Slashdot Log In
China Closes 1,600 "Internet Bars"
Posted by
CmdrTaco
on Sun Oct 31, 2004 09:04 AM
from the you-think-we-got-it-bad-here dept.
from the you-think-we-got-it-bad-here dept.
Kujila writes "According to a Chinese Reuters article, China has closed close to 1,600 "Internet Bars" (probably the equivalent of 'Internet Cafes' stateside) and inflicted up to $12.1 million worth of fines upon the establishment owners. The Internet Bars were apparently letting young children pay to play violent and adult-only PC games. China inspected a grand-total of 1.8 million bars, and ordered about 18,000 of those bars to "to stop operation for rectification," It's estimated that 18% of China's Internet population is composed of minors."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
China Closes 1,600 "Internet Bars"
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 381 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
I have an idea (Score:5, Funny)
That's less than point one percent 0.1 % (Score:5, Insightful)
And what were these guys shut down for? For allowing children to play adult games in public. Oh, that would be fine in the US right? Bullshit.
Now I think it is totally hypocritcal for Americans to get on a soap box about such a miniscule figure when the US puts content filters on millions of PCs in schools and libraries that prevent birth control and alternative political information from reaching students. And the US shuts down net cafes with just as much gusto as the Chinese. The double stardard is attrocious.
But you have to wonder. I mean didn't we just see an article in which hundreds of Slashdot posters defended in public the use of the term "ricer". Clearly there are some real double standards about what is appropriate when it comes to anything Asian.
William Randolf Hearst would be proud of all you asian haters making fools of yourselves in public. But remember, what you reap is what you sow.
Taught there. (Score:5, Insightful)
Here's a slightly longer perspective.
http://english.people.com.cn/200205
I was an English teacher in Nanjing from 1 year ago to about 6 months ago.
If you'd been to China recently, you'd know it isn't at all socialistic. Newspapers don't paint a very clear picture of things. It's somewhere between oligarchic, fascist and anarchic. But it's not socialistic at all. It used to be Maoist, distinct from Marxist Lenninist and also distinctly different from the socialistic governments of Europe. But China has changed a lot recently.
Anyway, if you're 16 you can do whatever you want in a netbar. Watch porn. Play CS. Whatever.
It's fair that the previous poster brought up the notion of standards. The US has to live by the same standards it applies to other nations. In China there's no age limit on alcohol or cigarette purchases. In the US, there is. Does this make the US a totalitarian state? I don't think it does. What has happened here is as 'totalitarian' as a rigid enforcement of the US movie rating system. And it's hard to tell from the article what the situation is on the ground. Sometimes, 'crackdowns' are ignored by business owners, who comply as superficially as possible. It's hard to tell how seriously people are taking this.
Of course, the US is more tolerant of violence than some cultures. Other non Judeo-Christian cultures are a lot more tolerant of sex.
Nothing has changed (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Nothing has changed (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://jon.gaynor.org/)
Wait which one - China or the US?
Re:Nothing has changed (Score:5, Funny)
(http://go.away/)
Yes.
Re:Nothing has changed (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Thursday November 04 2004, @10:16AM)
Wait which one - China or the US?
Why don't you try shouting that statement out in Tianamen Square and then at the Statue of Liberty, and find out the difference?
Re:Nothing has changed (Score:5, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Friday April 04 2003, @12:49AM)
A year before the protest and massacre in Tien An Men, I visited Beijing as a backpack tourist and went to Tien An Men square where I proceeded, along with some British accomplices, to do hand stands and various low end acrobatics in an attempt to attract attention.
Well, it worked great. In seconds we had a huge crowd. It wasn't really that we were so impressive, but more that people wanted to see what everybody else was gawking at and the crowd itself was what was drawing the crowd.
So, the higher up cops --there's actually many, many different levels of cops in Mainland China with only some actually having any authority-- came in and pulled the crowd apart and told us we were being bad and not to do it again.
That's it. That's all that happened. We were clearly trouble makers, but we weren't arrested or even hassled.
So, yeah what happened in that same sqauare a year later was a terrible tragedy, but Mainland China might not be as scarry as you think.
