Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

The Ultimate Net Monitoring Tool?

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Wed May 17, 2006 01:22 PM
from the corporations-striving-to-be-big-brother dept.
Wired News is reporting that the equipment found in the "secret" NSA room at AT&T wasn't some elaborate device designed by Big Brother. Rather, it is a commercially available network-analysis product that any company could acquire. From the article: "'Anything that comes through (an IP network), we can record,' says Steve Bannerman, marketing vice president of Narus, a Mountain View, California, company. 'We can reconstruct all of their e-mails along with attachments, see what web pages they clicked on, we can reconstruct their VOIP calls.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Ultimate Net Monitoring Tool? | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 293 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Error Page (Score:3, Funny)

    by MyNymWasTaken (879908) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:25PM (#15352719)
    The error page of "Nothing to see here. Move Along." that showed up when first clicking on the comments link was hilarious.
    • Re:Error Page by Savantissimo (Score:2) Thursday May 18 2006, @07:38AM
    • Re:Error Page by takeya (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:44PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Oh well, (Score:4, Funny)

    At least it's running under Linux.

  • oh, in that case... (Score:5, Funny)

    by gEvil (beta) (945888) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:27PM (#15352733)
    (http://evil.google.com/)
    Oh. Well, since the NSA bought the software that it's using, then that makes everything okey with me... :-/
  • Encryption? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by cwalk (899502) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:28PM (#15352751)
    I somehow doubt that they are just using a "commercially available network-analysis product". I mean what "commercially available network-analysis product" breaks encryption?
  • Functional Spec and Deliverables (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Tackhead (54550) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:29PM (#15352756)
    From TFfunctional specification:
    The Semantic Traffic Analyzer received and transmitted simultaneously. Any sound that Winston made, above the level of a very low whisper, would be picked up by it; moreover, so long as he remained within the field of vision which the metal plaque commanded, he could be seen as well as heard. There was of course no way of knowing whether you were being watched at any given moment. How often, or on what system, the Thought Police plugged in on any individual wire was guesswork. It was conceivable that they watched everybody all the time. But at any rate they could plug in your wire whenever they wanted to. You had to live--did live, from habit that became instinct--in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized."

    Orwell, G. Functional Specification, Narus STA 6400 (rev. 1984)

    From TFA, the deliverable:

    We can reconstruct all of their e-mails along with attachments, see what web pages they clicked on, we can reconstruct their VOIP calls.

    AT&T. Your world, delivered.

  • Hm. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by DoctorDyna (828525) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:30PM (#15352771)
    (http://www.dr-dyna.net/)
    Does it make anybody else nervous that there is a market for these products? "off the shelf" products that can scale to this degree?

    If enough large companies are purchasing these to the degree that a company manufactures this equipment...exclusively.. doesn't that strike an interesting chord?

    • Re:Hm. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF (Score:3) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:44PM
    • Re:Hm. by jhines (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:45PM
      • Re:Hm. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:58PM
        • Re:Hm. by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF (Score:2) Thursday May 18 2006, @08:58AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Ancient News, and more news by btarval (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:20PM
    • Re:Hm. by hacker (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:49PM
      • Re:Hm. by geoffspear (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @09:17PM
    • Re:Hm. by YrWrstNtmr (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @06:00PM
    • Re:Hm. by DoctorDyna (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:54PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Time enough (Score:4, Insightful)

    'Anything that comes through (an IP network), we can record'

    Great! So, do you get the Amazing PauseTheUniverseTechnology free with this nifty gadget? Because it'll take some time to review "anything that comes through".

