Microsoft Forces Shutdown of Autopatcher

kaufmanmoore writes "Posts on Neowin and Autopatcher's site announce Microsoft has forced the closure of the Autopatcher download section. Details are scarce as to the exact reason for the take down after over 4 years of availability, but an official from Microsoft legal says that it has nothing to do with Windows Genuine Advantage. Goodbye to another useful tool that helped sysadmins apply Microsoft's numerous patches."

One down, X to go.

Whilst skimming over the About-Section of the page, this tool's description reminded me of heise's "offline update" ( http://www.heise-security.co.uk/articles/80682 [heise-security.co.uk] ). It's an alternative tool, allowing the download of selected Microsoft Windows update packs for later, offline (re-)use. Nice to have - if you're still on Windows, that is. Wonder if/when it's gonna be shot down as well.

For many, this makes Windows XP more expensive.

The purpose of Autopatcher was to reduce the VERY high maintenance costs of Windows XP. Windows often becomes corrupted and must be reloaded to clear away system files that have been infected with viruses and other malware.

Notice that Microsoft has not released a Service Pack 3 for Windows XP, even though it has been years since SP2 was released. The purpose of the delay is apparently to make Windows XP more expensive, in the hope that people will begin to adopt Windows Vista.

The Windows XP updates of just last Patch Tuesday were more than 20 Megabytes.

Windows Vista is not an option for many, since because of the hassles with Windows XP, many companies have a rule never to use a Windows version before the 2nd service pack is released, and the bugs in Windows Vista are reinforcing that rule.

Also, Windows Vista requires far more resources. Each new Windows version requires more resources, apparently to try to manipulate customers to buy new computers. That serves Microsoft's biggest customers, the computer builders.

Terrific. How long before they break even that?

offline update is terrific; its basically a script that wgets the patches directly from Microsoft,

The geinous of M$ can not be understated. Rather than let people share the burden of distributing their "patches" (efficiently [netcraft.com])they will make everyone go to them. We have just seen how well they do at an easier task [slashdot.org].

It won't be long before they only allow "authenticated" clients to download.

The contrast between this and the free software world could not be greater. Every gnu/linux distro has been easy to keep up today for the last ten years and there are verified mirrors everywhere. When you download a package from a mirror, you can md5 sum check it against the original source and most package managers do this automatically. M$ on the other hand, won't even let you distribute what they consider "free". Be wary when someone from M$ advocates BSD, love of your freedom is not the reason for their advice.

This is sad...

That utility has obtained patches that Windows Update indicated were already installed but wasn't. This utility has saved a lot of headaches. Really sorry to see it go like that.

Morons.

Do they even understand the concept of bad publicity any more, or did they just stop caring?

Fuckers hit close to home, this time; Autopatcher was great for keeping relatives on dialup up-to-date.

Re:Morons.

I used it a lot as a PC tech. Microsoft might not realize that some people use dial-up still and downloading large updates isn't really practical. With Autopatcher all I had to do was pop in a CD or a thumb drive and get down to business patching up Windows. At least then I could be sure that when I left my clients computer fully patched up no matter what their connection was like. Way to go MS.

/em Pours out a '40 for the departed Autopatcher ; ;

Re:Morons.

They just stopped caring. And why not indeed - what is there to be afraid in squashing a little web site? The society is already in deep apathy (if not slumber,) and critical thought is about to send you to jail. Bloggers on /. will rage and fume for a few days, but nobody will notice that anyhow, and all that rage will dissipate in a week, but the good business remains.

MS is cynical and ruthless because it can and because it is profitable; and so it will stay. If you don't like that don't run Windows, it is that simple. With modern Linux distros it's not such a great loss. And if you don't want to fiddle with X settings, get a mac - Apple will charge you for that, but you get a sane system in return, not a buggy treadmill. [full disclosure: I do not own a modern Mac; all I have is an ancient PowerBook with 8.5.x MacOS, and I rarely even power it on, I keep it as a piece of history.]

Re:Understatement of the Month.

