of leisure travelers would pay $10 for Internet access on a two-to-four-hour flight and 45 percent would pay that amount for a flight longer than four hours. The airlines plans to turn their planes into the equivalent of a wireless hot spot once the aircraft reaches its cruising altitude but service will not be available on takeoff and landing. While the technology could allow travelers to make phone calls over the Internet, most carriers say they have no plans to allow voice communications."
[+] Linux: Virgin America Uses Linux to Entertain Inflight 106 comments
anomalous cohort writes "CrunchGear has an interesting interview with the Director of Inflight Entertainment for the airline Virgin America, who discusses their adoption of Linux for the passenger's seat back computers. 'The ability to compose a music-video playlist is pretty cool and on the horizon. The READ section is also awesome in that it takes what is typically a bunch of wasted trees (excess newspapers, periodicals) and allows us to be more environmentally friendly and timely with things like news/event info/sports/entertainment etc.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Airlines Plan To Filter, Censor In-Flight Internet Access 25 Comments More | Login /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Keybindings Beta
Q W E
A S D
Loading ... Please wait.
  • OMG censorship!!! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by The_Mystic_For_Real (766020) on Tuesday December 25, @09:43AM (#21814176)
    God forbid anyone regulate behavior in a situation where they are liable for the results. The airline has 100+ strangers including children and overprotective, on edge, a little under the influence parents. They have a duty to keep order on their plane. I'm not sure that I, while I have no problem with porn and have even *gasp* watched it, would want to see a giant gangbang going on right next to me, while my rowmate eyes it longingly.
    • Re:OMG censorship!!! (Score:5, Insightful)

      by SterlingSylver (1122973) on Tuesday December 25, @10:01AM (#21814256)
      I support this sort of filtering for the same reasons that I support the rules prohibiting cell phones on planes. Now, ignoring the safety concerns of cell phones, the second that two or three business travelers start competing to be the loudest person so that their incredibly important conference call can hear their thoughts on the Johnson proposal is the second that other passengers start acquiring arguments for reasonable homicide. Idiots on the web can only be an even worse idea.

      I don't mind people checking their e-mail, but if airlines wish to enforce civility while I'm paying $150+ for a 1.5 hour flight to DC with a bunch of philistines...I say more power to them.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:OMG censorship!!! (Score:5, Interesting)

      by catwh0re (540371) on Tuesday December 25, @10:06AM (#21814272)
      I think these issues will pretty much disappear once the pricing structure comes out. I doubt this is something airlines are going to offer for free. Price sensitive consumers will option it out of their ticket price. Or charging by the kilobyte will entice users to be sparing with the service.

      The flipside of course is that everyone is on for free and the plane is slashdotted by anonymised porn.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

      The problem with censorship isn't the desire to prevent harm, but the fact that it implies that there is some moral standard by which we all should run our lives, which I find utterly offensive to my own freedom. Children will see things eventually, so ins
      • Re:OMG censorship!!! (Score:5, Insightful)

        by YrWrstNtmr (564987) on Tuesday December 25, @10:31AM (#21814396)
        Children will see things eventually, so instead of hiding the truth from them, as an adult give them some parallax and understanding on what they are seeing.

        The problem with that is that it is not up to you to determine when I should have a teaching moment with my kid.

        Do you invite your kids into the room when you and the wife are gettin it on? Do you surf porn with your 6 year old? Have you explained the finer details of tubgirl to her?
        [ Parent ]
          • Re:OMG censorship!!! (Score:4, Insightful)

            by Albanach (527650) on Tuesday December 25, @11:01AM (#21814556) Homepage

            If every moment isn't a teaching moment for your kid, then you're doing something wrong.
            No, sorry. I think you are wrong

            Every moment for children tends to be a learning moment, but parents can decide the time, pace and subject for teaching.

            As they say, your right to swing your arm ends just before my nose. Equally, your right to watch stuff on a plane ends when it starts to offend or disturb those flying with you.
            [ Parent ]
            • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

              your right to watch stuff on a plane ends when it starts to offend or disturb those flying with you.