    • Re:Time enough (Score:5, Funny)

      by LilWolf (847434) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:46PM (#15352905)
      'Anything that comes through (an IP network), we can record'

      Not to worry. The RIAA will soon sue them for being able to record illegally downloaded songs. Problem solved.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Time enough (Score:5, Insightful)

        by TheRaven64 (641858) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:13PM (#15353138)
        (http://theravensnest.org/ | Last Journal: Sunday October 07, @07:05AM)
        Actually, this is an interesting point. If I send an email containing a copyright document (e.g. a draft of an article I have written, sent to my editor), and it passes over their connection, then they will copy it. This copying involves making an unauthorised copy of a copyrighted work. Since I live in the UK, my email is copyrighted in the UK, and the copyright works in the USA via the Berne convention. If a private company is violating this copyright then they owe me significant damages (thanks to certain paid-for legislation). If it is the US government, then they are in violation of the Berne convention. If the USA is violating the Berne convention, then we can regard all works originally copyrighted in the USA as being in the public domain in the rest of the world. Either way, it sounds like I win...
        [ Parent ]
    • Re:Time enough by Surt (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:16PM
    • Re:Time enough by pla (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:20PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • The evidence (Score:5, Informative)

    by op12 (830015) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:35PM (#15352806)
    (http://symbii.com/)
    Wired News has posted the AT&T whistleblower's evidence, which AT&T is trying to get returned to them and out of court documents: http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,70908-0.htm l?tw=wn_index_3 [wired.com]
  • One of the perks of living in Mt. View... by AriaStar (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:35PM
  • I'm so happy to know that the product the NSA - with the help of AT&T - used to analyze phone number patterns and the like can be purchased by any citizen.

    But - that's not the problem as I see it. The problem, to borrow and massacre a line from "Jurrasic Park", is that they were so eager to see if they could they didn't consider if they should.

    Take the domestic to international wiretap thing. Under US law, listening in on foreign conversations is A-OK (whether that's legal in other countries I'm not even going to worry about). But the law is clear: the second there's a domestic person on that call, the NSA has to get permission from the courts. And not only that, it can be a secret court. And not only a secret court, but they can do it up to 3 days after they start - so there's no issue of "Dang, we'd listen to this call from an Al Queda agent, but we can't because Michael Moore's on the phone, and the warrant will take too long!" No - they can start now, get the warrant later.

    Then there's the domestic phone call tracking. Even if this is not strictly illegal, it still smacks of wrong. (Yes, I think there are things not illegal that are still wrong. Like Mint Oreos. Very wrong, just not illegal.) Why? Because there's no independant, "checks and balances" oversight. And yes, I have things to hide, before you ask, so I don't want the government picking that out. Like people in politics I call because I disagree with their politicies, or calls to an abortion clinic for a friend of mine who's husband is abusive and says he'll kill her if she calls the clinic, or to a reporter because my place of work is doing illegal things (note for the clueless: the former might or might not be true, but they are examples of why people might not want the government tracking calls) - the list goes on. So I don't want the government snooping in on, especially when there's no guaruntee that Joe Politician can't look in and try and use that data against me or my family or the very government system itself.

    So, great to know that there are over the shelf components to track log files. I'm more interested in making sure that another branch of the government is at least watching out to make sure that this data is not being abused. No, I don't need all of the details - that's why we have elected leaders whom I (hopefully) trust enough to look out for my interests - I just want to make sure those interests are protected by the process.

    Which said process, so far, seems to be either willingly ignored, or outright violated.

    Of course, this is all just my opinion, and I could be wrong. And to the NSA folks tracking this post - Hi!
  • Err... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by cperciva (102828) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:35PM (#15352816)
    (http://www.daemonology.net/)
    the equipment found in the "secret" NSA room at AT&T wasn't some elaborate device designed by Big Brother. Rather, it is a commercially available network-analysis product that any company could acquire.

    Sure, anybody could acquire the hardware used. The trick is to get the equipment onto AT&T's network without ending up in jail.
    • Re:Err... by hacker (Score:3) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:40PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Tor (Score:4, Informative)

    by wpegden (931091) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:35PM (#15352817)
    This is why we should all use Tor [eff.org]. The more people that use it (and setup their node as a server) the faster it gets.
    • Re:Tor by Billosaur (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:30PM
      • Re:Tor by acaben (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:39PM
        • Re:Tor by CFrankBernard (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:25PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Tor (Score:4, Interesting)

      by republican gourd (879711) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:44PM (#15353404)
      (http://www.whatismyproxy.com/)
      Are there any estimate as to what percentage of the Tor (or Freenet, or etc etc) nodes are actually run by the Three-Letter-Agencies themselves? Considering that just about every nation has its own intelligence/security type agencies, thats easily a couple hundred nodes right there, probably on 'decent enough' links to get a decent share of traffic but not so fast as to attract suspicion.

