Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Do-Not-Call List, Two Years Later

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Wed Sep 28, 2005 02:48 PM
from the but-telemarketers-are-so-much-fun dept.
Carl Bialik writes "The Wall Street Journal is reporting that two years after the National Do Not Call Registry took effect, regulators say the system is working, but only six federal fines have been issued. More than half of registered consumers say they're still getting unwanted calls, according to a recent phone survey. Now, a fresh fight is brewing over which calls are restricted and which ones aren't. Twenty-five states maintain their own do-not-call lists, and many of them impose tougher restrictions on the kinds of calls that telemarketers can make."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Do-Not-Call List, Two Years Later | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 426 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Ironic... (Score:5, Funny)

    by vmcto (833771) * on Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:49PM (#13669474)
    (http://www.vigilantminds.com/ | Last Journal: Friday July 29 2005, @03:34PM)
    Am I the only one that finds it shockingly ironic that the survey to determine if consumers are still receiving unwanted calls is done by initiating unwanted telephone calls?

    I mean isn't that bound to skew the results?

    Consumer: Hello?
    Survey Operator: We're conducting a survey on unwanted phone calls
    Consumer: OK...
    Survey Operator: Have you received any unwanted calls lately?
    Consumer: Yes... Quite recently actually!
  • Do-Not-Survey list? (Score:5, Funny)

    by overpayd (855430) * on Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:50PM (#13669476)
    More than half of registered consumers say they're still getting unwanted calls, according to a recent phone survey

    From TFA:Regulators say the system is working, but a recent random survey (by telephone) by the Customer Care Alliance, a Virginia-based consortium of three customer-relations consultants, found that 51% of registered consumers say they're still getting calls they think the list is supposed to block.

    So they conducted the survey by CALLING the people on the do-not-call list...
  • Unwanted call survey by Leiterfluid (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:50PM
  • Worked for me (Score:5, Insightful)

    Here in Southern California, ever since I went on that list, I get almost no calls at all. Every so often I might get a call for a survey, but that's about it.

    But then, my calls had dropped pretty low even before the do-not-call list went into effect. I had learned the magic phrase, "Could you take me off the call list?", which I diligently said to every telemarketer. By law, they have to take you off, so that had already almost completely solved the problem. The national do-not-call list eliminated the last bits.

    • Re:Worked for me (Score:5, Informative)

      by mpathetiq (726625) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:56PM (#13669546)
      Thank you for stating the simple phrase! I'm amazed at how many people scream and yell and get angry about telemarketers. One simple phrase "Please place me on your Do-not-Solicit list." would cure most of it.

      I worked as a telemarketer for a year. I heard people yell at me every day and it didn't change anything. Those people would get calls over and over and over. It was the ones who were calm and said the magic phrase didn't call again.

      A little polite respect gets you much farther than spewing vitriol across the telephone line.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Worked for me (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Surt (22457) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:02PM (#13669617)
        (http://ptth.net/squish/ | Last Journal: Monday October 01, @11:26AM)
        A little polite respect, and the threat of expensive fines.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Worked for me (Score:5, Interesting)

        by AuMatar (183847) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:04PM (#13669628)
        Because you show no polite respect to us. You've taken a job that you know annoys the hell out of 90% of the population. That shows an utter lack of consideration of any type for the rest of humainty. Be polite? If I met you I'd punch you in the face.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Worked for me by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:11PM
        • Re:Worked for me (Score:5, Insightful)

          by Golias (176380) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:22PM (#13669786)
          Because you show no polite respect to us. You've taken a job that you know annoys the hell out of 90% of the population. That shows an utter lack of consideration of any type for the rest of humainty. Be polite? If I met you I'd punch you in the face.

          You were modded down as flame-bait and troll for saying this, but I'm behind you on this one.

          Yes, saying "put me on your do not call list" is a simple thing to do, but doing so three times in one evening when you are trying to enjoy a DVD or play a computer game is very tiresome. Before Minnesota's do-not-call registry was set up, that's what it was like.

          I'm generally a nice guy, but I delight in being rude to telemarketers. I deliberately waste their time. I belittle them. I pummel them with questions about why they want to be parasites and how can they sleep at night knowing that they make their livings spreading human misery.

          Why? Because I want every telemarketer to utterly hate his or her job. I want them to go home crying and wonder if the paycheck is worth the stress and heartache, so some of them will quit and companies who rely on telemarketing have to spend more money to hire new people. This makes telemarketing cost more for the same return, which makes it a less attractive means of generating business.

