Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Identity Theft Victim Gets Last Laugh

Posted by Zonk on Fri Mar 25, 2005 08:47 PM
from the the-phone-is-mightier-than-the-sword dept.
Ovid writes "Being a bit of a hypocrite, I sometimes whine about privacy in my blog. I do, however, try to be careful about not letting anyone get information about me they shouldn't and I rarely, if ever, use a credit card online. This is why I was surprised to find out one morning that identity thieves had racked up thousands of dollars one two of my credit cards. By early afternoon, I caught them and the police arrested them."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Identity Theft Victim Gets Last Laugh | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 725 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Canada (Score:5, Informative)

    by 2.7182 (819680) on Friday March 25 2005, @08:49PM (#12051375)
    The canadian mounties have a new branch devoted to identity theft and they solved my case in a week. They are amazing.
    • Re:Canada by Seumas (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @08:53PM
      • Re:Canada by cot (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @02:18AM
        • Re:Canada by The Ur-Grue (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @03:11AM
        • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Canada by Spruitje (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @04:04AM
        • Re:Canada by gjhut (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @06:56AM
      • Re:Canada by pigscanfly.ca (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @08:58PM
        • Re:Canada by calculi (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @11:00PM
          • Re:Canada by pnewhook (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:25PM
            • Re:Canada by pnewhook (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @06:50PM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Canada by madprof (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:53PM
      • Re:Canada by BlueCodeWarrior (Score:3) Saturday March 26 2005, @02:53AM
      • Re:Canada by killjoe (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @03:16AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Canada (Score:5, Funny)

      by ChuckSchwab (813568) on Friday March 25 2005, @08:54PM (#12051403)
      (Last Journal: Wednesday September 15 2004, @02:56PM)
      Similar experience here. Someone ran up $2000 dollars worth of condoms on my credit card. I turned all the information over the Mounties and by the next day they found the guy. I didn't even have to testify because he confessed, so strong was the evidence. I tried to kick him in the balls, but they wouldn't let me. :-(
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Canada (Score:5, Funny)

        by Anonymous Luddite (808273) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:17PM (#12051551)

        >>Someone ran up $2000 dollars worth of condoms on my credit card.

        Good god, he must have had a big weekend planned....
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Canada (Score:5, Funny)

          by NanoGator (522640) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:42PM (#12051700)
          (http://www.ferion.net/ | Last Journal: Monday May 06 2002, @02:16AM)
          "Good god, he must have had a big weekend planned...."

          Heh. At my high school they decided to deal with the teen pregnancy problem by handing out condoms. The water balloon fight was epic.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Canada by ect5150 (Score:3) Friday March 25 2005, @10:06PM
            • Re:Canada by NanoGator (Score:3) Friday March 25 2005, @10:17PM
              • Re:Canada by darkpixel2k (Score:3) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:04AM
              • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
            • Re:Canada by Morlark (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @10:49PM
              • Re:Canada by uberdave (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:24AM
              • Re:Canada by Xolotl (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @06:45AM
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          • Re:Canada (Score:5, Funny)

            by mapmaker (140036) on Friday March 25 2005, @10:59PM (#12052122)
            At my high school they decided to deal with the teen pregnancy problem by handing out condoms. The water balloon fight was epic.

            I think I see why your school has a teen pregnancy problem...

            [ Parent ]
            • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
          • Re:Canada by deltatype0 (Score:3) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:47AM
          • Re:Canada (Score:5, Funny)

            by niittyniemi (740307) on Saturday March 26 2005, @05:18AM (#12053273)
            (http://www.esperance-linux.co.uk/)


            My favourite condom story:

            During the war the Russians ran short of condoms and they asked the British government to ship some over on the next convoy.

            Churchill ordered that the London Rubber Company should ship a consignment of extra large condoms over but mark them all as "extra small".

            The story maybe apocryphal but it's well known Winston had a well-developed sense of humour and didn't like Stalin, so I tend to believe it :)

            [ Parent ]
            • Re:Canada by flossie (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @09:17AM
              • Re:Canada by niittyniemi (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:01PM
              • Re:Canada by flossie (Score:3) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:17PM
              • Re:Canada by medelliadegray (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:11PM
            • Re:Canada by Art Tatum (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @10:33PM
          • Re:Canada by l0b0 (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @06:09AM
          • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Canada by ceejayoz (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:48PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Canada by The Ultimate Fartkno (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:29PM
      • Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @10:30PM
        • Re:Canada by Jorkapp (Score:3) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:13AM
        • Re:Canada by Lusa (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @05:44AM
      • Re:Canada by kalel666 (Score:3) Friday March 25 2005, @10:57PM
        • Huh? by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:45AM
        • Re:Canada by zaddikim (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @09:30AM
        • Re:Canada by entrigant (Score:1) Sunday March 27 2005, @02:54AM
      • Re:Canada by multimed (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @11:40PM
      • Re:Canada by qube99 (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:29AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Canada by jdwest (Score:3) Friday March 25 2005, @09:01PM
      • Re:Canada by LeBlanc_Joey (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @10:00PM
        • Re:Canada by jdwest (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @10:23PM
    • Let me see... by game kid (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:18PM
      • Re:Let me see... (Score:4, Informative)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 25 2005, @10:47PM (#12052068)
        I'd rather not have an easy-to-get number [SSN] used as my very identification. It's too easy here; I don't know about where you are

        According to this page [privcom.gc.ca], "unless an organization can demonstrate that your [Social Insurance Number]" (equivalent to the American SSN) "is required by law, or that no alternative identifier would suffice to complete the transaction, you cannot be denied a product or service on the grounds of your refusal to provide your SIN."

