Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

US Group Wants Canada Blacklisted Over Piracy

Posted by samzenpus on Wed Feb 14, 2007 06:50 PM
from the are-you-on-the-list dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Following up on an earlier story, the IIAA wants to add Canada to a blacklist of the worst intellectual property offenders. A powerful coalition of U.S. software, movie and music producers is urging the Bush administration to put Canada on an infamous blacklist of intellectual property villains, alongside China, Russia and Belize. 'Canada's chronic failure to modernize its copyright regime has made it a global hub for bootleg movies, pirated software and tiny microchips that allow video-game users to bypass copyright protections', the International Intellectual Property Alliance complains in a submission to the U.S. government."

Related Stories

[+] Canada Responsible for 50% of Movie Piracy 459 comments
westcoaster004 writes "Hollywood is blaming Canada as being the source for at least 50% of of the world's pirated movies. According to an investigation by Twentieth Century Fox, most of the recording is taking place in Montreal theatres where films are released in both English and French. This has led to consideration of delaying movie releases in Canada. Their problem is that the Canadian Copyright Act, as well as the policies of local police forces, makes it difficult to come down especially hard on perpetrators. Convicting someone is apparently rather difficult, almost requiring a law officer to have a 'smoking camcorder' in the hands of the accused. Hence, the consideration of more drastic measures."
[+] Putting Canadian Piracy in Perspective 188 comments
An anonymous reader writes "Over the past year Slashdot has pointed to many industry claims and governmental pressure over Canada piracy issues. Canadian law prof Michael Geist has produced Putting Canadian 'Piracy' in Perspective, a video that demonstrates how the claims are hugely exaggerated. For example, it shows how despite the MPAA's claim of movie piracy, Canada was the industry's fastest growing market last year. Similarly, while the recording industry says Canada is the world's top P2P country, the data shows that the Canadian music industry is experiencing record gains and that most of the decline from the major labels is due to retail pricing pressures."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

US Group Wants Canada Blacklisted Over Piracy 50 Comments More | Login /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Keybindings Beta
Q W E
A S D
Loading ... Please wait.
  • tiny microchips (Score:5, Funny)

    by QuantumG (50515) * <qg@biodome.org> on Wednesday February 14 2007, @06:51PM (#18018162) Homepage Journal
    As opposed to those huge microchips you get from Intel.
  • Cue the music (Score:5, Funny)

    by esampson (223745) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @06:52PM (#18018172) Homepage
    Oh, sure.
     

    Blame Canada

    • Re:Cue the music (Score:5, Insightful)

      by antarctican (301636) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:01PM (#18018256) Homepage
      I just fail to understand why we should care (from a Canadian point of view). Why should we let the Americans control our internal policy?

      I'm offended and frankly would be extremely angry if Canada bowed to this pressure.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Cue the music (Score:5, Informative)

        by Telvin_3d (855514) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:25PM (#18018540)
        Well then, make sure your MP knows that you do not support the actions of the current heritage minister Bev Oda. As the person who sets policy for copyright in Canada she has been cught accepting large sums of money ('campaign funding') from American entertainment companies. At the same time, she has refused to meet with almost any groups who represent actual Canadaian artists. Michael Geist has some great reporting on the issue. Check out http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1564/ [michaelgeist.ca] and http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1529/ [michaelgeist.ca] to start, but there is much more there.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Cue the music (Score:5, Informative)

          by Hemogoblin (982564) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @10:12PM (#18019816)
          Dr. Geist has a blog entry on the IIPA report here [michaelgeist.ca].

          Heres a good bit: "The U.S. approach is quite clearly one of "do what I say, not what I do" (fair use is good for the U.S., but no one else), advising country after country that it does not meet international TPM standards (perhaps it is the U.S. that is not meeting emerging international standards), and criticizing national attempts to improve education or culture through exceptions or funding programs. Moreover, it is very clear that the U.S. lobby groups are never satisfied as even those countries that have ratified the WIPO treaties or entered into detailed free trade agreements with the U.S. that include IP provisions still find themselves criticized for not doing enough.

          Canadians should not be deceived into thinking that our laws are failing to meet an international standard, no matter what U.S. lobby groups or the Globe and Mail say. Rather, Canadians should know that our approach - and the criticism that it inevitably brings from the U.S. - places us in very good company.
          "
          [ Parent ]
              • Re:Cue the music (Score:5, Insightful)

                by ShieldW0lf (601553) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @11:31PM (#18020260) Journal
                It wasn't that long ago people would have thought you were crazy if you suggested Canada would make more money not selling cattle to the US.

