Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).


+ - Court rules bypassing dongles not a DMCA violation-> 2

Submitted by tcrown007
tcrown007 (473444) writes "MGE UPS makes UPS systems and software that are protected by hardware dongles. After the dongles expired, GE bypassed the dongles and continued to use the software. MGE sued, won, and now lost on GE's appeal. Directly from the court's ruling, "Merely bypassing a technological protection that restricts a user from viewing or using a work is insufficient to trigger the DMCA’s anti-circumvention provision...The owner’s technological measure must protect the copyrighted material against an infringement of a right that the Copyright Act protects, not from mere use or viewing." Say what? I think I just saw a flying pig go by."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Court rules bypassing dongles not a DMCA violation

Comments Filter:
  • by doomy (7461)
    Basically the court is saying that you can view and edit the data, but you cant copy and derive from it.
    • Can you break this down a bit more? I don't get the distinction here. I'm asking because I know the question on the minds of MGE's attorneys is going to be "how can we stop someone from copying something if they can view and edit it?". Or are they basically saying "it's yours, do with it as you wish as long as you don't copy or derive from it"??

Aren't you glad you're not getting all the government you pay for now?