Slashdot Log In
Thailand Sues YouTube
Posted by
ScuttleMonkey
on Mon May 07, 2007 01:35 PM
from the let's-all-take-off-our-left-shoe dept.
from the let's-all-take-off-our-left-shoe dept.
eldavojohn writes "Thailand is hitting YouTube with charges of lese majeste (up to 15 years in prison) regarding the recent videos on YouTube showing the king next to feet, something extremely offensive in Thailand. 'Since the first clip, more new videos mocking the king have appeared on YouTube, including pictures of the monarch that had been digitally altered to make him resemble a monkey. Thailand's 79-year-old king, almost universally adored by Thais, is the world's longest-reigning monarch, and one of the few who is still protected by tough laws that prohibit any insult against the royal family.'"
Related Stories
[+]
Politics: Venezuela's Contrarian TV Station Survives on YouTube 457 comments
carlos_J writes "Ars Technica is running a story about RCTV, a Venezuelan television station whose broadcast license was refused renewal by the government. In response, the station turned to YouTube to get its message out. Says Ars, 'El Observador clips have been seen 175,000 times since May 28, and the channel is currently the most-subscribed channel of the week. While putting the station's shows on YouTube is an excellent idea, YouTube still lacks anything near the reach of over-the-air broadcasts. But the use of the site to avoid censorship is growing, and it's not hard to imagine a day in the near future when the site (or sites like it) becomes as essential as local TV stations. As that happens, YouTube will come into even more conflicts with governments that have an interest in controlling what their citizens see, It's already happening--Thailand's king, for instance, has a thing for iPods but isn't too keen on YouTube. Will Hugo Chavez show more tolerance? '"
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Thailand Sues YouTube
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 435 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
"loved by all" (Score:5, Informative)
Perhaps instead they should photo-shop him into the pictures of the child prostitutes for which his country is infamous (not X-rated would get the most press, just standing among the lineups, and next to the AIDS ridden ones who are dying would be appropriate). Maybe his loving subjects might reconsider selling their daughters into a life of misery.
posted AC as I am a coward, more reading on the king and Thailand [speroforum.com]
right... (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://newsbyte.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Monday June 06 2005, @10:46AM)
In fact, it has nothing to do with it.
Re:"loved by all" (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://kagazburj.wordpress.com/ | Last Journal: Saturday May 27 2006, @05:27AM)
Americans (and Brits, I would presume) might not readily understand this, given that their political space is mostly a circus, but what the Thai king gets is not just love, but respect. He kinda embodies their culture and their identity; they even use a different dialect when addressing the royal family. Heck, the grandfather of the current king, Rama V, is actually venerated as a demi-god; he regularly makes an appearance in most Thai families' prayer rooms, next to Buddha and other gods. This, in turn, is a throwback to the old tradition of treating the king as a devaraja [wikipedia.org].
Those laws, then, exist not to enforce a single person's ego, but as a way to warn us barangs to not overstep on to the things that the Thais respect.
The king has no policy oversight on anything in Thailand, and hasn't had for decades now. Quite a red-herring to conflate other issues with that of free-speech.
(Not to say I actually support the laws - censorship in any form is bad - but it's important to understand the historical and cultural context within which they exist.)
Royal Family (Score:5, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/~nurb432/ | Last Journal: Friday August 27 2004, @03:24PM)
Now, sue me. Just try it. In *my* country i can say this, so go away.
Re:Well, (Score:5, Informative)
(http://bgcommonsense.blogspot.com/)
Re:Well, (Score:5, Insightful)
a. Do the right thing and denounce the law as unfair and unjust, telling your supporters not to be so overzealous, or
b. Silently accept the law, and reap the benefits of being able to "forgive" people for insulting you by pardoning them. Fools think you're a hero for being so generous.
Robbing someone of 15 years of their life and then giving it back isn't generous, it's cruelty. The people are foolish enough to support it, and the king does nothing about it.
Re:Royal Family (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Tuesday February 06 2007, @09:13AM)
Universally adored? (Score:5, Insightful)
Or is he universally adored in Thailand because it's illegal not to?
(Damn, I wish I could have people thrown in prison for making fun of me on the Internet. Wow.)