On the other hand, I've been called names by cops in the US over the loudspeaker of their partol cars and when I get pulled over, I regularly have my car searched from top to bottom looking for drugs when the stop was allegedly for things like a bent license plate or some such nonsense.
Re:Nothing has changed (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyone in the DC area want to try it and report back?
Re:Nothing has changed (Score:5, Interesting)
Kent State University - May 4 1970. National Guard opens fire on Students protesting the Vietnam War. 4 Dead, 9 Injured.
Jackson State University - May 15 1970. Police open fire on a protesting crowd. 2 Dead, 12 Injured.
Just because the number of dead is smaller, do not dismiss this. When threatened, Governments will fight back.
Re:Nothing has changed (Score:4, Insightful)
How typical. Well don't forget the future of the US economy is increasingly dependant on this 'corrupt, fascist, evil government' (look how many western companies now have a substantial portion of their manufacturing base in China), not to mention that this is also the country with most favoured nation trading status with the US.
It's certainly no oasis of freedom, but the good thing is that they can regulate stuff like this when it needs to be done without any interfering from dodgy lobby groups. Democracy is overrated anyway
So what ! (Score:5, Informative)
Again....so what!
I always make stupid mistakes but... (Score:5, Informative)
Good movement from China's Gov. (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://gustgr.freeshell.org/ | Last Journal: Saturday October 06, @04:18AM)
This young kids should be learning to read source code and hack it, or how to use the internet to do interesting research. Playing this kind of game just alienate the kids making them dumbasses (all right, I know slashdot is also alienating and prejuciail to my health, but I can't avoid it).
Re:Good movement from China's Gov. (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://gustgr.freeshell.org/ | Last Journal: Saturday October 06, @04:18AM)
Re:Good movement from China's Gov. (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Saturday October 30 2004, @12:44AM)
A better idea would be parenting classes, offered freely, and perhaps mandatory for first tiem parents.
After all, before there was the nice government to take care of us, how the hell did kids get raised, anyway?
Re:Good movement from China's Gov. (Score:5, Insightful)
Don't take anything China says at face value. This is not a free country we're talking about here. They release only that information which makes them look good to other countries, and if they haven't got any suitable information to release, they will make something up.
Must be because they are using microsoft (Score:4, Funny)
http://slashdot.org/articles/03/11/18/0219249.sht
This is news? (Score:5, Insightful)
Wouldn't the exact same thing happen in other countries (including the U.S.) if businesses were making adult-only games available to children?
rectification... (Score:1)
"Rectification" is a very scary word
Not to be flamebait or anything.... (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Saturday October 30 2004, @12:44AM)
Keep in mind, however, there are some parts of the United States that have a similar mindset. I mind me of the Maine library association....there were grants given out to give them internet access, but with a catch, that they had to have filtering software installed. Of course, many people cried "censorship!" and let slip the dogs of protest, but in the end, the puritans fought harder to keep all the corrupting influences from our youth, etc, etc.
Forgive my rambling...I'm not caffeinated yet. ^^;
1.8 million internet bars (Score:4, Insightful)
1.8 million internet bars means approx. 1 internet bar per 721 population.
to put that in perspective, a city of 30,000 would have 41 internet bars...
i'd like to know what counts as an "internet bar" though. anyone know what a typical chinese "internet bar" is like?
Re:1.8 million internet bars (Score:5, Informative)
(http://localhost/dev/null)
Re:1.8 million internet bars (Score:4, Informative)
Adult Sites? (Score:1, Insightful)
(http://slashdot.org/)
pardon my scepticism.. (Score:1)
Nice pretext... (Score:5, Insightful)
China Icon (Score:1, Flamebait)
I suggest that for an icon to represent the topic of China, we create an almagamation of subjects.
- Lack of freedom of speech
- Lack of freedom of assembly
- Lack of freedom of thought
- Lack of freedom of movement
- ...etc...
In general, create a hodge-podge of images that convey the impression of a dreary hell-hole of existence.Young and their vices (Score:1)
1.8 million internet cafes? WTF? (Score:2, Insightful)
18% minors? (Score:2)
(http://slashdot.org/~nurb432/ | Last Journal: Friday August 27 2004, @03:24PM)
Doesn't sound much special (Score:4, Informative)
[1] http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/33234
You believe them? (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://www.dangercollie.com/music/)
We don't know why they shut them down. More likely because some of the users were finding their way around the government approved web sites.
