Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Censorship

+ - Cartoon child porn falling down slippery slope.-> 1

Submitted by
BenFenner
BenFenner writes "Two out of the three Virginia judges involved with Dwight Whorley's case say cartoon images depicting sex acts with children are considered child pornography in the United States. Judge Paul V. Niemeyer noted the PROTECT Act of 2003, clearly states that "it is not a required element of any offense under this section that the minor depicted actually exists.""
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Cartoon child porn falling down slippery slope.

Comments Filter:
  • If the depiction is not of an actual person, how can one determine that it is the depiction of "a minor", as opposed to a "very young looking 18 year old", or maybe (for the D&D/anime crowd) "a 300 year old elf/dwarf/fairy/other-long-lived-species that ages/matures at a much slower rate than us humans" ?! Is the basis for this implied ability to distinguish what is or isn't a fictional minor along the (legally) absurd lines of, "I'll know it when I see it"?!?

    Well, I knew some 20-22 year-old girls in c

"Text processing has made it possible to right-justify any idea, even one which cannot be justified on any other grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC.

Working...