          If everybody who disliked being called by soliciters was as mean, rude, and disruptive as me, the entire industry would dry up within a couple years.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Worked for me (Score:5, Interesting)

            I agree with what you're saying, though I usually am less harsh in my time wasting. Often I'll come up with something that makes them feel foolish for calling me. It might not be very nice, but I have been known to berate them for calling and trying to sell home exercise equipment to "a paraplegic cripple". It's fun to see them try to explain their way out of that.

            In addition it's fun to play the Hold game. When they ask for somebody or something, I'll ask them to wait for me to find them and then put them on hold (my phone even played music) and go back to whatever it was I'm doing. The record holder (pun intended) is 1 hour and 25 minutes. I guess he liked the classic 80's songs playing...

            I try to waste as much of the company's money as possible by wasting their time and resources. At the same time I feel bad taking out my annoyance on the employees because it's very possible that they are at the only job available to them at the moment. Being a telemarketer doesn't require much in the way of skills, but it is better than other skill-less opportunities like fast food.
            [ Parent ]
          • Re:Worked for me by jeff_schiller (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:56PM
          • Re:Worked for me by Suzumushi (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @04:57PM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          • Re:Worked for me by CrackHappy (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @06:09PM
          • Re:Worked for me by Stripe7 (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @06:42PM
          • Re:Worked for me by E8086 (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @08:04PM
          • Re:Worked for me by John Hasler (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @09:39PM
          • Re:Worked for me by JourneyExpertApe (Score:1) Thursday September 29 2005, @12:25AM
          • Re:Worked for me (Score:5, Insightful)

            by Golias (176380) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:59PM (#13670198)
            You're no better than them you piece of trash.
            That's what you are. Trash.
            Utterly wasteful human garbage. You obviously leech off of other peoples' misery
            and try to prevent them from making a living in any way, shape, or form instead of
            just being polite and resolving your issue with them.


            My "issue with them" is that they choose to call me. They are welcome to make a living any way they like, but they are not welcome to call me, and will suffer my wrath when they do. Don't like it? Then don't call.

            It might be aggravating, but there are much better ways to go about it then trying to make
            someone feel awful about themselves.


            I can think of at least three, but none of them are as much fun. They feel awful about themselves after talking to me? Good! They are being awful people, and therefore I'm merely aligning their self-image with reality! Perhaps I will provoke some of them to change their lives in a positive direction.

            Seriously. Prostitutes deserve more dignity than telemarketers. At least a whore is providing a service which is actually desired by her customers.
            [ Parent ]
          • Re:Worked for me by tgibbs (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @05:59PM
          • Trash? He's my hero! by SuperKendall (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @06:52PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Worked for me by Yakko (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @04:32PM
        • Re:Worked for me by bxbaser (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @10:35PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Worked for me by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:06PM
      • well, not that simple (Score:5, Informative)

        by rjnagle (122374) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:06PM (#13669653)
        (http://www.imaginary...programmer/index.php)
        These kinds of companies generally need call only once for the damage to be done. I can't remember many occasions where the same company has called several times.

        That solution "tell them to put me on the do-not-call list" simply keeps the burden on the consumer, not the telemarketer. Also, how do you do it to recorded calls?

        BTW, before the national registry, there was a law requiring all telemarketing firms to send out written copies of their do-not-call policies to consumers upon request. Any individual violations of the request to send written copies of the DNC policy was something you could sue for in small claims court. Most telemarketers had never heard of this rule, and most were never trained about it.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Worked for me (Score:4, Funny)

        by IthnkImParanoid (410494) * on Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:11PM (#13669692)
        ...except that sometimes that doesn't work. 7-8 years ago my parents had a line dedicated for modem use only. AT&T would call that line three or four times a week, usually around 7pm (ie dinner time). The "magic phrase" didn't deter them in the slightest, so some of the screaming and yelling and getting angry at telemarketers in general may come from similar experiences. Bad experiences are hard to forget.

        Of course, I like to find the good in every situation, which in this case was answering the phone with greetings like "Thanks for calling the Psychic Hotline, but I know this is a wrong number." or "Genital Piercings R Us, would you like to hear about our special on clitoral spikes?" or "$City chapter of the Cult of Satan...". You get the picture.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Worked for me (Score:4, Informative)

        by lav-chan (815252) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:15PM (#13669730)

        I also worked as a telemarketer for a year.

