Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

China - We Don't Censor the Internet

Posted by Zonk on Tue Oct 31, 2006 01:05 PM
from the alternate-reality-china dept.
kaufmanmoore writes "A Chinese government official at a United Nations summit in Athens on internet governance has claimed that no Net censorship exists at all in China. The article includes an exchange by a Chinese government official and a BBC reporter over the blocking of the BBC in China." From the article: "I don't think we should be using different standards to judge China. In China, we don't have software blocking Internet sites. Sometimes we have trouble accessing them. But that's a different problem. I know that some colleagues listen to the BBC in their offices from the Webcast. And I've heard people say that the BBC is not available in China or that it's blocked. I'm sure I don't know why people say this kind of thing. We do not have restrictions at all."
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Online Media Representatives Face Jail 27 comments
OSDNBoss writes "According to the US Watchdog Committee to Protect Journalists a total of 134 journalists were in jail on December 1, 49 of which were Internet journalists. China leads the way with the highest number in jail. I'm sure the censors have already blocked Slashdot and other news and opinion sites in the countries mentioned. It begs the question, however, as the blogosphere grows are online journalists and editors more or less protected than their print and TV counterparts?" From the article: "China is challenging the notion that the Internet is impossible to control or censor, and if it succeeds there will be far-ranging implications, not only for the medium but for press freedom all over the world."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • the audience? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by victorl19 (879236) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:07PM (#16659957)
    Despite the fact that many outside of China know that it indeed does exist, this piece of news is more likely intended for those within China.
    • Thank you, China. Because every day, when I get up and read the U.S. news, and think "goddamn, our country is going into the toilet," all I have to do is turn to the International section to realize that it could always be worse.

      • by Firehed (942385) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @02:25PM (#16661499) Homepage
        The best can still suck, and I think we've long since lost that title (assuming anyone outside the country ever thought we had it). It's rather stupid to think how much worse we could have things because it results in us thinking that we have it so great - it just lowers the standard. Think of how much better we could have things and *raise* the standard we're looking to achieve.
        • by justasecond (789358) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @03:08PM (#16662319)
          "China has a political situation much the same as that in the U.S.". What a load of relativistic crap!

          Are you saying that the U.S. has forced abortions, political executions (with the executee's family being billed for the fucking bullet), wholesale cultural genocide (Do you know the chinese are hauling ethnic chinese by the trainload into tibet to overrun the place? Look up "tibetan spaniel" sometime to see how the fucking chinese have clubbed to death the entire population of tibet's beautiful native dogs), wholesale censorship of the press and Internet, massive "reeducation" (read: concentration) camps, support for mass-murderer dictators (Pol Pot, "Our Dear Leader", etc.).

          Why don't you grow up, pull your head out of your ass and stop spouting "bush=hitler" puke. If you weren't such a skull-full-of-mush parrot for the bullshit your teachers fed you you'd understand that, while the USA is not doing so great now (bush *is* dangerous), there's much worse to be found out there in the rest of the world.
    • by ackthpt (218170) * on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:25PM (#16660341) Homepage Journal

      Despite the fact that many outside of China know that it indeed does exist, this piece of news is more likely intended for those within China.

      No kidding. I've met people recently from China and they don't know where we all get off on these things. They claim there are any number of small newspapers and such all over the place. They also think we tend to make a bigger deal of things than we ought and their country is just fine thank you very much.

      Of course, if you grew up never knowing otherwise or thinking outside the box someone has constructed around you, you may be so indoctrinated. Same way Brits appear indoctrinated that they must read in the Sun or News of the World what trollop David Beckham is frollicking around Spain with or Americans feel the overwhelming urge to tell others how they ought to live and behave.

      Those friends and colleagues listening to the BBC webcast, since we don't know otherwise, may be checking for new words or topics they need to add to their filters.

      However you shake it up, China is in for a bit of adjustment when the 2008 Olympics bring people from all over the world into China where they will be expecting access to news and media as they had at home. Perhaps China has already thought of this and is constructing exclusion zones...

      • Four Words (Score:4, Interesting)

        by Yvanhoe (564877) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:39PM (#16660593) Journal
        Tien Anmen Google Images
      • by steve_ellis (586756) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @02:12PM (#16661271) Homepage
        Based on my experience in hotels in China aimed at foreign tourists (so-called 5-star hotels--certified 5-star by the Chinese government), all of them appeared to have unfiltered internet access available. Since many of them are affiliated with big western hotel chains, I'm guessing they get their feeds from their corporate parent, although the government itself may provide unfiltered feeds to hotels targeted at foreigners. I observed this in several major cities (Beijing, Shanghai, Xian & Guangzhou). On the other hand, the great firewall is in place and working very nicely on residential dial-up, DSL, and in internet cafes (my nephew has at times had both dial-up and DSL service).
      • by juuri (7678) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @02:15PM (#16661327) Homepage
        After 9/11 I was dating a girl from the Mainland. She had been in the states for a few years and still had a really positive view of her homeland. One night we were watching one of the tributes to the heroes of that day (she was really into that stuff) and they showed a quick summary of history for the last 25 years. As it was going on they showed the protest in Tienamen square and the student confronting the tank and then being... well you know.

        She had never seen it.

        She had no idea that had ever happened.