                Now we have meat packing plants of our own, and we can sell frozen steak internationally with all the associated markup.

                Why the hell are we selling our oil?
                [ Parent ]
      • Re:Cue the music (Score:5, Insightful)

        by narrowhouse (1949) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:27PM (#18018568) Homepage
        Really that is exactly the point, some industries would like as many countries as possible to have almost identical copyright and patent policies. Lately those industries have had the most luck influencing U.S. law so they have decided to make those laws the template. It isn't the "Americans" that are pushing this, it is a collection of huge corporations that are trying to keep from having to fight the same court battles over and over. If they can convince the U.S. government to pressure other countries to bring their laws "in line" with the U.S. laws they make their own lives a lot easier. If Canada keeps it's own laws it will be a force these industries have to deal with directly, if Canada bows to pressure they fade into the background, another "me too" country they never have to work with. Australia should think about that too.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Cue the music (Score:5, Insightful)

          by ScrewMaster (602015) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:36PM (#18018656)
          More to the point from my perspective as an American, most of the companies involved in this are not American, or even based in the United States. Personally, the very idea of our political leaders accepting bribes^H^H^H^H^H^Hcompaign contributions from foreign interests in exchange for modifications to our legal system smacks of high treason. Of course, that doesn't make this any less the responsibility of the citizenry of this country to fix ... as soon as we figure out how. Voting doesn't seem to work so well anymore.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Cue the music (Score:5, Insightful)

            by ScrewMaster (602015) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @11:03PM (#18020086)
            Do they hate America, do they hate that for which America has traditionally stood, or do they just hate George W. Bush and his cronies? Just in case it's news to you, a lot of us Americans aren't all that enamored of GWB and Co.

            In any event, saying "we hate America" means you're doing one awful lot of hating. I've known some Australians that were complete jackasses as well ... but I don't say "I hate Australia". I just express distaste for those particular idiots.
            [ Parent ]
          • Re:Cue the music (Score:5, Funny)

            by Robber Baron (112304) on Thursday February 15 2007, @01:14AM (#18020752) Homepage

            John Howard is so far up Bush's ass he wont be able to taste anything but shit till his 80'th birthday
            Actually no, it should be "he's so far up Bush's ass he can see Tony Blair's feet".
            [ Parent ]
      • Re:Cue the music (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Jerry (6400) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @09:33PM (#18019582)
        And more to the point: Why does the American government allow corporations to dictate foreign policy?

        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Cue the music (Score:5, Insightful)

          by Tablizer (95088) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @11:20PM (#18020190) Homepage Journal
          Why does the American government allow corporations to dictate foreign policy?

          1. Because they can.

          2. Because they can buy the best lobbyists.

          3. Because voters who don't pay attention let them.
           
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:Cue the music (Score:5, Informative)

          by xsbellx (94649) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @08:06PM (#18018904) Homepage
          Then maybe you would like to explain the US totally ignoring softwood lumber rulings from WTO. When will you Americans learn you cannot have it both ways.
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:Cue the music (Score:5, Insightful)

          by ceoyoyo (59147) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @08:18PM (#18019034)
          Except that it's not a random group, it's a powerful copyright lobby that has a history of getting exactly what they want.

          Not to mention the US government (which is even less of a random group) has already pressured several other countries into changing their copyright laws and has been hard at work on Canada for some time already.
          [ Parent ]
    • Re:Cue the music (Score:5, Interesting)

      by kfg (145172) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:19PM (#18018488)
      The funny part is that until the 1970s it was the US that was the "rogue" nation on the international blacklist (and even had the gall to be proud of it), because it still held somewhat to the quaint ideas delineated in the Bill of Rights which are antithetical to a "guild" system of intellectual property.

      Europe is the crucible from which "modern" (it's really fuedal, thus old fashioned, but what the hell. Nobody remembers anything before last Thursday anyway) copyright law was cast, but it's the converts that are almost always the biggest PITA fanatics; especially if there's money and power in it for them.

