Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Felony For Refreshing a Web Page?

Posted by Zonk on Fri Jan 06, 2006 06:15 PM
from the dangerous-pixelantes dept.
therandomw writes "An 18 year-old boy was recently arrested in Ohio for telling fellow students to refresh the schools web page in order to slow down the server. He is being charged with a felony and is currently being held in jail. According to Canton City Prosecutor Frank Forchione 'This new technology has created a whole wave of crimes, and we're just trying to find ways to solve them.'"
+ -
story
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • by yagu (721525) * <[yayagu] [at] [gmail.com]> on Friday January 06 2006, @06:16PM (#14412505) Journal

    AFAIK this barely even brushes up against being a felony, but let the school officials have their fun! Had they just ignored this and let it go (maybe take the kid aside and dress him down a bit), this would have slipped off the radar in half a day. As it is, they've loaded, locked, and are about to fire, aiming right at their own feet.

    BTW, I'm just wondering who the first brave soul in slashdot is who will actually post the schools URL. (Also, BTW, it's pretty easily found in Google: Lake High School Uniontown Ohio, duh).

    • by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 06 2006, @06:19PM (#14412538)
      http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/hs/ [k12.oh.us]

      this one?
    • Canton Law Dept page (Score:5, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday January 06 2006, @06:22PM (#14412581)
      Since the school's site is already DDoS'd, here is the Canton Law Dept [cityofcanton.com]. Let's see how fast we can take the prosecutor down.
    • by SoCalChris (573049) on Friday January 06 2006, @06:26PM (#14412624) Homepage Journal
      From TFA:

      It's not the first time local officials have investigated situations where students are misusing computers. Forchione noted a 2005 case in which four Jackson High School students were charged with misdemeanors after being caught accessing the school computer system. Some grades were changed.

      So, breaking in to the school's computer system, and changing grades is a misdemeanor, but encouraging people to visit the school's publicly posted website is a felony?

      Yeah, I know the kid had malicious intentions, but why is this a felony when actually breaking into their system and causing damage is only a misdemeanor?

      "Michael said it was a joke," Forchione said. "We showed him how we deal with this kind of joke."

      This prosecutor needs to be smacked.
  • Oh Crap! (Score:5, Funny)

    by rodgster (671476) * <[rodgster] [at] [yahoo.com]> on Friday January 06 2006, @06:16PM (#14412507) Journal
    Fark!

    I just commited 7 felonies waiting for this story to appear.

  • by Eyah....TIMMY (642050) * on Friday January 06 2006, @06:17PM (#14412511)
    ... after all the /. readers held down F5 to see if it really worked
  • Low-tech DDoS? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Kelson (129150) * on Friday January 06 2006, @06:17PM (#14412512) Homepage Journal
    Sounds like a distributed denial of service attack. He just left out the automation.

    Logically, the only thing that distinguishes a DoS from the Slashdot Effect is intent. If your intent is to spread awareness of the material that appears on a server, and the server can't handle it, well, that's tough for the server, but that's how the Internet works. If your intent is to take the server down, that's illegal.

    Up until now, most deliberate attacks were automated, making it easy to separate overwhelming legit traffic from attacks -- but that's only really as accurate as trying to separate legitimate city traffic from criminals by assuming that anyone on foot is a burglar.

    Of course, when you get down to the level of intent, you get to his contention that "Help me crash my school's server" was a joke, and that he wasn't actually trying to get people to follow through. And things get murky.
    • by Skye16 (685048) on Friday January 06 2006, @06:34PM (#14412704)
      Since his intent was to crash the school server, even as a joke, then his intent was to crash the school server. It doesn't look very good for him.

      Of course, they would have been better off letting him slide than making a few hundred thousand / million geeks curious all at once. That server probably unhooked its own ethernet cable, packed up its keyboard and mouse, and walked out the front door by now. Or it melted and dripped all over the carpet.
  • This problem can be solved through software already -- the school didn't take necessary means to avoid such a simple "DoS" style attack.

    Even so, it seems crazy to me to waste taxpayer dollars chasing down this citizen and even more dollars prosecuting him. While the law is supposed to be around to protect property, I don't see how this is a felony. He didn't do the refreshing, did he? He used his right to speak freely.

    I'm sure I'll hear the standard arguments about how speech can be regulated and I repudiate all of them. Crying fire in a theatre is private property -- the Constitution protects nothing on private property and the theatre owner is responsible for setting the standards of speech. Telling someone how to make a bomb is also free expression/speech -- you're not making the bomb. In this case, if clicking excessively is a crime (I can't believe it would be), the people who did the act should be indicted.

    I'd love to see what real crimes are happening right now in Canton City -- murders, rapes, thefts. Speeding tickets and telling people to refresh a website repeatedly are nothing compared to real property crime. The last quote about trying to solve them reads more to me like they're "trying to find ways to exploit them."

