Nestle Patents Coffee Beer 471
Dotnaught writes "New Scientist reports that Nestec, a Nestle subsidiary, has applied for a patent on a fermented coffee beverage. In other words, coffee beer -- it foams like beer and packs the caffeine of coffee, with "fruity and/or floral notes due to the fermentation of the coffee aroma."
Drew Carey Beat them to it!! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Drew Carey Beat them to it!! (Score:2)
What every college town needs (Score:5, Funny)
Not a bad patent... (Score:5, Insightful)
But anyway, for all those nay-saying this patent, I think it's a fairly decent one. It certainly isn't obvious!
From TFA:
Nestlé admits it was tricky to preserve the characteristic coffee smell in the production process. Coffee beans are roasted normally, and the chemicals containing the natural aroma collected in a cryogenic condenser, before being converted into coffee oil. The remains of the roast are then ground to powder, mixed with yeast and sucrose, and fermented for 4 hours at just below 22C. At this temperature the yeast can still metabolise but does not generate alcohol.
The aroma oil is then mixed in with the liquid and nitrogen is injected to make it foam. Adding a touch of extra sugar also helps trap the aroma until the drink is poured, Nestlé claim.
Now, ask yourself, is that obvious? I think this patent is perfectly acceptable.
Re:Not a bad patent... (Score:2)
The patent maybe acceptable, but having read all of that would you actually drink this chemical brew? Me neither!
Espresso stout [ineedcoffee.com] OTOH... 8*)
Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Not a bad patent... (Score:5, Informative)
Because patents require disclosure, the whole idea is to offer a certain time of protection for a product while at the same time forcing disclosure of it to the public. It is this disclosure that makes it possible for people to advance technologies and improve on them. Actually the Coca-Cola as a trade secret is a great example of how keeping a secret and not disclosing could technically stifle innovation in the soda industry if other companies were already so prolific in the area anyway.
The Big Mac is a BAD example. It is a burger which would be easily rejected as a sum of its parts. Nothing holding patentable weight, but a drink like Coca-Cola is a chemical mixture and one that is actually useful. What you fail to realize is that by patenting this idea Nestle has made is possible for every company in the world to improve on their process and to improve the overall item. Without this it would be a trade secret for all eternity and no one would ever know how it was made. Since this is something that people have not done before, it is important that disclosure is made in order to allow people to actually learn the process.
Really, you are WAY off base on this one. Go crawl back into your hole of paranoia, and moderators mod down the Parent because he is not insightful at all, just terribly misinformed.
Re:Not a bad patent... (Score:5, Informative)
Take the big 4 soda makers. Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, RC, and DPSU (Dr. Pepper/Seven-Up in case you are dense). Now none of these companies use the same formula. This is why they all have very different tasting soda products and why many people either love or hate one or the other when it comes to Coke and Pepsi in particular.
Now let us say for a minute that no one else was quick enough to have figured out the wonderful process and ingredients that Coca-Cola uses. By having a patent you force disclosure meaning everyone would then be in the know about Coca-Cola's recipe. This means that anyone could clone Coca-Cola perfectly after the patent age was up (see the post that is a sibling to the GP).
As it stands Coca-Cola's recipe is a trade secret and the same is probably quite true for Pepsi, RC and Dr. Pepper. This means that a "perfect" copy of these drinks is never going to be possible because so long as they protect their trade secret, anyone making a exact clone would be breaking the law in "stealing a trade secret." This means knock-off soda made by the people who provide grocery chains and Wal-Mart with their generic soda will never be perfect replicas and only close approximations.
What this boils down to is this: no patent means competition is only driven between brands of what are technically varying products. There is no generic substitute so people who want the "real thing" have to buy it from Coke, Pepsi, etc. This means that they usually do not have to worry so much about competing with the prices of generic sodas which are often sold for as much as half the cost of the name brand. The reason they do not have to compete with these is because they are smaller in number, but also because they can never successfully replicate a brands taste without copying the recipe, which as discussed above is illegal.
Your example of the RIM v. NTP case is not a good example. First off, you misuse the idea because it goes beyond e-mail and wireless link. Go read the claims of the patent and get back to me on that one, because unlike what the masses of patent haters on
Now back to my original example. The reason a Big Mac has no patent is because burgers are much older then the Big Mac. The idea of adding lettuce, tomato, etc. is no big deal since it would be "well known" in the art. There was nothing new and innovative about the Big Mac, I mean even the lame sauce isn't that secret.
I will now point you to a particular patent for a food product. In this case 4,871,554 which is a patent for fortified food products. The first claim basically covers your fortified orange juice. The patent as you will see is held by Coca-Cola, for their Minute Maid division no doubt. I once again invite you to look at class 426 and check out subclass 7 for fermentation processes. There are patents for Anheuser-Busch which covered a cholesterol free egg product (3,987,212) which is now expired.