        I've had no problems withholding the number from landlords and banks.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Let me see... by Daengbo (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @11:46PM
          • SSNs mostly not protected in US laws (Score:5, Informative)

            by billstewart (78916) on Saturday March 26 2005, @02:25AM (#12052826)
            (Last Journal: Wednesday March 02 2005, @11:08PM)
            The US does have some leftover parts of the Privacy Act of 1974 that occasionally protect people from government collection of their Social Security Number, though Driver's Licenses are now required to collect the number, and many other government activities have gotten permission to demand the number.

            There are private transactions where the government mandates that an individual provide a business with their SSN, primarily anything taxable, like hiring somebody, or opening a bank account that pays interest, and by now they mandate it for most bank accounts even if they don't pay interest, and they mandate it for any medical transaction involving Medicare or most other government-funded health care.

            For transactions where the government does not mandate that a business collect an SSN, they almost never place any restrictions on the business's activities with it, and they don't say that the business can't refuse to deal with you if you don't provide it - you're on your own.

            There are a very small number of cases where some government, mostly state, places limits on private use of SSNs, or otherwise insists on some kinds of privacy protection. But in practice, those are usually not effective.

            [ Parent ]
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Let me see... by Flendon (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:08AM
    • Re:Canada by realbadjuju (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:33PM
    • Re:Canada: Venue is everything... by quarkscat (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:48PM
    • Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @10:25PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • by kizzbizz (870017) * <kizzer@gma[ ]com ['il.' in gap]> on Friday March 25 2005, @08:49PM (#12051379)
    For those who haven't seen it (Like anyone in this crowd wouldnt have seen this), I'd suggest reading the P-P-P-Powerbook [zug.com] Story as a great compliment. These stories of Scammers getting Scammed never get old.
  • Uh... (Score:5, Funny)

    by Black Parrot (19622) on Friday March 25 2005, @08:49PM (#12051381)


    > and I rarely, if ever, use a credit card online.

    Don't you know whether you do or not?

    • Re:Uh... (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 25 2005, @09:03PM (#12051465)
      Do or do not, there is no rarely, if ever.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Uh... by Nermal6693 (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @04:48AM
  • I always say... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by LokieLizzy (858962) on Friday March 25 2005, @08:52PM (#12051394)
    never use a card when cash will get the job done. It might sound "cute", but it's the best way to protect your privacy - not to mention your bank account.
    • Nah, cards++ (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Peter Cooper (660482) on Friday March 25 2005, @08:56PM (#12051417)
      (Last Journal: Wednesday July 06 2005, @10:01PM)
      Cash can be stolen and used easily. Cards can be stolen and used, but you can get the money back. Big difference.

      Cards are way more convenient, less hassle in the long run, and let you get an accurate tally of what you spend. Cash just means constant trips to the ATM, spending money in dribs and drabs and forgetting about it, and the risk of getting mugged when you flash it too much.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Nah, cards++ (Score:4, Insightful)

        by LokieLizzy (858962) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:02PM (#12051459)
        One crucial difference between cards and cash:

        Your purchases aren't monitored and stored in huge server farms God-knows-where when you shop with cash. And that, to me, makes a hell of a difference.

        [ Parent ]
      • Cash cards by mec (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:04PM
        • Re:Cash cards (Score:4, Funny)

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 25 2005, @11:57PM (#12052344)
          >I've lost $0 in credit card theft, but dealing with the attempts has cost me quite a bit more in time: more than 100 times as much

          So, you've lost $0 then?
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Cash cards by Mycroft_VIII (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @05:53AM
      • Re:Nah, cards++ by mslinux (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:16PM
      • Re:Nah, cards++ by fred fleenblat (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:32PM
      • Re:Nah, cards++ (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 25 2005, @09:34PM (#12051655)

        Some tips for carrying cash, from a semi-professional gambler who occasionally carries thousands of dollars around:

        • Keep the main stash in one pocket or your wallet, and keep a smaller amount of flash money in another pocket. If you are mugged, you can use the flash money for the tip below.
        • If mugged and asked for your money, take out your cash (or flash money above), and throw it in one direction while you run in the other! 99% of robbers want the money. If you can get the money to spread out when you throw it, so much the better.
        • Life and limb are infinitely more valuable than any amount of money.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:12AM
        • Re:Nah, cards++ (Score:4, Informative)

          by stanleypane (729903) on Saturday March 26 2005, @11:11AM (#12054291)
          No offense, but you sound like someone that has never actually been mugged before. And it's no surprise the slashdot community found your misguided words to be insightful.

          I have been mugged. Several times. And if the person mugging you has a gun don't - I repeat, DON'T - do anything sudden. You are not in the movies and you aren't going to be a hero. Any sudden movements could easily scare someone who probably isn't very stable at the moment. And believe me, you don't want to add any stress to that unstable persons life when they have a gun in your back.

          At least, not in my neighborhood.
          [ Parent ]
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Nah, cards++ by woods (Score:1) Monday March 28 2005, @09:41AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Nah, cards++ (Score:5, Funny)

        by MillionthMonkey (240664) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:36PM (#12051667)
        (Last Journal: Wednesday January 31 2007, @02:25AM)
        Cash can be stolen and used easily. Cards can be stolen and used, but you can get the money back. Big difference.

        Pay by value is much better than pay by reference.
        If you lose cash, you lose the value, but no pointer escapes the transaction. If you pay by reference, you leave a trail of pointers around increasing the risk of someone dereferencing your wallet.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Nah, cards++ by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:36AM
        • Re:Nah, cards++ (Score:4, Funny)

          by zx75 (304335) on Saturday March 26 2005, @12:50AM (#12052524)
          One word for you: Gah!

