Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments
typodupeerror delete not in
  • Preferences

+-   Jury Finds Spamming Not Protected By Constitution-> on Saturday March 01 2008, @12:27AM eldavojohn

Submitted by eldavojohn on Saturday March 01 2008, @12:27AM
court
eldavojohn writes "In a split (4-3) decision, a Virginia court has upheld the verdict against the spam king making it clear that spam is NOT protected by the U.S. Constitution's first amendment or even its interstate commerce clause of the constitution."
Link to Original Source
submission
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Jury Finds Spamming Not Protected By Constitution 0 Comments More /

 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
Search
Anybody can win, unless there happens to be a second entry.

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2010 Geeknet, Inc.