Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashback: Vista Rewrite, Tuttle Travesty, Mac Botnets

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Wed Mar 29, 2006 06:59 PM
from the engage-brain-before-putting-mouth-in-motion dept.
Slashback tonight brings some corrections, clarifications, and updates to previous Slashdot stories including Microsoft denies Vista rewrite, Tuttle Oklahoma city manager still doesn't get it, MS Virtual Server slips and VMWare fills the gap, Samsung execs plead guilty to price fixing charges, Tux in retail part 2, a renewed bid to register the Linux trademark in Australia, OpenSPARC.net shades of the past, and a follow up on Mac botnets -- Read on for details.

Microsoft denies Vista rewrite. moochfish writes "Contrary to a heavily doubted feature earlier this week, Business 2.0 magazine reports that Microsoft will not be rewriting large portions of its operating system. From the article, 'Microsoft's own blogger Robert Scoble checked into the story and got a denial from an executive at Microsoft's PR firm, who says he's not aware of any Xbox programmers working on Windows.'"

Tuttle Oklahoma city manager still doesn't get it. gEvil (beta) writes "The Register has posted a followup to this past week's wonderfully humorous story about Tuttle, Oklahoma's technically inept city manager, Jerry Taylor. It appears that Mr. Taylor is not pleased with the publicity he has received due to the incident, despite his prior statement of, 'I have no fear of the media, in fact I welcome this publicity.' He sent an email to the Register's marketing team asking that people stop emailing him and making fun of him."

MS Virtual Server Slips and VMWare fills in the gap. nizo writes "On the heels of the announcement that Microsoft Virtual Server is slipping to 2007, VMware has announced the beta release of the VMware Virtual Machine Importer, which has the capability to convert system images stored in 3rd party formats (including Microsoft Virtual Server images) to VMware virtual machines. The good news is VMware released the importer as a free download."

Samsung execs plead guilty to price fixing charges. bdotcdot writes "Electronics News is running a story on Samsung executives who have plead guilty to the price fixing of DRAM. From the story 'According to the one-count felony charge filed in federal court in San Francisco, at various times during the period from April 1, 1999, to June 15, 2002, these three Samsung employees conspired with unnamed employees from other memory makers to fix the prices of DRAM sold to certain computer and server manufacturers in the U.S., in violation of the Sherman Act. The conspiracy directly affected sales to U.S. computer makers Dell Inc., Hewlett-Packard Company, Compaq Computer Corp., International Business Machines Corp., Apple Computer Inc. and Gateway Inc., the charge said.'"

Tux in retail part 2. silentbob4 writes "Mad Penguin brings us the second and final installment in their 'Tux in Retail' series, in which they interview Linspire CEO Kevin Carmony; Xandros CEO Andreas Typaldos; Mepis Linux founder Warren Woodford; and Kevin Jones, Micro Center Vice President of Merchandising, to get their take Tux's jump into big box retail. The first installment was run as an earlier Slashdot article."

Renewed bid to register Linux trademark in Australia? daria42 writes "A renewed bid to register the word 'Linux' as an Australian trademark must meet an early April deadline or face defeat." From the article: "'The deadline to file a response to the Examiner's rejection has not yet passed, and LMI and its attorneys are still determining if they will respond,' a spokesperson for the body told ZDNet Australia in an emailed statement."

OpenSPARC.net, shades of the past. Andy Updegrove writes "In what must have seemed to many as a bold move, Sun Microsystems recently announced that it would release the source code for its UltraSparc T1 processor under the GPL, supported by a new organization that it calls OpenSPARC.net. But to those that have been around for a while, the announcement had an eerily familiar sound to it, and that sound was the echo of an organization called SPARC International. Formed 18 years ago to license the SPARC chip design to multiple vendors to ensure second sourcing for the hardware vendors that Sun hoped would adopt it, SPARC International seemed to be every bit as revolutionary for its time as Sun's new initiative does today. Motorola launched a somewhat similar group called 88open to support its own RISC chip design, and later IBM, Motorola and Apple launched the PowerOpen Association to promote the PowerPC. The Websites of the PowerOpen Association and 88open are long gone, and seem to have escaped even the WayBack Machine's reach. But SPARC International's site, looking very retro and neglected, can still be seen - at least for now."