          I've spent the last 3 weeks ~12 hours a day working to complete a project for one of my classes in C++... and when I read your post I thought my subconciousness was leaking...
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:Nah, cards++ by alain94040 (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:52AM
        • Re:Nah, cards++ by NoMercy (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @07:25AM
        • Re:Nah, cards++ by MillionthMonkey (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @03:19AM
          • Re:Nah, cards++ by A beautiful mind (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @07:06AM
        • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Nah, cards++ by hass (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:38PM
      • Re:Nah, cards++ by Jah-Wren Ryel (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:40PM
      • Cash is better in grocery stores by billstewart (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @02:31AM
      • Re:Nah, cards++ by manaway (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @03:27AM
      • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:I always say... by l810c (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:23PM
    • Re:I always say... by im_thatoneguy (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @11:10PM
    • Really? by Mr. Underbridge (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @11:19PM
      • Re:Really? by Mycroft_VIII (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @06:37AM
        • Re:Really? by Mr. Underbridge (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @04:59PM
        • Re:Really? by timmyf2371 (Score:2) Sunday March 27 2005, @09:29AM
          • Re:Really? by Mycroft_VIII (Score:2) Wednesday March 30 2005, @03:58PM
    • Re:I always say... by ksaville00 (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:05AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Identity theft protection (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 25 2005, @08:56PM (#12051414)
    If you just send your full name, birth date, address, social security number, credit card numbers with expiration dates to securemyidentity@gmail.com, we will monitor your credit record and make sure that you never have to worry about your good credit record ever again.
  • I guess that means his apathy by Travoltus (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @08:56PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Be careful... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by LokieLizzy (858962) on Friday March 25 2005, @08:57PM (#12051420)
    "Shortly afterwards, the police led the two thieves by me. They were in handcuffs and I had the biggest grin on my face."

    You might have outsmarted them this time, but it's never a good idea to gloat. This is something you'll forget in time, but they're going to remember it for a lot longer than you are because they'll be the ones doing time for the crime. If they got really rough sentences because of you and spent several years in the slammer as a result, ten years later they could come looking for you to take away your life. Your credit cards would be the least of your problems.

    • Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:06PM
    • Re:Be careful... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by XorNand (517466) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:07PM (#12051496)
      That attitude is rather alarmist. By the same logic, anyone who's ever been a victim of any type of crime should forever being looking over their shoulder. Real life doesn't work the same way as the movies.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Be careful... (Score:4, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 25 2005, @09:12PM (#12051520)
      (Score:-1, Pussy)
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Be careful... (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Almost-Retired (637760) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:28PM (#12051616)
      And you are forgetting the 2nd ammendment to our constitution.

      And its backed in my case by a state law that says no matter how you get along with the local sheriff, if your record is clean, and you have passed the safe handling checks and have proved on the range in the presence of an licensed instructor that you can shoot reasonably accurately given the capability of the weapon in hand, he must issue a CCW to all who qualify as stated above.

      Like the sign showing the raging dog and the loaded revolver pointed directly at the viewer says, "Never mind the dog, beware of the owner".

      Do I carry? Damn betcha. Any chance of it being used? Only in my own home, or at work alone, and possibly if I should walk into a situation at a local convienience store, but the latter would have to be done under shots already fired circumstances. Otherwise the perp had better be in condition to get up from his face time on the floor and walk to the squad car.

      The bleeding hearts among us all tend to forget that the perp who does this, usually makes a consious choice to take what he wants/needs illegally from those who earned it legally. Generally speaking, society as a whole isn't going to miss those that claim a darwin award for their miss-guided efforts.

      --
      Cheers, Gene
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
      soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
      -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
      99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Be careful... by bani (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:52PM
        • Re:Be careful... by Nick of NSTime (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @10:20PM
        • Re:Be careful... (Score:5, Interesting)

          by Almost-Retired (637760) on Friday March 25 2005, @10:22PM (#12051969)
          Thats not worth the cost of the bullet, OR the hassle with both the authorities AND your concience.

          In my home I am king.

          At the 7/11 with a punk holding on the cashier, its a standoff, until he cracks a cap. Then believe me, its the last cap he'll crack. If he's got an IQ over 70, he'll hit the floor face down on my command with his piece thrown or kicked well out of reach. Bet on it. Those are his choices, its up to him which one because the 3rd choice, to swing to cover me will be a bad one. At that point I'm facing deadly force and can respond in kind. And if, because of my age (70), I'm not fast enough, at least I did try.

          --
          Cheers, Gene
          "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
          soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
          -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
          99.34% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:Be careful... by Dachannien (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @10:57PM
          • Re:Be careful... by metalhed77 (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:12AM
            • Re:Be careful... by dukerobillard (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:18AM
            • Re:Be careful... by shmlco (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @02:28AM
            • Re:Be careful... by Almost-Retired (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @03:03AM
            • Re:Be careful... (Score:5, Funny)

              by dasunt (249686) on Saturday March 26 2005, @04:29AM (#12053094)
              Why do gun owners seemingly fantasize over the scenarios in which they may use their gun. It always sounds almost masturbatory.

              Bunch of freaks.

              Now excuse me, I'm going to play CounterStrike:Source on my brand new Intel 3.73GHz Pentium 4EE Processer with 2MB cache, my 10k rpm Raptor SATA drives (raid 0 for speed), 2 GB of PC4800 memory and ATi FireGL X3 256MB GDDR3 memory!

              I'm going to cream the competition! Nobody will be left alive -- I can't wait!

              [ Parent ]
            • Re:Be careful... by RedBear (Score:3) Saturday March 26 2005, @04:29AM
            • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
          • Re:Be careful... by Kombat (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @10:03AM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Be careful... by quarkscat (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @10:19PM
        • Re:Be careful... (Score:4, Insightful)

          by Skye16 (685048) on Friday March 25 2005, @11:19PM (#12052207)
          Victims of CC fraud and ID theft feel just as violated as a rape victim or a burgled homeowner.