      KFG
      [ Parent ]
  • Tough choice (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Dorceon (928997) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @06:55PM (#18018200)
    1. Copyright Law
    2. Business Model
    Modernize one.
    • Re:Tough choice (Score:5, Insightful)

      by antarctican (301636) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:06PM (#18018324) Homepage
      Indeed. I fail to see how outlawing fair use and dual-use pieces of technology is "modernization."
      [ Parent ]
    • Actually, that would be not too bad. (Score:5, Interesting)

      by alexandreracine (859693) <alexandreracine@gmail.com> on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:10PM (#18018378) Homepage Journal
      Let's say Canada is on the black list. Then all countries on the black list would only do business togeter and not with the US anymore. Would the US make that mistake? Stoping billions in profits just for some millions lost? That would be so funny (MPAA, etc, shooting themself in the foot). But that would proove a point. When Canada and all others would be on the list, and music and movies would still be on the net, it is at that time, that the shooting in the foot would begin.
      [ Parent ]
  • They are part of *that* lot. (Score:5, Funny)

    by stimpleton (732392) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @06:56PM (#18018204)
    A friend and I have discussed whether Canada is part of the Axis of Evil.

    We concurred Yes. And reading this article just confirmed it, eh?
  • The release is backwards (Score:5, Insightful)

    by davmoo (63521) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @06:57PM (#18018216)
    Apparently the editors of that press release got it backwards...its the US that has a "copyright regime". What they meant to say was Canada has "realistic and fair copyright laws, and we cannot accept that".
  • I speak for all Canadians... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by abscissa (136568) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @06:58PM (#18018226)
    ... and all other people of the world, when I say that we just LOVE having Americans try to police us and control our affairs!
  • OH NOS!!! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Frogbert (589961) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @06:58PM (#18018228)
    Don't put us on your list! Whatever will we do if you put our countries name on a list? I mean I might fly to another country and the people there could say "Hey! That guys country is on a LIST! Kill him!"

    It could, and probably will, happen.
  • Where's David Wilkins Now??? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by rainman_bc (735332) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:01PM (#18018260)
    David Wilkins ( US Ambassador to Canada), who states that Canada doesn't dictate US policy should now go put his head back in his ass. Read about Maher Arar and the ass hattery that came out of David Wilkins mouth.

    If Canada doesn't dictate US policy, so too should the US not concern themselves with Canadian policies.
  • My Favorite quote (Score:5, Interesting)

    by grasshoppa (657393) <{gro.oc-onpt} {ta} {ydenneks}> on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:02PM (#18018278) Homepage
    "The problem of unauthorized camcording of films in Canadian theatres is now nearing crisis levels," the group complained.

    Crisis levels? People are dying?

    No, it's a fucking camcorder recording of a hollywood movie. All the bad things about watching the movie in the theator in the privacy of your own home.

    If this is really a problem, it's because the movies suck and early word getting out about how bad the movie is is hurting sales. Simple solution to that; Stop making crap movies.
    • Re:My Favorite quote (Score:5, Interesting)

      by TFloore (27278) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @11:59PM (#18020406)
      a fucking camcorder recording of a hollywood movie

      There's a missing note of hilarity here. Let me modify your statement slightly so you'll see it.

      a fucking camcorder recording of a hollywood movie that was filmed in Canada because it is cheaper there

      Are you laughing now? The US is exporting IP-related jobs to a country it claims doesn't respect IP.

      Personally, I think that's a great joke.
      [ Parent ]
  • by whitehatlurker (867714) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:05PM (#18018312) Journal
    FTFA:

    The problem of unauthorized camcording of films in Canadian theatres is now nearing crisis levels

    What is a "crisis level" for camcorders in movie theatres? Is that where the people behind you start attacking you for using a camera that makes too much noise (or gives off too much light, or what)?

    Nonetheless, if this sanction was imposed, Canada could retaliate by putting the Yanks on the list of countries to whom they won't export oil or uranium. Then the Americans would have to nicer to Chavez ... (This won't happen. By "this" I mean Canada blocking energy exports. The Canadians put up with a lot.)

  • Piracy is a problem with video games? (Score:5, Informative)

    by tomstdenis (446163) <`moc.liamg' `ta' `sinedtsmot'> on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:06PM (#18018330) Homepage
    You mean the industry that rakes in more than the movie and music industries ... COMBINED?

    You mean the one that rakes in more and more profits each year?