Follow up on Mac botnets. An anonymous reader writes "Washingtonpost.com has an interesting follow up to skeptical claims as a result of a previous Slashdot story. Mac OS X systems have indeed been spotted in botnets, thanks largely to several worms going around that take advantage of Web-based applications running vulnerable PHP software. From the article: 'By leveraging this PHP flaw, the attackers were able to seed the Mac systems with several tools designed to turn them into drones for use in waging destructive distributed denial of service attacks.'

Related Stories

[+] Linux: How Open Source is Faring in Retail 259 comments
SilentBob4 writes to tell us MadPenguin is running the first of two articles taking a look at the 'world of retail as Tux is experiencing it'. From the article: "Of the stores we visited, only Linspire Linux was sold pre-installed on computers in-store. Those FOSS boxes were often among the store's best volume sellers, primarily because they were the cheapest, according to store staff. The staff believed, based on conversations with frequent customers, that most customers were buying the boxes to install Windows on them. But that is not surprising to us, because, as we discuss in section two, brick-and-mortar "computer" stores are still part of the Microsoft distribution chain. The fact that there were some open source products at all in these stores is actually surprising, as Microsoft guards its distribution chain jealously, and punishes those business partners who stray into carrying FOSS products."
[+] Developers: 60% Of Windows Vista Code To Be Rewritten 662 comments
Alien54 writes "Up to 60% of the code in the new consumer version of Microsoft new Vista operating system is set to be rewritten as the Company "scrambles" to fix internal problems, according to this report. In an effort to meet a deadline of the 2007 CES show in Las Vegas Microsoft has pulled programmers from the highly succesful Xbox team to help resolve many problems associated with entertainment and media centre functionality inside the OS. Much more at the link."
[+] IT: Meet the Botnet Hunters 194 comments
An anonymous reader writes "The Washington Post is running a pretty decent story about 'Shadowserver,' one of a growing number of volunteer groups dedicated to infiltrating and disabling botnets. The story covers not only how these guys do their work but the pitfalls of bothunting as well. From the article: 'Even after the Shadowserver crew has convinced an ISP to shut down a botmaster's command-and-control channel, most of the bots will remain infected. Like lost sheep without a shepherd, the drones will continually try to reconnect to the hacker's control server, unaware that it no longer exists. In some cases, Albright said, a botmaster who has been cut off from his command-and-control center will simply wait a few days or weeks, then re-register the domain and reclaim stranded bots.'"
[+] Linux: Misconfigured Webserver, Threats to Call FBI 564 comments
the_harlequin writes "The Register is reporting that a city manager threatened to call the FBI over a misconfigured webserver. From the article: "The heartland turned vicious this week when an Oklahoma town threatened to call in the FBI because its web site was hacked by Linux maker CentOS. Problem is CentOS didn't hack Tuttle's web site at all. The city's hosting provider had simply botched a web server." "
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Slashback: Vista Rewrite, Tuttle Travesty, Mac Botnets 50 Comments More | Login /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More | Login
Keybindings Beta
Q W E
A S D
Loading ... Please wait.
  • And they usually come from the same place, as the followup notes:

    A php-based web application (forum, blog, CMS, etc.) that has an exploit, usually php injection, whereby various script/botnet kiddie tools and irc-related items are installed, usually in /tmp or /var/tmp. Perhaps they'll install a php shell too. Sometimes, they'll try to run a rootkit against the local machine.

    This is nothing new, and doesn't really have anything to do with "Macs". It has more to do with php and people not keeping their php-based web applications up to date than anything[1]. It is interesting, though, that since Mac OS X is essentially a UNIX, that it's certainly vulnerable to a whole slew of this family of exploits.