    For the school -- they can now expect this to happen more often. The publicity in charging this guy is going to be mostly negative in the minds of the students. All we need now is to get the link visible on slashdot, right?
    • by User 956 (568564) on Friday January 06 2006, @06:22PM (#14412580) Homepage
      This problem can be solved through software already -- the school didn't take necessary means to avoid such a simple "DoS" style attack.

      Judging by this quote, it sounds like they don't even really have a grasp on what kind of "attack" it was.

      "It's a crime and it is important we take this seriously ... especially for school officials ... it could have done a tremendous amount of damage," said Canton City Prosecutor Frank Fronchione.

      Causing a tremendous amount of damage? WTF? He's not DDoSing Air Traffic Control. What a total load. This kid should sue these jackasses for libel, false arrest, and harassment.

    • by cavemanf16 (303184) on Friday January 06 2006, @06:25PM (#14412613) Homepage Journal
      It's not "Canton City", it's just Canton. And, after having visited there recently, I can tell you it's a midwest town - NOT a city - where life moves just a bit slower than the rest of the country. You can tell by Mr. Fanchione's comments on the article that the police are "trying to teach this youngin' a lesson!" and think they're just so smart for arresting this kid. I agree with your sentiments about how important this really is in the face of actually dangerous stuff. There were all kinds of buildings in that town that probably need to be condemned because they're a fire and health hazard, but no, the 'authorities' are busy arresting kids smarter than they are.
  • the media (Score:5, Funny)

    by User 956 (568564) on Friday January 06 2006, @06:18PM (#14412526) Homepage
    I love the complete bullshit way this article [wkyc.com] frames the situation. He didn't put a link, he "created a website, which connected to the school's system." ooo.. sinister.. yeah...

  • Holy Crap (Score:5, Funny)

    by jandrese (485) * <kensama@vt.edu> on Friday January 06 2006, @06:18PM (#14412531) Homepage Journal
    Slashdot is in a heap of trouble.
  • by multiplexo (27356) on Friday January 06 2006, @06:20PM (#14412558) Journal
    to press all of the buttons on an elevator at once?

  • Video of Story (Score:5, Informative)

    by wike (742888) on Friday January 06 2006, @06:20PM (#14412561) Homepage
    Here's a link to a video newstory that provides some more details: http://www.wkyc.com/video/player.aspx?aid=18650&si d=45721&bw= [wkyc.com] This story has been up on Digg.com for a few hours, the school's website has been down most of the day
  • Number of hits (Score:5, Informative)

    by Silverlancer (786390) on Friday January 06 2006, @06:25PM (#14412618)
    According to the folks at Fark, who got to it before the slashdotting, it only had about 900 hits total. Come on, they crashed the server in NINE HUNDRED HITS?!
  • School (Score:5, Funny)

    by taskforce (866056) on Friday January 06 2006, @06:27PM (#14412640) Homepage
    The school in question is Lake High School in Uniontown Ohio.

    http://lake.stark.k12.oh.us/ [k12.oh.us]

    The site is actually down, which is a shame; it would have been a nice oppurtunity to see if we could get Zonk thrown in jail for posting it on the Slashdot front page.

  • by Psionicist (561330) on Friday January 06 2006, @06:30PM (#14412659)
    This doesn't make any sense, at all.

    - If a boy tells his friend to reload a webpage, he gets thrown into jail and gets felony charges.
    - A lone spammer gets $11 billion in fines.
    - If joe sixpack downloads a movie he gets huge fines.

    Yet, if a medium to large corporation sell/delete customer records, infect consumers computers with spyware or the like, they only get a slap on the wrist?

    When did corporations get more freedoms than individuals?
  • by ChipMonk (711367) on Friday January 06 2006, @06:32PM (#14412683)
    Last year, an article on the WEWS Channel 5 website had this gem of a quote:

    "School officials are not sure they [know] what has caused so many pregnancies..."

    Someone needs to get these people a clue-bat.
  • if i break your arm because i didn't see you standing behind me while i was moving a heavy piece of furniture, then there should be mild repercussions

    if i break your arm by taking it, looking dead in your eye, and twisting it as hard as i can, then there should be severe repercussions

    the whole issue is one of intent

    intent matters in this world, and any opinion that ignores intent, about this kid, or a whole range of modern problems in this world, is not a useful or valid opinion
  • As a concerned user of fully patched Gentoo, I have tested the "F5 causes excessive reloading" vulnerability. It works on Konqueror, Mozilla and Firefox, with all patches installed, including hardened kernel. Local access to the machine is NOT required; the F5 vulnerability can be triggered when opening a web browser through, e.g., SSH forwarded X connections.

    I hope there will be a patch soon!