Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Google Patent for User Targeted Search Results

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Sun Nov 06, 2005 01:52 PM
from the in-the-crosshairs dept.
lorenbake writes "Scoble is one of many to report that Google has filed a patent for user targeted, or attention targeted, search results which will change the ranking of Google's organic results per each individual user based upon that user's search behavior, location, sites visited, and even 'typing behavior'. How could Google build such user profiles to serve customized organic (non-paid) results to? Tracking via their network of desktop apps, advertising, Gmail, and other network services."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Do No Evil (Score:5, Funny)

    by Soporific (595477) on Sunday November 06 2005, @01:55PM (#13963833)
    Do no evil. Unless you have shareholders?

    ~S
  • 2084. Google will rule the government. Wherever you look, everything you see will be tailored to what you want to see. Screw normal advertising, you'll be seeing "Google AdSense billboards" which display roadside alerts and stuff based on whatever you're thinking. Google is the new thought police...
  • Evil, Google. Google, Evil. (Score:4, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 06 2005, @01:55PM (#13963844)
    I'm sure you two will get along.

    The main reason any big company patents anything is so they can violate the patents of other companies.

    "What's that, Microsoft? We're violating your patent #314159265? Well you're violating our patent number #299792458. Lets call it even, shall we?"
  • Help me Slashdot!!! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Psionicist (561330) on Sunday November 06 2005, @01:56PM (#13963846)
    It's about (= 'Google 'good), but also about (= 'patents 'evil), what to do, what to THINK!!!
  • The Google Future (Score:1)

    by chengee (821396) on Sunday November 06 2005, @01:56PM (#13963847)
    Exciting times we live in... Yahoo and MSN must prevail!
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • geez (Score:1, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 06 2005, @01:57PM (#13963852)
    everyones jumping on the organic bandwagon... wonder when we'll see low carb google
  • Filing a patent is EVIL (Score:1, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday November 06 2005, @01:57PM (#13963857)
    Since filing a patent is evil, Google has violated its "do no evil" policy. Google does like most other companies do immoral things when it benefits the stock holders. Now that we know that, can we please not get a stupid Google story in Slashdot every day? It is tiresome and the company is just as evil as all other companies.
  • Just my 2 cents... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Froze (398171) on Sunday November 06 2005, @01:58PM (#13963861)
    (http://butsuri.homelinux.net/)
    Before this goes all big brother...
    I just want to say that I hove no problem with targeted advertising at all. If there is a way that does not impose on my personal freedoms to selectiviely show me things that I might be interested in purchasing it is not only ok but much preffered to the massive spamvertisement campaigns that go on now.
    • Re:Just my 2 cents... (Score:4, Insightful)

      by cgenman (325138) on Sunday November 06 2005, @04:23PM (#13964766)
      (http://www.chriscanfield.net/)
      I have to say, I'm with you on this one, in theory. I really hate the irrelevancies of modern advertising. I would rather be shown a flood of ads for things I might be interested in (and preferably might not know about) in place of the flood of ads for "punch the monkey and win a years supply of Vioxx." Plus if the ads are twice as valuable to the advertiser, they can use half as many (yeah, right).

      That having been said, it is the database about me which is a bit creepy. But, as huge databases about me already exist I can't complain too much. I've always said that if we had perfect transparency, everyone's "freakish oddities" would seem normal.

      [ Parent ]
    • Targetted results by phorm (Score:2) Monday November 07 2005, @02:20AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • All I want.. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by lightyear4 (852813) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:01PM (#13963883)
    (http://www.fugitivethought.com/)
    All I want...is the ability to easily opt out.
  • Disposable personalities (Score:3, Interesting)