Is it me? (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Friday October 31 2003, @01:48PM)
Sounds painful for those involved (Score:2)
Not trolling, just having a laugh people. Sounds like a nasty situation for the Chinese populace.
Euphemism (Score:2)
China inspected a grand-total of 1.8 million bars, and ordered about 18,000 of those bars to "to stop operation for rectification"
That's Chinese for "bend over and spread 'em."
Hey, its their country (Score:2, Insightful)
(http://slashdot.org/~nurb432/ | Last Journal: Friday August 27 2004, @03:24PM)
We don't have the right to dictate our concept of morality to them. ( nor does it work in reverse.. )
Let them make their own decisions. Now, when you discuss the fact they restrict others from leaving that don't agree, we have something to talk about, but we don't have a right to demand they follow our values....
Question... (Score:4, Funny)
(http://houndwire.com/)
Two wrongs don't make a right (Score:3, Interesting)
I think most people are uncomfortable making moral judgements these days. I'm not. I judge this action by China to be wrong. This is true whether you hate George Bush or not.
Stop pushing democracy (Score:2, Interesting)
Democracy is good, but its not for everyone.
If you're forcing democracy down its throat, you're only gonna end up harming yourself. Just like how the Bush Administration is trying to push democracy in the Middle-East.
The people are not ready yet!
Other forms of government can be just as effective. So they are different, well thats culture for you!
And China' ain't bad, they are opening up, I've been in China for over a month and it feels just like home, you get to eat, sleep, shop, work, freedom to choose your jobs, buy materialistic things. What more?
China has been living with far worst government for over 2-5k years now (read: Monarchy; Emporers) and if you take a step back, Communism is actually much less strict.
Let the country run itself.
18% minors, the rest... (Score:2, Funny)
(http://www.mapraider.com/)
Republic view of this (Score:1, Insightful)
Here in the US, it is illegal in some states to have oral sex with your wife. Some conservatives, like Ann Coulter, believe that it is perfectly fine to pass a law that tells someone how to act based on her religious beliefs. And judging by the landslide victory the gay marriage amendment had here in Lousiana, there are plenty people who feel the same way.
Do the country a favor this Tuesday: Don't vote for Bush!
WTF? (Score:5, Informative)
China has 1.8 Million internet bars? (Score:1)
(http://www.ie-ap.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday March 28 2006, @05:27AM)
On a political note... (Score:2, Insightful)
Not surprising... (Score:1)
(http://diuf.unifr.ch/pai/)
(from http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=11715/ [rsf.org]
Governing a large nation (Score:1)
Re:Hmmmmmm (Score:1)
(http://www.zareste.com/?l=level3)
That was the last witchhunt but one (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.hwacha.net/)
'Video nasties' were an 80's panic; the idea was that horror videos would corrupt youth. Please get you witchhunts, panics, and scares in the right order!
Since the video nasty, penny dreadful, sinful rock'n'roll song, three-volume novel (blamed for leading young ladies astray in times past) and comic book scares have all been and gone with amazingly little impact on anything, I think it is reasonable to have a fairly relaxed response to the current computer games scare
Re:Smells Like Republicans (Score:2, Funny)
Re:China should cut down on the SPAM(== $$$) (Score:1)
(http://www.slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Tuesday March 09 2004, @11:15PM)
Pink contracts are pink contracts no matter where in the world they are agreed to.
I'll just continue to delete my spam automatically with my own software [cf13.com] as I have been since July, 2004.
Re:Good for China! Bring this here. (Score:1)
Re:Good for China! Bring this here. (Score:2)
(http://slashdot.org/)
1. Operationally define "moral character".
2. Show evidence to support your claim that the "moral character", as you defined it in #1, of our youth is being destroyed.
3. Show evidence for how the destruction of our youth's "moral character" is a direct result of violent video games.
Anecdotal evidence, being very unscientific and misleading, does not count for numbers 2 and 3.
Thanks.
Re:In... (Score:2)