Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!

  • View

  • Discuss

  • Share

We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).

×
Games

+ - Is Valve a dangerous monopoly?-> 2

Submitted by Absolut187
Absolut187 (816431) writes "Gearbox Software CEO Randy Pitchford says Steam's domination is "dangerous," and exploits small developers. "Steam helps us as customers, but it's also a money grab, and Valve is exploiting a lot of people in a way that's not totally fair." "Valve is taking a larger share than it should for the service it's providing. It's exploiting a lot of small guys." "There's so much conflict of interest there that it's horrid." "Steam isn't the answer." Is he right? And if so, what is the answer?"
Link to Original Source
This discussion was created for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Is Valve a dangerous monopoly?

Comments Filter:
  • ... go somewhere else! Let's see. Amazon Games, GOG.com, Direct2Drive, Impulse, GamersGate, Xfire Store....

  • Steam dominates because frankly its the best of its kind out there. People always like to whine when someone is #1 by a wide margin, thinking that "fair" somehow involves self-handicapping and that if someone dominates that much then it MUST be because they are strong-arming "the small guys." The reality is is that Steam is the best at what it does, and the company it's associated with also makes, simply put, fantastic games. If Valve's service is so "exploitative" then the "small guys" are more than fre

Suburbia is where the developer bulldozes out the trees, then names the streets after them. -- Bill Vaughn

Working...