      I remember reading about the Freenet Guy's planned changes (moving freenet to a friend-based system where you connect along lines of trust rather than completely anonymously, and immediately thought that the unstated goal was to cut *those* people out as much as possible rather (or in addition to) than the scalability reasons given.

      Hmm, better post this anonymously...
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Tor by adamshelley (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:59PM
        • Re:Tor by Sancho (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @05:50PM
        • Re:Tor by AnyoneEB (Score:2) Thursday May 18 2006, @04:40AM
      • Re:Tor by whitehatlurker (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:31PM
    • Tor Risks by finkployd (Score:3) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:45PM
      • Re:Tor Risks by mindtriggerz (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:26PM
        • Re:Tor Risks by finkployd (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:31PM
          • Re:Tor Risks by mindtriggerz (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:45PM
      • Re:Tor Risks by DragonWriter (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @04:25PM
        • Re:Tor Risks by finkployd (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @05:12PM
          • Re:Tor Risks by DragonWriter (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @06:35PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • These are the tools or databases (Score:5, Informative)

    by anandpur (303114) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:36PM (#15352820)
    From http://www.eff.org/legal/cases/att/faq.php#15 [eff.org]
    What is Daytona?
    Daytona is a database management technology originally developed and maintained by the AT&T Laboratories division of AT&T, and is used by AT&T to manage multiple databases. Daytona was designed to handle very large databases and is used to manage "Hawkeye," AT&T's call detail record (CDR) database. Daytona is also used to manage AT&T's huge network-security database, known as "Aurora." As of September 2005, all of the CDR data managed by Daytona, when uncompressed, totaled more than 312 terabytes.
    http://www.research.att.com/projects/daytona/ [att.com]

    What is Hawkeye?
    Hawkeye is AT&T's call detail record (CDR) database, which contains records of nearly every telephone communication carried over its domestic network since approximately 2001, records that include the originating and terminating phone numbers and the time and length for each call.

    What is Aurora?
    Aurora is a network-security database that had been used to store Internet traffic data since approximately 2003. The Aurora database contains huge amounts of data acquired by firewalls, routers, honeypots and other devices on AT&T's global IP (Internet Protocol) network and other networks connected to AT&T's network.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Yawn. (Score:3, Insightful)

    by BigMattyC (969603) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:36PM (#15352823)
    News: that the US Government is monitoring all the traffic flowing through the internet backbones provided by major US service providers. Not News(tm): that a company produces a device that can *GASP* *SHOCK* *HORROR* monitor network traffic. Get a grip.
    • Re:Yawn. by inKubus (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @04:36PM
    • Re:Yawn. by Julia Cameron (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @07:31PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Monitoring Users? Nawww. by 10100111001 (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:37PM
  • I am starting not to care anymore... by harshmanrob (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:40PM
  • reconstruct calls, as in 'listen to'? by 192939495969798999 (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:42PM
  • Why is this news? by dannyelfman (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:42PM
  • by i am kman (972584) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:44PM (#15352890)
    So, article starts with:

    The equipment that former AT&T technician Ed Klein learned was installed in the NSA "secret room" in AT&T's San Francisco switching office isn't some sinister Big Brother box designed solely to help governments eavesdrop on citizens' internet communications." ... - it's a commercial product!

    Oh great - I feel so much better about that. I was just worried that the government might have EXCLUSIVE rights to spy on me! But, as long as it's all shared and everyone can do it, then I guess it's ok.

    Thanks for the post - I'll sleep so much better now.