Well, you do lose PC games, since rare a game works under WINE. But I personally fixed this issue by just getting a console, and I am not sorry that I did - the thing just works, and I don't need to throw kilobucks at video cards. And in any case, games are first released for consoles, and only much later - maybe - rereleased for a PC.

Should have bought and funded it instead

Instead of shutting it down, Microsoft should have bought Autopatcher and funded it.

This service added a lot of value to MS customers. Tearing it down because they were better than their equivalent is destructive.

Doing things that make your products harder to use is bad business sense. It really shows how badly out of touch MS is with the industry.

Re:Should have bought and funded it instead

"Doing things that make your products harder to use is bad business sense. It really shows how badly out of touch MS is with the industry."

Nah, it shows what a powerful monopoly they have developed. They can make using their products downright miserable (they practically have already) and people will continue to curse that evil ol' bill gates as they IM each-other on MS messenger in MS vista on their laptops with the "built for windows!" sticker still attached. Plenty of other companies would like to implement the kind of security lockdowns MS has, and are capable of doing so. However, market pressures force them to realize that excessive measures create a barrier to use and sway customers towards friendlier products. Microsoft is not out of touch with the industry. Microsoft is the industry.

Re:Should have bought and funded it instead

They can make using their products downright miserable

Tell me about it.

My wife bought a new Vista laptop for her Masters classes. A simple request was to transfer some files and documents to and from our network SMB fileserver (A stand alone product).

They changed the default authentication protocol. It can't log in to any server using a password unless you either upgrade the server or downgrade Vists (not recommended by Microsoft) The server is an embedded Linux appliance (SimpleTech SimpleShare NAS).

The next simple task was to connect to my LAN printers. They hang on the LAN using the well established IPP interface with an address of IPP://192.168.1.101/lp1 and IPP://192.168.1.102/lp1. It took 4 hours and lots of Google searches to find out how to enter a non-IIS printserver address into Vista.

To make it easy, you leave off the IPP:// and put in the IP address and leave off the /lp1. On another page, you change from raw to LPT and put in the port name of lp1. Simple but not intuitive. To make matters even easier, noplace in Vista does it refer to it as Internet Printing Protocol. They just call it Network Printing. Very intuitive and user friendly.

Ubunto was much simpler to connect to these Windows printers. (an HP laserjet and HP inkjet) on garden variety stand alone hardware Print servers using IPP. (Hawking Technology Print servers)

Why would Microsoft make it much harder on Vista Home to connect to a home network and printers? It makes no sense to me.

It's almost like they designed it to be easier to use Ubuntu at home. It is much easier to use Ubuntu at home than Vista. Vista kept interrupting for a Java Update, Sound system Update, AV update and reregistration, and a few other things got in the way of setting up LAN settings and configuring 2 printers. Ubuntu was much better in that also. A single small notification popped up letting me know there were updates available. The small notification did not cover my applications in Ubuntu or force a reboot to close the notification.

Re:Morons.

Microsoft stopped caring over a decade ago. Do you think they have any interest in what users want or need? It's all about lock-in, baby.

They don't care what's on your hardware as long as it's theirs. Actually I wish that were true, because XP is pretty decent, but they couldn't leave well enough alone and had to spend 5 years squatting on the toilet to excrete Vista, the first piece of software that doesn't even pretend to offer anything new to the customers, it's only selling points are what's good for Microsoft and their big media buddies. OK, I lied. It does offer a new feature for users: It's shiny.

WindizUpdate next?

So are they going to shut down WindizUpdate next as it is a lot more useful that Windowsupdate has ever been. Then again maybe the patches are downloaded from Microsoft's servers but I'm not sure.

Are they making the arguement that.....

... this is some sort of DMCA violation? That's bizarre because Microsoft has known about them for some time and according to their site, they didn't care:

"Q: Is AutoPatcher legal?
A: Yes, Antonis Kaladis (our project manager) once spoke to a Microsoft employee and apparently they know about us but don't care what we do! The AutoPatcher project has been going strong since 2003 and never had a sniff of trouble from Microsoft."