        It's hard to put into words how sad she became and the rage that immediately followed towards her homeland. There's a lot governments are good at repressing things in most any country from public knowledge, but the ability to completely hide something from your people that the rest of the world knows about? That's just criminal.
  • Wow (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Facekhan (445017) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:08PM (#16659959)
    I think this guy has never had one of his lies pointed out in his face.
  • Hmmm (Score:5, Funny)

    by geoffspear (692508) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:08PM (#16659967) Homepage
    Well, if his high-ranking government official collegues are able to get an uncensored Internet feed, that must mean they don't have any censorship, right?
  • by the_skywise (189793) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:08PM (#16659971)
    Technically... in Chinese legalspeek(tm) he's probably right.

    It's not "censorship" it's "protection of the people from incorrect thoughts".
    • > Technically... in Chinese legalspeek(tm) he's probably right.
      >
      > It's not "censorship" it's "protection of the people from incorrect thoughts".

      I can buy that. My country's lawyers say it's not torture unless there's major organ failure or death.

      The USSR was the failed alpha release. The PRC is the live beta site.

  • no filters (Score:3, Insightful)

    by yakumo.unr (833476) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:13PM (#16660065) Homepage
    tiananmen square [slashdot.org] didn't happen either, why would we need such a thing as a filter. And no idea what google is talking about [slashdot.org] at all
  • by binaryspiral (784263) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:13PM (#16660089)
    "A Chinese government official at a United Nations summit in Athens on internet governance has claimed that no Net censorship exists at all in China.

    If truth was that easy.

    I'm a millionaire. I own a mansion and a yacht.
  • by Jonsey (593310) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:14PM (#16660095) Journal
    I think I've found Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf's [wikipedia.org] new job.

    Spin for one government is the same as a spin for another government, right?

    Trust The Computer, The Computer is your Friend. Happiness is Mandatory! (I'm dressed as a troubleshooter [wikipedia.org] this Halloween, but an Iraqi Information Minister would have worked as well)
  • by repvik (96666) <slashdot@kynisk.com> on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:14PM (#16660109)
    I think this:

    In China, we don't have software blocking Internet sites. Sometimes we have trouble accessing them. But that's a different problem.

    should've read:

    In China, we don't have software blocking Internet sites. Sometimes we have trouble accessing them. But that's because the hardware filters doesn't work most of the time.
  • O RLY? (Score:4, Informative)

    by focitrixilous P (690813) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:15PM (#16660119) Journal
    So, searching for any topic on google in china would give the same results, correct?

    US Image Search for Tiananmen Square [google.com]

    China Image Search for the same [google.cn]

    Who doesn't censor the internet, now?

    • Re:O RLY? (Score:4, Funny)

      by cdrudge (68377) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:18PM (#16660207) Homepage
      Well it's obvious that Google.cn just hasn't had the opportunity to index the entire internet. You know that the internet is a pretty big place and Google.cn is still fairly new. Give it 10-15 years and check again.
  • by Ancient_Hacker (751168) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:15PM (#16660131)
    Sometimes when you buy an old radio in Wisconsin, where lots of German immigrants settled, you'll find all the shortwave radio coils have been snipped out. In WW2 the govt censored SW reception by going into people's houses and doctoring their radios so they couldnt puick up far-away radio stations. Not one of the highpoints of the bill of rights.
      • by Ancient_Hacker (751168) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @02:54PM (#16662059)
        I found a source on Google News:

          I worked in a repair shop with some old timers during the early 80's. One day,
        a customer brought in a set that didn't work on the SW bands. The old-timer in
        the shop found a snipped coil and had the set fixed in a matter of minutes.

        I asked him how he found the problem so fast. He told me he had disabled the SW
        bands in that same set 40 years earlier! He further explained that all the
        repair shops had been under government directive to disable SW reception in any
        set brought in (by a foreign national) for repair. Our government apparently
        thought it could minimize espionage in this manner.

        In the following couple of years, I fixed no less than a dozen sets that had
        been disabled in the same manner. Several of those still had the "serviced by"
        sticker from the same shop on the back. And I have a few in my collection that
        have been fixed for the same ailment.

        Terry

  • by PoconoPCDoctor (912001) <jpclyons@gmail.com> on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:18PM (#16660201) Homepage Journal
    I think just using the CN in a google search must not be returning the same results, but there's no way for me to test this.

    For instance - plug in the term censorship in the same link that the AC used -

    http://www.google.cn/search?hl=zh-CN&q=censorship& btnG=%E6%90%9C%E7%B4%A2%E5%9B%BE%E7%89%87&ie=UTF-8 &oe=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=iw [google.cn]

    I saw links to Wiki with full articles on censorship in the ROC. Would this work if searched while located in Bejing or anywhere else in the ROC? My guess is no. Other hardware filters are in place.
  • by Phat_Tony (661117) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:25PM (#16660329) Homepage
    Just like Tibet has always been a part of China, but was momentarily mislead by the dangerous oppression of the Dalai Lama, until the people of Tibet rose up with the welcomed support of their Chinese brothers in a glorious revolution to overthrow their Buddhist oppressors and rejoin their traditional homeland.
  • by Lead Butthead (321013) on Tuesday October 31 2006, @01:37PM (#16660547)
    The PRoC government doesn't censor the internet. The private sector companies does it for them, "voluntary."