    Damn - where's the sarcastic emoticon when you need it.
  • Narus STA 6400? by Ossifer (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:44PM
  • AKA... by 9mm Censor (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:48PM
  • Wow by Locke2005 (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:51PM
  • You're kidding !?!?! by iXiXi (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:52PM
  • RIAA by msbmsb (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:56PM
  • Doesn't matter by symbolic (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:04PM
  • Bellyaching (Score:3, Interesting)

    by crossmr (957846) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:05PM (#15353078)
    (Last Journal: Thursday February 15 2007, @08:40PM)
    and all I hear is a bunch of bellyaching and "ooh they're evil!". As I stated a few weeks ago, Who is going to do anything about it? Evertyime we turn around the American government or corporations come up with a new way to spy on us, restrict our rights or do something else to make the world a little less pleasant.

    If they can't come up with anything specific that day, W. calls the RIAA and has them sue a dead woman. They want to make people so damn paranoid that one day they'll just turn around and say "Okay we're taking over your life, here is your itinerary for the day, don't alter this schedule. You have a bowel movement scheduled in 15 minutes". The vast majority will think its an awesome idea.

    These stories are great to remind us what a wasteland this place has become, but they serve no real purpose if no one actually does anything about it.
    • Re:Bellyaching by woolio (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:37PM
    • Re:Bellyaching by crossmr (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @06:53PM
    • Re:ITMFA? by crossmr (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:45PM
      • Re:ITMFA? by LifeNLiberty (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:52PM
        • Re:ITMFA? by crossmr (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @04:06PM
          • Re:ITMFA? by LifeNLiberty (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @04:16PM
          • Re:ITMFA? by TheDarkener (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @04:26PM
            • Re:ITMFA? by LifeNLiberty (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @04:40PM
    • Re:Bellyaching by crossmr (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @04:00PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • How Much? by Nom du Keyboard (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:07PM
  • by McGiraf (196030) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:12PM (#15353128)
    (http://batteriesnimh.com/)
    And the RIAA does not get a cent on royalties! shocking

    In other new, the RIAA sue the NSA!
  • Not just easily available, but free! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mustafap (452510) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:14PM (#15353142)
    (http://www.drivesentinel.co.uk/)

    Ethereal. Excellent tool, even for non black hats!
  • Field Proven! by endernet (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:19PM
  • Can reconstruct emails? Not this one. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by SuperBanana (662181) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:19PM (#15353191)
    "We can reconstruct all of their e-mails along with attachments"

    Dear Narus,

    -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

    jA0EAwMCiGG6wLlc/6tgyUeJGySx1Ccd8lGe3ugi35iwgMr2yi PxHsoCwtOeytve
    r8fdeb237gtWNHzaen4DpYF9ibJ4E6DCxm8+yGpYcoP7bgEnzJ H49A==
    =BJEi
    -----END PGP MESSAGE-----

    (created with "gpg -a -c"). Just a reminder that if you don't like people reading your email, you and your recipient can rather easily make sure nobody can practically do so.

    The NSA could probably break one PGP message's encryption in a matter of hours (or maybe even minutes), but they couldn't break one million. How about we all really press our friends to get PGP keys made+signed and the software installed...and ENCRYPT EVERY SINGLE PERSONAL EMAIL to them? Good luck to the NSA trying to sift through all that crap.

  • Increase the use of SSL dramatically (Score:3, Interesting)

    by MikeRT (947531) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:48PM (#15353440)
    (http://www.codemonkeyramblings.com/)
    I've thought about buying a SSL setup for my blog so that people coming and going from it can do so in encryption-provided peace. It would be a bold move for civil liberties if hosting services would provide cheap access to SSL for their shared hosting customers. I'd pay an extra $5-$10/month for it, even if the certificate was shared with 20 other blogs at my host. The government just doesn't need to know these things. It's sick and perverted that they would even ask. The only place that it's considered doing your job to be a peeping tom is in the federal government.
  • Used by Chinese telcos, too by kmike (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:58PM
  • Dupe by Psykosys (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:03PM
  • Expectations (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ulpilot (973523) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:06PM (#15353573)
    The law of the land (the USA anyway) says that if you have a conversation in a restaurant, there is no expectation of privacy. If you have a conversation at home, you do have an expectation of privacy, unless I consent to having my conversation recorded. As soon as you send/receive information in a public place there is no expectation of privacy, from a legal perspective.