    Yeah, piracy is just SUCH a problem, crippling that industry...

    And Canada doesn't need any new policy since it's already a civil offence to violate the copyright of another.

  • Height of ignorance & arogance (Score:5, Insightful)

    by UnknownSoldier (67820) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:06PM (#18018332)
    "failure to modernize its copyright regime" ??

    Canada's copyright system is MORE modern then the US. Common sense tells us that there is no difference "If I loan a CD to a friend to listen to", or "make a copy for him to listen to." I guess we should ban libraries too since the artist is not getting "his fair share."

    Copyright & Intellectual Property Rights (which are neither property nor rights) are artificial rights from a world where only people care about greed, instead of sharing knowledge.

    What price do you put on a patent that could cure cancer? Why is it OK to profit off the sick & dying? Have we really made that little progress in the past million years, that we still cry & whine like a 2 year saying "mine" -- simply because we were the first to come up with an idea, that we could care less about our fellow human beings??

    Copyright: Because it's _such_ a crime against humanity, that people want to share what they find entertaining with others, for free!

    --
    Because its easier to get mod'd down for having the courage to look at the facts, then ignore Forgotten Christian History [peopleofhonoronly.com].
        • I own the CD, I own the blank CD, I own the burner, it's in my house, what I do with my property on my property - including giving the burned CD to a friend - is my business.
          Unfortunately, Canadian copyright law disagrees. Copying and distributing is infringement. However, if you lend your friend your CD and they make a copy of it and return your CD, THAT is fully legal under Canadian law. Anyone in possession of the IP can make as many personal copies as they want. They just can't distribute copies. To me, that makes a LOT of sense. Similarly, making a copy of a movie in a theatre should be legal; distributing the copy shouldn't be. Modifying a game console in your possession should be legal; I'm not sure about distributing modified consoles, as they shouldn't fall under copyright law, but appear to in some instances. Same with direct satellite.
          [ Parent ]
  • Let's go over this slowly (Score:5, Interesting)

    by rumblin'rabbit (711865) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:09PM (#18018362) Journal
    So they want Bush to blacklist Canada, their biggest trading partner (last I heard), their NATO ally, whose troops are now fighting in Afghanistan against the Taliban, possessor of the second largest petroleum reserves in the world, and whose government is one of the very few who are not overtly hostile to the Bush administration?


    Over video games?

    Cool.

      • Re:Let's go over this slowly (Score:5, Funny)

        by rumblin'rabbit (711865) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:40PM (#18018688) Journal
        Inuit, not eskimos, you insensitive clod.

        Do we refer to African-Americans as "negroes"? Or Microsoft as "scum-sucking patent-hoarding competition-crushing market-manipulating idea-stealing monopolistic capitalistic bastard offspring of leprous apes"?

        Okay, bad example.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Let's go over this slowly (Score:5, Insightful)

          by ceoyoyo (59147) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @08:06PM (#18018912)
          Our "friendship" with the US is often cited as a reason why we should put up with a lot of things not the least of which was going to fight in Afghanistan. It's probably second only to the excuse "but they're our biggest trading partner!" When a foreign country is such an important trading partner that it's used as an excuse for letting them meddle in your internal affairs that says to me that it's time to find some new trading partners.

          Sure, we shouldn't stop sending you guys oil, but we should definitely be looking to sell more of it (along with other things) to places other than the US. They've proven over and over that they can't be trusted not to abuse their position as primary trade partner.
          [ Parent ]
  • treaty obligations? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by j1m+5n0w (749199) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:14PM (#18018420) Homepage Journal
    It would be interesting to know just what Canada's obligations are under the Berne convention [wikipedia.org] or any other IP treaties they may have signed. Is this just a bunch of large corporations whining that the rights they think they ought to have aren't universally recognized, or is Canada actually breaking a treaty obligation? Or is the Berne convention sufficiently vague that both sides can plausibly believe they are right? What if a country doesn't want to participate in the Berne convention or trips [wikipedia.org] anymore? (The US didn't sign on until 1989, now we're trying to force our IP laws on everyone else.)
  • by Kjella (173770) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:15PM (#18018444) Homepage
    ...but I don't know where to start, by size or notority.