From http://www.autopatcher.com/faq/ [autopatcher.com]

Re:How 'bout getting that in writing next time?

I have noticed at least one hotfix that's not normally publicly available, but was included with autopatcher. You know, the ones where you go to the KB article and it describes the exact symptoms you're seeing, and when you scroll down to download the patch it says something like:

"We don't think this is a major problem, and people who are having it are obviously too dumb to realize that it's somehow their own fault. Therefore, in order to get this patch, you'll have to call our support line where we will bill you outrageous fees in order to tell you whether you really need the patch or not."

Fortunately, the one I was looking for just happened to be included with autopatcher somehow, so I extracted the file and sure enough it fixed the problem.

Re:How 'bout getting that in writing next time?

You don't even need to call anymore, just go to this form [microsoft.com] and you can get the non regression tested hotfixes by email! Include platform because they will want it even if there is only one applicable fix in the KB article.

Re:Are they making the arguement that.....

So Kaladis talked to Microsoft's best friend's sister's boyfriend's brother's girlfriend who heard from this guy who knows this kid who's going with a girl who works somewhere in a Microsoft call center who saw Autopatcher in use at 31 Flavors last night. I guess it's pretty ironclad. It's my understanding that they can pursue legal action against Autopatcher at their leisure even if the Microsoft employee in question was accurately reflecting Microsoft-as-a-whole's knowledge of Autopatcher.

Goodbye

to another useful tool that helped sysadmins apply Microsoft's numerous patches.

Hello to a useful alternative operating system. If Microsoft doesn't want our business, we shouldn't give it to them. However, the desire for control of updates is understandable from a liability point of view, although they claim they don't have any...liability that is.

Are the patch installers still available?

Autopatcher was really just a front end to all the official MS one-off hotfix exes. If those files are still available, why not adapt the frontend to grab those files from MS instead? Hell, the least MS could do is take on the tech and offer it to their customers with a free WGA check thrown in. Because it was so much easier even for home users with say two machines to update at home, plus mum & dad's, and that one they built for their pal.

Torrents for August release plz?

Coming tomorrow

Microsoft announces a new service available for $50 a seat (check with sales rep for volume licensing) that will allow administrators to do what used to be free from some web sites.

Torrent links here for August ...

http://autopatcher.m2ys4u.co.uk/mystats.php [m2ys4u.co.uk]

http://autopatcher.m2ys4u.co.uk/torrents/AutoPatch er_DirectX_Aug07_x86_ENU_Addon.exe.torrent [m2ys4u.co.uk]
http://autopatcher.m2ys4u.co.uk/torrents/AutoPatch er_Extras_Jul07_x86_ENU_Addon.exe.torrent [m2ys4u.co.uk]\
http://autopatcher.m2ys4u.co.uk/torrents/AutoPatch er_Office02_Aug07_ENU_Core.exe.torrent [m2ys4u.co.uk]
http://autopatcher.m2ys4u.co.uk/torrents/AutoPatch er_Office03_Aug07_ENU_Core.exe.torrent [m2ys4u.co.uk]
http://autopatcher.m2ys4u.co.uk/torrents/AutoPatch er_Office07_Aug07_ENU_Core.exe.torrent [m2ys4u.co.uk]
http://autopatcher.m2ys4u.co.uk/torrents/AutoPatch er_OfficePack_Aug07_ENU_Addon.exe.torrent [m2ys4u.co.uk]
http://autopatcher.m2ys4u.co.uk/torrents/AutoPatch er_Win2K3_Aug07_x86_ENU_Core.exe.torrent [m2ys4u.co.uk]
http://autopatcher.m2ys4u.co.uk/torrents/AutoPatch er_Win2K_Aug07_ENU_Core.exe.torrent [m2ys4u.co.uk]
http://autopatcher.m2ys4u.co.uk/torrents/AutoPatch er_WinVista_Jul07_Core.exe.torrent [m2ys4u.co.uk]
http://autopatcher.m2ys4u.co.uk/torrents/AutoPatch er_WinX64_Jul07_x64_ENU_Core.exe.torrent [m2ys4u.co.uk]
http://autopatcher.m2ys4u.co.uk/torrents/AutoPatch er_WinXP_Aug07_x86_ENU_Core.exe.torrent [m2ys4u.co.uk]
http://autopatcher.m2ys4u.co.uk/torrents/AutoPatch er_WinXP_MCE2005_May07_x86_ENU_Addon.exe.torrent [m2ys4u.co.uk]
http://autopatcher.m2ys4u.co.uk/torrents/AutoPatch er_WinXP_WMP10_May07_x86_ENU_Addon.exe.torrent [m2ys4u.co.uk]

