Slashdot Log In
OpenDNS Says Google-Dell Browser Tool is Spyware
Posted by
samzenpus
on Thu May 24, 2007 06:57 AM
from the google-google-google dept.
from the google-google-google dept.
PetManimal writes "David Ulevitch, the founder of OpenDNS, claims that Google and Dell have placed 'spyware' on Dell computers. Ulevitch made the claim based on his observation of the behavior of the Google Toolbar and homepage that comes preinstalled on IE in new Dell machines. He says that a browser redirector sends users who enter nonexistent URLs to a Dell-branded page loaded with Google ads. Another observer, Danny Sullivan, says that this is a different result than what happens on PCs without the redirector. However, the original article notes that Ulevitch has a vested interest in the results of mistyped URLs."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
OpenDNS Says Google-Dell Browser Tool is Spyware
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 188 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Instructions to Remove (Score:5, Informative)
(http://slashdot.org/~eldavojohn/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 16, @03:26PM)
Now I work for a fortune 500 company and guess what we do with every box we get from Dell? Re-image it.
Now, for the 99% other Dell customers, this is just purely unfortunate because I'm not so naive to expect everyone to know how or why they should take the above actions. I hope that all the virus scanning apps (HiJackThis, Lavasoft's Adaware, etc) get this thing because Adaware is about the most useful thing I can show my family how to use frequently enough to keep the computer protected.
This sounds a lot like something the old Gateways would do. Huh, I never would have thought Dell would reach that level but, well, here we are. The important thing is to factor this in when you're thinking about a new computer. Hopefully some competition will spring up for Dell and, you know, quality of the software (not just the hardware) will start to matter for Dell.
Re:Instructions to Remove (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://jamesjustinharrell.com/)
Re:Instructions to Remove (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://cmorgan47.blogspot.com/)
i with you on the rest of the post, but as a good little Slashdotter you should know that the friend buys the beer.
Re:Instructions to Remove (Score:5, Insightful)
Haggling over who buys the beer when it's a prime excuse for some guys to just sit around and shoot the shit isn't worth it. I'll buy the beer and I'll make sure it's something you've never had
Computers are the new excuse to sit around and "bond" as corny as that sounds--like fishing or camping. Enjoy the excuse to stop and upgrade someone's ram, it'll make you feel useful. I'll bring the beer since I'm the one getting something out of the deal. If you haven't seen a friend in years, call them up and talk to them. If you want to hang out, ask them if their computer's running alright and offer to come over and help them out with the problems, everybody has them.
America has become too centered on who pays for what, I say relax and enjoy life before you die.
OT eldavojohn
Re:Instructions to Remove (Score:5, Informative)
(Last Journal: Saturday January 06 2007, @01:13AM)
If you are buying a bunch of boxes I heard you can send Dell your preferred image, and they'll image all of them for you.
This crapware matters because... (Score:4, Interesting)
By way of example; my Grandmother got a Dell. She's 80 odd, but can use a browser, email, etc. Her Dell was great - but she couldn't wo rk out why she wasn't able to receive emails. Time and again, she, or her friends would, with or without telephone support - would configure Outlook Express correctly - only to find that that it kept changing the POP3 server URL. I gave her remote assistance - and could swear it was working; but every time she told me it wasn't owrking, sure enough - the POP3 details had changed. Eventually, I tracked it down to McAfee which had a year's subscription to anti-virus; but 30 days' subscription to an entirely unnecessary spam blocker. A bug in their spam blocker meant that it correctly diverted all attempted POP3 connections to itself; but then screwed up the address of the actual POP3 box and couldn't actually connect. Of course, it only inserted itself at boot time - so every time I'd fixed it by remote desktop it looked great; till Gran rebooted...
I disabled this - but only after Gran had basically been emailless for 3 weeks. Lo and behold! On day 30 - it suddenly prevented here using email again - this time because its license had expired - so it refused to allow her to use her email app - even without it! Cue - Add/Remove Programs. Only it wouldn't allow itself to be removed because its AntiVirus companion was running... it took me hours to clear out this crap. And yet - without me doing it; Gran couldn't get her email, first because of their sloppy coding - and then because of their "license expiry" hijack.
That's why crapware preinstall should be banned. By all means - include a CD or a link to a website where I can choose to download trials - but preinstalling them is outrageous. Imagine if a car came with a pre-installed alarm system which wouldn't let you drive the car without getting out your credit card or a screwdriver?
