Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


+ - Actual damages for single download = single licens-> 1

Submitted by
NewYorkCountryLawyer writes "In Real View v 20-20 Technologies, it was held that the actual copyright infringement damages for a single unauthorized download of a computer program was the lost license fee that would have been charged. The judge, in the District Court of Massachusetts, granted remittitur, reducing the jury's verdict from $1,370,590.00 to $4200 unless the plaintiff seeks a new trial. Something tells me the plaintiff will seek a new trial."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Actual damages for single download = single licens

Comments Filter:
  • if the defendant pays what they would have had to pay to do the purchase legally, plus court costs (which include a nominal fee for the company's time and trouble), that's about as simple and effective as it gets. 1) there will be no incentive to steal because they would end up paying more that way 2) court costs would be covered so the cost to the taxpayer is nil 3) the company would have incentive to sue every downloader at no end cost to themselves, just a little different marketing approach to get that

The major difference between bonds and bond traders is that the bonds will eventually mature.