              Well, they shouldn't be looking at my screen then!
          • Re: (Score:3, Funny)

            We're cruising along at 30,000', having a 'teaching moment' about cloud formations and what all those little 'squares' are, when the asshat next to us decides that I must redirect my scholarly pursuits, and instead explain what is wrong with that mans butt
          • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

            Oh cut the crap. Do you even have kids? How old?

            It's so easy to preach when you have no clue.

            I do have a three year old son (btw, I'm European, so no prude). He does ask a lot of questions and we do our best to answer them. But there are thing difficult to
            • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

              That's ok. That's how I usually spot them everywhere in Illinois.

              I would, however, suggest reading "How to Lie with Statistics." If I sent out an anonymous survey to all readers of "Popular Mechanics" asking about which types of makeup they prefer to use,
        • Re:OMG censorship!!! (Score:5, Insightful)

          by egomaniac (105476) on Tuesday December 25, @02:41PM (#21815894) Homepage
          Atheists are ipso facto stupid. Like anti-gay fundamentalists, atheists have the ludicrous belief that they can make pronouncements about an emotional phenomenon which they do not experience. All people who even glimpse the complexity of the universe experience awe and wondrous exhilaration with such profundity that it cannot be described as anything other than a religious experience. Einstein understood this. You do not.

          Do you believe in Odin? Zeus? Ra? Queztalcoatl? The Great Spirit?

          No?

          Based on the fact that you're a self-righteous prick, I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that you're Christian. Mankind has dreamed up ten thousand different gods. You don't believe in 9,999 of them. I don't believe in the same 9,999 you don't believe in, plus I also don't believe in the God of Abraham. Evidently not believing in 9,999 gods doesn't make you stupid, but not believing in 10,000 gods makes me stupid.

          I'd like to believe that there's some logic or reason behind this, but there's no logic behind religious delusions. Sad that so much time and energy is spent defending fairy tales.
          [ Parent ]
    • Re:OMG censorship!!! (Score:4, Insightful)

      by 1u3hr (530656) on Tuesday December 25, @12:37PM (#21815124)
      . I'm not sure that I, while I have no problem with porn and have even *gasp* watched it, would want to see a giant gangbang going on right next to me, while my rowmate eyes it longingly.

      As may be. But who, would watch hard core porn in public, a coffeeshop, or such, now? I'm sure it does happen, but this is something that most of us do in privacy, or perhaps with friends. Someone who openly watches hard core porn on a plane should be stopped by the hostesses, the same as if he started masturbating in his seat.

      Anyone likely to use their laptop to watch porn could much more easily load it up with a few GB of videos before they leave the ground, rather than see -- buffering -- at inconvenient moments, let alone probably paying a small fortune for the privilege.

      So I'm not saying that watching porn is appropriate on a plane, but trying to filter it out of the net is not going to stop it, and we all know the silly side effects of overbroad filters.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re: (Score:3, Insightful)

        stop trying to reduce my liberties
        It's a freaking airplane ride. You are knee-deep in the crush of humanity. You already had to take off your shoes and belt to get on, and the TSA already reads and records the names of your books. What liberties do you t
  • It's a private airplane (Score:5, Interesting)

    by The Analog Kid (565327) on Tuesday December 25, @09:50AM (#21814214)
    It's their own service their providing, they can do whatever they want as far as filtering. I should have the same ability to sleep on an airplane like I did before they introduced internet access. I don't need to be sitting on a plane hearing a bunch of priests telling the passenger ahead of them how immoral pornography is, or hearing a people yell and scream if someone bring up goatse.
  • Common courtesy. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by ari{Dal} (68669) on Tuesday December 25, @10:09AM (#21814292)
    If you can't last more than a few hours with porn, you may have a problem.

    Having said that, since when does someone need internet access to view porn? I have porn on my macbook pro right now, but when I flew out yesterday and pulled it out for a bit of in-flight entertainment, I watched Monty Python and the Holy Grail.

