Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

+ - Tenenbaum's final brief: $675k award too high->

Submitted by NewYorkCountryLawyer
NewYorkCountryLawyer (912032) writes "The final brief (PDF) filed by the defendant Joel Tenenbaum in SONY BMG Music Entertainment v. Tenenbaum seems to put the final nail in the coffin on the RIAA's argument that 'statutory damages' up to $150,000 can be awarded where the record company's lost profit is in the neighborhood of 35 cents. Not only do Tenenbaum's lawyers accurately describe the applicable caselaw and scholarship, something neither the RIAA nor the Department of Justice did in their briefs, but they point out to the Court that the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit — the appeals court controlling this matter — has itself ruled that statutory damages awards are reviewable for due process considerations under the guidelines of State Farm v. Campbell and BMW v. Gore. The brief is consistent with the amicus curiae brief filed in the case last year by the Free Software Foundation."
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Tenenbaum's final brief: $675k award too high

Comments Filter:

Heuristics are bug ridden by definition. If they didn't have bugs, then they'd be algorithms.

Working...