    [1] Just as a Mac sitting on the internet with apache and ssh open doesn't really test anything beyond the security of the default configurations of apache and OpenSSH on that OS and architecture. And that's exactly the point.
    • by Anonymous Coward
      by the way, php also runs on non-unix machines too... I think even windows is included in the supported platforms list.
    • by Bonker (243350) on Wednesday March 29 2006, @07:30PM (#15022348)
      It's also worth noting that the exploits are against 'PHP applications' and not PHP itself.

      I can't count the number of terrified middle managers who scream bloody murder to me about PHPNuke or PHPBB bugs, thinking that the flaws are in PHP itself.

      Again, this boils down to keeping your software up to date. Careful pruning of your php.ini file also helps.
      [ Parent ]
      • PHP is not totally blameless in this. It is VERY easy to write PHP code that is subject to injection-style attacks, mostly because it's SO easy to insert one string into another string without doing the appropriate quoting and character escaping. Ie, PHP m
        • While PHP does do an awful lot of making strings easy to mung, fold, spindle, and mutilate, I have to say that I personally think that adding a convenience to the language does not a security hole make.

          I think that the real problem here lies in the fact th
    • by tpgp (48001) on Thursday March 30 2006, @04:52AM (#15024887) Homepage
      doesn't really have anything to do with "Macs".

      Don't be stupid. It has everything to do with "Macs" and any other unix-like operating system that runs perl & php.

      Its worth knowing that that there is people attacking OS X in the wild and the vectors they are using.

      Too many Mac users believe they're invlunerable & start to play around with internet facing services without adequately firewalling themselves.

      Articles like this are a good reminder that any unix-like system can be made vulnerable, even if its its pretty well hardened by default.
      [ Parent ]
  • Mr Tuttle (Score:4, Funny)

    by rob1980 (941751) on Wednesday March 29 2006, @07:07PM (#15022197)
    It appears that Mr. Taylor is not pleased with the publicity he has received due to the incident, despite his prior statement of, 'I have no fear of the media, in fact I welcome this publicity.'

    Yeah, the publicity isn't so great when it's not the local ABC affiliate oohing and aahing over your latest plan to put a new tree in the city park, is it?
    • Re:Mr Tuttle (Score:3, Informative)

      There was a pretty good and mostly objective wikipedia page [wikipedia.org] about the guy.

      Unfortunately it has been removed.

      Looks like Mr Taylor wasn't bluffing about his FBI connections.
      • Re:Mr Tuttle (Score:3, Informative)

        The page was removed basically because the powers-that-be felt Taylor wasn't worth the waste of wiki space. That has to hurt even more than the publicity.

        There was also concern that the page was an attack on Taylor. There were some sections that could ha

    • Let's add him to the language (Score:4, Interesting)

      by Beryllium Sphere(tm) (193358) on Thursday March 30 2006, @01:41AM (#15024230) Homepage Journal
      Should he be a noun, as in "that move was a real Jerry Taylor"?

      Or is a verb phrase more appropriate, such as "pull a Jerry Taylor", "Jerry Taylorize", or "go totally Jerry Taylor on $INNOCENT_TARGET"?

      Or should the winning entry be an adjective, as in "that email was *so* Jerry Taylor"?
      [ Parent ]
  • by m_chan (95943) on Wednesday March 29 2006, @07:10PM (#15022215) Homepage
    Email him a tinyurl [tinyurl.com] warning him that Tuttle's site has been coopted by an outside suspect, likely terrorist-affiliated organization.
  • The Scoop (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward
    I'm not saying there is any truth to the 60% rewrite figure, but if I wanted to verify it I woundn't ask an on-the-record PR guy. Blogger: So is Vista in the shitter? PR guy: Sure is Ken. (seemingly from nowhere a chair hits the PR guy)
  • Sent to citymgr@cityoftuttle.org (Score:5, Interesting)

    by anomaly (15035) <tom_cooper AT bigfoot DOT com> on Wednesday March 29 2006, @07:16PM (#15022258)
    I sent this to the city manager. I have not yet received a reply.

