FTC To Examine Targeted Advertising

narramissic writes "Following a series of complaints by privacy groups, the FTC has announced plans to host a two-day forum on targeted advertising at the beginning of November in Washington, DC. It's the first time since 2000 that the agency has looked at industry practices in this area. They hope to learn how Web advertising firms protect the personal data they collect, how they notify consumers about that data, and whether the data is sold to or used by other firms." The FTC page for the event ia here. Sign up by September 14 if you want to be a panelist or to recommend topics for discussion.

Editors!

The FTC page for the event ia here.

Perhaps the editors need to use the preview button. Or should I say Perhapa the editora need to uae the preview button.

Re:

You shouldn't be so hard on the poor editors... that's a common Lovecraftian slip. You're just typing like normal then all of a sudden Iä! Shub-Niggurath! The Goat with a Thousand Young! Ftaghn!

Normal typo, happens all the time.

Re:

So they can actually accomplish something instead of a massive wide-ranging discussion that accomplishes nothing.

Hosts file - don't surf without it

http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm [mvps.org]

No need for a popup blocker when the ad site host name goes into the bit bucket.

Re:

Bah. A hosts file is okay when you don't have a regular ad-blocker, but it really loses out by not being able to block stuff like "www.example.com/ads/*".

The filter list I use in Konqueror and Opera has over 700 things in it. Along with an ad-blockin

Seeing the ads is the lesser problem...

The greater problem is the gathering of personal data to serve the ads. For me personally, the scariest thing isn't them developing an accurate profile, but an inaccurate one and it spreading to potential employers, etc, if they ever attach my name to it.

Re:

For me personally, the scariest thing isn't them developing an accurate profile, but an inaccurate one and it spreading to potential employers, etc, if they ever attach my name to it.
You'll never work at Hooters again.

Re:

To the parent and GP:

I too use hosts file blocking, but I took a weekend (I'm not a code god) and augmented it's usefulness by developing a browser plug-in that infers whether a given image is a (putative) ad. It acquires DOM info about a particular image

Re:

Unfortunately, you really need to take a look at the way the ads are routed through otherwise innocuous or useful sites. Finding all the CNAME's for ad.doubleclick.net is not a trivial problem: neither is filtering out the image based ads fed by what are e

Re:

Adblock Plus + an auto-updating filter = I don't know how I used the web without it

http://adblockplus.org/en/ [adblockplus.org]

I'll make the FTC's job easy.

They hope to learn how Web advertising firms protect the personal data they collect,

They don't.

how they notify consumers about that data,

They don't.

and whether the data is sold to or used by other firms.

Yes.

There. Study done.

Re:

I work at a Fortune 100 company. You are an exception to the norm. Everyone who sends us "marketing leads" doesn't seem to exercise anywhere as much care as you do. Oh, and we buy leads, so somebody sells them.

Honestly, not selling your data is a bad

Re:

Honestly, not selling your data is a bad business move

There's PLENTY of reasons NOT to sell soft data. For starters, what you collect tells someone a lot about how you are using it. You almost never want that to get out. Most companies are not Google :p an

Re:

Honestly, not using slaves is a bad business move. All your competitors do it.
Fixed that for you.

With that attitude, the problem only escallates. The practice has to stop somewhere. Just because everybody does a given thing doesn't make it right. I me

Re:

I said business move. If you factor your personal beliefs into your business decisions, you might be a good niche business, but you'll never be able to compete at the Fortune 500 level.

I do agree with your sentiment. But businesses not being slimey won

Re:

You, are a liar.

Re:

They hope to learn how Web advertising firms protect the personal data they collect,

They protect it fiercely. Keeping the data secret keeps the valuation of the data high for resale and ensures that they retain a competitive edge in the niche markets where

Re:

Keeping it secret also hides the sales to spammers, scammers, and people who do follow the CAN-SPAM rules to protect themselves from lawsuit. Publishing the data would doubtless encourage legislation against many of the more nefarious practices, such as se

Re:

All advertising companies with more than a few months using an ad-server or doing performance level campaigns, have these basic policies. Of course corruption and stupidity leads to exceptions and we have let a number of people go over the years for straig

Re:

Ok, so you're gonna make me trundle out the tired old "You must be new here" gag.

I work for a large company that many people here hate, and no, not MSFT. It seems that whenever I make factual statements about certain company initiatives I get modded down

Re:

Your "facts" don't seem to be agreed with by most folks, or may even be unsupported (as they are in your statement here). You have a strong incentive to portray your own company positively, and they may in fact be positive about these practices.

But no, *al

Re:

You have a strong incentive to portray your own company positively, and they may in fact be positive about these practices.

I do not own a company. I'm not sure what I've said to portray my employer in a positive light, but have tried to relay the facts abo

Re:

And being a legitimate advertiser is a lot like being a high-class escort. The business you're engaged in, as legitimate as it may be in the way you practice it, is a paid service tainted by the dangerous majority of its practicioners. You cannot reasonabl

Re:

Moreover, I'd bet dollars to donuts that you have been defrauded by your clients or had your data stolen at least once in the last year,

2 years I've been here, it has never happened.

Nobody with hundreds of thousands of dollars to spend does large transacti

Re:

And being a legitimate advertiser is a lot like being a high-class escort. The business you're engaged in, as legitimate as it may be in the way you practice it, is a paid service tainted by the dangerous majority of its practicioners. You cannot reasonably talk about how "advertisers don't do this" any more than you can say "escorts are safe" without qualifying your statement, restricting it to what seem to the be the clear majority of the professionals we see out here cluttering up the sidewalks and molesting us as we try to get home.

Mmm. Condoms for data. Although, when you think about it, their normal use is to contain 'data'

Re:

Why did parent get modded redundant?? There's good info in his post. It really looks like anything going against the hive-mind gets slapped down on /. these days..

Re:

The FTC is probably initiating the study at the request of the advertising industry. The initiation of studies in response to the prospect of unfavorable legislative action by congress is a time honored and effective (unfortunately) delay tactic adopted by

Ballmer must be happy

He's finally gonna get Google killed.

Re:

...along with his "free" OS supported by ads displayed based on crawling the user's entire computer. Of course, this is Steve Ballmer we're talking about. He's been known to squirt his relatives. Ew.

Sure

I am pretty sure in two days the FTC is not going to figure anything out.

Yes, whenever we have a privacy concern

We can always depend on the government [informationweek.com] to help out.

Targeted advertising is still rare?

I rarely come across an ad that looks 'targeted' to me. Amazon does it, but that's based on data they gather on their own site (books I've previously bought), not data they purchased. Otherwise, website ads are IP-based (the Slashdot page I'm looking at now shows an ad specific to my country), or use the search terms I just entered (Google).
Ads I get via e-mail are invariably spam, which is as untargeted as it gets. Snail mail isn't targeted either.

So where's all this 'targeted advertising' going on? Companies must be sitting on loads of data that never gets used, if I'm any indication.

Re:

Product placement [youtube.com]? Is that where they're headed?

I was going to sign up, but ...

I'm not sure if the FTC promises to never sell or give out the information I submit ... :)