Feds Have Access To Cellphone Tracking On Request 140
Mike writes "According to a Washington Post article, federal officials are routinely asking and getting courts to order cellphone companies to furnish real-time tracking data on subscribers. The data is used to pinpoint the whereabouts of 'criminal suspects', according to judges and industry lawyers. In some cases, judges have granted the requests without even requiring the government to demonstrate probable cause that a crime is taking place or that the inquiry will yield evidence of a crime 'Privacy advocates fear such a practice may expose average Americans to a new level of government scrutiny of their daily lives. Such requests run counter to the Justice Department's internal recommendation that federal prosecutors seek warrants based on probable cause to obtain precise location data in private areas. The requests and orders are sealed at the government's request, so it is difficult to know how often the orders are issued or denied.'"
This just in (Score:5, Funny)
Re:This just in (Score:5, Interesting)
The biggest problem with your attempt at humor is the fact that people used to talk about tinfoil hats when people SUGGESTED something like this could happen, now people are delegated to the tinfoil hat crowd for COMPLAINING about this stuff happening.
When will it get to the point where the people who AREN'T paranoid about being constantly watched are mocked as the fools? Or is this subtle transition between 'you're crazy, that'll never happen' and 'what are you worried about, you're not a terrorist are you?' all the recognition the tinfoil hat people get for being right all along?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And the biggest problem with your attempt at a scare is the failure to articulate, what "this stuff", actually, consists of.
The Executive government requires the Judicial branch's approval for getting the data from cell-phone companies. Sometimes it gets i
Re:This just in (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:This just in (Score:5, Insightful)
Or a conservative constitutional scholar.
http://www.americanfreedomagenda.org/ [americanfr...agenda.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There is no right or wrong answer. I'm curious to what people really think when presented with an opinion like this.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
and the "being scared of the government" conspiracy theorist delusions makes then liberal? That's an interesting take on it.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
This doesn't require GPS to the best of my (limited) knowledge.
The cell phone needs to be in contact with a tower in order to have a signal. For billing purposes, they need to know who you are.
I think this works far more through radio triangulation than GPS. GPS, however, probably makes it easier. Of course, it makes one wond
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
At least for the commercial applications, the software is designed to require a response from the phone saying in effect "Yes, you can determine my location at this time". The software will then use the GPS in the phone (if it i
Re: (Score:1)
Damn them! How dare they have a phone turned on during a concert! By god and all that is right those signals should have been jammed! I don't care if she has a terminal illness... nobody should be able to interrupt my enjoyment of the Teletubbies Christmas Jam!
Re: (Score:2)
Uh... you realize nearly all phones have both a silent and a vibrate mode.
Moreover, that the ability to locate them like this would be *needed* at all suggests that the phone was at least either silent or off. (Otherwise, they would have just
Re: (Score:2)
That was the reference flying right over your head, just above hairline level.
A few weeks ago, /. had a front-page story called Cell Phone Jamming on the Rise [slashdot.org], talking about how establishments are jamming cell phone frequencies so their customers can have an evening in peace without some idiot yapping away on his cell phone. The sarcasm above was a parody of many of the comments.
Re: (Score:2)
Keep in mind, the government can make the right *environment* for all sorts of
new information to be tracked and provided, by creating laws, incentives, etc... so while the companies generating the information may not have any evil motives, some people in the government (and in criminal organ
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
GSM needs to keep track of phone locations very precisely because the primary means of synchronising the phone to the network is by altering the timing advance which tells the phone when to start transmitting.
3G is nowhere near to GSM in terms of location precision. In uses reflected signals in a positive feedback filter to improve the phone signal to noise ratio. If you look at the data before the filter you cannot make sense of it (it is combined wit
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Finally, the REAL reason why just about every phone nowadays comes with a built-in GPS receiver...... so the phone can tell the carrier-- and thus the government-- where it is.......
My phone has an option to turn off GPS unless I dial 911. Are you saying that this feature doesn't really work? Or that the phone company can override it?