    Sir,
    I appreciate that you were frustrated that your city website was
    non-functional, but it appears to me that the people to whom you
    complained were not responsible, and that the tone of your messages tended
    to be combative.

    The folks from CentOS were being polite and helpful, based on my read of
    the messages. I believe that you owe them an apology. they had
    absolutely NOTHING to do with the problems you experienced, and tried to
    assist you anyway. For you to respond with "I am sorry that we had to go
    through the process and accusations to get the problem resolved" They did
    nothing wrong. You accused them, and frankly it was uncharitable on your
    part.

    Please extend an official apology to those folks at www.centos.org. They
    deserve it.

    Please also note that I am not affiliated with CentOS in any way (except
    that I use their Linux distribution quite happliy.) I read about this
    spat on a technology-focused website known as slashdot
    http://www.slashdot.org/ [slashdot.org]

    Respectfully,
    • I good response, but I doubt it'll get through the thick skull of this guy. It seems to me the fatal flaw of many elected officials (and boy oh boy has this become BLINDINGLY obvious in the last 5 years) is they can't live up to their own mistakes. That
    • Re:Sent to citymgr@cityoftuttle.org (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 29 2006, @08:18PM (#15022614)
      My note:

      To the Honorable Lonnie Paxton and members of the Town Council of the City of Tuttle,

      You may want to consider hiring a new town manager, replacing Mr. Jerry A. Taylor who recently earned the City of Tuttle worldwide embarrassment with his legal threats against Centos.

      Mr. Taylor claims to have been a "Computer Systems Engineer" with 22 years of experience. However, upon discovering an extremely simple problem with the City of Tuttle web site, rather than proceeding to work with the hosting company responsible for the management of the City of Tuttle web site, Mr. Taylor chose to publicly harass and attempt to intimidate the developers responsible for designing a free operating system called CentOS.

      What is CentOS? Like the well-known Microsoft Windows, it is an operating system. More specifically, CentOS is a FREE operating system built by volunteers, largely based on the also-free GNU and Linux projects.

      Transcripts of the Mr. Taylor's juvenile threats toward CentOS are posted publicly on the Internet, and those transcripts underscore Mr. Taylor's utter incompetence, unwillingness to accept FREE help from folks who provided a FREE operating system, even though the CentOS developers have NO responsibility whatsoever to clean up Mr. Taylor's mess.

      When Mr. Taylor FINALLY agreed that the Centos folks had nothing to do with the misconfiguration problem (the problem is actually due to two parties: the company hosting the City of Tuttle web site, and Mr. Jerry A. Taylor himself) he not only was not apologetic, but downright insulting in his response.

      The City of Tuttle has earned worldwide ridicule in the face of this issue, and the dated and sophomoric appearance of Tuttle's now-well-publicized web site has earned widespread harsh criticism and ridicule as well.

      Please consider replacing Mr. Jerry A. Taylor. Many of us feel sorry for the City of Tuttle as we believe that there are many people more deserving of his salary and who can perform a much better job were they given the opportunity to fill his position. Jerry A. Taylor's salary is money wasted right now.

      Here are some of the web pages covering this story that you may wish to check out:

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/24/tuttle_cen tos/ [theregister.co.uk]
      http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/03/27/ 135221&tid=133 [slashdot.org]
      http://www.digg.com/security/Why_every_city_counci l_needs_at_least_one_geek_=%5D [digg.com]
      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/27/tuttle_ema il/ [theregister.co.uk]

      Mr. Taylor's outbursts and threats toward the generous CentOS folks may be seen here:

      http://www.centos.org/modules/news/article.php?sto ryid=127 [centos.org]

      As you will note, Mr. Taylor's outbursts are unbecoming of a city official and earn little respect for the City of Tuttle. Even after realizing that the CentOS representatives were not to blame, but he and his web hosts are, and even after having received hundreds of emails from kind folks all over the world who are attempting to explain to him that the CentOS developers are not to blame, he is insisting that the CentOS folks would only help him after he threatened to contact the FBI. This is not only patently false, but downright slanderous and such statements could earn a defamation of character suit from CentOS. I know if I were that developer I would consider filing suit against Tuttle over such false statements made to the media.
      [ Parent ]
      • How much of your life did you waste writing that? Are you such an asshole that you actually believe you will get a response or better yet an apology? Keep firing off those letters, Sparky. You'll change the world someday. Fucking dipshit.