There is a difference between patenting a mass produced product and a simple cooking recipe. The fact is it would not be economical to get patents on simple food recipes and quite possibly impossible since there is such a wide variety in cooking. On a side note, recipes have the potential to be copyrighted [copyright.gov] if provided with the proper context. We all know how much longer a copyright lasts over a patent.
Seriously, this is not a really contested issue among patents and you are in an obvious minority here. Why do I say that? The patent application is a WIPO/PCT patent application being sent to a wide variety of states, therefore it must be something that holds patentable weight in many countries and not just in the USA.
Re:Not a bad patent... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Not a bad patent... (Score:3)
Please don't post in ignorance. If you reverse-engineered Coke's formula (which has already been done), the Coca-Cola corporation would have absolutely no legal grounds on which to sue you. If you
Re:Not a bad patent... (Score:3)
No, no, no. That is absolutely NOT how a trade secret works. In fact, you cannot violate a trade secret precisely because of that second word: secret. If you come up with the formula for Coca Cola by any other means (i.e. chemical analysis, trial&error, plain dumb luck) than flat-out stealing the recipe, you're clear.
Of course, if you work for Coca Cola, have knowledge of the recipe and sell it to competitor X, you're toa
Re:Not a bad patent... (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Not a bad patent... (Score:3, Informative)
I think you mean shill.
Re:What every college town needs (Score:2)
Redhook/Starbucks produced a coffee beer (Score:2)
Another frivolous patent.
Patently ridiculous!
Exhibit A (Score:2)
Re:Exhibit A (Score:2)
Re:Redhook/Starbucks produced a coffee beer (Score:2)
Bring back Doubleblack stout! Prior art!
Re:Redhook/Starbucks produced a coffee beer (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Redhook/Starbucks produced a coffee beer (Score:2)
Schwab
Woohoo! (Score:5, Funny)
Nestle owns all European chocolate (Score:2, Interesting)
Take a look at your kitkat some time - licensed from Nestle.
I was at a restaurant at 10,000ft in the alps. Nestle hot chocolate, of course.
All of Nestle's chocolate products are made with powdered milk, except for Callier - the only Nestle chocolate made with fresh milk. Have fun getting it in the states.
Probably the only chocolatier that Nestle doesn't own is Caotina - damn hard to get that stuff in the states too.
My point is, Nestle has
Re:Nestle owns all European chocolate (Score:2)
Re:Nestle owns all European chocolate (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Nestle owns all European chocolate (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Nestle owns all European chocolate (Score:2, Insightful)
Nestle only seems big because it bought out British Rowntrees in the late 80's early 90's, which made Fruit Pastels, Kitkats, Smarties, Polos etc...
Re:Nestle owns all European chocolate (Score:2)
.. "Still Better than Cadbury!" (Score:2)
I dont eat much chocolate, but when I am over in the USA, I make sure that I get some he
Re:Nestle owns all European chocolate (Score:2, Informative)
What about Lindt [lindtchocolate.com]? I don't think is Nestle owned and there are many "little" chocolate prodoucers in Europe that make some delicious product. Here in italy we have NOVI, that's quite good but if you are searching something particular and you are in tuscany try the one from slitti [slitti.it]
Re:Nestle owns all European chocolate (Score:4, Informative)
ObSimpsons (Score:3, Funny)
Bartender: "Bee-er?"
This will be perfect for late night problem sets (Score:3, Funny)
Beer and coffee, together at last! (Score:2)
Homer
Here we go... (Score:2)
How deliciously absurd!
your wish is already granted (Score:2)
Re:Here we go... (Score:2)
Buzz Beer (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Buzz Beer (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Buzz Beer (Score:5, Funny)
I guess to be fair to you, the moderators marked the parent as "Insightful" so I guess they didn't get it either.
Re:Buzz Beer (Score:2)
Have I gone to heaven? (Score:2)
Skittles! (Score:4, Funny)
NB. I said beer was "knock-me-out" not "knock-me-up", so don't go getting any ideas. Not that the two are mutually incompatible, I guess...
Re:Skittles! (Score:2)
Assuming this is you [uq.edu.au] I think it might be a physical impossibility to knock-you-up in the classic sense of the phrase - unless of course you are the yellow one in the picture.
Clarification (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Clarification (Score:2)
Well done Nestle. Next you'll be making beer that is murky, has no head and tastes like bitter burnt beans. Good luck to you.
YRO? (Score:2, Informative)
Prior Art (Score:2)
The Drew Carey Show
Give me Java Porter any day... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Give me Java Porter any day... (Score:2, Funny)
Ah, they avoided prior art (Score:2)
Oh yeah? (Score:2)
Buzz Beer!!! (Score:2)
a couple of contentions (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.ratebeer.com/ [ratebeer.com] and search for 'coffee', 'mocha' or 'java'.