        I was completely amazed at how people are so uninformed about the whole thing. I realise we were bothering them, but that doesn't change the law or how incredibly simple it is to get us to stop calling back.

        I called on behalf of Qwest (the phone/Internet company). Qwest is kinda serious about the Do-Not-Call list. They don't call ANYBODY who isn't already a Qwest customer. Even if they're not on the Do-Not-Call list. And Qwest is, of course, allowed to call its own customers unless they've asked them specifically to be taken off the list (because they have an Existing Business Relationship).

        So this kinda got annoying after a while:

        me: 'Hi, i'm calling on behalf of Qwest, is so-and-so there?'

        guy: 'LISTEN HERE WE'RE ON THE DO NOT CALL LIST I'M GOING TO REPORT YOU' click

        It's just like... OK... that's cool that you're on the DNC list, but we're still legally allowed to call you. So since you have no idea what you're talking about and just hung up on us, we're just going to call you again. I hope acting like an ass hole was worth it.

        People not understanding the DNC law was the biggest annoyance we got. You'd be amazed. Almost nobody understands what the hell it does. I just can't fathom why you would sign up for something without having any idea what the fuck you're signing up for.

        Another thing that was annoying is the people who just hang up on you. And then they threaten you the next time you call, as if them hanging up last time was some kind of legal contract that you were supposed to adhere to. If you just hang up on a telemarketer, they're going to call you back. No doubt about it. They will do it. You never told them not to call back, for all they know maybe you just dropped the phone. Or maybe your 5-year-old answered. They don't know.

        Messing with telemarketers does not get them to stop calling you. No matter how many times you call them a fag or ask them what they're wearing or hang up on them or ask them how they'd like it if you called them during dinner, they're still going to call back. JUST TELL THEM TO TAKE YOU OFF THEIR FUCKING LIST.

        All you have to do is say 'put me on your do-not-call list'. That's it. THEY'LL NEVER BOTHER YOU AGAIN. If they do, you can call the FCC and get them fined $11'000 or whatever (and you get up to $500 out of it).

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Worked for me by Profane MuthaFucka (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:20PM
      • Re:Worked for me by hcob$ (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:23PM
      • Illegal Telemarketers by ilyaaohell (Score:3) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:35PM
      • Re:Worked for me by jcr (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:37PM
      • Re:Worked for me by Rodness (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:40PM
      • Re:Didn't Work for me by ihaddsl (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:43PM
      • Re:Worked for me by SnarfQuest (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:47PM
      • Re:Worked for me by soft_guy (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:48PM
      • Re:Worked for me by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:57PM
      • Re:Worked for me by NockPoint (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:58PM
      • Hi spammer! by freeweed (Score:3) Wednesday September 28 2005, @04:21PM
      • Re:Worked for me by sstidman (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @05:06PM
      • Re:Worked for me by kublikhan (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @05:21PM
      • Getting uncontrolably angry... by Eric Damron (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @05:22PM
      • Getting uncontrolably angry... by Eric Damron (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @05:27PM
      • You are but one of many jerks by 2short (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @05:32PM
      • Re:Worked for me by CFrankBernard (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @05:52PM
      • Re:Worked for me by spikedvodka (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @07:28PM
      • I'm very nice to telemarketers by Dog135 (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @07:33PM
      • Re:Worked for me by DSP_Geek (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @07:48PM
      • Re:Worked for me by geminidomino (Score:2) Thursday September 29 2005, @01:48AM
      • Re:Worked for me by rew (Score:2) Thursday September 29 2005, @02:19AM
      • Re:Worked for me by aug24 (Score:2) Thursday September 29 2005, @05:33AM
      • Re:Worked for me by bobthemuse (Score:2) Thursday September 29 2005, @08:38AM
      • 9 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Worked for me by alman (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:56PM
    • Re:Worked for me by broller (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:58PM
    • Re:Worked for me by Otter (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:00PM
    • Re:Worked for me by AuMatar (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:07PM
    • Re:Worked for me by Alien Being (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:26PM
    • Re:Worked for me by MrLogic17 (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:27PM
    • Re:Worked for me by jcr (Score:3) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:29PM
    • Re:Worked for me by vought (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:39PM
    • Re:Worked for me by Da_Biz (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @04:55PM
    • Re:Worked for me by Yehooti (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @09:29PM
    • I work in telemarketing... by ImaLamer (Score:2) Thursday September 29 2005, @12:39AM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • 0.0014% by mysqlrocks (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:51PM
    • Re:0.0014% by Shakrai (Score:3) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:26PM
      • Re:0.0014% by 0rionx (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @04:10PM
        • Re:0.0014% by idonthack (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @10:06PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Questionable List by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:51PM
  • Half? by wfberg (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:51PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Why do we tolerate these sociopaths? by LeonGeeste (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:52PM
  • I just don't understand ... (Score:4, Insightful)

