Jury Finds Spamming Not Protected By Constitution

Slashdot

+ - Jury Finds Spamming Not Protected By Constitution-> 0

Submitted by

eldavojohn

on Saturday March 01, 2008 @01:27AM

eldavojohn writes "In a split (4-3) decision, a Virginia court has upheld the verdict against the spam king making it clear that spam is NOT protected by the U.S. Constitution's first amendment or even its interstate commerce clause of the constitution."
Link to Original Source

This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Jury Finds Spamming Not Protected By Constitution

Load All Comments

Search 0 Comments Log In/Create an Account

Comments Filter:

All
Insightful
Informative
Interesting
Funny

There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.

A priest advised Voltaire on his death bed to renounce the devil. Replied Voltaire, "This is no time to make new enemies."

Jury Finds Spamming Not Protected By Constitution More Login

Jury Finds Spamming Not Protected By Constitution