However, these are simply Porters, Stouts, etc. that are brewed as they would normally be but with the addition of coffee, being a complimentary and intuitive adjunct since roasted malts frequently contribute a coffeeish, roasty sort of malt bitterness and flavor to many dark beers.
In fact, this Nestle product wouldn't even seem to be eligible to be called beer since it doesn't appear to contain malt, a prime ingredient of beer along with water, hops and yeast.
Prior art! (Score:2)
From the URL:
"A dark beer made with a touch of roasted chicory, organic Mexican coffee, St. John's Wort, and licorice root."
I'd hope that the patent office would at least bother doing some research.
NO, officer... (Score:3, Funny)
That's not BEER you smell on my breath, it's coffee. COFFEE! Hey, put those damn handcuffs away!
Prior art? (Score:2)
Does anyone think they're the first to think of combining the two most addictive beverages in the world?
I'm sure the patent is much more specific than just mixing the two, enough to make it unique, but the general idea is nothing new. I really didn't know you could patent food, but I guess where there's a will there's a way.
Um.... (Score:2)
How the fuck is this "your rights online"?
OSQ (Score:2)
alert, and reckless all night long.
Clerk: Well, Congress is racing back to Washington to outlaw
these. [puts a bottle of pills on the counter]
Homer: [takes bottle] Sold!
[downs most of the pills on the spot]
Clerk: Hey, you can't take that many pep pills at once.
Homer: No problem, I'll balance it out with a bottle of sleeping
process, not idea... (Score:2)
a stimulant and a depressant? (Score:2, Funny)
What the (expletive deleted)...?! (Score:2)
So I decided to pop a search out there:
http://www.californiawineandfood.com/links/coffeeb eerandotherbeverages.html [california...ndfood.com]
Also from another site analysing beers: Mountain Sun's coffee beer also has more of a coffee flavor. "I love the Mountain Sun Java, but it has a lot more coffee character," Parker said. "That's the beauty of it. Even in something as esoteric as a coffee beer you can have a range of choices. That's what makes brewing g
Cellphone chaperone (Score:2)
There was even a demonstration of such a system on British TV at least 10 years ago being used by the police in "sting" opera
How to deride? (Score:2)
Ah, yes. The fruity and/or floral notes. It has a slightly musky scent wafting on the pallette and... wait. We're talking about a cross between beer and Red Bull here. WTF is it with the high-brow wine vocabulary?! Ah, well. We brought it back down to the college level at the end when we proposed that it was caused by an aroma that ferments.
Pass me some of that weed, dude! My aroma is fermenting!
Applied for != Patented (Score:2)
pfft.
Kahlua (Score:2)
Heck, you can put Kahlua in coffee!
I don't see being able to do any of that with a beer made from coffee. Not if I want the result to be drinkable, anyway.
I knew they were working on it! (Score:3, Funny)
This is not new! (Score:2)
Papazian (Score:2)
Tomacco anyone? (Score:2)
Brought to you by Homer [thesimpsons.com].
Just home brew your own (Score:3, Informative)
Here is one recipe from that link (I just might have to try it):
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:2, Insightful)
And what do these Real Red Blooded Programmers do after work? Sit around waiting for the Bug Alarm, at which point they slide down the Fire Pole leading from their basement above the office to the office itself? No rational person
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:3, Funny)
And that's what I call REAL Ultimate Power!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:4, Insightful)
We do "real programming" as much as anyone else.
Fact is, you can take whatever opinions you have about beer and caffeine, but the average person doesn't share those opinions. The average person sees nothing wrong with either caffeine or beer. This is the reason why Starbuck's makes tons of money, and why any gas station has probably about 1/4 of the beverages that it has for sale which are alcoholic.
Your small little prudish subsection of the world may not give a shit about caffeinated beer, but neither will devout Mormons, Arabs, nor dry counties all around the country. Just because you don't give a shit, doesn't mean no one else will. Especially even among even "real" programmers.
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:5, Funny)
It's fun to play chemistry with your body. Showdowns between Starbucks and NyQuil, NoDoz and Sudafed, Red Bull and Sleeping pills. It's legal so it can't possibly hurt me, right?
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:5, Insightful)
If it's in moderation, alcohol and/or caffeine is alright. Maybe you're thinking of extreme cases, like the unemployed guy down the street drinking 10 beers before lunch time. I have met many smart people who drink alcohol socially. Caffeine has been around for centuries and again, within moderation, it isn't going to kill you or make you stupid.
Before you start harping on people drinking caffeine or alcohol, take a look at what people eat. The nutrition value of meals these days, in the US, has taken a large nosedive. Obesity is huge, and it is mostly because of what people eat and the lack of exercise.
Moderated beer consumption doesn't make one a good or bad programmer....
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:2)
Isn't that kind of the point?
