Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
The Courts

+ - UK Court Confirms: IP Addresses Aren't People->

Submitted by suraj.sun
suraj.sun (1348507) writes "Wrapping up the last of the United Kingdom's notorious copyright infringement "pay up" letter cases, a UK patent and copyright judge has had a major revelation. Just because some lawyer cites an Internet Protocol (IP) address where illegal file sharing may have taken place, that doesn't mean that the subscriber living there necessarily did the dirty deed. Or is responsible for others who may have done it.

The judge has given ACS:Law two weeks to continue the case or pay the defendants' legal expenses (or "wasted costs" as they're called in the UK). Crossley and MediaCAT have already closed up their operations, but they may still be targeted in a "group complaint" (like a class action here in the US) brought by defense lawyers at the major law firm Ralli.

ARS Technica: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/02/court-confirms-ip-addresses-arent-people-and-p2p-lawyers-know-it.ars"

Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

UK Court Confirms: IP Addresses Aren't People

Comments Filter:

"Most of us, when all is said and done, like what we like and make up reasons for it afterwards." -- Soren F. Petersen

Working...