        How much of you

  • by Heem (448667) on Wednesday March 29 2006, @07:16PM (#15022260) Homepage Journal
    Is that this guy just still hasn't got a clue..

    Now I am being flooded with emails from CentOS users that after knowing the answer say the problem was simple.

    What I can't stand more than anything is someone that can't admit that they were wrong, even at this stage of the game.
    • by porkThreeWays (895269) on Wednesday March 29 2006, @09:01PM (#15022835)
      I still can't believe this tool. He actually thinks the threat to the FBI is what prompted the CentOS developer (lead dev if I remember correctly). More likely the developer got tired of this fagtart harassing him. The city manager justified his actions by saying that anyone who is experienced on the internet knows better than to follow directions on a website. When the directions are to consult your site's administrator, I think those are pretty safe instructions.

      And I can't believe this twiddle dick STILL hasn't apologized. He shoots back with "there should have been better directions". It is mind boggling that in 20 years of his supposed IT experience he's never run into a default webserver page. I really think this ass clown is deserving of any and all harassment he gets. In fact, he is deserving of a bill for CentOS's wasted time. If I had go-go gadget balls, I'd teabag that butthole surfer from 12 states away.
      [ Parent ]
          • Re:This guy is the biggest tool ever (Score:4, Informative)

            by killjoe (766577) on Wednesday March 29 2006, @11:21PM (#15023588)
            LOL, I was stationed in Altus AFB OK. I spent two years over there. I still have the T-Shirt front: "Where in the hell is Altus OK" Back:"About ten miles south of blair". When I left Altus I thought "Man I am never going back to that fucking state again" but alas for business reasons I have had the distinct misfortune of having to travel back there many many times.

            Fuck man, if you want OK to look good don't tell people to go to that shithole of a town. Tulsa maybe, OKC maybe but Altus?? No freakin way. Having said that even Tulsa is nothing but a sea of white conservative suburbia occationally broken up by strip malls. I have never met so many rabid republitards and religious fundamentalists in my life. Man those people think BBQued bologna is gourmet!

            Oh and while there are plenty of stupid people in my state it's nowhere near as many in OK.
            [ Parent ]
          • Yes, please do. You could go to one of the conferences NASA holds there, or to visit Altus Air Force Base, where a bunch of "dumb Okies" teach Air Force pilots how to fly their jets to protect your freedom to make stupid bigoted statements on Slashdot. Or
  • by MerlynEmrys67 (583469) on Wednesday March 29 2006, @07:17PM (#15022270)
    Lets assume that Vista is as few as a 1000KLoc - (I'd bet another order of magnatude personally) That implies 600KLoc of new code written, tested debugged, etc. in 6 months. Uh - NO operating system development isn't that fast. I am not even sure I would buy the line that the current Vista codebase is 60% new/changed from XP (RTM - not SP2, patched to heck)
  • VMware URL wrong (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 29 2006, @07:19PM (#15022278)
    The URL for VMware Importer beta is wrong: It should be: http://www.vmware.com/products/beta/vmimporter/ [vmware.com]
  • OpenSPARC (Score:2, Interesting)

    I was under the impression that opening up the design of the UltraSPARC T1 was partly just to bolster interest in it (and it really is an incredible design from a hardware perspective) and partly just to allow people like EE and computer architecture stude
    • Re:OpenSPARC (Score:5, Insightful)

      by joe_bruin (266648) on Wednesday March 29 2006, @09:53PM (#15023104) Homepage Journal
      Sun was always hoping, and still is, that others will take the SPARC design and implement their own chips. They want economies of scale to start playing into SPARC like it has into the x86 and ARM market. Obviously, joe hacker is not going to be doing this, but there are some companies that can and very well might.

