Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Privacy

+ - Supreme Court: GPS devices equivalent of a search,-> 2

Submitted by
gambit3
gambit3 writes "The Supreme Court says police must get a search warrant before using GPS technology to track criminal suspects.

The court ruled in the case of Washington, D.C., nightclub owner Antoine Jones. A federal appeals court in Washington overturned his drug conspiracy conviction because police did not have a warrant when they installed a GPS device on his vehicle and then tracked his movements for a month."

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Supreme Court: GPS devices equivalent of a search,

Comments Filter:
  • by schwit1 (797399)

    Now I'm waiting for Obama to issue an executive order that vacates the ruling or says it is trumped by the Patriot Act or DMCA.

    • by galaad2 (847861)

      they don't need an executive order because if you read the decision carefully you'll see it says:
      ===
      We hold that the Government’s installation of a GPS device on a target’s vehicle and its use of that device to monitor the vehicle’s movements, constitutes a “search.”
      ===
      thus they only need to outsource the "installation" part to a third party and they can continue with the search. Mobile phone (preferably with carrierIQ) looks like the most promising candidate since ciq is alrea

Unix is the worst operating system; except for all others. -- Berry Kercheval

Working...