Found via google cache :-)

I noted this on Neowin...

"I asked the representative if Windows Genuine Advantage had anything to do with it and he categorically told me this was not the case, he added that Windows Update for pre-Vista versions of Windows can now be accessed using Firefox and that the concern at Microsoft had more to do with the possible malicious code that could be redistributed with certified Microsoft updates."

Sure. Whatever. We all know that there's never been a case of malicious code distributed with Autopatcher. So I'm calling it now. Watch M$ come up with their own tool that does the same thing as Autopatcher and watch them find a way to turn it into a revenue stream.

It was good, but

Patches can be slipstreamed anyway [winsupersite.com], and for the mother of all 'off-line patching systems' there's Windows Server Update Services [microsoft.com].

That said, the overall rhetoric of this move still isn't nice. AutoPatcher was at the very least, a handy tool for people that didn't know about the above methods, and to leave it 4 years in the game before sending in the lawyers isn't a nice way of treating the user community. A shame if you ask me.

But you don't understand what it was good for

Patches can be slipstreamed anyway, and for the mother of all 'off-line patching systems' there's Windows Server Update Services.

Slipstreaming? WSUS? Those are useful in entirely different situations. Autopatcher is for when you are visiting your aunt Tilly and don't want to spend four hours downloading all the latest patches for her over her dialup. Please explain how either of your proposed solutions would be even remotely useful in the very common situation of patching a relative's computer.

Re:It was good, but

Patches can be slipstreamed anyway [winsupersite.com], and for the mother of all 'off-line patching systems' there's Windows Server Update Services [microsoft.com].

Yeah, except that neither of those things does what autopatcher does. I don't want to have to reinstall the whole OS just to keep patches up to date, and I don't want to have to lay ethernet cable several hundred miles to my relatives' homes in order to patch them quickly from a server I control.

The donkey of the comuting industry...

Well this is just retarded... Once again a corporate donkey just uses their money and power to shutdown a project that is very helpful, again... Can't wait to see what they start shutting down next... I can see something stupid like alternative search engines coming up.

Microsoft

There is no reasonable alternative to the AutoPatcher from Microsoft, and Microsoft is threatened by revelation of hundred patches for a clean/new install of XP (wSP2).

Apple and Linux, he we come!

Windizupdate

You can find windows updates thru http://windizupdate.62nds.com/ [62nds.com]
I hardly use IE, and this updates through Firefox.
Which is of course very neat. *cough*firefox fan*cough*

From Neowin

I had a call from Microsoft Legal this morning and they have told me that we are no longer allowed to endorse AutoPatcher on Neowin.

Microsoft will only allow updates to be downloaded from its own servers.

AutoPatcher started in 2003 and has been redistributed in some of the worlds best computer magazine cover CD/DVD's. I have no explanation for why Microsoft allowed it to continue unchecked for 4 years before making this decision.

I asked the representative if Windows Genuine Advantage had anything to do with it and he categorically told me this was not the case, he added that Windows Update for pre-Vista versions of Windows can now be accessed using Firefox and that the concern at Microsoft had more to do with the possible malicious code that could be redistributed with certified Microsoft updates.

We have no grounds to challenge the decision by Microsoft.

I'd like to thank the whole AutoPatcher team for their continued work, unfortunately none of the team is online, but they have been contacted via the AutoPatcher.com website by Microsoft Legal.

The AutoPatcher forums on Neowin have been disabled for guests and members.