    by zecg (521666) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:02PM (#13963884)
    Don't allow cookies accross sessions, dispose of your personalities and change your gmail accounts regularly, use only GPG 4096-byte encrypted text in your gmail account, put on your tinfoil hat when thinking anything at all and - you'll still be within the System, tracked and numbered.
  • This is awesome! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by LaughingCoder (914424) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:06PM (#13963906)
    Those guys at $oogle are making Microsoft look like amateurs when it comes to world domination!
  • All the world's information (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Ifni (545998) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:06PM (#13963909)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    ... includes yours.
    • Funny? by enjahova (Score:1) Sunday November 06 2005, @04:03PM
  • Fine by me (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Turn-X Alphonse (789240) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:06PM (#13963911)
    (Last Journal: Sunday September 19 2004, @10:03PM)
    My Gmail account is my "send everything here" account. It gets spam from every where from tin foil hat sites to live journal. If you can find a way to work out what I like from "Person X has replied to your comment with 'lol, I agree' " then that's fine by me.
  • Cradle-to-Grave Ad Tracking (Score:5, Interesting)

    by K-Man (4117) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:08PM (#13963923)
    Let's face it, the only economic reason for a company to build and host a bunch of unrelated applications is to link together advertising and user profiles. Why else would a search engine be talking about providing free WiFi service? So they can track users' locations and deliver location-targeted ads.
  • Welcome to the future (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Colin Smith (2679) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:09PM (#13963928)
    Where computers and systems know what you want and then give it to you. Good? Evil? Well that all depends on intent doesn't it.

     
  • Are patnets evil? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by a_greer2005 (863926) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:10PM (#13963929)
    NO! the abuse of ptents is evil, and Google has yet to do this, they are just defending themselves in the arms race against ass-hats like Bezose and Gates, who patented the single and double clicks respectively, and other such loonicy. Google has yet to cross thhe line, untill they do, I will respect them -- HELL, if they havent abused teir power by now, why would they start?
  • It's already being done (Score:5, Informative)

    by Slashdoc Beta (925619) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:11PM (#13963942)
    (http://www.slashdoc.com/)
    On some seaches you perform you see a "personalized results (BETA)" message. I didn't really have a chance to determine whether the results are better, other than that it ranks the sites you visited before higher.
  • by ip_fired (730445) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:12PM (#13963952)
    (http://www.pojo.us/)
    Perhaps they are filing the patent to prevent other companies from filing a similar patent and then using it against Google? Google has already started down the road of targetted ads for their users and storing everything they can about the user's search habits.

    For example, if you sign up for a personalized google page, they'll start tracking your searchs, and they will even let you go back and look at the searches that you made weeks ago.

    I personally like this kind of stuff. It's useful to me if I forgot to bookmark a site that I liked, I can go back through my search history and find the site again.
  • What were you expecting? (Score:3, Informative)

    by whayworth (928952) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:14PM (#13963957)
    All the clues were there: context-sensitive ads in GMail was just an obvious one. If you sign up for an account with Google, you agree to their licensing terms; you do the same when instsalling an operating system from a corporation who shall not be named. If you don't like the idea that Google has access to your email, realize that any other provider has the same privileges; it's just that Google, intelligently (but not necessarily morally defensible), chose to take advantage of them. If you didn't use Google, it would be your ISP or another email provider (unless you have your own server).

    TANSTAAFL.
  • Subject (Score:1)

    by trollable (928694) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:19PM (#13963979)
    (http://www.milliondollarscreenshot.com/)
    You still have software patents? How unlucky you are! BTW, nothing new. It has been done many times (and long time ago) but in general for a specific domain (music, ...). Google is just introducing targeted search to their own system, which is a bit more global. Now burn the USPTO.
  • Get ready to watch ... (Score:5, Funny)

    by ngunton (460215) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:19PM (#13963982)
    (http://www.neilgunton.com/)
    ... as all the Google fanboys do mental summersaults to twist reality to fit the conflicting notions that Google can do nothing wrong, and yet web patents are so very, very wrong...

    I can see it now, future headline:

    Google CEO Revealed as Beelzebub Prince of Darkness, Mountain View New 7th Circle of Hell

    Slashdot comments:

    "Well, you know, Satan *is* very misunderstood"

    "Gmail still rocks! I don't care if the Google minions sacrifice a kitten every time I check my mail, as long as I have my 100 TB of storage! Whoohoo!"

