Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

+ - Is "fair use" unfair to humans?->

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "This article in Wired advances the idea that humans are losing the battle against machines because the fair use laws are tilted against it. The writer wanted to include photos in his book but the licensing fees were too high. The aggregators, though, like Google are building their own content by scraping all of the photos they can find. If anyone complains, they just say, "Fill out a DMCA form." Can humans compete against the machines? Should humans be able to use the DMCA to avoid copyright fees too? Should web sites be able to shrug and say, "Hey, we just scraped it?""
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Is "fair use" unfair to humans?

Comments Filter:

Nothing is more admirable than the fortitude with which millionaires tolerate the disadvantages of their wealth. -- Nero Wolfe

Working...