Update: A Microsoft representative has told Neowin that he is looking into the matter and will try to get some answers. More to follow.

It seems like a reasonable request.

Autopatcher FAQ's now out of date

'Tis a sad sad day! Thanks for everyone's work on the project!

But... you might want to update the FAQ's on the website. Looks a little funny now!

Q: Is AutoPatcher legal?
A: Yes, Antonis Kaladis (our project manager) once spoke to a Microsoft employee and apparently they know about us but don't care what we do! The AutoPatcher project has been going strong since 2003 and never had a sniff of trouble from Microsoft.

AutoPatcher needs to think "business" instead

They could have avoided a lot of trouble, if they had just signed up as a Microsoft Partner. It costs nothing and would have made them "a co-player" rather than a "security risk".

- Jesper

Missing the obvious

You are all missing the obvious reason for the shutdown. Microsoft has finally fixed all the bugs! Celebrate!

Why does Microsoft hate their users?

We give them the vast majority of our IT budgets, we try to keep believeing in them and still they hate us......

Shenanigans

"Microsoft legal says that it has nothing to do with Windows Genuine Advantage. "

I call Shenanigans!

Can we get an auto downloader for these updates?

The reason for the ban:

Microsoft will only allow updates to be downloaded from its own servers.

That's certainly MS's right. A technical objection is that one could use cryptographic hashes/signing so that the download source wouldn't matter (and wouldn't it be caveat emptor if users didn't go to MS for updates?), but c'est la vie.

But why can't we make this even vaguely win-win? Provide a utility that will download ALL of these updates (whether the machine thought they were applied or not) directly from MS for use on removable media.

What alternatives are there for those on dial up (or other cases of no or intermittent network connection)? For those who have had malware make edits to their hosts file and/or browser security settings that make obtaining updates directly from MS on the computer they're updating difficult?

Still many useful tools

I have found that a combination of Heise Security's ctupdate [heise-security.co.uk] and nLite [nliteos.com] can be used to create a very nice custom Windows installation CD that not only includes any updates you choose to include, but you can also specify a large number of custom registry settings that will be set when you install.
Is very nice

Microsoft is immune to bad press

Microsoft is so large and its userbase so enormous that no amount of bad press can affect them. Anything short of eating live babies would not impact them in the slightest.

Shutting down Autopatcher is nothing to them and will not affect their business in even a negligible fashion.

I would like to think otherwise but I can't. They are unstoppable.

I just used this to fix a xp media center system

That I did a repair install on and was not able to install windows updates after running auto patcher windows update now works.

Now THAT'S customer service!

So much for small business and residential users in rural areas [slashdot.org]. You know, this will hurt ONLY paying customers; not the "pirates" downloading slipstreamed ISOs off of IRC and torrent networks (or buying "pirated" CDs in the streets, etc). This also hurts small businesses on cable and DSL connections where there are "unspecified" download caps to their "unlimited" internet services.

  Congratulations, Microsoft. You've shut down yet another tool useful for installing and deploying legitimate Windows, thereby increasing the value of "pirated" Windows offerings AND provided more reasons for users to choose alternatives such as Linux, OS X, and BSD. Good move there.

Why not actually, oh, I don't know, innovate some new features for Windows rather than harassing small third-party developers who offer FREE utilities to make YOUR piece of crap offering easier to manage? Like, say, I dunno, work on a better filesystem [slashdot.org] or something.

I can't believe no one's mentioned this yet...

They might not listen, or they might -- who knows? <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/common/survey. aspx?scid=sw;en-gb;1348&showpage=1&WS=mscomukform1 ">Let Microsoft know about the mistake they're making by writing to them!</a> (I found the link at the torrent site for AutoPatcher.)

What about the DVD ISO on MS's download page?

I haven't heard of this before, (just found it, actually), but would this be a reasonable facsimile?
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=913086&SD=tech [microsoft.com]

Re:What about the DVD ISO on MS's download page?