    SE Asia is pretty much one big pool of piracy all around.
    China is a huge one, they don't seem to care about IP at all.
    Ukraine seems to be the most fucked up of the former Soviets.
    Russia isn't far behind, with allofmp3 and all.
    All the remaining ex-Soviet states are notorious too.
    East europe in general has a long track record of piracy.
    West europe got the fastest lines and places like The Pirate Bay.
    South America is quite rampant too, last I checked.
    Australia banned the region coding crap, didn't they?

    Anyone know if the Middle East and Africa qualifies? Haven't heard much but I bet they do. Now they want to add Canada to this "exclusive" list? I have a much simpler proposition: Take the list of countries. Remove US and maybe their pet dog, UK. The remainder is their list of copyright villains.
  • I can see this as only good. (Score:5, Funny)

    by Lordpidey (942444) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:17PM (#18018470) Homepage
    By allowing pirates within their shores, Canada is surely helping alleviate global warming. I thank them.
  • I think (Score:5, Insightful)

    by AlphaLop (930759) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:20PM (#18018500)
    As an American Citizen I really hope Canada Man's up and tells the USA to go screw itself. America needs to worry more about the problems we have at home and less on other countries internal politics when they are not a threat to the U.S.'s safety.

    To the best of my knowledge, copyright infringement going on in other countries in no way affects our safety (besides the weak "it funds terrorists" argument that seems to be the defacto excuse for everything around here anymore).

    The only people that would benefit from the massive expense and sacrifice of civil liberty that would be necessary to enact such a stupid idea would be the media fat cats..... And they can go and (insert witty thing here) themselves for all I care.

  • Michael Geist (Score:5, Interesting)

    by alexandre (53) * on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:26PM (#18018556) Homepage Journal
    Take a look at Michael Geist [michaelgeist.ca]'s blog... he's the Lawrence Lessig of Canada.

    This message proudly paid by a Montreal Pirate! (whatever that means ;)
  • Oh Put A Sock In It (Score:5, Informative)

    by The Real Nem (793299) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:34PM (#18018628) Homepage

    The last article was completely overblown, and this is even worse.

    Once put on notice, failure to address U.S. concerns could result in trade challenges at the World Trade Organization, plus possible sanctions.

    Need I even go into the many ways the US has violated [www.cbc.ca] our free trade agreement. How are different copyright laws even a violation?

    ...and tiny microchips that allow video-game users to bypass copyright protections...

    Maybe because the copyright protections violate our basic copyright freedoms? There's no DMCA here.

    The industry paints a grim picture of Canada as a country where copyright pirates operate with impunity because of lax laws, poor enforcement and a laissez-faire attitude.

    In case you haven't noticed, we're lax in all areas of law. How has incarceration [wikipedia.org] helped to reduce US crime rates [fbi.gov]? Why should copyright violation be a criminal offense? The last article was even so bold to say:

    Frith says government bureaucrats try to placate him by saying that under the Copyright Act exhibitors have the ability to charge someone criminally. "But here's the catch. Under the Copyright Act, you have to prove that an individual camcording in the theatre is doing it for distribution purposes. That's almost impossible."

    So camcording is a criminal offense, you just have to, shock, prove your case rather than assume guilt. I guess this article is *technically* right when it says:

    Unlike in the United States and most other developed countries, videotaping movies in theatres is not illegal in Canada.

    What else did they complain about proving?

    We don't want to have to prove the economic loss from distribution. We want it to be a Criminal Code activity to be caught camcording. Period.

    Is that 15th century thinking I hear? Are they going to blacklist every liberal country?

    "Highly organized international-crime groups have rushed into the gap left by Canada's outmoded copyright law and now use the country as a springboard from which to undermine legitimate markets in the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and elsewhere," the group said.

    Please, the UK and Australia wouldn't even have these type of laws if the US and *AA and friends hadn't strong armed them into it. Are these the only shinning examples they can find?

  • by Cordath (581672) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:37PM (#18018668)
    Blacklisting Canada... What an excellent idea!

    Let's say that the U.S. delayed the release of all films in Canada by several months, as they have already threatened to do. Suddenly, film release dates in Canada would no longer coincide with the hype in American media. Canadian consumers would have to endure months of temptation to download industry-insider-provided rips of screeners (not crappy camcorder copies) before films finally come out in Canada. That would certainly hurt good films, but those one-weekend-wonder stinkers that are massively promoted (and never shown to critics in advance) would flop bigtime in a fore-warned Canada. Overall, that's a lot fewer movie tickets sold. Who's going to pick up the slack? Maybe, just maybe, local Canadian film-makers. Quebec actually has a pretty good cinema going but English Canada has bugger all thanks to the abundance of american media. Anything that reduces the market share of american cinema is likely to cause a boom in Canadian film. Yes, american TV shows filming on the cheap in Canada might finally have a little competition for local talent, but who cares?