    Basic common courtesy kept people from watching porn while they travelled without internet access; the same thing will keep them from watching porn with internet access. Those few asshats who can't restrain themselves, well, they're asshats regardless of internet access.

    I've also spent a fair bit of time travelling by train, which already come with free wi-fi. I've yet to see anyone browsing hotbabesxxx.com during the trip.
  • Thank you, SSH tunnels... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by pla (258480) on Tuesday December 25, @10:23AM (#21814360) Journal
    Seat 17D is yapping endlessly on an Internet phone call. Seat 16F is flaming Seat 16D with expletive-laden chats. Seat 16E is too busy surfing porn sites to care. Seat 17C just wants to sleep.

    ...And seat 14C has established and maintained a single encrypted tunnel to a non-resolving IP, over which he appears to have routed a high volume of bidirectional traffic.


    Seriously, using airline-provided internet access doesn't magically take away the standard rules for the use of any public-access short-term ISP, whether libraries or coffee shops or just someone's open WAP - Encrypt everything!

    Of course, in the current political climate, that would probably have the gestapo waiting to "ask" me a few questions on landing, but I refuse to give up best-practices out of fear of boogey-men.
  • by internic (453511) on Tuesday December 25, @10:31AM (#21814392)

    Already someone could watch porn, movies or games with extreme violence, or other adult (and possibly offensive) material on their laptop. For that matter, someone could just bring a Playboy magazine on the plane to pass the time. With the possible exception of people trying to use VOIP (I wonder if the latency would be low and consistent enough), I really don't see how this brings up many etiquette questions that aren't already present on a plane. This just sounds like a lame excuse for filtering to me.

  • Oh forget about pr0n (Score:3, Insightful)

    by laejoh (648921) on Tuesday December 25, @10:51AM (#21814508)

    I wonder what would happen if I'd open this [aljazeera.net] on an American airliner? Would people care? Probably, they'd all go nuts!

  • SSL VPN's (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Ececheira (86172) on Tuesday December 25, @11:31AM (#21814770)
    If they allow access to SSL sites, then how would they stop you from using an SSL VPN to your office/home to get to any site/service you want? If they block Skype, then use your SSL VPN and go through that...

  • Filtering Porn (oblig) (Score:5, Funny)

    by ravenspear (756059) * on Tuesday December 25, @12:32PM (#21815088)
    I'm sick of all this motherfucking fucking on this motherfucking plane!!!
  • Rather than filter the content... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by jessecurry (820286) <jesse@jessecurry.net> on Tuesday December 25, @12:36PM (#21815120) Homepage Journal
    Airlines should be dealing with etiquette violations as they happen, not by filtering content. If someone is talking too loudly, ask them to stop. If someone is looking at porn(and another passenger can see it) ask them to stop. Porn is available everywhere, but rarely do you see someone looking at porn while at a coffee shop. I think that these stories are a little sensationalist.
    • by creysoft (856713) on Tuesday December 25, @10:16AM (#21814332)
      Maybe the flights you always fly on Hooker Airlines are filled with hot, friendly chicks, but here's a list of the people I've sat next to on airline flights:

      A fat man
      Another fat man
      A surprisingly fat man
      An old woman who needed oxygen and smelled like cheese
      Two fat men
      A little brat (boy) who kept kicking the seat in front of him and throwing things across the aisle at his mother (on the other side of me) who in turn kept screaming at him for the whole flight
      An exhausted mom and her toddler who banged on his musical sesame street toy and screamed the whole flight.

      I would have given anything for porn!
      [ Parent ]
    • by Moraelin (679338) on Tuesday December 25, @10:49AM (#21814492) Journal

      I mean, really, you geeks can't go without porn for 3 or 4 whole hours?


      Oh please, sometimes I even go without it for a whole 8 hours or more. Damn that filtering proxy at work ;)

      Here's a thought: close Firefox, shut the lid on the laptop, and *gasp* actually talk to the girl sitting next to you. You just might find that you'll be enjoying the real thing, rather than rubbing one out to pictures of it.