Re:Universally adored? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Universally adored? (Score:5, Informative)
Or is he universally adored in Thailand because it's illegal not to?
I live in Thailand, and there's no doubting the King is genuinely universally adored. For example, to celebrate his 60th year on the throne the royal family asked people to wear yellow shirts (the royal colour) on Mondays. That was months ago, but still in Bangkok now every Monday at least 50% of the people you see about are voluntarily wearing yellow shirts with "We live the King" written in Thai on them. No one has a bad word to say about the King even in private, and just about every household has a picture of the King and Queen too.
There's no doubt in my mind the affection is genuine and not legally mandated (after all, the Crown Prince is protected by the same law but much less venerated), although to what extent it's caused by "brainwashing" and propaganda is somewhat arguable. After all, if you're only ever told how wonderful your King is and all the good things he's done for the country and never hear a word of criticism, then who wouldn't love him ?
(Damn, I wish I could have people thrown in prison for making fun of me on the Internet. Wow.)
Interestingly, the King himself actually told people him and his ideas shouldn't be above criticism in one of his birthday speeches - though he's probably the only person in Thailand who could publically make such a statement! He also pardoned the Swiss guy jailed for lese majesty very quickly, so he doesn't seem to be the instigator to me.
As to why people put the videos on youtube, well who knows, but Thais I know who have seen the video are very angry about it - much more so about that than the fact that youtube is blocked. I've seen quite a few "boycott youtube" messages on Thai websites, so whatever else the failings of the junta government they do seem to be in touch with the feelings of the population on this issue, and they could have faced a bigger problem if they'd done nothing. It seems strange to me Google accommodate China's censorship and oppression but are unwilling to work with Thailand on this issue.
Personally I find the block very frustrating though, I didn't realise how often I went to youtube following some link or other before this!
Re:Universally adored? (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.legalresourcecentre.ca/)
China = $$$$$$$$$$$$$
Thailand = $
I think that basically explains it.
Applaud (Score:5, Funny)
(http://lpetr.org/ | Last Journal: Wednesday February 07 2007, @11:04AM)
Hrm... (Score:4, Funny)
Hrm...
Re:Hrm... (Score:5, Insightful)
No more Duke of Ears jokes, no more Hakenkreuz-Harry, no "why can't Camilla ride a horse" jokes... the world would be poorer
Re:Hrm... (Score:5, Informative)
(http://stylus-toolbox.sf.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday May 15, @11:50AM)
And this, my friends, is why we we have the 1st Amendment to the Constitution in the U.S.
Your lesson in American History and Civics brought to you today by the King of Thailand -- Universally Adored by Thais everywhere!
another proud American (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://shockandblog.com/blog)
Re:another proud American (Score:5, Funny)
"Unlike you, we have true free speech", the American says, "see, I could go right to the White House and shout, 'Reagan is an asshole' as much as I like, and they won't do anything to me!"
"Then we have free speech in the USSR as well", shrugs the Russian. "I can, too, go to the Red Square and shout 'Reagan is an asshole' as much as I like, and they won't do anything to me either".
Re:Hrm... (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://blog.parasight.de/)
A user on YouTube has created some commentary that has to be the most intelligent thing I've heard on the situation up until now:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnz7lwh0pCM [youtube.com]
Here we go again (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Friday May 18, @11:07AM)
In fact, since this story has come out in the open now, you are sure to see even more pictures of the king in all sorts of not-so-pleasant-for-him ways.
I guess they have to try until they learn....
Queue the viral news stories with funny pictures of the king in 3... 2... 1..
Re:Here we go again (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.exacttarget.com/)
Re:Here we go again (Score:5, Funny)
Like with 09 f9 11 02 9d 74 e3 5b d8 41 56 c5 63 56 88 c0 on his forehead...
rj
You tube should plead guilty! (Score:5, Funny)
(http://sackofcatfood.blogspot.com/)
Take that you abstract embodiment of an American corporational contract owned by another abstract entity also with no definite personification! It's off to the pokey!
Nice... (Score:3, Informative)
(Last Journal: Thursday April 10 2003, @03:01AM)
Why do I get the image (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://mysite.verizon.net/tkrotchko/)
No seriously...
Do people think Google officials should be sent to Thailand on extradition the way Australia sent alleged copyright criminals to the United States? Is this the same situation, or is it fundamentally different?