Can you really blame google (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Thursday April 07 2005, @04:52PM)
Just because google make the tool doesn't mean its their fault that it is installed by default in a spywareish fashion.
When I work on a Dell ... (Score:2)
(http://www.animal-assist.org/donate.html)
Obligatory Google Reality Check (Score:2, Insightful)
(http://sanghahost.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday March 23 2005, @08:47AM)
Making money for their stockholders.
That means doing things like creating spyware if it helps their bottom line. The mantra of "Do no evil" becomes null and void once you become a publicly traded company. They should change their motto to "We do less evil than everyone else".
Google is going to do what is best in their corporate interest. Surprised? Don't be. It's business
Re:Obligatory Google Reality Check (Score:4, Insightful)
OpenDNS is bummed (Score:5, Insightful)
OpenDNS is bummed that Google figured out a way to make money off the proposition. OpenDNS should have thought of that first.
OpenDNS is not open (Score:5, Insightful)
Kinda fitting (Score:4, Funny)
Age of domain 9 year(s), 9 month(s) and 9 day(s) - Online since: 15-Sep-1997
P.S. Roll your monitor 180 degrees.
Re:Kinda fitting (Score:5, Funny)
(http://kestas.kuliukas.com/)
Take the number of days Google have public (2321), multiply by the number of Chinese people imprisoned thanks to Google (7), multiply by the number of web pages that Google indexes (11,029,291,583), divide by Nostradamus' number that he foretold would mark the beginning of the end (10,392), and round to the nearest 6 (6 as in 666). Now simply base64 encode the number, and you get DLOeVFT0501l==, rearrange the letters and you get "D0LOTSOFeV1l".
This has nothing to do with Google toolbar... (Score:4, Informative)
Claim is complete FUD (Score:5, Informative)
I'm sure slashdot denizens will have a good time discussing how useless the bundled software and trialware that comes with Dell computers is, and how the sensible thing to do is reinstall from scratch, but that's been the case for a while. There is zero story here.
Re:Claim is complete FUD (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.footballfans.tv/)
yea do you HONESTLY think that you average Joe user would uninstall a program with such a scary name? thats if they even understand 1 of the 4 words in that name!
Re:Claim is complete FUD (Score:4, Informative)
Browser - "What's a browser? You mean, like, the internet?"
Address - You are telling me that people who can't tell difference between a search bar and an address bar know what an internet address is?
Error - Sounds scary...
Redirector - "Redi-what?" (I very much doubt average user knows what's a redirect, you can as well tell them it polynormificalizes their antroendoretarterons, it does the same effect)
Re:Claim is complete FUD (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.everydns.net/ | Last Journal: Saturday April 26 2003, @12:34PM)
It's highly unusual for a piece of software to not mention who put it there. Look at your other Google software you have installed. Do you have "Desktop" installed or do you have "Google Desktop?" Does it say "Toolbar" or does it say "Google Toolbar?"
Oh wait, I know what kind of software hides things like that... software that is trying to be opaque and hidden.
-davidu
Re:Claim is complete FUD (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Claim is complete FUD (Score:5, Interesting)
Not spyware (Score:5, Insightful)
The fact that it sends you to a custom page if you make a URL typo does not mean it is spyware. That's a visible change, and you would be hard-pressed not to notice the effects of the software, or the fact that it sends you to a Dell branded page.
Since Dell ships it to you that way, you have no meaningful opportunity to establish an expectation that the Dell system behave differently. I.E. Since the software "comes that way" for you, it's not as if the software made a change to your computer without your permission.
So not only is it not spyware, it's not malware, or software that secretly modified your system without authorization (because, you see, your system came that way in the first place).
Don't Be Evil (unless the shareholders say so) (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Friday August 29 2003, @08:41AM)
Google's motto should now be "Don't be evil, unless it increases our stock price."
Face it geeks, your idols have jumped the shark.
Charter do it too (Score:2, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Wednesday January 03 2007, @05:01PM)
Decrapifier (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Decrapifier (Score:4, Informative)
a way to test (Score:3, Informative)
Decrapify it (Score:4, Informative)
(http://sourceforge.net/projects/karekol/)
David Ulevitch is a hipocrite (Score:5, Insightful)
http://www.opendns.com/faq/#how_does_opendns_make
How does OpenDNS make money?