    "I just sold my eternal soul for more relevant search results - but hey, I got a great price on this DVD player! Thanks Asmodeus!"

    "My monitor smokes a bit when I do searches now, but hey - I can find out what all my friends have been *really* thinking about me! Hey, this new GoogleBrainCrawler kicks butt! Go Google! But ... make the voices stop, please?"

    "Yahoo! made a deal with the ancient Nordic Gods but they're just playing catch up at this point"

    "Jeez guys, if it was Microsoft making a deal with Belial then we'd be all over it but just because it's Google, you're all ... erk ... ack ... (transmission terminated)"

  • you are what you buy (Score:3, Funny)

    by moviepig.com (745183) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:28PM (#13964022)
    (http://www.moviepig.com/)
    ...change the ranking of Google's organic results per each individual user...

    Okay, here's a tinfoil-wrapped theory for your light enjoyment:

    Psychologists have long claimed that advertising affects our psyches (e.g., cartoon shows' cereal and toy ads, the NFL's beer ads...). Google proposes to detect those changes in our psyches, and presumably to reinforce them. This could amount to a self-fulfilling and dangerous feedback-loop... resulting in mental image-burn, if not outright transformation. Before the body-snatching takes hold, I'm writing my congressperson...

  • it's all good (Score:5, Insightful)

    by intmainvoid (109559) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:28PM (#13964024)
    Makes perfect sense for google to track which links i click on - essentially i'm filtering out the type results I don't want, so if the search algorithm can learn from that and produce more relevant results, then great!

    Privacy isn't such an issue on this considering Google already has this information on a per user level - this probably doesn't raise any additional privacy concerns.
    • Re:it's all good by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Sunday November 06 2005, @03:31PM
  • by kclittle (625128) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:30PM (#13964033)
    ... a motto of "do no evil" with patent applications that use phrases such as "user targeted"? Obviously I am not a customer to be served, but a resource to be "targeted". What next, "identify and neutralize"? "Search and destroy"?
    -k
  • They probably have to do this (Score:5, Insightful)

    by max born (739948) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:34PM (#13964057)
    Google is not necessarily evil for doing taking out a patent. We live in a world of IP and patents. They probably have to do this for protection.

    However, if Google starts using this patent to thwart their competition then they'll be making a mockery of their own do-no-evil slogan.
  • I'm sure I could write a witty comment about how the once noble Google has fallen from grace and sold its soul, rising like a rocket to the grat and smog filled heights of modern corperate decadence, but the storyline has probably been patented by now.
  • by polv0 (596583) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:36PM (#13964068)
    What with gmail being copyrighted in the UK, perhaps this is designed to prevent others from frivously patenting google's technology and then suing them in an attempt to get paid off?
  • Bloody 'ell! (Score:2, Informative)

    Remember, in this wonderful technocapitalist system of ours, YOU HAVE A CHOICE!

    If you don't want to support the 767-buying [independent.co.uk], patent-filing search engine [google.com], you could switch to ...

    ... the search engine [yahoo.com] that snitches on dissidents [iht.com] to the secret police of totalitarian China!

    ... the search engine run by a bullying monopoly that has run afoul [cfo.com] of anti-trust laws.

    ... the search engine [a9.com] of another company looking to exploit the patent system.

    Suddenly I'm wishing at least one university had held on to its search engine (Stanford had Google and Berkeley Inktomi) before spinning it out to make bucks.