Re: (Score:2)
The feature to turn of GPS is likely working. Its reasonably improbable that they'd be able to remotely stealth turn it on.
However, cellphones talk to multiple towers simultaneously. Carriers can a locate a phone relatively accurately even without GPS. Additionally cellphones regularly communicate with the towers to let the network know where it is, so tha
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
If you don't want people to know where you are then don't buy a cell, don't have ccards, don't have an internet connection, don't use a land line. Live in a shack in North Dakota and talk to your family in a set of cans connected by a string.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
When I worked in this
Can we just have a revolution and get it over with (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Can we just have a revolution and get it over w (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Can we just have a revolution and get it over w (Score:1)
Meet your new boss, same as old boss. But with bigger guns.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm going to put my money on a combination of both to some degree. You seem to be at an extreme end of the spectrum. This typically me
Re: (Score:2)
No, it doesn't mean you cannot be right, it just means that you aren't likely to be right. there are people a lot more intelligent then we are that don't have a bias on the situation who just don't see it in the same light as you do. Most people who see things as negetive as you have expressed, have an agenda or bias on the situation. Those that see it as a bed of roses do to. But here is something to keep
Re:Can we just have a revolution and get it over w (Score:2)
The Corps and the rich folks behind them are trying to sneak control and $ away from the people gradually so that Joe Apathetic doesn't see anything wrong until it's too late. When they'll be done, the US will look like the Alphaverse in Charlie_Jade. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Jade)
I doubt it will happen because Greedy people can only hold back for so long...
Re:Can we just have an election and get it over wi (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Can we just have a revolution and get it over w (Score:2)
When the actions of the government affect the TV viewing and high fructose corn syrup eating of the American public. Until then? Everyone will continue to sit on their asses smiling that they did "great work" at their pointless jobs and consider themselves
Re: (Score:2)
Every day it's either some government agency or some giant corp that is tightening the screws on US citizens. When will there be a tipping point where Joe Apathetic says "enough!" and takes to the streets?
I'll tell you the answer, but you won't like it.
The reason people are apathetic about these things is because it doesn't affect normal citizens to any great extent. There will ALWAYS be government abuses -- that's just the nature of power. The question is whether there are widespread enough abuses to
Another Reason (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Another Reason (Score:4, Insightful)
But I wonder, can "they" track me even when I turn the "feature" off? Maybe "they" see through the little camera on the phone? Can "they" hear waht I'm saying even when the phone is "closed"?
Anyway, I'm off to the store to buy more aluminum foil (with cash in coin form, of course)...
Re: (Score:2)
Even on older phones without GPS features, they still have an idea where you are by which cell tower your phone is connected to. sure, its not as accu
Re: (Score:2)
Sometimes paranoia == talking out of one's ass.
Re:Another Reason (Score:4, Interesting)
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2006/12/can_you_hear_me.html [abcnews.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Grow up kid. This is not your 1960s USA.
This is 2007. What the companies and government say is false.
Re:Another Reason (Score:5, Interesting)
Yes. From 2006. [abcnews.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Actually, it's hardly a secret that this has pretty much always been true, even for the old rotary "black phone" from the 1940s and 50s. Unlike modern phones, those didn't have any internal power source, and couldn't be plugged into wall power. They were powered by the 50 volts that the phone company provided on the phone line. And (except for a few rare models) it was openly admitted that they were
Re: (Score:2)
Ooooh! Try this: since all calls "may be monitored for quality," how about a random process that connects random government employee's phones to a 900 number that anyone can call? $1.99 a minute, and maybe you get to listen in on an IRS auditor, or a petty drone, or maybe, just maybe, your own Senator or Congre
Re: (Score:2)
not too long i'd imagine.
