Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×

+ - Removal of Printed Photo Credit Qualifies as DMCA -> 2

Submitted by mattgoldey
mattgoldey (753976) writes "A federal appeals court in Philadelphia has reinstated a photographer's copyright lawsuit against a New Jersey radio station owner, after finding that a lower court came to the wrong decision on every issue in the case.

Most significantly, the appeals court said that a photo credit printed in the gutter of a magazine qualifies as copyright management information (CMI) under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA). The DMCA prohibits the unauthorized removal of encryption technology or copyright management information from copyrighted works."

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Removal of Printed Photo Credit Qualifies as DMCA

Comments Filter:
  • Should be "violation" after "DCMA"
  • So when a judge's ruling is found to be materially (legally) incorrect on every point by a higher court, this would strongly indicate (at least to me) a significant level of incompetence on the judges part.

    Perhaps this is a misconception I formed thanks to those terrible "Judge Judy"-type shows, but compared to EU countries, it seems that US judges are free to, and do, make shit up as they go along rather than be restricted to seeking definitive proof of guilt and only enforcing existing law.

    I'm not a US ci

"There is no statute of limitations on stupidity." -- Randomly produced by a computer program called Markov3.

Working...