    If you send/receive packets of data over a public connection, i.e. the internet, somehow you are expecting privacy? Hmmm. (notice the thoughtful pause) If you want or need privacy over a public medium, it seems simple to me. Use encryption.

    Don't get me wrong, I hate big government and big government's intrusion into my personal life. But, I also do not see my internet activity as a personal/private activity. There are just too many people involved. Webmasters see me visiting their site. My ISP knows where I go and what I do. So, I assume there will be others knowing that stuff too. There may be dozens of people 'knowing' what my internet activity looks like. No, I do not like big brother recording everything. It will, however take an amazing database to house all the data while waiting to be filtered and I am doubtful that the end result will accomplish what they are striving for.
    • US mail, by a_greer2005 (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @05:00PM
      • Re:US mail, by robertjw (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @05:37PM
  • Article Is Spin, Of Course by Master of Transhuman (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:07PM
    • Re:Article Is Spin, Of Course by iggymanz (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:12PM
    • Re:Article Is Spin, Of Course (Score:5, Interesting)

      by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF (813746) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @04:30PM (#15354221)

      This device as designed and built for spying, and was placed into telcos everywhere on the PRETEXT of being useful for traffic analysis. Then the NSA came calling and bulldozed the telcos into giving them everything that goes through it.

      Well, sort of. This device is (I believe) a modified version of what the ISPs have been using for a long time to let them accurately bill people for the services they offer and negotiate peering agreements and QoS contracts.

      The fact of the matters is that Narus the company is run by an "Israeli immigrant" and is financed by, among others, an Israeli investment company, one of the partners of whom happens to have worked for the Israeli government, including a stint developing optical devices for the Israeli military.

      Whoa, whoa, whoa there cowboy! Now I like a good conspiracy theory as much as the next guy, but you're making some pretty big and likely unwarranted leaps here. A whole lot of the traffic shaping, modeling, and balancing technology came out of Israel. The university there had a top notch network engineering program with a lot of smart people and patents coming out of it. Most moved to the US, where they could make money off of the .com boom and the aftermath. I know because I work with one of the professors who came over here to do that and let me tell you, he giggles way to much to be a mossad agent. I imagine anyone working in high-tech in Israel probably did some work for the military, especially if they were in academia.

      And one of the directors on the board happens to be an "ex-" NSA guy...

      So? I'm sure it helped them get the contract, and maybe helped them decide on the feature set. This is very common in the security industry. The company I work for has ex Microsoft people and ex-Cisco people. Surprise, surprise we sell to both of them. Another company we do a lot business with has ex Naval intelligence and NSA people. Guess who two of their big customers are? That is just the way the industry works. If you know people, you have an in and and often an advocate who helps to make the sale.

      The reality is that this device was designed and built for spying by the Mossad, in collaboration with the NSA, and then sold to the telcos under a pretext, which was then altered by arm-twisting or payment to the telcos to sell out the US Constitution.

      The reality is, some people found a niche and they filled it. This same type of functionality is needed for billing services and compliance with a number of government acts regarding lawful intercept, financing, security, and privacy assurance. Now maybe the NSA or AT&T requested added features to make this sort of activity easier. Maybe Narus came up with them on its own and sold them on it.

      I certainly think it is being misused and in a way that violates the founding principals of our government. That does not mean it is some grand conspiracy and running off half-cocked spouting this sort of unsupportable nonsense isn't helping anything. All it is doing is reducing the credibility of those who argue to have this sort of thing stopped and distracting people from the real issue.