It looks like, for example, the latest August 2007 2GB .iso release contains 10 updates with support for XP (x64), Server 2003 (x64/Itanium), windows 2000 and Vista (x64) in all languages. It would take a lot of downloading of every .iso release to get every patch released since SP2...

You're missing the point!

It's about security: if you're not downloading the patches direct from Microsoft, there's more of a chance of them being compromised. Sure, it may not have happened yet but that's not to say it won't happen in the future.

Now what would be useful, is for Microsoft themselves to make it very easy for you to download and burn an 'windows update' DVD that'll take each version of XP up to date. Downloadable direct from Microsoft.

Alternatively, they could offer hashes for the downloads on Microsoft's servers, which Autopatcher can be pointed at in order to verify the downloads.

Had they done that, then they'd avoid all the negative PR!

Total cost of ownership

So I guess now that they have retired the "Get the facts" campaign, Microsoft is actively increasing the total cost of ownership of Windows? After all, they are shutting down a free tool that presumably saved their clients thousands of man-hours.

They may claim that the shutdown is not about WGA, but I can't see what other reason they would have, other than that AutoPatcher competes with some as-yet-unreleased Microsoft product.

What's the deal with Neowin?

Microsoft is within its rights, though obnoxious, with regard to Autopatcher, but since when is it their business what Neowin says about Autopatcher? Where does MS get off telling Neowin to take down their forums? Is MS just being a bully or is there some relationship between MS and Neowin that I don't know about?

How much money did this program save?

I mean, neither Microsoft nor any large companies have "unlimited" internet usage. Once you scale your infrastructure up large enough, you have to pay for all of the data transferred in and out. So how much money could this program save not only Microsoft (which has enough money as it is), but all of the companies that used this? Or are there "official" ways of storing updates on your own computers to distribute amongst others on your network?

What about the other fish?

What does this mean for the other vendors, namely the larger ones? Companies like PatchLink, Shavlik, BigFix? Do they all pay licensing fees to Microsoft to redistribute their content? ...or does Microsoft leave them alone because they have large customers with deep pockets?

AWFUL

Wow. This sucks. Glad I'm moving into nix/bsd admin and security, career wise. I'm currently a field service technician/computer consultant... our company provides it support for small to medium businesses... and even a few large ones that don't want an in house IT dept...

We use Autopatcher ALL the time for in house clean up work... ie... who wants 6+ boxes trying to download patches and clog up your bandwidth?

Slipstream? Don't make me laugh. Who doesn't already have an SP2 XP disc? If you're setting up a new box... activate, drop autopatcher on it, and you're done. WSUS? Why waste time adding another person's box to our domain, update, and then remove?

MS's own update ISO's? You really think I want to stick like 9 different discs... in several machines? And still not get like 1/2 the updates out there?

And of course... it has saved our bacon times when our net access was down(usually a backhoe hitting the fiber), or when Windows update simply wouldn't work(dreaded Win 2000 windowsupdate issues, even on a clean install).

Honestly, I don't think we can go back to downloading the same damn crap 5 at a time again. Just ridiculous.

Well shit...M$ fucks me over

Autopatcher was basically the "only way" I could patch Windows up to date. Owning a rather used SP1 XP cd, getting all the critical updates and SP2 could be a bitch. Especially when it came to stuff that was vitally important to the system.

Now it's just a matter of time before another huge flaw is founded which malware/spyware & virus makers exploit to shit. With WGA and all, patching my system against these hazards will basically be impossible. Just a matter of time before it succumbs to one of these :(

I Don't Do Windows

Seriously, MS pulls crap like this all the time, not to mention Windows is a buggy piece of crap that's a real pain to use.

This is just one of the reasons I refuse to run Windows and I refuse to support it. If somebody is having problems with their Windows stuff I tell them to call Microsoft or buy a Mac.

BITS broke

BITS (Background Intelligent Transfer Service) has never worked on my laptop, so Windows Update doesn't work (neither does Google Pack). I've had to use AutoPatcher to update. Crap.

wsus

Please tell me why autopatcher is better then wsus. On my network at work we use wsus. Only the one wsus connects to download the updated(when nobody is there) then all the computers automatically get there updates from that one server. What does autopatcher do that wsus cant?