          Sorry, but that's them being retarded. Sure, they can feel very violated. Sure, they can feel very uneasy. But to say it's the same as rape is like saying breaking a finger is the same as giving birth. It's not even in the fucking ballpark. Almost nothing is worse than rape. Nothing. Even torture, followed by murder, isn't as bad as rape. It's the most devestating thing you can do to someone, short of maybe raping their family then gutting them with a spoon and hanging them with their own entrails in front of your eyes. I'm sure I could think up a few more fucked up scenarios, but to say identity theft and credit card fraud is the exact same feeling for the victim as rape is completely ridiculous. My apologies for offending you, but rape should never be used in an analogous situation.
          [ Parent ]
      • Re:Be careful... by Boogaroo (Score:3) Saturday March 26 2005, @02:06AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Be careful... by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:56AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Be careful... by JoeCommodore (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @11:50AM
    • Re:Be careful... by LandGator (Score:1) Wednesday March 30 2005, @08:47PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by Oriumpor (446718) on Friday March 25 2005, @08:57PM (#12051426)
    (http://support.microsoft.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday June 27 2004, @06:34PM)
    In a situation like this where you know the culprit is standing only a few meters away from you its so tempting to confront the thief. I admire his resolve.

    I never really thought how much power you the credit card holder have in these situations. A few proactive measures can go a great deal further than a phone call to a dusty beurocrat.
  • this is why (Score:4, Interesting)

    by indy_Muad'Dib (869913) on Friday March 25 2005, @08:57PM (#12051428)
    (http://69.93.0.230:8000/listen.pls)
    this is wnhy you get a prepaid visa or mastercard for online purchases. id rather spend the 30 minutes to put the cash on the card and buy something online with it than than let some druggy scum waltz off with my hard earned money. http://www.netspend.com/ [netspend.com] Netspend offers inexpensive prepaid visa and mastercards that are useable anywhere.
    • Re:this is why by LokieLizzy (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:06PM
      • Re:this is why by MrP- (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:14PM
      • Re:this is why by anthony_dipierro (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:15PM
      • Re:this is why by Jah-Wren Ryel (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:32PM
        • Re:this is why by LinuxHam (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @10:18PM
          • Re:this is why by PedanticSpellingTrol (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @10:34PM
          • Re:this is why by Yavi (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @11:55PM
          • Re:this is why by Jah-Wren Ryel (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:25AM
        • Re:this is why by Jah-Wren Ryel (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:29AM
        • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:this is why by indy_Muad'Dib (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @10:50PM
    • Re:this is why by blackest_k (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:12PM
    • Re:this is why (Score:5, Interesting)

      by The-Bus (138060) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:33PM (#12051643)
      (http://www.fantasticdamage.com/)
      Except they don't really walk off with your hard earned money. I worked at XYZ credit card bank in their inward fraud department and it was usually something as simple as saying "These charges aren't mine." I say, "OK", tag them as such, and the merchant needs to come up with proof otherwise they pay. Usually, if we suspected it is a family member (say, calls to 900#s originating from their home), we ask them if they are willing to prosecute. That's the tough choice usually, if they know their $relative has been using their card.

      But usually the maximum you are responsible under federal law is $50 for any fraud (not per charge, for all the fraud). A lot of places will waive that and pay it themselves so you don't get pissed off.

      One time, I got a call in from someone who suspected this person was using a stolen card. They were at an electronics store buying a big screen TV and the teller said the guy looked suspicious. Well, we get the card info while the manager acts like he's "processing the order", we call the number associated with the account, and I ask, "Sir, are you in a store right now buying a big screen TV?"

      He says, "No, I am not."

      "Do you have your XYS Visa on you?"

      "Yeah, it's right her--- where'd it go?"

      We called the cops while the guy was waiting around for his TV to get prepared.

      Anyway, long story short,the article is not about "identity theft" since the guy just stole the guy's credit card number / mail somehow, just regular fraud. It is an interesting article though. And what he described is pretty common. Figure we havd a group of about 50 people working full-time just talking on the phone with people who suspected fraud. This was not counting the people who called customers who may have fraud, nor the people investigating the fraud either.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:this is why by nilbog (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @11:48PM
      • Re:this is why by indy_Muad'Dib (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:50AM
    • Re:this is why by Inthewire (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @03:36PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • more restraint than me .... (Score:4, Interesting)

    by icebrrrg (123867) on Friday March 25 2005, @08:59PM (#12051439)
    (http://www.icebrrrg.com/)
    ... i would have found it very difficult to resist the urge to take some very gratifying physical revenge on the perps. bravo to ovidius. this won't stop identity theft, but it surely promotes a bit more vigilance on the potential victims ...
  • For that matter... (Score:3, Insightful)

    by LokieLizzy (858962) on Friday March 25 2005, @08:59PM (#12051445)
    It seems a tad arrogant to declare "I caught them and had them arrested by afternoon." Why? Because if not for Discover, and Visa's fraud-alert services, you wouldn't have been the wiser for quite a while longer - days or weeks, perhaps. You didn't do this by yourself. To imply otherwise denies the actions of many people working behind the scenes to make sure that when this stuff happens, it doesn't ruin innocent people's lives.
    • Re:For that matter... by HeelToe (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:09PM
    • Re:For that matter... by el-spectre (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:38PM
    • Re:For that matter... (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Vellmont (569020) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:39PM (#12051686)
      No one EVER works alone and does a task entirely by themselves. Are you going to give credit to Alexander Graham Bell for inventing the telephone he used to call the police too? The distinguishing factor here is that he is the only person who would have even possibily caught this guy. The credit card company would have just written it off as a loss. The police would have written it up as a statistic. Ovid is by far the person most responsible for catching them.

      It's great the the CC company has fraud detection, but that's really not intended to catch anyone, merely to reduce losses.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:For that matter... by damiangerous (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:56PM
  • No joke. I would have gutted those two like pigs. Throat to groin. Wouldn't have thought twice about it. Not any issue at all.