    Market controls on foreign content in a nation's cinema have been shown to improve that nation's cinema. Just look at French cinema since WWII. Their government required that a certain percentage of films shown in French cinemas had to be French. U.S. production companies were financing cheap films just to boost the overall French market so they could release more films in France! Canada considered implementing similar legislation, but failed to do so, much to the detriment of our own nation's cinema. Canada's cinema could certainly benefit from market controls today, but implementing them would be political suicide for any who dared. The U.S. would cry foul over protectionism and Canadians used to american films would be very peeved about not being able to get their fix. However, if the kind americans were to do this for us...

    This really is a win-win situation for Canada. The worst the U.S. can do to Canada is the best possible thing for Canada's cinema and the worst possible thing for american film makers. So *PLEASE* blacklist us. Pretty please! I freakin' double dare ya! Heck, BAN the release of american movies in Canada indefinately!
  • by wrook (134116) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:47PM (#18018746) Homepage
    I'd like to see what the reaction would be. It might surprise many Americans, but there is a fair amount of anti-american sentiment here north of the 49. I know we seem friendly and all, but really we're just polite. (Note: I like American's just fine... well all the ones that aren't the president... and a few others...)

    I believe all this "Canadians are dirty rotten thieves" stuff the "IP proponents" are pulling is due to the fact that the current government is working on revising our copyright law. I suspect that they are trying to pressure the Canadian government into getting their way.

    It might even be at the behest of the government who seems to be intent on listening to only one side (guess who?). The Conservatives campaigned partially on "repairing the damage that the liberals did to US - Canada relations" (not that most Americans pay much attention to Canada anyway...) The copyright reforms are likely to be very unpopular no matter what's in them. If they say, "Oh we need to crack down to keep our relations happy with the Americans", maybe they think that will smooth things over.

    If that's the case, I think they are terribly misguided. Canadians have always had a low tolerance to being stepped on by the elephant that is the US. We have a chip on our shoulders. In fact, one of the defining principles of being a Canadian is that "We aren't American". For some people, that's their only definition of being Canadian.

    Pressure from the US to do *anything* to our laws will likely doom that idea, whether it be good or bad. Hence it would be nice to see what happens if the above characterization would be on the front page of the local newspapers...
  • Time to fight back (Score:5, Funny)

    by G1975a (913602) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @08:07PM (#18018922)
    How's aboot we withold Canadian bacon, maple syrup and cheap pharmacy drugs from Americans?
    • Re:in other words (Score:5, Insightful)

      by grcumb (781340) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:10PM (#18018372) Homepage

      'Canada's chronic failure to modernize its copyright regime has made it a global hub for bootleg movies, pirated software and tiny microchips that allow video-game users to bypass copyright protections'

      Translation: "We have a stranglehold on the music and movie industries, we want control over video game consoles, as well."

      No, a better translation would be:

      The Conservative government needs a stick to shake at the Canadian public in order to cow them into accepting a digital media market that is more conducive to the desires of their corporate master. Conveniently, the media associations and their government cronies are happy to provide one.

      [ Parent ]
    • by Jon.Laslow (809215) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:38PM (#18018676)
      I live in BC, the pot capital of North America, and all I can say is the only Chronic failure that I ever see is when someone tries to light up and either their out of Butane or didn't roll properly. Then again...

      (catchpa: underway)
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:As a Canadian to Bush (Score:5, Insightful)

      by alienmole (15522) on Wednesday February 14 2007, @07:59PM (#18018844)

      Canada should put the USA on some kind of a rogue counties list , for terrorism, meddling in the internal affairs of other countries, being way too fat and making crappy movies.
      Actually, quite seriously, this is the way to go. The grievances we all hear that other countries have with the U.S. are often raised, but never to a level at which the U.S. government really has to answer to them or think about them. The U.S. people have failed to keep its government in check, it's up to the rest of the first world (and perhaps other countries) to step up and help do so.
      [ Parent ]