      ..or is that your intention? You certainly do enough rabble rousing and insulting. If you really want to help, stick to the facts, not the wild speculation.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Article Is Spin, Of Course by JhohannaVH (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @05:10PM
    • Re:Article Is Spin, Of Course by Master of Transhuman (Score:2) Thursday May 18 2006, @03:16PM
  • Fear by vodkamattvt (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:10PM
  • By the way by TCM (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:11PM
  • has anyone considered? by atarione (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:19PM
  • Once again - we need mandatory encryption... by maillemaker (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:36PM
  • Symantic Traffic Analysis by CFrankBernard (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @04:08PM
  • That's why ATT DSL is soooo slow ! by loolgeek (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @04:09PM
  • by Lokni (531043) <<reali100> <at> <chapman.edu>> on Wednesday May 17 2006, @04:10PM (#15354089)
    You guys might want to check this out: http://thinkprogress.org/2006/05/17/new-executive- order/ [thinkprogress.org] Bush has signed an executive order that allows the Telcos to lie on their financial statements. It would be almost impossible to prove these programs existed without access to classified information. Another way to prove them, however, would be to detail how much money the telcos receive from the federal government. They are required to report this information to the SEC beecause they are publically traded companies. Bush has signed an order that allows them to violate securities law. Worse off, he did this just a few days preceeding the USA Today article which implies that they had notice ahead of time that they were about to be exposed. We are in for a world of hurt people. Say bye bye to the United States of America as we know it. This is fascism by definition.
  • How long... by natx808 (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @04:43PM
    • Re:How long... by LifeNLiberty (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @05:04PM
  • Just remember ... by jonathan_95060 (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @06:55PM
  • Off the shelf actually hurting NSA? by swb (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @07:34PM
  • What horrible people. The problem with geeks... by Jackie_Chan_Fan (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @08:41PM
  • UUCP by kevinbr (Score:2) Thursday May 18 2006, @05:37AM
  • The real worry is that someone found out by pesky25 (Score:1) Thursday May 18 2006, @08:09AM
  • For me, it's Ethereal. by Wolfier (Score:2) Thursday May 18 2006, @08:51AM
  • DOD/DARPA by ph4s3 (Score:1) Thursday May 18 2006, @08:51AM
  • Time to start encrypting everything by fish_in_the_c (Score:1) Thursday May 18 2006, @09:32AM
  • Re:Spying (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Lord_Slepnir (585350) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:36PM (#15352827)
    (Last Journal: Thursday June 05 2003, @09:57AM)
    I wonder how this will make people feel now that everyone is complaining about how the "government" is listening and recording phone calls and what have you

    Except that people aren't. I read in TIME magazine last night that over 50% of the people interviewed think that the NSA call database is justified in the War On Terror (TM). Most people will only care if it influences thier ability to watch American Idol, and if not, oh well.

    [ Parent ]
    • Re:Spying by usurper_ii (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:48PM
      • Re:Spying by Beryllium Sphere(tm) (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:24PM
        • Re:Spying by LilGuy (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @04:17PM
    • Re:Spying by TheBogie (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:49PM
    • Re:Spying by gEvil (beta) (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:49PM
    • Re:Spying (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Jtheletter (686279) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:19PM (#15353189)
      I read in TIME magazine last night that over 50% of the people interviewed think that the NSA call database is justified in the War On Terror

      Was the article getting those numbers from Time's own poll, or the recently released telephone poll of 502 (IIRC) Americans which there are plenty of problems with? This is exactly why the saying "there are lies, damn lies, and statistics" is applicable. This single - IMHO flawed - poll is being used at every media outlet to show people there isn't a problem and 'see, most Americans think this is ok so You Should Too.'