    by crimethinker (721591) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:53PM (#13669516)
    why the telemarketing companies fight this so hard. I mean, here's a list of people who don't want to hear your sales pitch, so why waste time calling them? I suppose they are worried (justly) about people convincing grandma to sign up so she doesn't get so many "buy this shit now" calls.

    Once and for all, somebody needs to drive this into their heads: it is MY phone, and you may not use it (i.e. call me) without my consent. P.S. refusing to pay $3.50 a month to NOT be listed in the phone book does not mean I consent to have you morons call me.

    -paul

  • Works well for me by RazzleFrog (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:53PM
  • It's worked amazingly well for me by smartin (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:54PM
  • 25 States have tougher restrictions... by rdurell (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:54PM
  • I IS working, in unexpected ways (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Pharmboy (216950) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:54PM (#13669531)
    (http://www.tanningbeds4less.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday November 05 2006, @07:23AM)
    I am NOT on the Do Not Call List, but I am getting about 90% less telemarketers calling me. I would have to say its a pretty good track record considering I didn't do anything. Some are having problems, but no one is getting MORE calls than before, unlike spam and CAN-SPAM.

    This is because many companies that do telephone marketing are doing something else instead (spam maybe?). So while the system isn't perfect, and can be improved, it has to be considered a success for the most part.
  • The federal Do-Not-Call system has worked very well for me.

    The Oregon state government was charging [state.or.us] for Do-Not-Call. Now the state system has been terminated.
  • People are idiots by taustin (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:55PM
  • The question is (Score:3, Interesting)

    by hoovernj (827158) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @02:59PM (#13669572)
    I think the question is, do people report - or even know where to report - telemarketers when a violation occurs?
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • My concern about exemptions by L. VeGas (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:00PM
  • The tricky thing about this is.. by radiashun (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:01PM
  • What they let in: (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ZachPruckowski (918562) <zachary.pruckowski@gmail.com> on Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:01PM (#13669601)
    Well, considering charities, political parties, pollsters, and anyone you've had a prior business relationship with can still call you, there is a significant percent of telemarketers who can get through.

    Then there is the fact that to report someone, you have to jump through hoops, and have a lot of information from the telemarketer, most people probably don't report illegal calls if they get them.

    Lastly, I think we need a "Do-Not-Fax" list, as it drives me crazy that people will send vacation offers (that are probably scams) to the office I work at sometimes (which is technically a residential number), and not only does it waste time, it wastes ink and paper. Essentially, we have to pay to get spammed.
  • Unwanted Calls Still Happening by themepsp (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:02PM
  • Do-Not-Call List has made my life worse. by zwilliams07 (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:03PM
  • What's Slashdot's cut? by DrSbaitso (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:03PM
  • Well that's because by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:04PM
  • No Calls in KY (Score:3, Informative)

    by ayeco (301053) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:06PM (#13669649)
    We get no calls in KY. The only calls we do get are from the police, firefighters, and a few other fund raisers. KY has it's own list. The KY / Fed combo is working great for us.
  • Worked for me... by fak3r (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:07PM
  • No phone calls but... by doormat (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:12PM
  • 2 years of vonage and still not a single one by netsavior (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:12PM
  • Robo-callers still a problem... by L0neW0lf (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:17PM
  • I cant believe that number (Score:3, Interesting)

    by bizitch (546406) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:17PM (#13669748)
    (http://www.the-sopra...y/s3_tony_logoff.wav)
    Over half say it doesn't work?

    I don't get it - I was totally harrassed by at least 4-5 calls per night before this list came along.

    Not only has it blocked almost 95% of the bullshit, it kicked in almost instantaneously. The execptions for charities are annoying/minor. Some utiliies and banks I do business occasionally bug me with the claim that I opted-in somehow - or that its just a "courtesy call .."

