Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
IBM

+ - IBM Seeking 'Patent-Protection-Racket' Patent 2

Submitted by
theodp
theodp writes "Wikipedia defines a protection racket as an extortion scheme whereby a powerful non-governmental organization coerces businesses to pay protection money which allegedly serves to purchase the organization's 'protection' services against various external threats. Compare this to IBM's just-published patent application for 'Extracting Value from a Portfolio of Assets', which describes a process by which 'very large corporations' impress upon smaller businesses that paying for 'the protection of a large defensive patent portfolio' would be 'a prudent business decision' for them to make, 'just like purchasing a fire insurance policy.' Sounds like Fat Tony's been to Law School, eh? Time for IBM to put-their-money-where-their-patent-reform-mouth-is and deep-six this business method patent claim!"
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

IBM Seeking 'Patent-Protection-Racket' Patent

Comments Filter:
  • I guess we have to mod all those funny posts [slashdot.org] insightful now! :-o
  • I think IBM may actualy have a VERY good reason for this. Can you think of any "large corporations" in competition with IBM, who have been bad-mouthing a product IBM is involved with, and encouraging smaller distributers of said product to pay for "the protection of a large defensive patent portfolio"?

    From the post:

    a process by which 'very large corporations' impress upon smaller businesses that paying for 'the protection of a large defensive patent portfolio' would be 'a prudent business decision' for t

All the simple programs have been written.

Working...