Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Science

+ - Misconduct, not error, is the main cause of retractions->

Submitted by
ananyo
ananyo writes "One of the largest-ever studies of retractions has found that two-thirds of retracted life-sciences papers were stricken from the scientific record because of misconduct such as fraud or suspected fraud — and that journals sometimes soft-pedal the reason. The study contradicts the conventional view that most retractions of papers in scientific journals are triggered by unintentional errors.
The survey examined all 2,047 articles in the PubMed database that had been marked as retracted by 3 May this year. But rather than taking journals’ retraction notices at face value, as previous analyses have done, the study used secondary sources to pin down the reasons for retraction if the notices were incomplete or vague. he analysis revealed that fraud or suspected fraud was responsible for 43% of the retractions. Other types of misconduct — duplicate publication and plagiarism — accounted for 14% and 10% of retractions, respectively. Only 21% of the papers were retracted because of error (abstract)."

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Misconduct, not error, is the main cause of retractions

Comments Filter:

Our business in life is not to succeed but to continue to fail in high spirits. -- Robert Louis Stevenson

Working...