4873233
submission
+- British court rules against whistleblower bloggers-> on Tuesday June 16 2009, @11:05AM
Submitted
by
on Tuesday June 16 2009, @11:05AM
background: url(//a.fsdn.com/sd/topics/topicmediaall.gif); width:73px; height:59px;
media
An anonymous reader writes "In a dangerous judgment for British bloggers and whistleblowers, a British court has ruled absurdly that simply because blogging itself is a public activity, bloggers have "no reasonable expectation of privacy" regarding their identities, and newspapers are allowed to publish their identities if they can find them by fair or foul means. A British police detective who recently won the Orwell Prize for his excellent political writing used his blog to write highly critical accounts of police activities and unethical behavior, making very powerful enemies in the process. A well-funded newspaper with powerful connections quickly heard of his blog and decided it was absolutely vital to expose his identity using an investigative journalist. Like any good newspaper, the blogger anonymized the people and the locations in all the cases he discussed on his blog, but the newspaper alleges these were not sufficiently anonymized and complains that they could work out the identities, though British newspapers don't complain that they are allowed to publish the identities of men who are falsely accused of rape and cleared in court. The newspaper also helpfully contacted the blogger's employer, and his job is now threatened."
Link to Original Source
Link to Original Source
Chism's Law of Completion:
The amount of time required to complete a government project is
precisely equal to the length of time already spent on it.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2010 Geeknet, Inc.
British court rules against whistleblower bloggers 0 Comments More Login /
Get More Comments