    Ovid, you are a sane man.

    * hey are you Ovid from Perl Monks & the Perl Monks Seti team?
  • Hmm... by praetis (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:01PM
  • Wow! by tornadothrasher (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:01PM
  • Purchases were not made online (Score:5, Insightful)

    by mincognito (839071) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:02PM (#12051460)
    More evidence that credit card signatures are useless. [slashdot.org]
  • First of many (Score:5, Funny)

    by ryantate (97606) <ryantate@ryantate.com> on Friday March 25 2005, @09:03PM (#12051468)
    (http://ryantate.com)
    Calling the cops three times on your cellphone: 68 cents.

    Driving to Denny's at 96 miles per hour: $1.10 in gas.

    Seeing identity-thieving bastards hauled off in handcuffs before your very eyes: priceless.

    There are some things money can buy. For everything else, there's adrenaline and instincts.

  • Nothing being done about fraud at all (Score:4, Interesting)

    by auzy (680819) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:06PM (#12051491)
    (http://driverondemand.sourceforge.net/)
    In fact, I'd like to add that companies like paypal penalise those who get frauded by others. In one case, a friend of mine was "paid $1000" over paypal, and a week later, paypal took it away and charged him $500 for a really dodgy reason. I constantly hear of such cases over paypal and the end result is that the frauder wins in one way or another.

    Whats even worse is that I have never seen any online store do a basic check to see if users were on a proxy or not, which could easily help reduce fraud if they did.

    Unrelated, if you want to see just how much credit card companies care about fraud, a rather funny link can be found at http://www.zug.com/pranks/credit_card/ [zug.com]. It explains why I dont have a credit card...
  • poor ovid by Stalyn (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:10PM
  • Amazon alerted me... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by lp-habu (734825) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:13PM (#12051527)
    About three years ago I got an email from Amazon telling me that a new account had been opened using a credit card I used from my account.

    They closed that account and notified me immediately without authorizing any sales. I called the credit card company and found that in fact there had been three or four transactions on my card which I hadn't made. They weren't for a lot: there was one for a tank of gas, and the total was for less than a thousand dollars. The credit card company took care of the charges but seemed totally uninterested in pursuing the matter, even after I provided them contact information at Amazon. Amazon could not give me the information directly, but were anxious to provide it to the issuing bank. and urged me to contact my local law enforcement agencies.

    Stupidly, I didn't contact local law, but kept badgering the issuing bank. Finally I gave up and cancelled the account. The original card had of course been cancelled immediately when I reported the problem, but I no longer had any confidence in the bank.

    It's pretty bad when Amazon does a better job of tracking my credit card than the issuing bank does. Of course, I still do business with Amazon and I don't do business with that bank so maybe there's a moral there somewhere.

  • We need a national ID system by sPaKr (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:16PM
  • Yes you do (Score:4, Informative)

    by nate nice (672391) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:16PM (#12051542)
    (Last Journal: Wednesday October 20 2004, @01:41AM)
    "I do, however, try to be careful about not letting anyone get information about me they shouldn't and I rarely, if ever, use a credit card online."

    If you go to any store or use your credit card just about anywhere, it's on the Internet regardless of if you actually go to a Website to buy something.

    When you swipe your card to get groceries, where is that data sent? How does it get there? Through the Internet. It stays on a company database like anywhere else.

    I don't use my credit card on "shady" Websites, but I do realize when I use my card just about anywhere, that data is sent over the Internet and into a database somewhere where someone savvy enough could get access to it.

    It's for this reason I try and not use my debit card often as if someone takes my credit info and buys things, I'm not responsible for it. they haven't taken any money form me. However, if I use a debit and they take money, then that is money I have lost and it is much harder to get back.
    • Nonsense. by jotaeleemeese (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @10:17PM
    • Re:Yes you do by pigscanfly.ca (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @10:18PM
      • Re:Yes you do by nate nice (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @10:31PM
        • Re:Yes you do by tweek (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @10:00AM
    • Re:Yes you do by Squidbait (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @10:44PM
      • Re:Yes you do by nate nice (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @11:53PM
    • Re:Yes you do by slavemowgli (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @10:00AM
    • Re:Yes you do by mbaciarello (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:27PM
  • CC Fraud Not Identity theft (Score:5, Informative)

    by coloneyb (168242) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:16PM (#12051544)
    People sure have been jumping on this identity theft band wagon for about the last year. This isn't identity theft, it is Credit Card Fraud.

    Identity theft would be if I opened up a credit card using your social or if I obtained a loan using your social.

    Credit Card Fraud is stealing your credit card information and using it.

    Too bad the media just keeps misleading people to believe the two are one and the same.
  • Phat Lip by sbillard (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:16PM
    • Re:Phat Lip by Jeremi (Score:3) Friday March 25 2005, @10:15PM
      • Re:Phat Lip by danielrose (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @10:50PM
        • Re:Phat Lip by Jeremi (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @10:55PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Chief Wiggum (Score:5, Funny)

    by Poeir (637508) <poeir DOT geo AT yahoo DOT com> on Friday March 25 2005, @09:17PM (#12051550)
    (Last Journal: Wednesday July 06 2005, @01:38PM)
    Looks like this guy caught his own criminal. Unlike the rest of you lazy slobs.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Biohazard by fishbowl (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:20PM
  • I RTFA (Score:5, Informative)

    by Cytlid (95255) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:21PM (#12051580)
    (http://geexology.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 11 2005, @07:25PM)
    And all I can say is ... "SHRED THOSE CHECKS, DUMMY!". I have a discover card and get those all the time. I *Do NOT* toss them out. They get shredded in about 1 million little pieces.

    I shred just about anything that might have any information about me, my family, or my bills or creditors/debtors. This guy coulda saved himself some grief. The kid prolly saw him check his mail from a PO box and then shake his head and toss the checks in the trash, where he retrieved them.