      Here's why other people would want to make SPARC chips: Linux. Oh no, here comes the zealot talk. Actually, not quite. Linux runs on the three leading server architectures, x86 (+AMD64), POWER, and SPARC. From a deployment and administration standpoint, you don't really care what CPU you're running on. With the T1, Sun released the CPU with the highest performance per Watt on the market (for some tasks). This is an attractive chip, but buying from Sun is not always appealing. Sun gear is pretty expensive.

      Today, there are many Taiwanese and Chinese motherboard makers, and they sell lots and lots of hardware. But their chips must always come from Intel or AMD (or Via, who's never been competitive). They would love nothing more than to have a standard CPU architecture that they can manufacture (TSMC or PMC can fab these for them) and take the profit cut from instead of handing that business to Intel. With Sun's release, they now have the tools to make a chip that is not only competitive with x86 and Power, but is actually top of the line, and at no additional cost to them. It already runs Linux, it's ready for blades, they know it will sell.

      Sun benefits by having cheaper SPARC CPUs on the market, driving down their costs and increasing their architecture share. The manufacturers benefit by being able to sell at the high end, and sell cheaper. Server buyers benefit, because there is now a cheap source for high end machines. Now, if these chips really move, don't be surprised to see Texas Instruments (who doesn't have a server chip, but does have the fabs and experience with SPARC) and even IBM (who will make whatever sells) start to make these.
      [ Parent ]
  • CityManager Email (Score:3, Informative)

    by AmigaAvenger (210519) on Wednesday March 29 2006, @07:27PM (#15022340) Journal
    Looks like he managed to figure out how to edit the frontpage site so that it no longer shows his email, so if any slashdot user wishes to express their opinions on this matter the corresponding public official, here they are!

    city manager at citymgr@cityoftuttle.org [mailto],
    mayor at mayor@cityoftuttle.org [mailto].

    Enjoy!

    • Sorry, but I don't agree on harassing someone over e-mail. His public shame is enough, don't you think? PLUS, by posting his e-mail on the web, you just made his e-mail vulnerable to spammers.

      Worse, the e-mail address will be still available AFTER he resigns or his government period finishes. Will the next mayor have to cope with this?

      [ Parent ]

      • Sorry, but I don't agree on harassing someone over e-mail.

        The poster GP post didn't call for harassment, he only posted his email for people to give replies to. Do you really think that the only possible use for email is harassment?

        His public shame is eno
        • #4) He should resign as he acted in a manner unbecoming an elected official and for making false statements in an official capacity, which could cost Tuttle a heap of money were the CentOS team inclined to sue
  • Vista (Score:2)

    MS don't have a serious competitor in Desktop OS. Right now they are competing with themselves. As long as they are able to sell more licenses of any of their brand of OS they don't care to innovate. I think when Apple and/or Linux Desktop becomes a seriou
    • Re:Vista (Score:2)

      I know of at least one guy who heard that Vista was going to be late so he gave into his long felt desire to buy a Mac.
  • Tuttle NBC video (Score:5, Informative)

    by dustwun (662589) on Wednesday March 29 2006, @07:40PM (#15022408) Homepage
    Seems even the Tulsa NBC affiliate picked up the story. They've got a video online at http://www.kfor.com/global/category.asp?c=9667 [kfor.com], it's the Tuesday 10pm news story. The CentOS bit starts at around 4 minutes 13 seconds, and is around 3 minutes long.