Re:Why do I get the image (Score:4, Funny)
Fundamentally different: this would involve extradition from America.
Um.... (Score:5, Insightful)
He is a KING. A KING. He should be able to deal with (oh horror) FEET!. I am aware of the cultural implications (I am friends with a few people from Thailand), but I expect people to be able to get over jackasses giving them the finger. I expect more of a guy who is a king.
The laws are lame. Tough shit Thailand.
Re:Um.... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://gmail.com/)
He's a king; if he can lead the country, surely he can withstand...FEET. I understand that feet are treated differently over there.... but well, if someone posted a picture of me next to a bare penis (or hell, even a BEAR penis), I don't think I'd be trying to sue them--it's the internet. Nobody cares.
Re:Um.... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Um.... (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Wednesday March 27 2002, @09:26PM)
I'm thinking that it's not the King who wants to sue, but some officials who feel insulted or wants to ingratiate themselves or whatever. Remember that Thailand is under military rule and the monarch is just the "head of state".
In fact, it was the king who pardoned the swiss man who defaced his portrait. For all we know the king doesn't give a hoot about this issue but it's not in his power to change the law or to keep people from trying to enforce it.
In any case, I don't think this will amount to anything. I think they just want their displeasure to be heard but they are fully aware that a lawsuit of this kind will not do a thing.
What goes around... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Protected by law?! (Score:5, Interesting)
Simple, Don't take the party plane near Thailand. (Score:3, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Friday January 12 2007, @12:24PM)
*ADVICE*
Next time you want real Thai food, go to the corner emigre's restaurant instead, yes I know it's so much fun to fill up the party plane and jet on over, but seriously, you'll get to enjoy your freedom...
*FUN FACT*
Did you know that the word Thai means "Freedom"?
OP, RTFA. (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.alphageek.com/)
Actual article title: "Thailand *to sue* YouTube over king clips"
First line in article: "We are *considering* taking legal action against the website," said Vissanu Meeyo, a spokesman for the information ministry."
Teeensy bit of difference, there.
Expression (Score:3, Insightful)
Maybe there is a relationship between this universal adoration and the tough laws that prevent Thais from expressing opinions to the contrary.
Re:Expression (Score:5, Informative)
I can answer that for you. He will tell you that King Rama IX brought democracy to Thailand, uses his vast wealth to help poor, rural parts of the country, and is just generally a great guy. He also has gone on record stating that the laws against criticizing the monarch are stupid, and often pardons those convicted of criticizing him.
And no, I am not Thai by any stretch of the imagination.
as the dmca number fiasco demonstrated (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://circletimessquare.com/)
i'm glad the thais love their king. but if they are secure in their love for their king, the existence of these videos won't mean anything to them. by freaking out at the existence of these videos, they only demonstrate insecurity on their part, and they cheapen and devalue their love for their king
same when deeply religious people freak out at some sort of sacriledge. with dignity and ignoring the sacriledge, they show the depth of their love, by turning into ravenous dogs, they only denigrate their faith, such as with devout muslims and pictures of muhammad, or devout catholics and depicitions of the virgin mary
if your faith or love is storng, idiots and childish pranks don't move you. if it does move you, it only shows your love or faith is cheap and shallow and insecure
I'll get this in (Score:4, Informative)
I'm a resident of Thailand, let's get that out of the way right now.
Firstly, all those who insist that the lese majeste laws are there because the majority of Thais would suddenly rise up and start doing what those without respect for anything would do are seriously disillusioned. And/or they've never traveled to Thailand. There's a deep reverence for the King here which arises from all that he has done. The fact that he has mostly remained out of politics has been a bonus, but the attention that he pays to his people weighs significantly in his favour. And the link that another poster put in that suggest that he had a personal dislike for Thaskin, and that is what forced him out of the country is laughable. As anyone who follows the politics knows, the situation had been brewing for quite some time. The fact that Thaskin was guilty of doing exactly what people hate Bush Inc for is conveniently either glossed over or omitted.
And to the inevitable "What do you expect from a country of pedophiles?" comments: There's absolutely nothing of the sort in your country?
Well, this will quietly eliminate the mocking. (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.chaingang.org/code/)
A) While the number aware of the