    In fact, it bugs me Discover sends me those checks all the time. I never use them, probably never will, and wish they wouldn't send them so frequently.

    • Re:I RTFA by ydrol (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:33PM
    • Re:I RTFA by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:36PM
    • Re:I RTFA by mrchaotica (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:39PM
    • by thpr (786837) on Friday March 25 2005, @10:05PM (#12051864)
      In fact, it bugs me Discover sends me those checks all the time.

      Geez. Call Discover (or almost any other credit card company) and they will never send them again.

      [ Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:I RTFA by Kurt Gray (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:01PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • I spend a lot of time on the road, so she audits the hell out of my cards. Turns out there were a couple charges at a local hotel - weird, because it was not anything I would book! Weirder yet when she realized it was her card. My wife's credit card info got swiped at Target.

    Anyhow, the way the scam worked is they booked the room with hotels.com using my bride's card info. They checked in, tried to pay with a card that was expired (or did not work - they were not clear on that). When the hotel attempted to charge for the room service and the time they were there, it defaults to the card used to make the reservation. Card canceled, new one issued, no cost to us - but dang, you really have to watch your statements.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Come on, now.

    Using a credit card online is much safer than using it at any restaurant in which someone takes it out of your sight, using it at a store at which an imprint is taken, or giving its number to someone on the telephone.

    I do all of these, and like the vast majority of everyone else, I've never had a problem.

    Many, if not most, online merchants, don't ever store your credit card number. The exceptions would be those who have a recurring charge capability and those who explicitly have the capability to store it.

    Being aware of the security of your information is fine, but rejecting convenience without adquately weighing the relative risk is damned silly.

    This isn't to say that the original poster doesn't have good practices when it comes to using his credit card at restaurants as well. However, nearly everyone I know who won't use a credit card online will pony it up at a restaurant without a second thought.

  • congratulations, ovid. (Score:5, Funny)

    by croddy (659025) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:26PM (#12051603)
    you got your personal web log linked on the front page of slashdot.

    now go upstairs and help your mom with the dishes.

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • A Missing Bit of Info by torrentami (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:28PM
  • It could have been me. (Score:5, Interesting)

    As a former scammer and hacker turned security consultant... I have to say that it is surprisingly FREAKING EASY!!! to get someones CC numbers... from social engineering tactics, dumpster diving, or just slight of hand / eye tricks... its possible to get almost anyones card number these days.

    Maybe not a single person as a target mind you, but valid card numbers none the less.

    Once you get the card numbers youll also find that it is stupidly simple to make large purchases with them. Online buys can be made to drop houses for obscurity... and in person purchases can be made with a $300 3M card writer and a good inkjet printer and a bit of photoshop to create a physical card...

    People NEVER verify the card holders name to the ID these days so having the actual card stolen from someone is just about as safe. (When they did attempt to ID me I would claim that I didnt bring my wallet, just the card and they would let me make a $599 purchase at best buy).

    I commend him quick thinking and 'dumb luck' in your of your credit attackers... I have to say that if some people had been as vigilant I may have had their fate.

    On the flip side of the coin, While I once had a stack of 50 valid and working credit cards obtained from one method or another... I now manage and secure online companies from attack and fraud using counter techniques which I used to skirt in MY efforts. I now have access to between 75 and 100K customer's information which Is locked down tighter than Fort Knocks if I do say so myself... not that this makes up for any of my past exploits, but to me, its a way of atoning.
  • by wernst (536414) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:33PM (#12051642)
    (http://www.warrenernst.com/)
    I commend this fellow. I wish I had similar luck in the past...

    Last year Wells Fargo calls me. It seems some doofus used my Wells Fargo Mastercard to buy, among other things, $1000 in Victoria's Secret gift certificates from the VS Website. The expriation date was wrong, and the transaction flagged. Wells Fargo did NOT authorize the purchase, and I wasn't billed. (Other smaller purchases, under $50, had been authorized earlier in the day, but they were now being charged back since I said I didn't make them.) Bravo to Wells Fargo for being diligent about this.

    Of course, I want to catch these shitheats. Victoria's Secret has their shipping address, so I think it should be pretty easy to get that address, call the police, and have justice done.

    WRONGO!!

    I call Victorias Secret. They say they can only give the shipping address out to a police officer/detective conducting an investigation, or at the request of the Credit Card company (Wells Fargo.). OK. Fine. They don't want vigilantes.

    I call local PD. They say that since I didn't lose any money (WF blocked or refunded all charges) there was no crime for them to persue. If anyone lost money, Wells Fargo did. Call them and have them call police.

    I call Wells Fargo. They say THEY didn't lose any money; they cancelled or blocked the charges. If anyone lost anything of value, it is Victorias Secret for (apparently) shipping out the gift certificates immediately without a valid payment now, or a valid expiration date eariler. They would need to call the Police to start an investigation.

    "But I just called them! They don't care about who did this. They sent me to the local PD, and they sent me to you," I say. "I just want to know who did this. They have an address, but they'll only issue it to you or the PD."

    The conversation took TWO more laps around these three parties before I gave up.

    The story linked to in this post gives basically the same story in the sense that the local PD didn't give a shit about this crime in terms of investing ANY investigational effort. It was up to the poor victim to do all the legwork, and even THEN, the police seem like they take their sweet time getting there to catch the jerk-off criminals.

    I bet the local DA pleads them down to nothing without a trial too.

    In short, it seems that only determined application of stupidity on the part of credit card theives, along with an angry, lucky, motivated victom working hard at finding the theif, is the ONLY way these shitheads will ever get caught.

    I don't even know why I work for a living...

