Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Science

+ - Did life on land emerge over 65 million years earlier than was thought?->

Submitted by
ananyo
ananyo writes "A controversial paper published in Nature argues that enigmatic fossils regarded as ancient sea creatures were actually land-dwelling lichen. If true, that would suggest life on land began 65 million years earlier than researchers now estimate.
The nature of fossils from the Ediacaran period, some 635 million–542 million years ago, has been fiercely debated by palaeontologists. But where others envisage Ediacaran sea beds crawling with archaic animals, Gregory Retallack, a geologist at the University of Oregon in Eugene sees these sites in southern Australia as dry, terrestrial landscapes dotted with lichens. He proposes that rock in the Ediacara Member in South Australia — where palaeontologist Reginald Sprigg first discovered Ediacaran fossils in 1947 — represents ancient soils, and presents new geological data. Among other lines of evidence, Retallack argues that the rock’s red colour and weathering pattern indicate that the deposits were formed in terrestrial — not marine — environments (abstract). Others strongly disagree."

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Did life on land emerge over 65 million years earlier than was thought?

Comments Filter:

Premature optimization is the root of all evil. -- D.E. Knuth

Working...