16-bit, 44.1khz (CD quality) mono sound is ~11KB/s
with ~300 million Americans, presuming all of them use the phone for 3 hours a day:
300,000,000*11*3600*3=33,000 terabytes per day
a 1TB drive costs $402 currently, and assuming three copies of every call (for redundancy purposes) that's about $40 million per day or $14.6 billion per year, which isn't a whole lot given government spending.
of
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The phone (I suspect this is Sprint's text, not Palm's) tells me this when I select the "911 only" tracking:
Turning location on will allow the network to detect your position using GPS technology, making some Sprint PCS applications and services easier to use. Turning location off will disable the GPS location function for all purposes e
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
life is good. I have nothing to hide, and I, for one, am glad to see our law enforcement doing everything they can to keep our American lifestyle safe and secure from terrorism. Don't like it? leave.
If you love wealth more than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, depart from us in peace. We ask not your counsel nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.--big fat American patriot, Samuel Adams
Re: (Score:2)
About time (Score:3, Insightful)
What moron doesn't know they can buy a throw away cell from Walmarts for cash?
If you're dumb enough to be a crook AND use a traceable (i.e. contracted) cell phone you deserve what you get.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
This method is known by police and the feds for a long time with the disposable phones; they even got smart and started buying them from another state to throw off the authorities.
The drug dealers in Baltimore know a lot more about privacy and keeping their conversations private than a lot of people around here sometimes.
Re: (Score:2)
What makes you think this technology is only used to track crooks? RTFS.
somebody log in and repeat this (Score:5, Interesting)
A car was stolen by three guys, and the guys rammed a police car during the chase.
The police opened fire on the vehicle, killing the driver. They also wounded one of two other guys in the car who bailed and ran off into the night.
Here's the part that made me take notice: The news guy said that by using the cellphone number of the driver, they located and captured the other two guys within 20 minutes... by using location tracking of the fugitive's cellphones.
Considering that a) the driver was dead and b) they didn't know who the other two guys were when they bailed out of the car and took off, 20 minutes seemed awfully fast. But how can you track down a cell phone's location without knowing the number or who the owner is?
This means (obviously) that there must be an easily accessible database tracking both caller history (to find out who you called, or called you) AND those people's current locations. I knew things like this were in place for DHS and the FBI (a lot of bank robbers get caught because they have cell phones on them or in their cars), but that local LE had access to this stuff was a surprise.
That means that you and I, joe geek guy, are already in this thing.
Pretty cool, huh? It's *way* too late for tinfoil.
Re: (Score:1)
That would be much scarier if the dead guy wasn't carrying the database in his pocket. As for locating two wounded guys on foot--can you say "redial"?
Re: (Score:1)
what I really wish... (Score:4, Insightful)
The government only does this stuff because they feel like they can get away with it, that's what kills me.
Re: (Score:2)
Seems like they can.
"on request" (Score:2)
What I want to know is... (Score:1)
It may even be eaiser than you think (Score:2)
1. Cellphones can be tracked very accurately.
2. Government can tap the records at will.
3. Bank robbery happens at 4th and main.
4. Police notify FBI.
5. FBI calls the cell carriers and says "we need all active numbers in grid 34,53 at 12:03 pm when a robbery occurred" List please.
6. FBI asks for the above mentioned numbers, "Which moved away from grid 34,53 at 12:05 at where are they now" List Please.
7. FBI asks what was the duration of movement, and speed of numbers in list
Re: (Score:1)
5. FBI calls the cell carriers and says "we need all active numbers in grid 34,53 at 12:03 pm when a robbery occurred" List please. 6. FBI asks for the above mentioned numbers, "Which moved away from grid 34,53 at 12:05 at where are they now" List Please. 7. FBI asks what was the duration of movement, and speed of numbers in list 2 please, and where are they RIGHT NOW.
That would require geo-locating AND logging. I'm not saying it doesn't exist, but I have yet seen evidence of logging.
Re: (Score:2)
The location information is stored continuously by the network, in a database called HLR (
On the other hand ... (Score:2)
Come on folks. We've watched enough '24' and 'CSI' to know how tracking works. We know better then to carry our own cell phones while committing a crime.
