Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Rule on Constitutionality of Bulk Surveillance

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to rule on the constitutionality of the National Security Agency's bulk acquisition and storage of phone record metadata. The petition for a Supreme Court ruling was submitted as a result of U.S. District Judge Richard Leon staying his ruling (PDF), pending an appeal, in a suit in which he concluded that collection of phone metadata without probable cause violated the Fourth Amendment. The plaintiffs had bypassed the federal appeals court and applied directly to the high court, given Judge Leon's admission that the case had significant national security interests at stake. The Supreme Court's decision not to rule on the case means that an appeal will need to be submitted to the federal appeals court as per protocol, but there is speculation that the mass surveillance issue will likely be addressed in the legislative and executive branches of government before the judicial branch weighs in. 'Section 215 of the Patriot Act, the stated provision allowing the bulk collection, expires June 1, 2015.'"
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Rule on Constitutionality of Bulk Surveillance

Comments Filter:

We warn the reader in advance that the proof presented here depends on a clever but highly unmotivated trick. -- Howard Anton, "Elementary Linear Algebra"

Working...