Slashdot Log In
RIAA Wants Student Deposed On School Day
Posted by
kdawson
on Thu Apr 19, 2007 10:05 AM
from the drop-everything-and-get-in-here dept.
from the drop-everything-and-get-in-here dept.
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "In a Houston, Texas, case, UMG v. Hightower, the RIAA has served a subpoena on the defendant's son, a high school student, on one day's notice, telling him to be at a lawyer's office at 9:00 a.m. the next day, a school day, for a deposition. The defendant's lawyer objected (PDF)."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Full
Abbreviated
Hidden
Loading ... Please wait.

Prays? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Funny)
oblivious, adjective: see FooAtWFU
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Interesting)
(Of course, the origin of the word curia is even earlier and during roman times simply meant a division of the people, then the term was applied to the people meeting as a body in order to make civil and judicial decisions. It is through the Catholic church that "curia" acquired its eclesiatical meaning.)
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Interesting)
i don't know about the 'bloody' part, but article 1 section 4 of the bill of 'rights' of the texas constitution states that people may not hold office if they don't "acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being".
the full text is:
"No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments, provided he acknowledge the existence of a Supreme Being."
my source is here [state.tx.us].
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Informative)
And while I'm not sure if that segment of the Texas con. has specifically been challeneged, but other states that have similar provisions have had them struck down unanimously by the USSC [Torcaso v. Watkins (1961)]. The Article VI language preventing religious tests or oaths for federal office was ruled to apply to the states.
Re:Prays? (Score:5, Interesting)
School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Interesting)
Why does the music industry feel it should tamper with the education of our minors just to placate some facile legal action?
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Insightful)
THEY want his deposition. Not the other way around.
Why should he suffer an inconvenience to suit their schedule?
In the same situation, if I had to lose a day's pay to humor the RIAA, I'd feel mightily pissed off. OTOH, I have very little doubt that some hungry young lawyer would work OT on the RIAA's dollar to take the deposition on Saturday or some weeknight.
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Insightful)
Because this is one of the RIAA file sharing lawsuits. Making people suffer is their primary objective. The greater inconvenience in the initial stages, the less likely someone will actually challenge them. This is the RIAA saying "We can make life miserable for you and your entire family, and it's completely legal. So cough up whatever amount of money _we_ think is fair, and we won't keep you dangling in legal hell for the next decade."
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Insightful)
BTDT.
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Informative)
Well special provisions are afforded to minors as opposed to adults. Also one of the objections was that the deposition would be during school hours. Certainly the plaintiff could have done it on a weekend or after school hours, but didn't do so.
Reading the motion, it appears that the subpoena was done in a very sloppy manner which explains the short notice. It appears that the plaintiff tried to email the subpoena (not legal from what I recall) and to the wrong attorney at first. The plaintiff finally sent a subpoena to the defendants home with less than 24 hours. Now, if it is true that the plaintiff's attorney failed to deliver a subpoena in a timely manner, they should have moved back the deposition to accomodate. It appears that they didn't do that either.
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:School Day == Work Day? (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, it's not just any school day they picked. It's TAKS testing day - a statewide test in Texas that has to be passed to graduate from high school. They picked one of the worst possible days of the year to compel him to show up. They are either evil or ignorant, in my opinion.
Go figure. (Score:5, Insightful)
Someone needs to start doing something about RIAA's boundaries and arrogance, considering they're getting so careless with who they're attacking nowadays. How long will it be, before Judges and courtrooms are sick of these petty charges, and start only allowing the larger criminals who actually sell and distribute?
Right now, you're paying less when distributing marijuana or posessing cocaine, than you are to host MP3's.. EVEN if you're a child!
There HAS to be a line drawn somewhere.
Why would they need a deposition anyway? (Score:5, Insightful)
Since he would not be facing a policeman but the opposition lawyer, can he simply walk away anytime he wants or refuse to sign anything?
TAKS Test (Score:5, Informative)
RIAA's fishing expedition (Score:5, Insightful)
The subpoena is being used for patently improper purpose, namely as a fishing expedition by plaintiffs'
That sums up the RIAA's entire strategy.
School's wasted on the kid anyway (Score:5, Funny)
They're doing him a favor. Really.
It's intentional (Score:5, Interesting)
Response: (Score:5, Insightful)
Serving a notice for a sworn deposition on one day's notice is contrary to the rules of professional conduct, and can (and should) result in penalties against the lawyers' clients in court, as well as with with the lawyer regulatory disciplinary authority.
Re:Just say no? (Score:5, Informative)
I may not be a lawyer, but I know this to be false. Don't give the RIAA any more power of fear than they already enjoy. Deponents can object, if a witness refuses the moving party can ask for a motion to compel, there are lots of rememdies other than automatically losing. The biggest problem isn't that the kid is going to miss school, its that they are attempting to take his deposition with only 24 hours notice. In my experience as a paralegal, again- IANAL, that is simply poor if not abusive practice.