      Right. On a plane.

      I guess there's always the off chance that the fat guy on the right is really a beautiful woman in disguise. Or that the lady with the screaming baby behind me is really available and is carrying someone else's kid. Or maybe the fat, loud yakking couple in front of me aren't really married, and I could pick the woman up. If I didn't have any taste, that is. (And I'm not even talking about the "fat" part, as about what she's yakking loudly about.)

      But ok, let's say that I pulled the proverbial jackpot, my guardian angel used the miracle quota for a small nation and a century, or the karma accountants in the Heavens decide to give me a sorta tax return for what my ancestors suffered during the black plague and a few wars. So I'm seated next to a woman who's gorgeous, smart, horny, available, etc, etc, etc.

      On a plane.

      Have you been on one of those lately? The seating for a start has been clearly designed for halflings, and anyone over 3 ft tall will have to fold in unnatural ways just to fit their legs in there. I've been occasionally wishing for a modified Folding@home client just to figure out how I'm supposed to fold in there. Doubly so if the guy in front decides to lean his seat back on top of you, and/or hasn't understood under which seat his bag should go.

      Then we're both after the airport experience, which is designed to inconvenience you the most, so you'll know you're safe up there. And I don't mean just the coming one hour early and standing in the line for the security circus. That's just the ante. You know, the foreplay for the real shafting experience. Then you've had to put up with loud and chaotic crowds, had to find your terminal (presumably named so because by the time you're there, death doesn't look that bad an alternative) with clues that would make old adventure games look tame, had a jolly good wait because your flight is delayed, then got packed on the plane and waited another 40 minutes because some retard forgot to load the luggage too. (I swear to the elder gods, it actually happened.)

      Right. Do you figure at this point either of you is in a jolly and relaxed mood, conducive to making friends and maybe a little flirt?

      Well, if you are, I suggest you hurry up, because soon you might get your in-flight meal. Which isn't exactly candle-lit dinner material, to put it mildly. On the last flight I've been on, for example, they gave us some... chopped up weeds, with one thin slic of tomato and one thinner slice of Mozarella. It was slightly larger than a 2 Euro coin, btw. It was called "Insalata Caprese", apparently because "capra" in Italian means goat and you'd have to be one to actually enjoy it or get any nourishment out of it. (Hint: herbivores can extract protein from leaves and stalks by letting it ferment in their compartmented stomachs. Humans can't.)

      Again, forget any ideas you might have about what Insalata Caprese is _normally_ supposed to mean. The picture on Wikipedia tends to suggest something completely different than the airline version of it. I'd say that they had gone for the minimal meeting the definition (technically it had sliced tomatoes and mozarella, because they had one slice of each), but even that would be false. I don't remember it having any oil, for example.

      I don't know about you, but if you're put in a romantic mood by it, and find a woman to match... well, then may I suggest a romantic honeymoon in an authentic Spanish Inquisition dungeon, complete with top-of-the-line torture chamber? ;)
      [ Parent ]
      • Laws of own country? (Score:4, Insightful)

        by SerpentMage (13390) <ChristianHGross AT yahoo DOT ca> on Tuesday December 25, @11:12AM (#21814636)
        >Besides, even when you are in another country, regardless of their less restrictive laws, you still must abide by the laws of where you claim citizenship, or risk be arrested on your return to home soil.

        ehh... No... Otherwise there would be oodles of people getting arrested for smoking pot legally in Holland. When abroad you are actually subject to the laws of that country, not your country of citizenship.

        Yes there are situations where a country will act even if the act is not carried out on in the country of citizenship (eg child prostitution) but that is relatively rare.

        A citizen is nothing more than the right to vote and not be persecuted by your own government. With respect to the law everybody in the country regardless if they are a citizen or not has to respect them.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re: (Score:3, Informative)

          I didnt say you *would* be arrested, but you *can* be. Look closer at the law, and you might be surprised. I was.