Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - Measuring science with a broken ruler->

Submitted by Shipud
Shipud (685171) writes "How do we assess the value of of a a scientific study? How can we tell "just OK" scientist from "great scientist"? Measuring this intangible is important to funding agencies, university search and promotion committees, and fellow scientist. One way is to look at the journals they publish in. Journals are ranked by a measure called the "impact factor", which is he average number of citations to that journal's articles over a history of two years. Although deferred to almost universally, it is a poor measure by which to assess scientists and their science. The fact that such a poor measure is almost universally used raises the question of how well funding and hiring decisions in science are being made."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Measuring science with a broken ruler

Comments Filter:

It is contrary to reasoning to say that there is a vacuum or space in which there is absolutely nothing. -- Descartes

Working...