    • Re:Bloody 'ell! by enjahova (Score:1) Sunday November 06 2005, @04:11PM
      • Re:Bloody 'ell! by DysenteryInTheRanks (Score:1) Sunday November 06 2005, @08:24PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Sweet Revenge (Score:3, Funny)

    by sco08y (615665) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:43PM (#13964102)
    We'll have sweet revenge when the goatse trolls run an innocuous search for their boss and get their "personalized results."
  • Wow, cool (Score:1)

    by Lord Bitman (95493) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:43PM (#13964103)
    (http://www.the-h.net/)
    I was just thinking yesterday what a horrible idea that would be and how glad I am that google doesnt do this. I'm so cool.
  • Google and Privacy (Score:5, Insightful)

    by pdjohe (575876) on Sunday November 06 2005, @02:51PM (#13964162)
    Google is getting worse and worse with privacy. From a geek point of view, they got a bunch of cool apps, but from a humanist point of view, I feel google is definately turning over to the dark side.

    In a couple of years, we will probably be discussing Google and privacy concerns just like we discuss Microsoft and security concerns now.
  • by uberchicken (121048) on Sunday November 06 2005, @03:32PM (#13964435)
    This is actually very clever. It's just a ploy by Google themselves to shake out all the hypocrites and fanboys. It's like that stuff the FBI use to show up semen at a crime scene.

    My slashdot policy book must be out of date. Didn't we all agree software patents were evil?
  • amazon doing that ? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by dindi (78034) on Sunday November 06 2005, @03:34PM (#13964446)
    it is kinda covered by a previous amazon patent, besides displaying an ad on a visitors behaviour exists for a long time:

    e.g.
    My visitor is looking at portable mp3 audio players for the last 5 visits, you want to display an ipod commercial instead of a hairdryer.

    When that user searches for "moby audio tracks" you will present results ranked higher for places that sell mp3 other than LPs.

    Respect to google, but I think it is also a common knowledge patent. I mean what I mentioned is an afternoon of SQL query tuning that I do not want to compare to millions of results organized by google, but at the end that patent seems to cover a bunch of similar practices that fall under the

    "search result ordering based on user behaviour" ....

    the typing issue is a good idea though .... e.g. you can distingush grandma typing 1 letter per 5 seconds, while mr 10-finger-typer geek can type 5+ letters in a sec :) hmm ... strange idea ....
    I guess it also includes typo watch, misspell watch and similar ..... cool idea:) never thought of that ....

    now google will start displaying ads about "quit drinking" or "hangover pills" when compared to my normal daily typing I start typing terribly on a late Saturday night ? ARE YOU DRUNK ? :)

    now google just needs to start putting a HAL-like glowing red eye and microphones into our rooms, an anal implant and urine and stool analyzer to provide perfect results ....

    off topic:

    I mentioned it already , but interestingly the more and more google refines it's algo, the more and more I find myself using other search engines, as some of the things I am searching for provide less and less usable information for me...
    for tech stuff google is unbeatable, however shopping/comparing and travel, I turn to yahoo more and more nowadays.....

  • by RockoW (883785) on Sunday November 06 2005, @03:47PM (#13964528)
    (http://steve.blogdns.org/)
    I think this patent is for their on going Personalized Search Beta technology you can enable or disable it is YOUR choice.
    Personalized Search Help [google.com]
  • So that's why... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by mikael (484) on Sunday November 06 2005, @03:54PM (#13964560)
    This has been driving me nuts for some time now.

    Often, when trying to find some information at work, I'll try a Google search, and
    make a note of the search terms in order to continue working at home. Then when I go
    home and type in the same set of keywords, I'll get a completely different set of
    search results, with the articles I was reading now missing.
  • a-ok (Score:2, Interesting)

    by frankcow (925500) on Sunday November 06 2005, @03:55PM (#13964571)
    (http://justin-cook.com/wp)
    I have absolutely no problem with this. I really don't care how detailed they want to get in their information gathering. After all, I'm one in a few billion people, what are the chances that any of my 'private' information would ever be surfaced in any way.

    I don't see this as an invasion of privacy. I see it as a business filling the need of a customer, one who wants to find the exact information they're looking for, and instantly.
  • Teaching someone to search? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by kinbote (100263) on Sunday November 06 2005, @03:59PM (#13964610)
    (http://infinitejest.org/)
    This may be a disaster for Person X trying to communicate to Person Y how to search for a particular topic. The terms that yield good results for X may receive hidden help from X's personal context, which is totally murky and can't be readily communicated to Y, let alone typed in the search box...