    I'm not linking directly to it, because we've already crushed their bandwith enough for one week, but feel free to check it out.
    It's not at all flattering to the City Manager...
    • Re:Tuttle NBC video (Score:3, Insightful)

      Well, it appears the video only works in IE, that will save bandwidth. I don't think I've ever seen a local news station have their whole news cast streamable online though. Most just have clips. And if this was available as a clip, it would've used less b
  • ... got a denial from an executive at Microsoft's PR firm, who says he's not aware of any Xbox programmers working on Windows.'"

    I mean, like somebody's gonna randomly tell this PR Geek about technical matters? The obvious person to (not) ask (depending on whether or not you want a meaningfull answer) would be an executive in Microsoft's OS development group.

    eg: The fact that I've never personally seen George Bush snorting coke or had him tell me about it doesn't tell you much about whether he has or not (given that I've never met the man). Getting that denial from his best friend would mean a little bit more.

  • Check your sources ... (Score:4, Funny)

    by Bob Loblaw (545027) on Wednesday March 29 2006, @08:19PM (#15022624)
    'Microsoft's own blogger Robert Scoble checked into the story and got a denial from an executive at Microsoft's PR firm, who says he's not aware of any Xbox programmers working on Windows.' ... because an executive from MS's PR firm is the *first* person I would go to for the "truth" ... : /

    They are likely not aware of a lot of things ... that doesn't make them untrue.
  • Write a letter to Tuttle (Score:5, Insightful)

    by slamb (119285) * on Thursday March 30 2006, @01:53AM (#15024274) Homepage
    I hope more people take the time to write to The City of Tuttle asking them to apologize. Dealing with people like this drains all motivation to get involved with projects like CentOS, so it's important to take care of this and prevent it from happening again.

    Here's the email I just sent:

    To: citymgr@cityoftuttle.org
    CC: mayor@cityoftuttle.org
    Subject: Apologize to CentOS

    Mr. Taylor,

    I'm writing in response to your recent letter to The Register [1]. I am appalled to learn of your continued hostility to the Johnny Hughes, the CentOS Team, and the open source community as a whole. I am a member of this community.

    You wrote that you "only got help after threatening to contact the FBI" [2]. That's a misleading statement without also mentioning that you threatened to contact the FBI prior to describing the problem or asking for help. I quote from your initial email: "Please remove your software immediately before I report it to government officials!!"

    Most organizations would have immediately directed you to their legal department and cut off all other contact. CentOS stuck with you through your lengthy email exchange and resolved your problem despite your threats and ingratitude. That shows a level of dedication and professionalism that you could never achieve. Even more so when you consider that they are volunteers and that you are not a paying customer. They are not obligated to help under even the best of circumstances.

    After CentOS provided you with the publicity you welcomed, you apparently discovered that the open source community has no respect for those who abuse our movers and shakers. Realize that an apology is a necessary first step to repair the damage you have done to your city's reputation.

    Sincerely,
    Scott Lamb

    [1] - http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/27/tuttle_ema il/ [theregister.co.uk]
    [2] - http://www.centos.org/modules/news/article.php?sto ryid=127 [centos.org]

  • by steveoc (2661) on Thursday March 30 2006, @06:51AM (#15025182)
    It wont be long now until the next installment of microsoft's 'Get the facts' campaing includes the following headline :

    City of Tuttle saves $ billions by migrating from Linux to Microsoft Windows.

    After an extensive evaluation in which the City of Tuttle compared Windows® and Linux, the city selected Microsoft® Windows Server System(TM). Besides the obvious cost savings of moving to Windows, the city manager of Tuttle observed that security was of prime importance in the decision. "Ive worked with computers for 22 years, and Ive seen first hand how an interweb running on linux can easily be hijacked by hackers without MY permission."
    • Why would you want to bother trying to implement something like this on an FPGA? It's much cheaper to just buy a processor than try to squeeze one inside an FPGA. FPGAs are much slower and much more expensive than a custom chip (a high-end FPGA chip can
    • Neither 88Open nor PowerOpen were open opening up the chip. Both were about creating Application Binary Interface (ABI) standards so that multiple vendors could provide compatible operating systems and Independent Software Vendors could count on compiling