Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


+ - Ron Paul found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in domain dispute->

Submitted by Anonymous Coward
An anonymous reader writes "Ron Paul lost his two cybersquatting complaints against and

In the case of, Paul was been found guilty of "reverse domain name hijacking".

A reverse domain name hijacking finding means that the arbitration panel believes the case was filed in bad faith, resulting in the abuse of the administrative process.

The panel ruled this way since Paul filed the case after the owner of had already offered to give him the domain for free.

The panel also ruled against Paul for the domain name."

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Ron Paul found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in domain dispute

Comments Filter:

"It ain't so much the things we don't know that get us in trouble. It's the things we know that ain't so." -- Artemus Ward aka Charles Farrar Brown