    As a simplified example, consider how the agriculture professor and a freshman student may end up with wildly divergent search results for "Onion"...

  • Patents always Evil? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by kg4gyt (799019) on Sunday November 06 2005, @04:12PM (#13964703)
    Patents can be a good thing in the right hands. If google allows anyone to use the technology it could be a good thing, because if they control it companies like Microsoft can't charge us for it. Google could get the patent, use it against microsoft, but allow open source not for profit groups to do with the technology as they please.
  • PADME: So this is how liberty dies, to the sound of thunderous applause.

    Well done Google... another patent... another cool app... but then all in all it's just another brick in the wall.
  • NSLs (Score:1)

    by Thrasy (746008) on Sunday November 06 2005, @04:43PM (#13964907)
    Just wait until the FBI hands out an NSL for your "user targeted" search results...
  • To thwart world domination, use your browser to block everything except session cookies from Google. This will allow you to keep using Gmail and your Gmail Notifier Firefox extension, etc. while keeping Google from tracking you across the Internet./p.

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by SushiFugu (593444) on Sunday November 06 2005, @05:28PM (#13965158)
    The thing that bugs me is it seems impossible to find out exactly what information Google has tied to me. Do they offer any way for me to request to see such info? I would assume not, they would likely make the argument that if they allowed that there could be misuses by people claiming to be someone they are not attempting to gopher information, but it still bothers me that there is no way to find out.
  • Cool! (Score:3, Funny)

    So when I google myself [google.co.uk] I'll look really popular on the web!
  • by Paraplex (786149) on Sunday November 06 2005, @05:58PM (#13965350)
    (http://www.richgentlemenhide.com/)
    I've always wanted a search feature in my "Stumble to" account

    stumble! has a decent enough database of me, matched up to a decent enough database of other users so that websites I visit through it are entirely relevant to me, however they are also *limited* to the select group of current interests, not really allowing for any drastic changes of interests, and indeed funnelling you only into areas that are already relevant to you.

    Google may be able to address this using this system (or alternatively it may further limit peoples ability to see other peoples ideas by accident)
  • Blogedy, blog, blog (Score:3, Interesting)

    Yes, if you keep clicking on the links from blog [wordpress.com] to [searchenginejournal.com] blog [searchenginejournal.com], you will find the actual [uspto.gov] patent [uspto.gov] links [uspto.gov].

    It would be helpful if submitters included such links directly rather than sending all the interested /. readers on a wlid goose chase.
  • Analogy (Score:2)

    by fulldecent (598482) * on Sunday November 06 2005, @10:26PM (#13966686)
    (http://www.phor.net/)
    I had a couple mod points, but I think a couple simple analogies will better explain that the behavior exhibited by google, and refered to in this patent, will clearly fall under your definition of "reasonable".

    You walk into a library in Mountain View, CA and talk to a librarian. You ask her to help you find some stuff about rosa parks [google.com]. And PS, this librarian is hot, you talk to her all day every day. She recognizes you and gets to know you as time goes on. And you sometimes give her mail to send, which she makes clear that she will read to get a better understanding of you. And she sometimes tells you when she thinks you'll be interested in one of her sponsors. She is also kind enough to completely forget who you are if you ask her. Oh, and she gives great head.

    Another day you walk into a store in New York, NY (doubleclick.net). You find there a man who somehow knows most of the books the hot librarian in Mountain View told you about. He also knows your credit card number and your mother's maiden name. He stabs you and takes you wallet, fleeing the scene.

    Hope that clears it up.

    P.S. Google search history now allows you to "star" visited pages and add "tags" to them, exactly like delicious. Only thing is, you can use multiple word tags.
  • by kg4czo (516374) on Monday November 07 2005, @02:10AM (#13967648)
    That should be..... The Search Results target you!!!
    [ Parent ]
  • 10 replies beneath your current threshold.