Slashdot Log In
20 States Collecting Internet Tax
Posted by
timothy
on Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:54 PM
from the good-to-live-in-washington dept.
from the good-to-live-in-washington dept.
Patik writes "According to this AP article, twenty states, including New York and California, are "requiring taxpayers to declare any tax they owe on out-of-state purchases," targetting Internet sales. New York expects this to bring them $2.5 million this year while California expects $13 million. Many are cynical about the new push, saying taxpayers will simply leave the line on the tax form blank, though the IRS says they will audit any offenders."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
20 States Collecting Internet Tax
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 62 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
It's not new, nor "Internet" (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Sunday June 19 2005, @01:43PM)
My father's TV shop was 3 miles from a state line. He regularly had people come to buy TV and such to be delivered 'out of state' and so didn't have to pay him sales tax. They were supposed to declare it on their state tax form. Sure, few did. Sure, far more are doing this now. But it's nothing something new specifically aimed at the net.
IRS says they will audit any offenders (Score:2, Insightful)
Someone needs to be bit more careful attributing quotes.
Where do I pay the tax? (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.votecrow.com/ | Last Journal: Monday July 01 2002, @01:30PM)
Re:Where do I pay the tax? (Score:4, Informative)
If these are the same as the Ohio Use Tax, then you pay the tax wherever the item will eventually reside, in your case Long Island. So for example, I buy a computer from California and have it delivered to Ohio I pay my Ohio county's sales tax rate as a "use tax". Actually, from what I understand of the law, if I buy a computer in an Ohio county that has a 6% tax rate and bring the item back to my county where I live where the tax rate is 8%, I owe the state 2% use tax. That's bullshit IMHO. It's entirely voluntary compliance though and Ohio has no authority to regulate interstate commerce so I'm not sure how they could ever hope to enforce this.
not a bad move, maybe (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/)
putting it on the main form will at least get money from more people, not such bad thing, and if you're dishonest you should still appreeciate it because it will lower your taxes otherwise due. heck if it's in on the main form maybe i'll pay it just as, er, i've been paying it all along of the separate one.
if you have a problem with the collection of the tax, bear in mind your problem is with ALL sales taxes, not the "internet" flavor of some of those purchases. (hey i don't like them, i think they may inhibit commerce.) one way to ease the recordkeeping burden is to provide, say, a $1000 exemption so many people don'thave to think about it. and from a recordkeeping standpoint, it may actually be a favor for out-of-state merchants to collect the tax for you. i think asking consumers to keep the records is nutty, we have better things to do. (btw, sales tax could be made deductible for federal purposes, it once was, as state income tax is now.)
personally i'd nationalize sales tax if we're going to have one at all, the present system only works because it is unenforced. way too inefficient, both for recordkeeping and enforcement. of course getting all 50 states to agree on tax policy is
Washington State (Score:2, Funny)
(http://www.ironwolve.com/ | Last Journal: Friday July 09 2004, @12:59AM)
Government's view of the economy could be summed up in a few short phrases: If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidise it. - Ronald Reagan
IRS? (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://kandent.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday February 21 2007, @10:31PM)
I don't think the IRS will be involved. The IRS is for federal taxes. The state tax auditors (if there are any) will do the investigating. If you do get audited by the IRS. only show them your federal forms. Unless they have a need to know, your state forms are none of their business.
Re:IRS? (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.ironwolve.com/ | Last Journal: Friday July 09 2004, @12:59AM)
Police already make a profit on busting criminals, parking/speeding tickets, fines. Why wouldnt the State tax collectors go after people for money? Thats the whole point of the article.
Have companies report sales to states, so states can go after people. Treat everyone like criminals. It even states that in the article.
The states might have little to do now, but if theres money involved, expect it to get bigger.
On one condition would I pay an Internet tax. (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Tuesday September 25, @04:26AM)
IRS will audit any offenders (Score:4, Funny)
Consumer: Yes.
IRS: Can you show us your out of state reciepts to prove your claim.
Consumer: Uhh
IRS: Damn that usually works.
POS is the only way to make this work (Score:2, Insightful)
I mean, obviously hardly anyone keeps track of all that stuff. It's a huge pain in the ass. If it was collected at purchase time then it would be a whole lot more normal (you know, like when you buy stuff in-state).
how wil they know and... (Score:3, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Saturday October 07 2006, @07:46PM)
If they want to really collect tax they need to find a way to make the seller responsible for collecting the taxes not they buyer to report them. So now what, all companies in CA who buy things from CDW or tigerdirect are suppose to report how much they bough on the internet and then report that to the IRS? That will create a tax nightmare. Good luck to them at auditing!
Across state lines (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Tuesday July 19 2005, @03:24PM)
Minor correction of facts (Score:2)
(http://www.northarc.com/~ke6isf | Last Journal: Tuesday November 23 2004, @01:32AM)
Mind you, they won't go after people who purchased t-shirts or books, they're pretty much looking for people who purchased (say) boats or cars from out of state.
Oregon (Score:2)
(http://eoti.org/~malachi)
However, if I sell something online, there is no change to that policy. Realistically, if you barter (ie: no cash involved at all) you are legally required to fill out the form 1099-B Miscellaneous Income.
That income is on the Federal form, but the state form uses the Gross income from the Federal form -- thus it gets counted on your state form whether they have any lines for it or not.
Just another squeeze... (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://www.virage.org)
When most people purchase, they do so with the expectation of delivery charges. Catalogs are similiar. Whatever you don't pay in state tax, you will normally pay for in shipping fees.
The "Use Tax" is absurd. If the states which wish to impose sales tax on internet purchases, it should only to ONLY the stae in which the company resides. This would make states compete for the business of such companies. States would soon learn it's far better to not charge end users, but directly tax these companies earnings their the income of their employees.
Yet another form of short term legislation, which can't see beyond the next hill.
Hmmm (Score:1, Funny)
Enforaceable?? (Score:1)
I suppose the same holds true on a larger scale, if no one paid their taxes at all, where the hell would they start? But when was the last time everybody agreed on anything.
Too Much Burden on the Taxpayer (Score:2)
(http://www.silentbrouhaha.com/ | Last Journal: Saturday July 31 2004, @07:42AM)
Someone in one of those states should file a lawsuit against their state for such stupid tax collection.
"Audit any offenders" (Score:2, Insightful)
(http://blogs.bwerp.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday July 06 2004, @03:58PM)
Wait a second here. (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://s87365085.onlinehome.us/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 28 2003, @04:22PM)
Need that cash to feed that jones (Score:2)
(http://www.evolt.org/)
But I think the interesting case in the context of /. is cigarette sales, because states are specifically going after internet sales and not other cases such as residents driving to a neighboring state with lower taxes. In one case, Massachusetts [boston.com] is not only going after the resident or requesting customer details from the merchant, but they've gone so far as to go to shipping companies.
Of course UPS rolled over like a crack whore. The USPS is at least putting up a front of standing up for customers' privacy.
Re:Come to Delaware (Score:1)
(http://tesmer.org/)
Here in Florida, the purchaser is required to report sales tax on all goods purchased from a foriegn corporation (i.e. a corporation in a different county or state).
See for yourself: Florida DOR [myflorida.com]