Just grab the script from MS that does it for you.

MSDN's Version:
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-US/library/aa387102. aspx [microsoft.com]

My modified version that forces cscript.exe and adds an /auto switch:
http://b0n.us/WUA_SearchDownloadInstall.vbs [b0n.us]

It usually takes 3 times with reboots in between to get all the patches.

It will use your WSUS settings and get the patches from a local server if you have one.

Yes, they are VBS, don't run them without reading them and understanding them!

jorgie

This makes my job much longer...

I run a pc repair and sales shop. We use autopatcher all the time, everyday, for updating customer machines that walk in the door un-updated, and also getting new builds patched up. This saves me not only a bunch of time as it is a start-and-forget procedure, but also saves a bunch of bandwidth, since I have to only get the updates ONE TIME PER CYCLE, not EVERY TIME I UPDATE A CLIENT! Mot to mention all the times i update our clients that we support at their businesses. Instead of popping in the autopatcher and going, I have to download the stupid updates, from each machine, therefore increasing THEIR bandwidth costs as well. I would be all for a WSUS server on my guest network that my clients connect to, if I could just make all of the clients' windowsupdates point to it easily and easily revert back when done. I run anywhere from 10 to 40 machines through my shop per day. Autopatcher was much better. Thanks Microsoft for making my life harder when I bend over backward trying to sell your server and desktop software to clients. I appreciate it. Really.

loyalty test

I think MS just likes to stick it's finger in it's users eyes every now and again to give self assurance that their user base will literally put up with anything. like moe did with curly. curly hung around.

kind of a crude and sadistic loyalty test. ...that or MS is preparing to release a new and improved "Bug-Free Windows (TM)", making such sites as these obsolete. yeah, that's it...

Usual Microsoft Bashing...

I know it's hip to hate them, but really, can you imagine the mess that would ensue if autopatcher or whoever accidentally (or intentionally) put in a bogus update and it was distributed out to people and it destroyed or compromised their PC?

Yes, they could digitally sign their updates or release md5s or something, but at the end of the day it's a third party application that they have no reason to trust giving their customers updates to their operating system - updates that could potentially cause a lot of problems.

There's no doubt who the finger would be pointed at - MS. They want their customers to update using their mechanism so if anything breaks, they can at least try to figure out why, instead of having to unravel a ball of changes made to their OS by some random third party updating system.

Thanks a lot Microsoft

Talk about kicking your most loyal users in the teeth. I'm so angry at this that I am writing a letter of complaint, stop sniggering, I know that some secretary will just file it in the cylindrical filing cabinet. For us who repair peoples PC's either part time or full time, this is devastating news. Microsoft may love to think that we live in a world where everyone is on broadband, or where everyone can obtain updates easily, or even perhaps that reinstalling Windows is never necessary but that simply isn't true. You fix someone's PC and have to reinstall Windows, they then dial up their internet connection and Windows update tries to download hundreds of megabytes of data, well, they aren't going to sit around, so the PC goes un-patched and Malware gets in easy. Thanks to Autopatcher it was easy to patch Windows PC's after a clean install, or even PC's that had never been connected to the internet. now Microsoft go and kill it... heck, I run a Windows website and even I'm thinking of dusting off my Ubuntu installation now.

This is just a predicate

This is just a predicate to Microsoft lining up all the ducks and get ready to induce breakage of all prior versions of Windows O/S. The setup here is to surreptitiously force you into upgrading into Vista. They don't want those updates coming from multiple locations and by locking it down to only servers they own, they control the entire deck of cards.

Just a hunch. /black helicopter

RyanVM is unavailable as well

Not sure if it is related but RyanVM and his addons can no longer be downloaded from his site. You can find the latest pack RVMUpdatePack2.1.11.7z elsewhere though. Last packs MD5 was 2A1534598304646757CFE6D8C6F0F221

I'm wondering what took them so long.

Last year they shutdown torrent trackers for the Vista beta. This site had been around much longer (obviously).