  • What I want to know... (Score:3, Funny)

    by unladen swallow (844965) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:43PM (#12051714)
    Is what type of person steals 2 credit cards, racks up thousands of dollars in charges. Then proceeds to order breakfast from Denney's? Come on the meal is free live it up a little.
  • wow, he's so secure! by GISGEOLOGYGEEK (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:48PM
  • seems kind of brave by Pinefresh (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:53PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • tracking down fraud... by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:56PM
  • Syringes... (and protection) (Score:5, Insightful)

    by droopus (33472) * on Friday March 25 2005, @09:57PM (#12051809)
    Well done man, but the syringe portion gave me a chill. The syringe part is more than just evidence...what the cop did was both illegal and insanely dangerous. "Sharps" are considered hazardous medical waste and in every state MUST be disposed of in a proper labeled container (NOT a Coke bottle.) They must be given to a company licensed to dispose of hazardous or medical waste and destroyed, usually in these massive incinerators. (I was a med student once...)

    Ironic as this sounds, what the cop did with those sharps (syringes) was more dangerous than your identity theft. Most likely, the manager chucked the bottle in the trash, and those needles are possibly now being reused by some dumpster diving junkie. Who knows what viruses, bacteria, whatnot those kids had lurking in their blood.

    I'm insanely proud of your victory but I gently suggest calling the Red Lion, and TELL them that 'dirty needles' are somewhere in their trash. Two asshole identity theives in jail is small change compared to a trash collector or Red Lion employee getting Lyme, AIDS or septicemia, and spreading it to his family.

    Also, those guys know who you are, are obvious heavy druggies and probably don't like you very much right now. They'll be out one day. Consider a pistol permit. I ALWAYS carry, and that's saved my life twice. Get some professional training [blackwaterusa.com], and practice every week, too. My close scrapes: Three guys went at me with crowbars (carjacking attempt in a parking lot...liked my M3) and their eyes got as large as frisbees when in under half a second they saw the business end of my Les Baer .45. Never had to fire a shot, but I was absolutely ready to drop all three of them and they knew it. The other time I just opened my vest to a knife wielding mugger, we both smiled and he ran off like Carl Lewis doing the 100. Protect yourself!
    • Er..... (Score:4, Interesting)

      by jotaeleemeese (303437) on Friday March 25 2005, @10:15PM (#12051926)
      (http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday January 22 2002, @05:54AM)
      .... you USians never stop to amaze us.

      In similar situations I just handed over my stuff.

      Nobody was hurt, I was protected (insured) so I did not lose anything. One of the thieves was later caught.

      With all due respect I think you USian guys should consider what firearms are doing to your society.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Syringes... (and protection) by smashin234 (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @10:39PM
    • Re:Syringes... (and protection) by Dachannien (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @10:51PM
    • Re:Syringes... (and protection) by pi_rules (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @11:41PM
    • Re:Syringes... (and protection) by michaelhood (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:36AM
    • Re:Syringes... (and protection) by droopus (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:15AM
    • Re:saved your life? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by droopus (33472) * on Saturday March 26 2005, @12:25AM (#12052446)
      1st time you saved your car

      With great respect, I don't agree, I saved my life. One was sitting on my car's bumper. The other then two ran towards at me full speed with full length crowbars. You think a raised 4 foot crowbar in the hands of a running attacker just wants to gently ask for my keys?

      One hit on the head and bye bye droopus. The police caught the same theives days later after they had bludgeoned a woman into a coma, and stole her car.

      Ok here are your choices: feel good about being PC and unarmed, and (God forbid) possibly end up a vegetable in a hospice or on a slab. Or learn to protect yourself, professionally, safely and effectively and live to a ripe old age.

      Which do you want to bet your life on?

      Do what you feel is right for YOU, all I ask is that you extend me the same courtesy. Unless you threaten me or my family with deadly force (and for NO other reason whatsoever) I wouldn't harm a fly. Fair?

      I will admit, training is every bit as important as the decision. I have taken hundreds of hours of training, up to the SWAT level at Blackwater, and am probably better than 90% of AMericans who carry, including cops (many of whom are terrible shots.) Owning and carrying firearms is an awesome responsibility, I do not take it lightly, and unlike the NRA and most gun owners I SUPPORT yearly, tough, proficiency tests, which makes me rather unpopular in the gun world. But that's the way I see it.

      It gets even tougher for criminals in my home where I keep my Winchester 1300 SWAT shotgun with 8 rounds of 00 Buck under the bed.

      My 180 pound bloodhound, Flop, who can smell an unfamiliar person anywhere near my property and is gun trained is added protection.

      NO ONE is going to fuck with my family. And yes, my line of work makes me have reasons to be this secure.

      Murderers carry guns too.

      Damn right they do. So, we should allow them to be the only ones who do?

      If they carry one into my house they get carried out in a body bag, though.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Syringes... (and protection) by droopus (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:31AM
    • Re:Syringes... (and protection) by trawg (Score:3) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:33AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Syringes... (and protection) by droopus (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:05AM
    • Re:Syringes... (and protection) by droopus (Score:3) Saturday March 26 2005, @03:09AM
    • 4 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • It Didn't Happen Online by theraccoon (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @10:02PM
  • Wow, so many coincidences! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @10:04PM
  • Identity Theft by Treacle Treatment (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @10:45PM
  • Lucky by suwain_2 (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @11:20PM
    • Re:Lucky by vidarh (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:19PM
  • Source of Info by suwain_2 (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @11:30PM
  • Red Lion = Red Devil (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Baby Duck (176251) on Friday March 25 2005, @11:55PM (#12052337)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    1) I have stayed at that Red Lion in Portland.
    2) I have eaten at that Denny's as well.
    3) I have checked my email on the computer in the lobby.
    4) A PuTTY icon on the desktop should have clued me in that I should not have checked my email there.
    5) Over the next 3 days, my ISP account was used to spam strangers like crazy, before I finally changed my password.
    6) This was almost 2 years ago.