Coffe is a slow poison (Score:2)
"Coffe is a slow poison. It has to be. I have drunk eight cups a day for fifty years, and I am still not dead." -- Voltaire
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:5, Insightful)
While many of the best humans I have ever met are strong advocates of caffeine and alcohol use.
Come on... (Score:2)
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:2)
Um... The USDA uses a 2000 Calorie reference diet. That's for a normal lifestyle. If you put eight to ten hours of physical activity in and only consume 1000 Calories, most people are not gonna last long...
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:2)
Caffeine makes me jumpy and makes my heart feel like it's doing crazy things long before it really starts to keep me awake. And when it does keep me awake, it might as well not for all the difference it makes to my productivity.
Pseudoephedrine on the other hand... wheeeeeeeeeeee
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:2)
All alcohol does is impair the drinker's mind. Caffeine causes undue anxiety. Those are not good things to suffer from when you're trying to write solid software, especially when facing deadlines and changing requirements.
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:2)
Alcohol does have health benefits in moderation - for mental health, that is.
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:5, Funny)
I don't know. A little extra anxiety and paranoia might be a good thing for people writing antivirus software and firewalls....
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:2)
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:4, Interesting)
Also, There has been a lot discussion lately about coffees health benefits, see the following articles for example:
Coffee found to be high in health-giving antioxidants [independent.co.uk]
Coffee is America's No. 1 Source of Antioxidants [go.com]
Coffee: The New Health Food? [webmd.com]
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:2)
I don't want the developers of mission critical software being impaired while designing and implementing software. I'm talking about software that can result in people dying if it contains errors. The sort of software controlling nuclear power plant shutdown systems, or aeroplane flight control software.
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't give a rats ass if a person is stoned, hyper on caffine or buzzed if they accomplish what they attempt, always. If there isn't a method to see if a person is capable for this mission critical software, THAT is the problem.
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:4, Funny)
BTW: It isn't just guesswork that reduces errors. If you have formally proven your systems, (which I'm quite sure you have right?) then they are correct. It isn't necessary for the implementer really to be sober as long as you have a formal proof and others, including yourself with your pristine substance free (no sugar right) body, can check the proof. Going from a provably correct system to real code is pretty easy work what with all those nice tight pre/post conditions an all.
Oh, and of course you only use compilers that are subjected to similar standards, right?
And please don't tell me any of this runs on windows, none of it runs on windows, right? I bet you're only solid mission critical operating systems that have had every line of code checked and double checked against a formal system? Right?
After all, we wouldn't want the software with bugs. It has to be as good as the rest of the airplane, bug free, nothing will fail, nothing has been overlooked, the design is PERFECT!!!
Reminds of that accident that happened sometime in the late eighties/early nineties where an airplane toilet had its contents jetisoned while still in flight and the frozen contents came crashing into someone's living room. The victim was quoted as saying "Of course it surprised me, the last thing I expect to come crashing into my house in this day and age is an icy BM."
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:3, Insightful)
Wait. Every time you drive a car someone is at risk. Screw the don't drink and drive thing, we need don't drink a coke and drive!
Moderation. Yes, repeat that word. Real adults know their limits. Sure a pot of coffee will make me purform less well, but 2-3 cups has no real mental imparement. (for me), and thus I indulge.
Fat foods, and a lazy life style could also hinder their abilities. As could dating.
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Why do people drink this crap? (Score:2, Interesting)
I half a 1 and a half hour commute each day.
I do this on a bicyle
I also drink coffee (usually in moedration) and alcohol (in moderation).
Then again, Im currently working in moscow for a week, so I have no biking commute, I drink about a dozen cups of coffee a day, (and Im not going to talk about alcohol, though compared to the locals Im hardly drinking anything).
Ive also spend time doing similar work in muslim countries (no alcohol allowed, and tea, tea, tea al
Re:bah (Score:2)
No thanks.
Beats me where these are from, but try St. Peters Porter or Original Flag Porter. (Original Flag may be US? Regardless, it beats any of the numerous US porters I've tried.) Any stout must top the standards of that category - Guiness, Murphy's, etc., and Storm King didn't do it for me. Even Rasuputin Imperial Stout was a more interesting drink. There are about 9 million
Foamy (Score:5, Insightful)
My guess is that the selling point of the product is that it is a packaged foamy drink. It is easy to market foamy. Coffee shops do a good job selling foaminess. The other bottled caffiene drinks are all flat. So, something that foams might stand out.
Re:Good (Score:2)
"What's that you're reading?"
"Slashdot"
"Oh, is that about hockey?"
"No, it's about computers and technology and open source."
"dude, that's so gay"
(they walk off chuckling)
What did they do? Well, they took a subject that none of them like (or none would admit that they like) and since they were in the majority, they labelled it a pejorative term. Needless to say, using the word "gay" to mean "ba