    But IMHO - The list rocks!
  • The irritating loopholes (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ValentineMSmith (670074) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:17PM (#13669749)
    The irritating thing for me was that I'd never received much in the way of "traditional" telemarketing calls. Instead, it was always charities (wanting me to donate) and businesses with whom I have a current relationship (credit card companies trying to sell me extra crap, and so on).

    And, so, when the law was passed, they had loopholes for

    • politicians (of course: wouldn't want you to forget to donate to someone's [re]election campaign)
    • charities
    • businesses with whom I have a previous relationship

    The only thing that seems to work is to hang up on the charities and to tell the businesses that you'll be closing your account with them if you get any more calls.

  • my solution by solarlux (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:26PM
  • Well...yeah... by ucblockhead (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:30PM
  • Have some fun with 'em (Score:3, Funny)

    by Wansu (846) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:31PM (#13669859)

    Sometimes, I just lay the phone down and say nothing or cut a big fart or hold the phone down and get my cat to meow. I've used airhorns, the alarm clocks on Dark Side of the Moon, police whistles and tape recordings of me talking about something.
     
    Have some fun with 'em.
     
  • Now the question is... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by stubear (130454) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:33PM (#13669879)
    "More than half of registered consumers say they're still getting unwanted calls, according to a recent phone survey." ...was this phone survey unwanted as well? Nothing would be more ironic than an unwated phone survey about unwanted phone calls.
  • Not necessarily all correct. by schotty (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:34PM
  • Missouri's list works by Mustang Matt (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:37PM
  • Works for me by Now.Imperfect (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:37PM
  • Unwanted calls by aduzik (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:39PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • It's been great for me by SenseOfHumor (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:44PM
  • Telecrapper 2000 by soft_guy (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:45PM
  • Asterisk by Dan667 (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:50PM
  • If only for e-mail by Kyru (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:53PM
  • Funny how lives change by evildogeye (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:56PM
  • It's working well for me by LGV (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @03:58PM
  • God Help You... by MBCook (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @04:02PM
  • works for me, but... by e40 (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @04:02PM
  • NC auto auctions by PW2 (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @04:06PM
  • Look up your state's Attorney General (Score:3, Interesting)

    by deanj (519759) on Wednesday September 28 2005, @04:07PM (#13670306)
    I got a call a little while ago from one of those annoying taped messages wanting to let me in on some sort of "special deal" to "make money fast". I'm on the state's do not call list. I went to the state government's website, and they had a form to fill out to register a complaint. I did. A couple of days later, I got a letter from the Attorney General that said they're pursuing it.

    That do not call list has been pretty good over all. It's really cut down to number of calls we used to get. Of the few we get, nearly all of them say "we're not trying to sell you anything" during their taped messages.... SUUUUUUURE.
  • Multi-tiered strategy is necessary by mschuyler (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @04:11PM
  • works for me by Trailer Trash (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @04:14PM
  • Solving it where no regulation is avaiable by famazza (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @04:26PM
  • The do-not-call list is widely ignored by bani (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @04:26PM
  • Firm continued to harrass me. by SeaFox (Score:2) Wednesday September 28 2005, @05:02PM
  • Not all calls are covered. . . by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @05:42PM
  • My approach is two fold and FUN. by tabbser (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @06:08PM
  • I haven't had a telemarketing call in 6 years by hamsterspeed (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @06:14PM
  • Please add the whole of the UK to this list by thelem (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @06:27PM
  • My Solution is Even Better! by OneWiseMan (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @06:39PM
  • do not call lists by omgdiepls (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @06:54PM
  • Disabled Telemarketers? by Psteudio (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @07:45PM
  • Audacity of some people amazes me by Raven_Nights (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @08:32PM
  • Calls, good. Spam, bad. Faxes-- next frontier by Mechcozmo (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @10:07PM
  • VoIP numbers by elwing (Score:1) Wednesday September 28 2005, @10:15PM
  • dumb people by Faux_Pseudo (Score:2) Thursday September 29 2005, @12:10AM
  • I want my phone to do the work for me by Harald74 (Score:2) Thursday September 29 2005, @01:53AM
  • Not All Telemarketers Deserve Your Abuse by JWedg (Score:1) Thursday September 29 2005, @03:13AM
  • hmm by spx (Score:1) Thursday September 29 2005, @10:33AM
  • DNC not really the problem by leabre (Score:2) Thursday September 29 2005, @01:35PM
  • 9 replies beneath your current threshold.