Damn Stallman! (Score:1)
Richard Stallman is famous for being very careful when he makes predictions. They always seem to turn out to be true. But, in one of his interviews, the interviewer's cell phone rang and RMS said "Will you please turn off your tracking device?". (sorry, couldn't find a link) He went on to talk about cell phones being used by the government to track people.
Now, when I saw this, I was thinking, "I doubt it. He has got to be wrong about this one. This is just tinfoil-hat stuff." But it turns out Stallman w
encryption (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
The problem is that they can tell where you are if you're using a mobile phone, even if you aren't using it. And if you are using and have some kind of whizz-bang encryption, they can still figure out who you're calling, because you can't encrypt the call setup (otherwise how would they know where to route the call?)
Duh... (Score:2)
I've been saying this for about five years. This is pretty much a So Nineties article.
The FBI, at least the pre-Bush FBI, required a search warrant to tap into the GPS signaling that phones and OnStar provides. So as a work around they employed the cellular companies to provide them with regristration information on the cell and node that your phone has recently passed into/out of as you travel. This won't give the resolutions to 10 feet, but they certainly know when you are one the move and where you a
Inevitable (Score:4, Interesting)
Call me paranoid, but I still think that the above is a rational assessment given historical evidence.
Re: (Score:1)
Given the emphasis that is put on technical development, yes.
If humanities had the same weight as science, perhaps no.
CC.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Humanities doesn't have the same weight as science because they haven't found a way to kill people with it yet. Yet. [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I think we have to realize that a surveillance society is an inevitable consequence of surveillance capability. If anything, history should show us that when groups of people are granted powers over other groups, they tend to abuse them (see the "Stanford Prison Experiment" for psychological evidence). Thus...
it is necesary to replace the people in power regularly, to spead power across more persons and across several groups of people, to grant the population of a country a certain amount of control over what people with power can and cannot, do and to enforce proper sactioning of those who abuse there powers. It's a nice system, they call it democracy.
The US seems a good candidate to try this, just drop the whole president thing, create a system with more than two parties of which none can have a full majori
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Of course is for our own protection but, as discussed in the Skype thread, once you have the technology in place and when you start granting too much power without any real oversight, who's to prevent them to abuse both technology and power?
RT
--
Your Bookmarks. Anywhere. Anytime. [simplybookmarks.com]
Judges should demand a modicum of evidence (Score:3, Insightful)
A real judge that does his job will slow things down to make sure only people who really should be under surveillance are put under surveillance.
Re: (Score:2)
But your physical location, your comings and goings, that's not a "person" or a "thing" to be "seized", so no worries, right? And the fact that the government asked for this info
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Do you want to be know as the guy who made someone explode? Somebody do humanity a favor and mod this down for another ten minute or so.
If you didn't get the tongue in cheek there, Good point.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you're (partially) missing the point: It still is illegal, the intention behind the law is ignored in lots of cases and you just compared "the land of the free" with a regime that was universally accepted as totalitarian (everything behind the iron curtain). That should tell you what "the land of the free" is on it's way to become.
Behind the iron curtain nobody was making much of a fuss about it, because those who did got in trouble, fast (the government was the b
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Listen up (Score:4, Insightful)
It's like torture. Newsflash: the people who torture know it doesn't really "work" on (i.e., produce valuable information from) the victims. It's a form of state terrorism -- it works best on the rest of us.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Listen up (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
These services are mandated by law and have been required for long enough so that almo
Re: (Score:2)
I don't understand your "...standard GPS does not do this." GPS doesn't do what -- give your location in lat/long? Or it doesn't work in the basement? If the latter, it sounds like your phone is either giving you the last location for which it had a GPS signal or i
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The weird thing is that the Sprint broadband card my company supplies me has access to the location data by default. I have access to a really nice search feature on any number of web mapping sites -- it can use my location & show me the closest whatever-I've-searched-for. I guess it could be just part of a separate package th