      Well that's not what democracy is about, it's not about groupthink, otherwise there would be no wheelchair access to most places, plenty of towns would probably still have public buildings segregated by race/class/religion, etc, etc. Majority - or mob - rule is something that democracy tries to prevent, just because the majority thinks one way does not mean they are right. And yet people allow themselves to be coerced by one stupid poll after another. Let's face it, anyone who is willing to answer a 50 question telephone poll is likely not terribly interested in their privacy, that fact alone should invalidate the poll as it introduces an unmeasurable - but likely significant - bias. My thought is that a more thorough, in-person poll with a larger sampling will show that in fact most Americans don't think this program is ok. But until such a less biased poll is conducted then all that will be referenced is this stupid poll that forwards the government's agenda. And if I'm proven wrong then so be it, in that case then this poll should no longer be quoted to assauge people's fears of this domestic spying program, but should be used as an alarm that this country is asleep! The populace needs to be woken up. Until 100% of the people are screaming mad at a warrantless datamining/spying program undertaken by the government against anyone and everyone regardless of guilt, then it means we have some educating to do! You wouldn't let a government agent swing by every morning and look at all the mailing addresses on letters going to/from your house, why the hell would you let them do the same to your phone records? Because you can't see it? Because "it doesn't affect me"? If nothing else the whole program is stupid because the government is looking for a needle in a haystack in these communications and thus far all their efforts are doing is adding more hay! Some of the 9-11 hijackers' calls were intercepted before 9-11, but they weren't translated in time to be of any use. Now we're expected to believe that fewer agents sifting through more data will somehow prevent another attack of the same sort? Laughable if it weren't so damn unfunny.
      [/rant]

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Spying by woolio (Score:3) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:41PM
        • Re:Spying by Jtheletter (Score:3) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:22PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Spying by wanna_be_a_developer (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:23PM
        • Re:Spying by ScrewMaster (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @05:40PM
      • Re:Spying by greg_barton (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @04:56PM
      • by martyb (196687) on Thursday May 18 2006, @05:55AM (#15356271)
        You wouldn't let a government agent swing by every morning and look at all the mailing addresses on letters going to/from your house, why the hell would you let them do the same to your phone records?

        This got me thinking... according to this link: Handwritten address interpretation [buffalo.edu]:

        Handwritten address interpretation research began at CEDAR in 1987 through funding from the United States Postal Service (USPS). The objective was to automate mail sorting through a system that could read a handwritten street address and ZIP code and encode each envelope with the destination address for machine sorting.

        This research ultimately led to the development and deployment of system that automates mail sorting through image analysis, digit recognition, word recognition, postal directory lookup, and a barcode assignment that designates the destination address. Since field-testing began in 1996, the Handwritten Address Interpretation System (HWAI) has been implemented at all USPS mail processing centers.

        (emphasis mine.)

        So, it's only a small step to record all that metadata for every letter sent within the USA. Just have postmasters general submit the day's scan logs to the gov't for review for possible terrorist links, and, by the way, archive all th information received. This information could include:

        • Who received mail.
        • Who sent it (from the return address).
        • When it was sent.
        • How much it weighed.
        • How urgently it was sent (overnight, first class, parcel post, etc.)

        So, maybe you were just joking, but from what I've seen lately, I'd have to suspect that this may already in place... can anyone corroborate this?

        [ Parent ]
    • Re:Spying by man_of_mr_e (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:25PM
      • Re:Spying by TinyManCan (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:17PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:Government doesn't like to do homebrew by earnest murderer (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:39PM
  • No (Score:5, Insightful)

    by nonlnear (893672) on Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:50PM (#15352954)
    By sending IP packets, you are distributing your work. Narus could make a fair use argument that would be a chilling parody of the arguments posted by folks who troll around slashdot arguing that fair use covers anonymous torrents.

    If you don't like it, encrypt it.

    [ Parent ]
    • Re:No by Ossifer (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:54PM
    • Re:No by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @01:57PM
      • Re:No by nonlnear (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:35PM
      • Re:No by flonker (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:45PM
        • Re:No by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:56PM
          • Re:No by flonker (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @08:16PM
    • No No No by woolio (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:46PM
      • Re:No No No by CFrankBernard (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:36PM
  • Re:Here's a question... by qwijibo (Score:1) Wednesday May 17 2006, @02:14PM
  • Re:So THAT explains the webcam pics... by Ungrounded Lightning (Score:2) Wednesday May 17 2006, @03:05PM
  • Re:Government doesn't like to do homebrew by saskboy (Score:1) Wednesday May 31 2006, @04:57PM
  • 15 replies beneath your current threshold.