    Nice to see the Red Lion is still such a hotbed of criminal activity ;-)
  • Why isn't the credit issuer held libel? by PanHEad2003 (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:07AM
  • Stolen Identity by Cliff.Braun (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:23AM
  • MBNA (Score:4, Informative)


    Since losing a credit card number in an online purchase to a dbase hacker, I now use MBNA [mbnanetaccess.com] for all of my online shopping. It gives me a new credit card number everytime I use it, for which I can set an arbitrary $ amount before that number is consumed and also any expiration date for out to a year.

    I generate new numbers using my browser, and even Safari works on OS X. I rest easy knowing that the particular number is set at just over the amount of my purchase, so even if the cc number was compromised it would have no more value attached.
    • Re:MBNA by cpghost (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @09:40AM
      • Re:MBNA by vidarh (Score:3) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:10PM
    • Re:MBNA by evilviper (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @10:49AM
    • Discover does, too by RandyOo (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @11:12AM
  • Awesome story by beforewisdom (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:29AM
  • Revenge by ramblin billy (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:49AM
  • Did they have an actual card or just the numbers? by Simulant (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @04:19AM
  • On the other hand... by jpellino (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @09:18AM
  • They can do Cartwheels too by monk.wal (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @10:54AM
  • Why always blame the internet? by Glendale2x (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:18PM
  • thats a fantastic post! by museumpeace (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @02:13PM
  • This is cool. by mindstrm (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @04:04PM
  • My credit card theft by lopgok (Score:1) Sunday March 27 2005, @12:35AM
  • Discover Card Secure Numbers by PicoTera (Score:1) Sunday March 27 2005, @08:15AM
  • What we need is a FAQ - get cops to work by BluedemonX (Score:2) Monday March 28 2005, @12:42PM
  • Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by rkww (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:11PM
  • Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by The Clockwork Troll (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:21PM
  • Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by Sanity (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:24PM
  • by ScentCone (795499) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:30PM (#12051627)
    That some kid stole a couple thousand dollars from Discover Card and some Visa merchant - so what? This guy acts like they were stealing the money from him.

    Don't you get it? This isn't play money. It's real money that the merchants, banks, and card processors have to cough up. Where do you think it comes from? Higher merchandise prices (or, eroded retail margins, and fewer mom-and-pop retailers as a result), higher bank fees, and higher transaction fees. All of that, all of it, trickles down to the paying consumer in one way or the other.

    Thieves like this are taking it from all of us, however indirectly. They're parasites. I completely tip my hat to someone who busted a couple of these punks while their greasy (stolen) Denny's breakfast was still impacting their short-term blood pressure. Truly delightful.
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by mattkime (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:32PM
  • Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by mrchaotica (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:34PM
  • by bani (467531) on Friday March 25 2005, @09:41PM (#12051693)
    leave it to /. readers to get upset about credit card frauders getting caught.
    [ Parent ]
  • They were - and from you by SuperKendall (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:47PM
  • Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by Vellmont (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @09:47PM
  • Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by anthony_dipierro (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @09:57PM
  • by purves (800872) on Friday March 25 2005, @10:07PM (#12051872)
    What worries me the most is that so many people were so cooperative in trying to find "the thief". You go to Denny's, show them a credit card, and they give you a description of the person who used the credit card? That's the scary part.

    I think you have "thief" confused with thief. They really stole his money. And why wouldn't the people at Denny's help him? He has his credit card and ID to prove that he is who he says he is. If someone else used the same card number they obviously weren't supposed to.

    That some kid stole a couple thousand dollars from Discover Card and some Visa merchant - so what? This guy acts like they were stealing the money from him.

    If someone stole your car, would you say, "So what? They're only stealing from the insurance company."? A defrauded man, his credit card companies, restaurant & hotel employees, and the police come together to arrest two thieves and somehow this is a bad thing? This is the way things should work, people taking responsibility and looking after their own interests and those of others.

    [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Wrong answer. Thank you for playing. We have wonderful consolation prizes for you (or not.)

    For what it's worth, and as I noted earlier in this thread, I'm actually fairly well-known in the Perl community. I'm a grant manager for the Perl Foundation, a scheduled speaker at the next OSCON, and an occasional technical book reviewer for O'Reilly. If I dared to create a lie this huge, my reputation would be ruined. I generally get job offers because of who I am. That would go away. Regardless of what you may think of my story, I'm not so stupid as to make this up.

    They did have a photocopy of ID of one of the thieves. However, the registration (made through hotels.com) was still billed to me. And as for your info about the credit card companies, I know nothing about your experience, but it is vastly different from mine. If you have any credit cards, call and ask to speak to their fraud department (or, more likely, navigate through all of the damned menus they have.) I'm sure they'll be happy to set you straight.

    [ Parent ]
  • You are kidding right? by juuri (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @11:25PM
  • Re:This story is very likely made up.. by I kan Spl (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @11:28PM
  • Re:This story is very likely made up.. by Jetson (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @11:32PM
  • Re:This story is very likely made up.. by (startx) (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @11:46PM
  • Re:This story is very likely made up.. by Buelldozer (Score:1) Friday March 25 2005, @11:48PM
  • Re:This story is very likely made up.. by slashrogue (Score:2) Friday March 25 2005, @11:50PM
  • Re:The first fact about identity theft by loupgarou21 (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:03AM
  • Re:The first fact about identity theft by GWTPict (Score:1) Saturday March 26 2005, @12:13AM
  • Re:I was waiting for the twist in the story... by salesgeek (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @08:39AM
  • Re:This story is very likely made up.. by pz (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @10:37AM
  • Re:This story is very likely made up.. by bani (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @10:40AM
  • Re:This story is very likely made up.. by vidarh (Score:2) Saturday March 26 2005, @01:42PM
  • 15 replies beneath your current threshold.