OpenDNS makes money by offering clearly labeled advertisements alongside organic search results when the domain entered is not valid and not a typo we can fix. OpenDNS will provide additional services on top of its enhanced DNS service, and some of them may cost money. Speedy, reliable DNS will always be free.
Now, to be fair I use OpenDNS at home, but I find it hard to take this kind of warning from a person who makes money the same way.
Re:David Ulevitch is a hipocrite (Score:4, Informative)
If I use that as my DNS, and do a lookup for www.google.com, I get
redirected to a CNAME of google.navigation.opendns.com.
What's up with that? DNS hijacking, anyone?
OpenDNS uses javascript for its spyware (Score:1, Informative)
they track everything you do on their "guide" from what links you click on, when you exit the page, uses hidden iframes, the list goes on all 50+kb of script to help you just like Verisigns sitefinder helped,
what they do deserve credit for is convincing people clever enough to change their DNS settings that somehow breaking DNS in exchange for seeing adverts is a worthwhile tradeoff, just like spyware/adware convinces a user that viewing adverts for getting weather is somehow a good thing.
perhaps they should team up with new.net as they do the same just using a binary to help change those pesky dns settings
here's how to stop their crap
add this to your hosts file
127.0.0.1 guide.opendns.com
shortcuts? (Score:1)
So did Google actually write this? (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://pintday.org/)
Hi, I wrote that post... (Score:3, Informative)
(http://www.everydns.net/ | Last Journal: Saturday April 26 2003, @12:34PM)
Yesterday I got a lot of feedback from people who just assumed I was biased and an underdog out to complain about Google. This is not what it's about!
Here's what I mean:
Use the smell test. Does what Google is doing smell bad? Is it giving users a good experience?
Compare:
with
(and if you want to see ours)
If you just compare what google is doing to their own users you'll see that they are showing a terrible experience to the users who are Locked-In versus the users who have the choice to use any search service.
Thanks,
davidu
Re:Hi, I wrote that post... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Hi, I wrote that post... (Score:4, Insightful)
And lost in all this is the fact that you seem to be redirecting google.com to your own servers. I really liked OpenDNS when it was just a DNS server, please trust your users to be able to follow instructions and stop intercepting their google queries.
Same as Microsoft? (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://playstation-3.se/)
That is why... (Score:1)
Deceptive article! (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://www.scarydevil.com/~peter/ | Last Journal: Monday September 26 2005, @06:53PM)
The only way to get to Google's page from Internet Explorer in its default configuration is to explicitly go to google.com, and with the redirector in place you still get to the regular google home page if you do that.
If you open up Internet Explorer without the redirector and type a "keyword" into it, you normally end up on Microsoft's search engine.
Given the alternative of going to MSN.com or a Dell-branded google.com, I know which one I prefer.
[1] If you care you should be using Firefox which (for all its flaws) has a design that's many times more secure than IE...
Google/Dellbar also overrides company Intranet (Score:1)
Just another Arugment... (Score:2)
for FireFox.
Way too many typosquatters (Score:3, Informative)
(http://www.animats.com)
Way too many people are into typosquatting now. From OpenDNS to the "toolbar" guys to the guy who paid off the government of Cameroon (try anything in ".cm"), there can now be several layers of typosquatting between the user and the actual domain. At least we got Network Solutions to back off from their attempt.
Search may be coming apart. There are too many people trying to "game" the search systems now. "Search engine optimization" used to be viewed as evil and was done by low-rent operations. Now we have publicly held companies (Marchex [marchex.com], ticker symbol MCHX) formed just to create dummy domains. Collactive [collactive.com], the Digg spammer, just got venture capital from Sequoia Ventures. Computer vendors load up their preinstalled machines with unwanted "toolbars", which, as this article mentions, produce mostly user-hostile information. All the sources of information which drive search engines, from inbound links to user ratings, are now being spammed by sizable companies. It's a big change from the situation two years ago, when the troublemakers were all little guys with limited resources.
It's going to get worse before it gets better.
End of all problems (Score:1)
Always hated Google (Score:1)
Ummm... pot, kettle? (Score:2)
(http://www.keirstead.org/)
But seriously - this Dell/Google thing is the EXACT same idea. It is easy to uninstall and I can see no one hiding it's existance. If OpenDNS has any complaints about it it is just because they were not chosen for the factory install!